This paper presents a real-time simulation-based control framework to determine dynamic toll rates to optimize an operator's objective subject to various operational and contractual constraints, such as smooth toll rate changes and maintenance of prescribed levels of service on the toll lane. The toll-setting system incorporates models to predict both the vehicle arrival process upstream of the toll lane facility and drivers’ choice whether to use the toll lanes as a function of the toll rate and travel times presented to drivers within the information system. A macroscopic traffic simulation model is used to predict the flow conditions within the prediction horizon. The travel times provided to users as information and the travel times predicted by the traffic flow model are iterated until consistency between them is obtained. The whole process is embedded within an optimization algorithm that sets tolls to optimize a given objective function. Several case studies demonstrate the use of this framework and its potential to provide useful toll settings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LindseyC.R., and VerhoefE.T.Traffic Congestion and Congestion Pricing.Handbook of Transport Systems and Traffic Control, Vol. 3 (ButtonK. J. and HensherD.A., eds.), Bingley, United Kingdom, 2001, pp. 77–105.
2.
LiJ.L., and GovindS.An Optimization Model for Assessing Pricing Strategies of Managed Lanes.Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.
LouY., YinY., and LavalJ.Optimal Dynamic Pricing Strategies for High-Occupancy/Toll Lanes.Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2010, pp. 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2010.03.008.
5.
LouY.A Unified Framework of Proactive Self-Learning Dynamic Pricing for High-Occupancy/Toll Lanes.Transportmetrica A, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2013, pp. 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/18128602.2011.559904.
6.
DaganzoC.F.The Cell Transmission Model: A Dynamic Representation of Highway Traffic Consistent with the Hydrodynamic Theory.Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 28, No. 4, 1994, pp. 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(94)90002-7.
7.
DaganzoC.F.The Cell Transmission Model, Part II: Network Traffic.Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 29, No. 2, 1995, pp. 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(94)00022-R.
8.
BonsallP.W.The Influence of Route Guidance Advice on Route Choice in Urban Networks.Transportation, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1992, pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01130771.
9.
RammingM.S.Network Knowledge and Route Choice. Ph.D. dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2001.
10.
WardmanM.BonsallP.W., and ShiresJ.D.Driver Response to Variable Message Signs: A Stated Preference Investigation.Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 5, No. 6, 1997, pp. 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(98)00004-7.
11.
HidasP., and AwadallaE.Investigation of Route Choice in Response to Variable Message Signs.Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 4, 2001, pp. 39–54.
12.
PeetaS., and RamosJ.L.Driver Response to Variable Message Signs-Based Traffic Information.IEEE Proceedings on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 153, 2006, pp. 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-its:20055012.
13.
ErkeA., SagbergF., and HagmanR.Effects of Route Guidance Variable Message Signs (VMS) on Driver Behavior.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 10, No. 6, 2007, pp. 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2007.03.003.
14.
ZhengL., and LevinsonD.Determinants of Route Choice and Value of Traveler Information.Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2086, 2008, pp. 81–92.
15.
JansonM., and LevinsonD.HOT or not: Driver Elasticity to Price on the MnPASS HOT Lanes.Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 44, 2014, pp. 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2014.04.008.
16.
WilliamsB.M., and HoelL.A.Modeling and Forecasting Vehicular Traffic Flow as a Seasonal ARIMA Process: Theoretical Basis and Empirical Results.Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 6, 2003, pp. 664–672. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:6(664).
17.
WangY., and PapageorgiouM.Real-Time Freeway Traffic State Estimation Based on Extended Kalman Filter: A General Approach.Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2005, pp. 141–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2004.03.003.
18.
WangY., PapageorgiouM., and MessmerA.Real-Time Freeway Traffic State Estimation Based on Extended Kalman Filter: Adaptive Capabilities and Real Data Testing.Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 42, No. 10, 2008, pp. 1340–1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.06.001.
19.
AntoniouC., M. Ben-Akiva, and KoutsopoulosH.N.Nonlinear Kalman Filtering Algorithms for On-Line Calibration of Dynamic Traffic Assignment Models.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2007, pp. 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2007.908569.
20.
QinX., and MahmassaniH.S.Adaptive Calibration of Dynamic Speed–Density Relations for Online Network Traffic Estimation and Prediction Applications.Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1876, 2004, pp. 82–89. https://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1876-09.
