An important goal on the way to an inclusive society is to achieve a self-determined and independent daily life for persons with vision impairment or legal blindness. Mobility research for this target group mainly focuses on technological (assistive) devices, navigation, and routing tools. Less attention is paid to mobility behavior, mobility needs and prerequisites such as obstacles and barriers, orientation features and landmarks, and daily routine information. However, these aspects are essential for the design and implementation of supporting software tools. The research design of this study exemplifies a new approach by classifying persons with vision impairment or legal blindness into five target groups, with a hierarchical cluster analysis. The cluster analysis, which uses Ward’s method, was conducted with the results of a nationwide online survey in Austria. The survey encompassed detailed information about mobility barriers, landmarks and orientation cues, information needs, and technology use. The cluster results provided the basis for designing and developing a geographic information system (GIS)–based online information platform to support persons with vision impairment or blindness. The platform (a) presents accessibility information and points of interest; (b) presents the results of GIS-based analyses, like closest facilities, including navigation guidelines for pretrip planning; and (c) is designed with an accessible user interface.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
D’AtriE., MedagliaC. M., SerbanatiA., CeipidorU. B., PanizziE., and D’AtriA.. A System to Aid Blind People in the Mobility: A Usability Test and Its Results. Presented at the 2nd International Conference on Systems, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONS.2007.7.
2.
FariaJ., LopesS., FernandesH., MartinsP., and BarrosoJ.. Electronic White Cane for Blind People Navigation Assistance. In World Automation Congress, Kobe, Japan, 2010, pp. 1–7.
3.
WangG. S., and ZhengJ. H.. The Threshold of Route Guidance for Visually Impaired Based on Haptic Technology and Their Spatial Cognition. HealthGIS ’14, November 2014. http://healthgis.tamu.edu/program/2014/healthgis-04.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2016.
4.
MayM., and CaseyK.. Accessible Global Positioning Systems. In Assistive Technology for Blindness and Low Vision (ManduchiR. and KurniawaS., eds.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 2013, pp. 82–103.
5.
BrockA. M.Touch the Map! Designing Interactive Maps for Visually Impaired People. In ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing, No. 105, 2013, pp. 9–14.
6.
KatzB. F., KammounS., ParseihianG., GutierrezO., BrilhaultA., AuvrayM., TruilletP., DenisM., ThorpeS., and JouffraisC.. NAVIG: Augmented Reality Guidance System for the Visually Impaired. Virtual Reality (Waltham Cross), Vol. 16, No. 4, 2012, pp. 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-012-0213-6.
7.
JanschitzS.Von Barrieren in unseren Köpfen und Karten ohne Grenzen: Geographische Informationssysteme im Diskurs der Barrierefreiheit – ein Widerspruch in sich oder unerkanntes Potenzial. LIT, Vienna, Muenster, 2012.
8.
GolledgeR.Geography and the Disabled: A Survey with Special Reference to Vision Impaired and Blind Populations. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1993, pp. 63–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/623069.
9.
JacobsonR., and KitchinR.. GIS and People with Visual Impairments or Blindness: Exploring the Potential for Education, Orientation, and Navigation. Transactions in GIS, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1997, pp. 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.1997.tb00060.x.
10.
BruceI., McKennellA., and WalkerE.. Blind and Partially Sighted Adults in Britain: The RNIB Survey, Vol. 1. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, 1991.
11.
Clark-CarterD.Doing Quantitative Psychological Research: From Design to Report. Psychology Press/Erlbaum. Taylor & Francis, United Kingdom, 1997.
12.
HillE., ReiserJ., HillM., HalpinJ., and HalpinR.. How Persons with Visual Impairments Explore Novel Spaces: Strategies of Good and Poor Performers. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, Vol. 87, 1993, pp. 295–301.
13.
ShimizuM. A.Survey of Daily Trips of Persons Who Are Visually Impaired Living in Communities in Japan. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, Vol. 103, No. 11, 2009, pp. 766–772.
14.
SammerG., UhlmannT., UnbehaunW., MillonigA., MandlB., DangschatJ., and MayrR.. Identification of Mobility-Impaired Persons and Analysis of Their Travel Behavior and Needs. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2320, 2012, pp. 46–54. https://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2320-06.
15.
MeyG., and HöwingP.. Großstadt (er) leben von Sehbehinderten. Eine explorative Studie. Veröffentlichungsreihe der Technischen Universität Berlin: Forschungsbericht der Abteilung Psychologie. Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Berlin, 2001.
16.
KirchnerC., GerberE., and SmithB.. Designed to Deter: Community Barriers to Physical Activity for People with Visual or Motor Impairments. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2008, pp. 349–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.005.
17.
HershM.The Application of Information and Other Technologies to Improve the Mobility of Blind, Visually Impaired, and Deafblind People. Travel Health Informatics and Telehealth, European Federation for Medical Informatics Special Topic Conference, Antalya, Turkey, 2009.
18.
FürstE.Mobility Barriers in Urban Transport for the Sight or Hearing Impaired: Solutions Help All Passengers. In Cities for Everyone, Real Corp Proceedings (SchrenkM., PopovichV. V., and ZeileP., eds.), Vienna, Austria, 2010, pp. 435–444.
19.
BergnerB. S., ZeileP., PapastefanouG., RechW., and StreichB.. Emotional Barrier-GIS: A New Approach to Integrate Barrier-Free Planning in Urban Planning Processes. In Change for Stability, Real Corp Proceedings (SchrenkM., PopovichV. V., and ZeileP., eds.), Vienna, 2011, pp. 247–258.
AfroozA., ToktamH., and ParolinB.. Wayfinding Performance of Visually Impaired Pedestrians in an Urban Area. In Re-Mixing the City, Real Corp Proceedings (SchrenkM., PopovichV. V., ZeileP., and EliseiP., eds.), Vienna, 2012, pp. 1081–1091.
22.
StrothotteT., PetrieH., JohnsonV., and ReichertL.. MoBIC: User Needs and Preliminary Design for a Mobility Aid for Blind and Elderly. In The European Context for Assistive Technology: Proceedings of the 2nd TIDE Congress, Vol. 1, IOS Press, Paris, 1995, p. 348–351.
23.
QuinonesP. A., GreeneT., YangR., and NewmanM.. Supporting Visually Impaired Navigation: A Needs-Finding Study. In CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2011, pp. 1645–1650. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979822.
24.
MarstonJ. R., and GolledgeR. G.. Towards an Accessible City: Removing Functional Barriers for the Blind and Vision Impaired: A Case for Auditory Signs. Final Report, University of California Transportation Center, Santa Barbara, Calif., 2000. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6826j1b7. Accessed July 14, 2016.
25.
YairiI. E., and IgiS.. Universal Designed Mobility Support Geographic Information System for All Pedestrians. Journal of the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Vol. 54, No. 3, 2007, pp. 135–145.
26.
FernandesH., ConceicaoN., ParedesH., PereiraA., AraujoP., and BarrosoJ.. Providing Accessibility to Blind People Using GIS. Universal Access in the Information Society, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2012, pp. 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0255-7.
27.
EndersA., and BrandtZ.. Using Geographic Information System Technology to Improve Emergency Management and Disaster Response for People with Disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2007, pp. 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073070170040501.
28.
ChristensenK. M., SharifiM. S., and ChenA.. Considering Individuals with Disabilities in a Building Evacuation: An Agent-Based Simulation Study. Presented at 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2013. http://amonline.trb.org/13-2790-1.2515682?qr=1. Accessed Oct. 27, 2016.
29.
Dell’OlioL., MouraJ. L., and IbeasA.. Bus Transit Accessibility for People with Reduced Mobility: The Case of Oviedo, Spain. ITE Journal, Vol. 77, No. 1, 2007, pp. 28–32.
30.
Canal-FernandezV., and MunizM. H.. An Exploratory Analysis of Disabled People Accessibility to Urban Public Transport: The Use of Geographical Information Systems. Investigaciones Regionales, No. 30, 2014, pp. 79–101.
31.
KammounS., MaceM. J. M., OriolaB., and JouffraisC.. Towards a Geographic Information System Facilitating Navigation of Visually Impaired Users. In International Conference on Computers for Handicapped Persons, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2012, pp. 521–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31534-3_77.
32.
FernandesH., FilipeV., CostaP., and BarrosoJ.. Location Based Services for the Blind Supported by RFID Technology. Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 27, 2014, pp. 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.02.002.
33.
SerrãoM., ShahrabadiS., MorenoM., JoseJ. T., RodriguesJ. I., RodriguesJ. M., and du BufJ. H.Computer Vision and GIS for the Navigation of Blind Persons in Buildings. Universal Access in the Information Society, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2015, pp. 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-013-0338-8.
34.
RanL., HelalS., and MooreS.. Drishti: An Integrated Indoor/Outdoor Blind Navigation System and Service. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Annual Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, 2004, pp. 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOM.2004.1276842.
35.
WieserM., MayerhoferB., PresslB., Hofmann-WellenhofB., and LegatK.. GIS-gestützte Navigation blinder und sehbehinderter Personen. In Angewandte Geoinformatik (StroblJ., BlaschkeT., and GriesebnerG., eds.), Wichmann, Berlin, 2006, pp. 747–756.
36.
CoughlanJ. M., and ShenH.. Crosswatch: A System for Providing Guidance to Visually Impaired Travelers at Traffic Intersection. Journal of Assistive Technologies, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2013, pp. 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/17549451311328808.
37.
ZengL., and WeberG.. Audio-Haptic Browser for a Geographical Information System. In Computers Helping People with Special Needs (MiesenbergerK.K., KlausJ., ZaglerW., and KarshmerA., eds.), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010, pp. 466–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14100-3_70.
