The last two decades have seen a marked increase in men's self-presentation practices and the creation of a new identity category: “metrosexual” (Simpson, 1994, 2002). Here we examine men's makeup use, considered one of the more extreme indicators of “metrosexuality” (Harrison, 2008). We deploy a discursive analytic approach informed in particular by membership categorisation analysis (Sacks, 1972a, 1972b, 1992) to examine male makeup users' responses to a young man's online makeup tutorial posted on YouTube. In particular we focus on how the video creator and the respondents design and manage the accounts of their activities, paying particular attention to those gendered norms and categories invoked. What we find is that when contributors endorse or reference cosmetic use they invariably attempt to inoculate themselves against potential charges of being “gay”; our analysis highlights the strategies used to manage gender and sexual identities. In addition, we discuss the implications of the analysis for mapping contemporary masculinities.
CarnielJ. (2009). Sheilas, wogs and metrosexuals: Masculinity, ethnicity and Australian soccer. Soccer & Society, 10(1), 73–83.
4.
CoadD. (2008). The metrosexual: Gender, sexuality, and sport. New York: State University of New York Press.
5.
CoyleJ., & MacWhannellD. (2002). The importance of “morality” in the social construction of suicide in Scottish newspapers. Sociology of Health and Illness, 24(6), 689–713.
6.
EdwardsD. (1998). The relevant thing about her: Social identity categories in use. In AntakiC. & WiddicombeS. (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 15–33). London: Sage.
7.
EdwardsD. (2000). Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment, and doing nonliteral. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(4), 347–373.
8.
EdwardsT. (2003). Sex, booze and fags: Masculinity, style and men's magazines. In BenwellB. (Ed.), Masculinity and men's lifestyle magazines (pp. 132–146). Oxford: Blackwell.
FrancisD., & HartC. (1997). Narrative intelligibility and membership categorization in a television commercial. In HesterS. & EglinP. (Eds.), Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis (pp. 123–152). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
11.
GillR.HenwoodK., & McLeanC., (2005). Body projects and the regulation of normative masculinity. Body and Society, 11(1), 39–62.
12.
GoffmanE. (1981). Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia.
13.
GreenfieldP.M., & SubrahmanyamK. (2003). Online discourse in a teen chatroom: New codes and new modes of coherence in a visual medium. Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 713–738.
14.
HallM., & GoughB. (2011). Magazine and reader constructions of “metrosexuality” and masculinity: A membership categorisation analysis. Journal of Gender Studies, 20(1), 67–86.
15.
HallM.GoughB.HansenS., & Seymour-SmithS. (2012). On-line constructions of metrosexuality and masculinities: A membership categorisation analysis. Gender and Language, 6(2), 379–403.
HarrisonC. (2008). Real men do wear mascara: Advertising discourse and masculine identity. Critical Discourse Studies, 5(1), 55–74.
18.
HepburnA., & WigginsS. (2007). Discursive research in practice: New approaches to psychology and interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HesterS., & ElginP. (Eds.). (1997). Culture and action: Studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington: University Press of America.
20.
HorneJ., & WigginsS. (2009). Doing being “on the edge”: Managing the dilemma of being authentically suicidal in an online forum. Sociology of Health and Illness, 31(2), 170–184.
21.
JeffersonG. (1991). List construction as a task and a resource. In PsathasG. (Ed.), Interactional competence (pp. 63–92). New York: Irvington Publications.
22.
KesslerS.J., & McKennaW. (1978). Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. New York: John Wiley.
23.
KitzingerC. (2000). Doing feminist conversation analysis'Feminism and Psychology, 10, 163–93.
24.
MacInnesJ. (2001). The crisis of masculinity and the politics of identity. In WhiteheadS.M. & BarrettF.J. (Eds.), The masculinities reader (pp. 311–329). Cambridge: Polity Press.
25.
MillerT. (2006). A metrosexual eye on queer guy. Lesbian and Gay Studies, 11(1), 112–117.
26.
MillerT. (2009). Metrosexuality: See the bright light of commodification shine! Watch yanqui masculinity made over. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Studies Association, 24 May, Accessed 12/05/2010 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p105600_index.html
MoursandJ. (1997). Sanctuary: Social support on the internet. In BeharJ.E. (Ed.), Mapping cyber-space: Social research on the electronic frontier (pp. 53–78). Oakdale, NY: Dowling College Press.
PomerantzA. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–229.
32.
PotterJ. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
33.
ProvineR.SpencerR., & MandellD. (2007). Messages emotional expression online: Emoticons punctuate website text. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26, 299–307.
34.
PsathasG. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. London: Sage.
35.
RodhamK., & GavinJ. (2006). The ethics of using the internet to collect qualitative research data. Research Ethics Review, 2(3), 92–97.
36.
SacksH. (1972a). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In SudnowD. (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 31–74). New York: Free Press.
37.
SacksH. (1972b). On the analyzability of stories by children. In GumperzJ.J. & HymesD. (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 325–345). New York: Rinehart and Winston.
38.
SacksH. (1992). Lectures on conversation (2 vols., ed. JeffersonG., with introductions by SchegloffE.A.). Oxford: Blackwell.
39.
SalzmanM.MatathiaI., & O'ReillyA. (2005). The future of men. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
StokoeE.H. (2003). Mothers, single women and sluts: Gender, morality and membership categorization in neighbour disputes. Feminism & Psychology, 13, 317–344.
49.
StokoeE.H. (2006). On ethnomethodology, feminism, and the analysis of categorial reference to gender in talk-in-interaction. The Sociological Review, 54(3), 467–494.
50.
StokoeE. (2010). “I'm not gonna hit a lady”: Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men's denials of violence towards women. Discourse & Society, 21(1), 59–82.
WestC., & FenstermakerS. (1993). Power, inequality, and the accomplishment of gender: An ethnomethodological view. In EnglandP. (Ed.), Theory on gender/feminism on theory (pp. 151–174). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
53.
WinzelburgA. (1997). The analysis of an electronic support group for individuals with eating disorders. Computers in Human Behaviour, 13(3), 393–407.
54.
WiszniewskiD., & CoyneR. (2002). Mask and identity: The hermeneutics of self-construction in the information age. In RenningerK.A. & ShumarW. (Eds.), Building virtual communities (pp. 191–214). New York: Cambridge Press.
