Representing Global Public Concern: A Critical Analysis of the Danish Participatory Experiment on Climate Change

Abstract

Drawing on the recognition that questions of discourse and power are vital components in analysing the public participation in environmental governance, this paper examines the ways in which dominant scientific discourses about the Earth's climate inform the types of public talk facilitated in and by mini-publics, particularly when they are ‘scaled up’ to address environmental issues such as climate change. World Wide Views on Global Warming (WWViews) serves as a case study. Conceived and organised by the Danish Board of Technology, WWViews was a historically unprecedented public forum in which participants, invited from a range of nations, were given the opportunity to deliberate on key themes addressed in the negotiations taking place during the United Nations Convention on Climate Change in Copenhagen (COP 15). The overarching purpose of this analysis is to invite reflection on the practices and assumptions that serve to make up publics in relation to issues that have been framed, predominantly, as scientific, universal and global.

Keywords

Public engagement mini-publics climate change science democracy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adger , Neil

, Barnett

, Chapin

F.S.

and Ellemor

. 2011. ‘This must be the place: Underrepresentation of identity and meaning in climate change decision-making’. Global Environmental Politics 11: 1–25. CrossRef.

Agger

, Jelsoe

, Joeger

and Phillips

. 2012. ‘The creation of a global voice for citizens: The case of Denmark’. In Rask

, Worthington

, and Lammi

(eds), Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance, pp. 45–69. London and New York, NY: Earthscan.

Andersson

and Shahrokh

. 2012. ‘Crossing boundaries with deliberation: but where are we going?’ In Rask

, Worthington

, and Lammi

(eds), Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance, pp. 70–88. London and New York, NY: Earthscan.

Baber

and Barlett

. 2005. Deliberative Environmental Politics and Ecological Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bäckstrand

, and Lövbrand

. 2007. ‘Climate governance beyond 2012. Competing discourses of green governmentality, ecological modernization and civic environ-mentalism’. In Pettenger

, (ed.) The Social Construction of Climate Change, pp. 123–148. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

Barker

D.C.

2005. ‘Values, frames, and persuasion in presidential nomination campaigns’. Political Behavior 27(4): 375–394. CrossRef.

Bedsted

, Gram

, Klüver

. 2012. ‘The story of WWViews’. In Rask

, Worthington

, and Lammi

(eds), Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance, pp. 30–44. London and New York, NY: Earthscan.

Bedsted

and Klüver

. 2009. WWViews on Global Warming: From the World's Citizens to the Climate Policy-Makers. Policy Report. Copenhagen: Danish Board of Technology.

Bodansky

2001. ‘The history of the global climate regime’. In Luterbacher

and Sprinz

(eds), International Relations and Global Climate Change, pp. 23–40. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

10.

Bodansky

2011. ‘A tale of two architectures: the once and future UN climate change regime’. Arizona State Law Journal 43: 697–712.

11.

Bohman

2007. Democracy Across Borders: From Demos to Demoi. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

12.

Boykoff

and Boykoff

. 2004. ‘Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press’. Global Environmental Change 14: 125–36. CrossRef.

13.

Calhoun

2011. ‘Civil society and the public sphere’. In Edwards

, (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Civil Society, pp. 311–323. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. CrossRef.

14.

Calvert

and Warren

. 2013. ‘Deliberative democracy and framing effects: Why frames are a problem and how deliberative mini-publics might overcome them’. In Grönlund

, Bächtiger

, and Setälä

(eds), Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, pp. 203–223. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

15.

Dryzek

2006. Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

16.

Dryzek

and Stevenson

. 2011. ‘Global democracy and earth system governance: Ecological economics’. Ecological Economics 70(11): 1865–1874. CrossRef.

17.

Dryzek

, Bächtiger

, and Milewicz

. 2011. ‘Toward a deliberative global citizen's assembly’. Global Policy 2: 33–42. CrossRef.

18.

Einsiedel

, Jelsøe

and Breck

. 2001. ‘Publics at the technology table: The consensus conference in Denmark, Canada, and Australia’. Public Understanding of Science 10: 83–98. CrossRef.

19.

Fishkin

2009. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

20.

Fishkin

and Luskin

R.C.

. 2005. ‘Experimenting with a democratic ideal: Deliberative polling and public opinion’. Acta Politica 40: 284–298. CrossRef.

21.

Fogel

2004. ‘The local, the global and the Kyoto Protocol’. In Jasanoff

and Martello

(eds), Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance, pp. 103–126. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.

22.

Fung

2003. ‘Survey article: Recipes for public spheres: eight institutional design choices and their consequences.’ Journal of Political Philosophy 11: 338–67. CrossRef.

23.

Hulme

2008. ‘Geographical work at the boundaries of climate change’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33: 5–11. CrossRef.

24.

Hulme

2010. ‘Problems with making and governing global kinds of knowledge’. Global Environmental Change 20: 558–564. CrossRef.

25.

Irwin

2006. ‘The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the ‘new’ scientific governance’. Social Studies of Science 36: 299–320. CrossRef.

26.

Irwin

, Jensen

and Jones

. 2013. ‘The good, the bad, and the perfect: Criticizing engagement practice’. Social Studies of Science 43: 118–135. CrossRef.

27.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policy Makers. Geneva: World Meteorological Organisation.

28.

Jasanoff

1999. ‘The songlines of risk’. Environmental Values 8: 135–152. CrossRef.

29.

Jasanoff

2007. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

30.

Jasanoff

2010. ‘A new climate for society’. Theory, Culture and Society 27: 233–253. CrossRef.

31.

Lahsen

2004 ‘Transnsational locals: Brazilian experiences of the climate regime’. In Jasanoff

and Martello

(eds), Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance, pp. 151–172. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.

32.

Lezaun

and Soneryd

. 2007. ‘Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics’. Public Understanding of Science 16: 279–297. CrossRef.

33.

Livingston

2003. Putting Science in its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef.

34.

Lomborg

2001. The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World. Translated by Matthew

. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef.

35.

Martello

and Jasanoff

. 2004. ‘Globalization and environmental governance’. In Jasanoff

and Martello

(eds), Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance, pp. 1–30. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.

36.

Miller

2004. ‘Climate science and the making of a global political order’. In Jasanoff

(ed), States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, pp. 46–66. London and New York, NY: Routledge.

37.

Rask

and Worthington

. 2012. ‘Towards a new concept of global governance’. In Rask

, Worthington

and Lammi

(eds), Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance. pp. 3–29. London and New York, NY: Earthscan.

38.

Rayner

2007. ‘The rise of risk and the decline of politics’. Environmental Hazards 7: 165–172. CrossRef.

39.

Riedy

and Herriman

. 2011. ‘Deliberative mini-publics and the Global Deliberative System: Insights from an evaluation of World Wide Views on Global Warming in Australia’. PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies 8(3): 2–29. CrossRef.

40.

Scott

1998. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed. Princeton, NJ: Yale University Press.

41.

Smith

2003. Deliberative Democracy and the Environment. London and New York, NY: Routledge. CrossRef.

42.

Sønderriis

, Klüver

, Bedsted

, Gram

, and Leisner

. 2009. WWViews Information Booklet. Copenhagen: Danish Board of Technology.

43.

Stevenson

and Dryzek

. 2014. Democratizing Global Climate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef.

44.

Stirling

2008. “‘Opening up” and “closing down”: Power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology’. Science, Technology & Human Values 33: 262–294. CrossRef.

45.

Swyngedouw

2007. ‘Impossible/undesirable sustainability and the post-political condition’. In Krueger

J. R.

and Gibbs

(eds), The Sustainable Development Paradox. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

46.

UNFCCC. 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations.

47.

Visvanathan

2005. ‘Knowledge, justice and democracy’. In Leach

, Scoones

and Wynne

(eds), Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement, pp. 83–94. London: Zed Books.

48.

Worthington

, Rask

and Jaeger

. 2012. ‘Deliberative global governance: Next steps in an emerging practice’. In Rask

, Worthington

, and Lammi

(eds) Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance, pp. 263–286. London and New York: Earthscan.

49.

Wynne

2005. ‘Risk as globalizing “democratic” discourse? Framing subjects and citizens’. In Leach

, Scoones

and Wynne

(eds), Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement, pp. 66–82. London: Zed Books.

50.

Wynne

2007. ‘Public participation in science and technology: Performing and obscuring a political–conceptual category mistake’. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 1: 99–110.