One of the many sets of distinctions made by Hannah Arendt was that between the world and the earth. I give two different interpretations of this distinction then set out four different ways in which nature matters to us, depending on whether nature is regarded as world or as earth, and whether humans are seen as biological beings or as beings who create and inhabit a world. These different ways are represented in different forms of environmentalism and theories of environmental ethics. The controversy over wind farms in the UK as an instance in which two of the different ways that nature matters come into conflict with each other.
ArendtHannah. 1958. The Human Condition.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
ArendtHannah. 1968. Between Past and Future. Viking Compass Edition with additional text.
3.
ArendtHannah. 1982. Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy. Brighton: Harvester Press.
4.
CallicottJ. Baird. 1989. In Defense of the Land Ethic.Albany: State University of New York Press.
5.
CanovanMargaret. 1992. Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of her Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
ChapmanAnne. 2004 ‘Technology as world building’, Ethics, Place and Environment, 7(1-2): 59–72. doi: 10.1080/1366879042000264778.
7.
GoodinRobert E.1992. Green Political Theory.Cambridge: Polity Press.
8.
GoodpasterKenneth. 1978. ‘On being morally considerable’, Journal of Philosophy, 75: 308–325. doi: 10.2307/2025709.
9.
HaysSamuel. 1959Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
JohnsonLawrence E.1991. A Morally Deep World: An Essay on Moral Significance and Environmental Ethics.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
JonasHans. 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
12.
KatebGeorge. 1983. Hannah Arendt: Politics, Conscience, Evil.Oxford: Martin Robertson.
13.
KatzEric. 1997. Nature as Subject: Human Obligation and Natural Community.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
14.
KellyAngela. 2000. ‘When the wind blows’, Faculty of Building Journal. Available at www.countryguardian.net (5 July 2006).
15.
MariettaDon E.Jr. 1979. ‘The interrelationship of ecological science and environmental ethics’, Environmental Ethics, 1: 195–207.
16.
MarrenPeter. 2004. ‘Once there were giants’, The Independent Review, Thursday 30 September.
17.
McKibbenBill. 1989. The End of Nature.New York: Random House.
18.
MillJohn S.1904. Nature, the Utility of Religion and Theism, London: Watts & Co.
19.
Passerin d'EntrèvesMaurizio. 1994. The Political Philosophy of Hannah Arendt.London: Routledge.
20.
PinchotGifford. 1914. The Training of a Forester.Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.
21.
ReganTom. 1983. The Case for Animal Rights.Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
RussowLilly-Marlene. 1981. ‘Why do species matter?’ Environmental Ethics, 3: 101–112.
23.
SingerPeter. 1990. Animal Liberation, 2nd edition. New York: New York Review/Random House.
24.
TaylorPaul W.1986. Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
25.
Whiteside, KerryH.1998. ‘Worldliness and respect for nature: an ecological application of Hannah Arendt's conception of culture’, Environmental Values, 7: 25–40. doi: 10.3197/096327198129341456.
26.
WilliamsGarrath, ed. 2006. Hannah Arendt: Critical Assessments of Leading Political Philosophers, 4 volume set. London: Routledge.
27.
Young-BruehlElisabeth. 1982. Hannah Arendt, for the Love of the World. New Haven: Yale University Press.
