Little is known about the sexual lives of “feminine” heterosexual men (i.e., men who eschew traditional rigid “masculine” gender roles in favor of more stereotypically “feminine” gender roles and characteristics). Based on an analysis of gender and sexuality discourse, mostly from social psychology, this paper proposes a model of the sexual subjectivity of the feminine heterosexual man. This model suggests that these men may find it difficult to attract a partner and maintain satisfying sexual relationships, but once established they appear to build strong relationships. This conceptualization proposes that feminine heterosexual men subvert overly restrictive heteropatriarchal sexual scripts, freeing both traditional and nontraditional men to explore ways of being sexual with women outside a dominant-submissive dialectic.
BemD.J. (2000). Exotic becomes erotic: Interpreting the biological correlates of sexual orientation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 531–548.
2.
BegganJ.K., & AllisonS.T. (2001). What do Playboy playmates want? Implications of expressed preferences in the construction of the “unfinished” masculine identity. The Journal of Men's Studies, 10, 1–38.
3.
BlazinaC., & WatkinsC.E. (2000). Separation/individuation, parental attachment, and male gender role conflict: Attitudes toward the feminine and the fragile masculine self. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 1, 126–132.
ColemanM. (1986). Nontraditional boys: A minority in need of assessment. Child Welfare, 65, 252–259.
6.
CorbettK. (1998). Cross-gendered identification and homosexual boyhood: Toward a more complex theory of gender. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68, 352–360.
7.
CorbettK. (1999). Homosexual boyhood: Notes on girlyboys. In RottnekM. (Ed.), Sissies & tomboys: Gender non-conformity & homosexual childhood (pp. 107–139). New York: New York University Press.
8.
DanskyS.KnoebelJ., & PitchfordK. (1977). The effeminist manifesto. In SnodgrassJ. (Ed.), A book of readings: For men against sexism (pp. 116–120). Albion, CA: Times Change Press.
9.
DeauxK., & LewisL.L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991–1004.
10.
DesrochersS. (1995). What types of men are most attractive and most repulsive to women?Sex Roles, 32, 375–391.
11.
DunbarJ.BrownM., & AmorosoD.M. (1973). Some correlates of attitudes toward homosexuality. Journal of Social Psychology, 89, 271–279.
12.
DunkleJ.H., & FrancisP.L. (1990). The role of facial masculinity/femininity in the attribution of homosexuality. Sex Roles, 23, 157–167.
13.
ErnulfK.E., & InnalaS.M. (1998). Masculinity, femininity, and sexual attractiveness: A cross-national perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Sexology, 1, 107–120.
14.
FraserJ.M. (2000). Women's stories of power: Exploring reclamation and subversion of heterosexual sex. Unpublished dissertation, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON.
15.
FreudS. (1962). Three essays on the theory of sexuality (StracheyJ., Ed. & Trans.). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1905)
16.
GreenR. (1987). The “Sissy Boy Syndrome” and the development of homosexuality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
HeasleyR. (2005). Queer masculinities of straight men. Men and Masculinities, 7, 310–320.
18.
HerekG.M. (1987). On heterosexual masculinity: Some psychical consequences of the social construction of gender and sexuality. In KimmelM.S. (Ed.), Changing men: New directions in research on men and masculinity (pp. 68–82). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
HeroldE.S., & MilhausenR.R. (1999). Dating preferences of university women: An analysis of the nice guy stereotype. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 25, 333–343.
HunterA. (1993). Same door, different closet: A heterosexual sissy's coming-out party. In WilkinsonS. & KitzingerC. (Eds.), Heterosexuality: A feminism and psychology reader (pp. 150–168). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
JacksonM. (1984). Sex research and the construction of sexuality: A tool of male supremacy?Women's Studies International Forum, 7, 43–51.
23.
JacksonS. (1996). Heterosexuality as a problem for feminist theory. In AdkinsL. & MerchantV. (Eds.), Sexualizing the social (pp. 15–34). New York: St. Martin's Press.
24.
Jensen-CampbellL.A.GrazianoW.G., & WestS.G. (1995). Dominance, prosocial orientation, and female preferences: Do nice guys really finish last?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 427–440.
25.
KatzJ., & FarrowS. (2000). Heterosexual adjustment among women and men with non-traditional gender identities: Testing predictions from self-verification theory. Social Behavior and Personality, 28, 613–620.
KiteM.E. (2001). Changing times, changing gender roles: Who do we want women and men to be? In UngerR.K. (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 215–227). Toronto, ON: John Wiley & Sons.
28.
KiteM.E., & DeauxK. (1987). Gender belief systems: Homosexuality and the implicit inversion theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 83–96.
KulikJ.A., & HarackiewiczJ.M. (1979). Opposite-sex interpersonal attraction as a function of the sex roles of the perceiver and the perceived. Sex Roles, 5, 443–452.
31.
KurdekL.A., & SchmittJ.P. (1986). Interaction of sex role self-concept with relationship quality and relationship beliefs in married, heterosexual cohabiting, gay, and lesbian couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 365–370.
32.
LeaperC. (1995). The use of masculine and feminine to describe women's and men's behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 359–369.
33.
LevantR.F. (with KopeckyG.). (1995). Masculinity reconstructed: Changing the rules of manhood—At work, in relationships, and in family life. New York: Penguin.
LombardoJ.P.FrancisP.L., & BrownS. (1988). Sex-role and opposite-sex interpersonal attraction. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 67, 855–860.
38.
MacKinnonC.A. (1994). Sexuality. In HermannA.C. & StewartA.J. (Eds.), Theorizing feminism: Parallel trends in the humanities and social sciences (pp. 257–287). San Francisco, CA: Westview Press.
39.
McLarenL. (2001, November 10). The perfect guy: Smart, manly, just gay enough. The Globe and Mail, p. L3.
40.
McLarenL. (2003, October 4). I like my men gay, with just a little bit of straight. The Globe and Mail, p. L3.
41.
MilletK. (1969). Sexual politics. New York: Avon Books.
42.
MillerL.R.BilimoriaR.N., & PattniN. (2000). Do women want “new men”?: Cultural influences on sex-role stereotypes. Psychology, Evolution, & Gender, 2, 127–150.
43.
MorrisL.A. (1997). The male heterosexual: Lust in his loins, sin in his soul?Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
ObstfeldL.S.LupferM.B., & LupferS.L. (1985). Exploring the relationship between gender identity and sexual functioning. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 11, 248–258.
46.
OrlofskyJ.L. (1982). Psychological androgyny, sex-typing, and sex-role ideology as predictors of male-female interpersonal attraction. Sex Roles, 8, 1057–1073.
47.
PerperT., & WeisD.L. (1987). Proceptive and rejective strategies of U.S. and Canadian college women. Journal of Sex Research, 23, 455–480.
48.
PfostK.S., & FioreM. (1990). Pursuit of nontraditional occupations: Fear of success or fear of not being chosen?Sex Roles, 23, 1524.
49.
PlummerK. (Ed.). (1981). The making of the modern homosexual. London, UK: Hutchinson.
50.
RichardsonD.BernsteinS., & HendrickC. (1980). Deviations from conventional sex-role behavior: Effect of perceivers' sex-role attitudes on attraction. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 351–356.
51.
RichardsonD. (1996). Heterosexuality and social theory. In RichardsonD. (Ed.), Theorizing heterosexuality: Telling it straight (pp. 1–20). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
52.
ReganP.C. (1998). Minimum mate selection standards as a function of perceived mate value, relationship context, and gender. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 10, 53–73.
53.
ReganP.C., & BerscheidE. (1997). Gender differences in characteristics desired in a potential sexual and marriage partner. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 9, 25–37.
54.
RottnekM. (Ed.). (1995). Sissies & tomboys: Gender non-conformity & homosexual childhood. New York: New York University Press.
55.
RusbultC.E.ZembrodtI.M., & IwaniszekJ. (1986). The impact of gender sex-role orientation on responses to dissatisfaction in close relationships. Sex Roles, 15, 1–20.
56.
SadallaE.K.KenrickD.T., & VershureB. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 730–738.
57.
SegalL. (1990). Slow motion: Changing masculinities, changing men. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
58.
SeyfriedB.A., & HendrickC. (1973). When do opposites attract? When they are opposite in sex and sex-role attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 15–20.
59.
SimpsonJ.A., & GangestadS.W. (1992). Sociosexuality and romantic partner choice. Journal of Personality, 60, 31–51.
SmithE.R.ByrneD., & FieldingP.J. (1995). Interpersonal attraction as a function of extreme gender role adherence. Personal Relationships, 2, 161–172.
62.
SteedmanM. (1987). Who's on top? Heterosexual practices and male dominance during the sex act. In BuchbinderH.BurstynV.ForbesD., & SteedmanM. (Eds.), Who's on top?: The politics of heterosexuality (pp. 83–111). Toronto, ON: Garamond Press.
63.
StoltenbergJ. (1990). Refusing to be a man: Essays on sex and justice. Markham, ON: Penguin.
64.
StormsM.D. (1978). Attitudes toward homosexuality and femininity in men. Journal of Homosexuality, 3, 257–263.
65.
StormsM.D.StiversM.L.LambersS.M., & HillC.A. (1981). Sexual scripts for women. Sex Roles, 7, 699–707.
66.
UrbaniakG.C., & KilmannP.R. (2003). Physical attractiveness and the “nice guy paradox”: Do nice guys really finish last?Sex Roles, 49, 413–426.
67.
WhitleyB.E. (1983). Sex-role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 765–768.
68.
ZilbergeldB. (1992). The new male sexuality. New York: Bantam.
