Two decades of social and political analysis have helped to enrich the concept of risk that underlies the bulk of modern environmental regulation. Risk is no longer seen merely as the probability of harm arising from more or less determinable physical, biological or social causes. Instead, it seems more appropriate to view risk as the embodiment of deeply held cultural values and beliefs – the songlines of the paper's title – concerning such issues as agency, causation, and uncertainty. These values are incorporated into the formal methodologies, such as quantitative risk assessment, by which industrial societies assess risk. The meaning of risk accordingly varies from one cultural context to another, posing difficult problems for global environmental governance. The paper reflects on the role of science in promoting convergent perceptions of risk across disparate political cultures.
AmesBruce N., MagawRenae, and Swirsky GoldLois. 1987. ‘Ranking Possible Carcinogenic Hazards’. Science236: 271–280.
2.
AshleyRichard K.1983. ‘The Eye of Power: The Politics of World Modeling’. International Organization37: 495–535.
3.
BeckUlrich1992. The Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.
4.
BotkinDaniel1990. Discordant Harmonies: A New Ecology for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
BreyerStephen1992. Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
BullardRobert D., ed. 1993. Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the Grassroots.Boston: South End Press.
7.
CaldwellLynton Keith. 1990. International Environmental Policy: Emergence and Dimensions. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
8.
CallonMichel1986. ‘Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay’. In LawJohn, ed., Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, pp. 196–233. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
9.
ChatwinBruce1988. The Songlines. London: Penguin Books.
10.
ClarkWilliam C.1990. ‘Managing Planet Earth’. In Managing Planet Earth, Readings from Scientific American, pp. 1–11. New York: W.H. Freeman.
11.
ClarkeLee1989. Acceptable Risk? Making Decisions in a Toxic Environment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
EzrahiYaron1990. The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
FoucaultMichel1972. The Archeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon.
14.
FussellPaul1975. The Great War and Modern Memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
GierynThomas F. and FigertAnne E.1990. ‘Ingredients for a Theory of Science in Society: O-Rings, Ice Water, C-Clamp, Richard Feynman, And the Press’. In CozzensSusan E. and GierynThomas F., eds., Theories of Science in Society, pp. 67–97. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
16.
GreenbergM.1993. ‘Proving Environmental Inequity in Siting Locally Unwanted Land Uses’. Issues in Science and Technology4: 235–252.
17.
HaasPeter M., KeohaneRobert O., and LevyMarc A.1994. Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
18.
HaasPeter M.1990. Saving the Mediterranean. New York: Columbia University Press. N Y.
19.
IrwinAlan and WynneBrian1996. Misunderstanding Science?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
JasanoffSheila1998. ‘The Political Science of Risk Perception’. Reliability Engineering and System Safety59: 91–99.
21.
JasanoffSheila1992. ‘Science, Politics, and the Renegotiation of Expertise at EPA’. Osiris2: 195–217.
22.
JasanoffSheila1987. ‘Contested Boundaries in Policy-Relevant Science’. Social Studies of Science17: 195–230.
23.
JasanoffSheila1986. Risk Management and Political Culture. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
24.
JasanoffSheila and WynneBrian1998. ‘Science and Decision Making’. In RaynerSteve and MaloneElizabeth L., Human Choice and Climate Change, pp. 1–87. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
25.
JohnsonBranden B. and CovelloVincent T.1987. The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk. Dordrecht: Reidel.
26.
LatourBruno1992. ‘Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts’. In BijkerWiebe E. and LawJohn eds., Shaping Technology/Building Society, pp. 225–258. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
LevinSimon1992. ‘Sustaining Ecological Research’. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America73: 213–218.
28.
National Research Council (cited as NRC).1996. Understanding Risk. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
29.
National Research Council.1994. Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
30.
National Research Council.1989. Field Testing Genetically Modified Organisms: Framework for Decisions. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
31.
National Research Council.1987. Regulating Pesticides in Food: The Delaney Paradox. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
32.
National Research Council.1983. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
33.
PerrowCharles1984. Normal Accidents. New York: Basic Books.
34.
PorterTheodore M.1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
PowerMichael and McCartyLynn S.1998. ‘A Comparative Analysis of Environmental Risk Assessment/Risk Management Frameworks’. Environmental Science and Technology32: 224A–231A.
36.
Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident (cited as Challenger Commission).1986. Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Chal lenger Accident. Washington, D.C.: US GPO.
37.
Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management (cited as Risk Commission).1997. Framework for Environmental Health Risk Management. Washington, DC: Presidential/Congressional Commission.
38.
SkolnikoffEugene1993. The Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology, and the Evolution of International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
SlovicPaul, FischhoffBaruch, and LichtensteinSarah. 1985. ‘Characterizing Perceived Risk’. In KatesR.W., HohenemserC., and KaspersonJ.X., eds., Perilous Progress: Managing the Hazards of Technology, pp. 91–125. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
40.
IrvingStone, ed. 1969. Dear Theo: The Autobiography of Vincent Van Gogh. New York: Signet.
41.
TalAlon1997. ‘Assessing the Environmental Movement's Attitudes Toward Risk Assessment’. Environmental Science and Technology31: 470A–476A.
42.
LordTennyson Alfred1930. Idylls of the King. New York: Macmillan.
43.
TribeLaurence1973. ‘Technology Assessment and the Fourth Discontinuity: The Limits of Instrumental Rationality’. Southern California Law Review46: 617–660.
VaughanDiane1996. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46.
WeissEdith Brown1989. In Fairness to Future Generations: International Law, Common Patrimony, and Intergenerational Equity. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Press.
47.
WinnerLangdon1986. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
World Commission on Environment and Development.1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
WynneBrian and MayerSue. 1993. ‘How Science Fails the Environment’. New Scientist 5 June: 33–35.
