Abstract
A comparative study was made of the results obtained by the Hecht-Weinberg-Gradwohl and a modified Wassermann technique in the serum diagnosis of syphilis during the routine examination of a general group of hospital patients. An acetone-insoluble antigen, as advised by Gradwohl, was used in both methods, and in addition, a cholesterinized antigen with the Wassermann method. In performing the Hecht-Weinberg-Gradwohl test, the procedure as outlined by Gradwohl was closely followed. The Wassermann technique was that which had given satisfactory results in St. Luke's Hospital during the past few years. Two series of tests were undertaken; the first series included 50 cases, the second 100 cases. In each instance the “hemolytic index” as defined by Gradwohl, was carefully determined, and his test was performed only on those sera which showed an index of 4 or greater, since he states that the test possesses no advantage over the Wassermann method when the index is 3 or lower. The first series showed only seven (14 per cent.) sera which filled that requirement. Since the erythrocytes used in this series were from an old laboratory sheep, it was thought that possibly its blood cells had become more resistant to hemolysis than normally, so a second animal, which had been bled but little previously, supplied the erythrocytes for the second series of 100 cases. In this series, 34 per cent. of the sera showed the natural hemolytic index desired. All sera were tested either shortly after the blood was drawn, or within 24 hours; the latter were kept in the icebox until used.
Of the seven suitable sera in the first series, only one gave a positive reaction with both methods. Another gave a questionable positive reaction with the Hecht-Weinberg-Gradwohl method, while with the Wassermann method, a negative resulted with the acetone-insoluble antigen, but a low positive with the cholester-inized antigen.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
