Classification yards play a significant role in railroad freight transportation and are often considered bottlenecks for railroad networks. Based on a generic yard simulation model, the model in the presented study fits the Bureau of Public Roads function, which is widely used in highway capacity to represent the volume–dwell time relationship. The proposed analytical model incorporates major features of rail yards, such as the number and capacity of tracks in each area, the number of engines and humps, the humping speed, and the assemble rate. The model is validated by historical data from 16 classification yards of Class I railroads in the United States. The results show that the proposed model can generate precise capacity data of rail yard, as well as the dwell time of rail cars in yards. The dwell time increases sharply when the volume is greater than the capacity of a rail yard. The identified relationship may help a railroad analyze its network at the macro level and therefore improve the systemwide capacity and efficiency.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
JacobR., MártonP., MaueJ., and NunkesserM.. Multistage Methods for Freight Train Classification.Networks, Vol. 57, No. 1, 2011, pp. 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/net.20385.
2.
CraneR. R., BrownF. B., and BlanchardR. O.. An Analysis of a Railroad Classification Yard.Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1955, pp. 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.3.3.262.
3.
AbrilM., BarberF., IngolottiL., SalidoM. A., TormosP., and LovaA.. An Assessment of Railway Capacity.Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2008, pp. 774–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2007.04.001.
4.
GattoM., MaueJ., MihalákM., and WidmayerP.. Shunting for Dummies: An Introductory Algorithmic Survey. In Robust and Online Large-Scale Optimization, Springer, New York, 2009, pp. 310–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05465-5_13.
5.
PetersenE.Over-the-Road Transit Time for a Single Track Railway.Transportation Science, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1974, pp. 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.8.1.65.
6.
PetersenE.Interference Delays on a Partially Double-Tracked Railway with Intermediate Signalling. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Joint Meeting of the Canadian Transportation Research Forum and the Transportation Research Forum, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1975, pp. 55–62.
7.
EnglishG.An Analytic Model for the Analysis of Single Track Railway Capacity. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Travel Supply Models, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 1977.
8.
TurnquistM. A., and DaskinM. S.. Queuing Models of Classification and Connection Delay in Railyards.Transportation Science, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1982, pp. 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.16.2.207.
9.
SzpigelB., Train Scheduling. MS thesis. Pontificia Universidade Catolica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1972.
10.
CrainicT., FerlandJ.-A., and RousseauJ.-M.. A Tactical Planning Model for Rail Freight Transportation.Transportation Science, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1984, pp. 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.18.2.165.
11.
CrainicT. G., FlorianM., and LealJ.-E.. A Model for the Strategic Planning of National Freight Transportation by Rail.Transportation Science, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1990, pp. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.24.1.1.
12.
ShiT., and ZhouX.. A Mixed Integer Programming Model for Optimizing Multi-Level Operations Process in Railroad Yards.Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 80, 2015, pp. 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2015.06.007.
13.
HauserA., and MaueJ.. Experimental Evaluation of Approximation and Heuristic Algorithms for Sorting Railway Cars. In Experimental Algorithms, Springer, New York, 2010, pp. 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13193-6_14.
14.
JhaK. C., AhujaR. K., and ŞahinG.. New Approaches for Solving the Block-to-Train Assignment Problem.Networks, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2008, pp. 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/net.20195.
15.
LiH., SongR., JinM., and HeS.. Optimization of Railcar Connection Plan in a Classification Yard. Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014.
16.
FerreiraL. and SigutJ.. Modelling Intermodal Freight Terminal Operations.Road and Transport Research: A Journal of Australian and New Zealand Research and Practice, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1995, pp. 4–16.
17.
MarinovM., and ViegasJ.. A Simulation Modelling Methodology for Evaluating Flat-Shunted Yard Operations.Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, Vol. 17, No. 6, 2009, pp. 1106–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2009.04.001.
18.
LinE., and ChengC.. Simulation and Analysis of Railroad Hump Yards in North America. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2011.6148064.
19.
DirnbergerJ., and BarkanC.. Lean Railroading for Improving Railroad Classification Terminal Performance: Bottleneck Management Methods.Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2007, 1995, pp. 52–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1995-07.
20.
MártonP., MaueJ., and NunkesserM.. An Improved Train Classification Procedure for the Hump Yard Lausanne Triage. In OASIcs-OpenAccess Series in Informatics, Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, Wadern, Germany, 2009.
RoadsU. B. O. P.Traffic Assignment Manual.U.S. Department of Commerce, 1964.
25.
FernándezL. J. E., De Cea ChJ., and GiesenR.E.A Strategic Model of Freight Operations for Rail Transportation Systems.Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2004, pp. 231–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308106042000228743.
