Mixed use of T1- or T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in histographic analysis has impeded cross-reference of studies on fatty degeneration of muscles in patients with back pain.
OBJECTIVE:
The current study aimed to establish the measurement reliability of histographic analysis for normal and painful paraspinal muscles between T1- and T2-weighted MRI.
METHODS:
T1- and T2-weighted MRI at the L4-5 level were performed in 31 patients with unilateral back pain. Two raters conducted the histographic analysis on 2 separate occasions. Multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas major muscles were assessed on both normal and painful sides.
RESULTS:
Intra- and interrater reliability of the parameters were generally excellent for both T1- (intrarater: 0.83 ± 0.13 and interrater: 0.93 ± 0.08) and T2-weighted images (intrarater: 0.93 ± 0.12 and interrater: 0.92 ± 0.12). Histogram width was fair to good for both kinds of image. Intraclass correlation coefficients were similar between painful and normal sides.
CONCLUSIONS:
The evidence that most histographic analysis parameters had excellent reliability for both T1- and T2-weighted images allows for cross-reference of the results between the two kinds of image. Moreover, the results of this study support the availability of histographic analysis for assessment of fatty degeneration in patients with back pain.
D'hoogeR, CagnieB, CrombezG, VanderstraetenG, DolphensM, DanneelsL. Increased intramuscular fatty infiltration without differences in lumbar muscle cross-sectional area during remission of unilateral recurrent low back pain. Man Ther. 2012; 17(6): 584-588.
2.
KjaerP, BendixT, SorensenJS, KorsholmL, Leboeuf-YdeC. Are MRI-defined fat infiltrations in the multifidus muscles associated with low back pain?BMC Med. 2007; 5.
3.
MannionAF. Fibre type characteristics and function of the human paraspinal muscles: normal values and changes in association with low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1999; 9(6): 363-377.
4.
MannionAF, KaserL, WeberE, RhynerA, DvorakJ, MuntenerM. Influence of age and duration of symptoms on fibre type distribution and size of the back muscles in chronic low back pain patients. Eur Spine J. 2000; 9(4): 273-281.
5.
KalichmanL, HodgesP, LiL, GuermaziA, HunterDJ. Changes in paraspinal muscles and their association with low back pain and spinal degeneration: CT study. Eur Spine J. 2010; 19(7): 1136-1144.
Zhi-JunH, Wen-BinX, ShuaiC, Zhi-JieZ, Feng-DongZ, Xiao-JingY, et al. Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal Intensity Ratio Measurements in the Evaluation of Multifidus Muscle Injury and Atrophy Relative to That of Histological Examinations. Spine. 2014; 39(10): E623-E629.
8.
FortinM, YuanY, BattieMC. Factors Associated With Paraspinal Muscle Asymmetry in Size and Composition in a General Population Sample of Men. Phys Ther. 2013; 93(11): 1540-1550.
9.
HyunJK, LeeJY, LeeSJ, JeonJY. Asymmetric atrophy of multifidus muscle in patients with unilateral lumbosacral radiculopathy. Spine. 2007; 32(21): E598-E602.
10.
HidesJA, RichardsonCA, JullGA. Multifidus muscle recovery is not automatic after resolution of acute, first-episode low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(23): 2763-2769.
11.
RopponenA, VidemanT, BattieMC. The reliability of paraspinal muscles composition measurements using routine spine MRI and their association with back function. Man Ther. 2008; 13(4): 349-356.
12.
HuZJ, HeJ, ZhaoFD, FangXQ, ZhouLN, FanSW. An Assessment of the Intra- and Inter-reliability of the Lumbar Paraspinal Muscle Parameters Using CT Scan and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Spine. 2011; 36(13): E868-E874.
13.
ParkkolaR, RytokoskiU, KormanoM. Magnetic-Resonance-Imaging of the Disks and Trunk Muscles in Patients with Chronic Low-Back-Pain and Healthy Control Subjects. Spine. 1993; 18(7): 830-836.
14.
RansonCA, BurnettAF, KerslakeR, BattME, O'SullivanPB. An investigation into the use of MR imaging to determine the functional cross sectional area of lumbar paraspinal muscles. Eur Spine J. 2006; 15(6): 764-773.
15.
CagnieB, BarbeT, VandemaeleP, AchtenE, CambierD, DanneelsL. MRI analysis of muscle/fat index of the superficial and deep neck muscles in an asymptomatic cohort. Eur Spine J. 2009; 18(5): 704-709.
16.
LeeJC, ChaJG, KimY, KimYI, ShinBJ. Quantitative analysis of back muscle degeneration in the patients with the degenerative lumbar flat back using a digital image analysis-Comparison with the normal controls. Spine. 2008; 33(3): 318-325.
17.
BartlettML, GinnL, BeitzL, VillalbaML, PlotzP, BacharachSL. Quantitative assessment of myositis in thigh muscles using magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 1999; 17(2): 183-191.
18.
WillcocksRJ, ArpanIA, ForbesSC, LottDJ, SenesacCR, SenesacE, et al. Longitudinal measurements of MRI-T2 in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: effects of age and disease progression. Neuromuscul Disord. 2014; 24(5): 393-401.
19.
ElliottJM, GallowayGJ, JullGA, NoteboomJT, CentenoCJ, GibbonWW. Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the upper cervical spine extensor musculature in an asymptomatic cohort: an index of fat within muscle. Clin Radiol. 2005; 60(3): 355-363.
20.
KaderDF, WardlawD, SmithFW. Correlation between the MRI changes in the lumbar multifidus muscles and leg pain. Clin Radiol. 2000; 55(2): 145-149.
21.
MengiardiB, SchmidMR, BoosN, PfirrmannCWA, BrunnerF, ElferingA, et al. Fat content of lumbar paraspinal muscles in patients with chronic low back pain and in asymptomatic volunteers: Quantification with MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 2006; 240(3): 786-792.
22.
ElliottJ, SterlingM, NoteboomJT, DarnellR, GallowayG, JullG. Fatty infiltrate in the cervical extensor muscles is not a feature of chronic, insidious-onset neck pain. Clin Radiol. 2008; 63(6): 681-687.
23.
GloorM, FaslerS, FischmannA, HaasT, BieriO, HeinimannK, et al. Quantification of Fat Infiltration in Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy: Comparison of Three MR Imaging Methods. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 33(1): 203-210.
24.
SorensenJS, KjaerP, JensenTS, AndersenP. Low-field magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine: Reliability of qualitative evaluation of disc and muscle parameters. Acta Radiol. 2006; 47(9): 947-953.
25.
ValentinS, LickaT, ElliottJ. Age and side-related morphometric MRI evaluation of trunk muscles in people without back pain. Man Ther. 2015; 20(1): 90-95.
FleissJL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: Wiley. 1999.
28.
EliasziwM, YoungSL, WoodburyMG, FrydayfieldK. Statistical Methodology for the Concurrent Assessment of Interrater and Intrarater Reliability-Using Goniometric Measurements as an Example. Phys Ther. 1994; 74(8): 777-788.
29.
RoebroeckME, HarlaarJ, LankhorstGJ. The Application of Generalizability Theory to Reliability Assessment-an Illustration Using Isometric Force Measurements. Phys Ther. 1993; 73(6): 386-401.
30.
BeckermanH, RoebroeckME, LankhorstGJ, BecherJG, BezemerPD, VerbeekALM. Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res. 2001; 10(7): 571-578.
31.
PrasarnML, KostantinosV, CoyneE, WrightJ, RechtineGR. Does lumbar paraspinal muscle fatty degeneration correlate with aerobic index and Oswestry disability index?Surg Neurol Int. 2015; 6(Suppl 4): S240-243.
32.
ValentinS, YeatesTD, LickaT, ElliottJ. Inter-rater reliability of trunk muscle morphometric analysis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015; 28(1): 181-190.
33.
BattieMC, NiemelainenR, GibbonsLE, DhillonS. Is level- and side-specific multifidus asymmetry a marker for lumbar disc pathology?Spine J. 2012; 12(10): 932-939.
