While it is generally accepted that large breast sizes in females contribute to back pain and poor posture, the effects of breast size on spinal motion and muscle activation characteristics are poorly understood.
OBJECTIVE:
This study examined the relationship between breast size, spine motion, and trunk muscle activation.
METHODS:
Fifteen university-aged females, free of back pain symptoms, were tested. Breast sizes were calculated, and three-dimensional spine motion and activation from five trunk muscles bilaterally were measured during standing and trunk flexion movements. Correlations between breast size and motion and muscle activation measures were assessed.
RESULTS:
Head and trunk angles were strongly, negatively correlated to breast size during upright standing; thoracic angles were moderately, positively correlated to breast size during thoracic flexion movements. Trunk muscles showed positive, moderate-strength relationships with breast size during upright standing and some trunk movements.
CONCLUSIONS:
These findings provide a preliminary indication that increasing breast sizes are associated with altered postures and increased muscle activation in a non-clinical population, and constitute a baseline for the study of females with a full range of breast sizes. Further research is required to confirm the generalizability of these findings to other sizes, in order to inform strategies for the prevention or reduction of back pain, as well as diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation techniques associated with breast size and back pain.
BergA, StarkB, MalecE. Reduction mammaplasty: A way helping females with neck, shoulder and back pain symptoms. Eur J Plast Surg. 1994; 17: 84-86.
2.
LettermanG, SchurterM. The effects of mammary hypertrophy on the skeletal system. Ann Plast Surg. 1980; 5(6): 425-431.
3.
BlomqvistL, ErikssonA, BrandbergY. Reduction mammaplasty provides long-term improvement in health status and quality of life. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106(5): 991-997.
4.
BruhlmannY, TschoppH. Breast reduction improves symptoms of macromastia and has a long-lasting effect. Ann Plast Surg. 1998; 41(3): 240-245.
5.
FreireM, NetoMS, GarciaEB, QuaresmaMR, FerreiraLM. Functional capacity and postural pain outcomes after reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 119(4): 1157-1158.
6.
GlattBS, SarwerDB, O'HaraDE, HamoriC, BuckyLP, LaRossaD. A retrospective study of changes in physical symptoms and body image after reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 103(1): 76-82.
MizgalaCL, MacKenzieKM. Breast reduction outcome study. Ann Plast Surg. 2000; 44(2): 125-133.
9.
NetscherDT, MeadeRA, GoodmanCM, BrehmBJ, FriedmanJD, ThornbyJ. Physical and psychosocial symptoms among 88 volunteer subjects compared with patients seeking plastic surgery procedures to the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105(7): 2366-2373.
Benditte-KlepetkoH, LeisserV, Paternostro-SlugaT, RakosM, Trattnig S, HelbichT, et al. Hypertrophy of the breast: A problem of beauty or health?J Womens Health. 2007; 16(7): 1062-1069.
12.
ChaoJD, MemmelHC, ReddingJF, EganL, OdomLC, CasasLA. Reduction mammaplasty is a functional operation, improving quality of life in symptomatic women: A prospective, single-center breast reduction outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 110(7): 1644-1652.
13.
FindikciogluK, FindikciogluF, OzmenS, GucluT. The impact of breast size on the vertebral column: A radiologic study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007; 31: 23-27.
14.
MazzocchiM, DessyLA, Di RonzaS, IodiceP, SagginiR, ScuderiN. A study of postural changes after breast reduction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012; 36: 1311-1319.
15.
BriggsAM, van DieenJH, WrigleyTV, GreigAM, PhillipsB, LoSK, et al. Thoracic kyphosis affects spinal loads and trunk muscle force. Phys Ther. 2007; 87: 595-607.
16.
Nelson-WongE, CallaghanJP. Is muscle co-activation a predisposing factor for low back pain development during standing? A multifactorial approach for early identification of at-risk individuals. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010; 20: 256-263.
17.
Nelson-WongE, PouporeK, IngvalsonS, DehmerA, PiatteS, AlexanderP, et al. Neuromuscular strategies for lumbopelvic control during frontal and sagittal plane movement challenges differ between people with and without low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013; 23: 1317-1324.
18.
Schinkel-IvyA, NairnBC, DrakeJDM. Investigation of trunk muscle co-contraction and its association with low back pain development during prolonged sitting. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013; 23: 778-786.
19.
Schinkel-IvyA, PardisniaS, DrakeJDM. Head and arm positions that elicit maximal voluntary trunk range-of-motion measures. J Appl Biomech. 2014; 30: 689-696.
20.
Schinkel-IvyA, DrakeJDM. Which motion segments are required to sufficiently characterize the kinematic behaviour of the trunk?J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015; 25(2): 239-246.
21.
MirkaGA, MarrasWS. A stochastic model of trunk muscle coactivation during trunk bending. Spine. 1993; 18(11): 1396-1409.
22.
McGillSM. Electromyographic activity of the abdominal and low back musculature during the generation of isometric and dynamic axial trunk torque: implications for lumbar mechanics. J Orthop Res. 1991; 9(1): 91-103.
23.
ZippP. Recommendations for the standardization of lead positions in surface electromyography. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1982; 50(1): 41-54.
24.
BurnettA, O'SullivanPB, CaneiroJP, KrugR, BochmannF, HelgestadGW. An examination of the flexion-relaxation phenomenon in the cervical spine in lumbo-pelvic sitting. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009; 19(4): E229-E236.
25.
SolomonowM, BarattaRV, BanksA, FreudenbergerC, ZhouBH. Flexion-relaxation response to static lumbar flexion in males and females. Clin Biomech. 2003; 18: 273-279.
26.
McGheeDE, SteeleJR. How do respiratory state and measurement method affect bra size calculations?Br J Sports Med. 2006; 40: 970-974.
27.
McGillSM. A myoelectrically based dynamic three-dimensional model to predict loads on lumbar spine tissues during lateral bending. J Biomech. 1992; 25(4): 395-414.
28.
PreussRA, PopovicMR. Three-dimensional spine kinematics during multidirectional, target-directed trunk movement in sitting. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010; 20: 823-832.
29.
WinterDA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2005.
30.
DrakeJDM, CallaghanJP. Elimination of the electrocardiogram contamination from electromyogram signals: An evaluation of currently used removal techniques. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006; 16(2): 175-187.
31.
BreretonLC, McGillSM. Frequency response of spine extensors during rapid isometric contractions; effects of muscle length and tension. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1998; 8(4): 227-232.
32.
SwinscowTDV. Correlation and regression. In: Statistics at square one. 9th ed. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 1997: 75-85.
33.
McGheeDE, SteeleJR. Breast volume and bra size. Int J Cloth Sci Tech. 2011; 23(5): 351-360.
34.
MayoE. The human problems of an industrial civilization. 6th ed. New York: Routledge; 2003.
35.
HooperDM, RicciardelliEJ, GoelVK, AleksievA. Biomechanical changes in the low back following reduction mammaplasty surgery. Clin Biomech. 1997; 12(7-8): 525-527.
36.
GranataKP, MarrasWS. Cost-benefit of muscle cocontraction in protecting against spinal instability. Spine. 2000; 25(11): 1398-1404.
37.
McGillSM, GrenierS, KavcicN, CholewickiJ. Coordination of muscle activity to assure stability of the lumbar spine. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003; 13(4): 353-359.
38.
ScurrJC, WhiteJL, HedgerW. Supported and unsupported breast displacement in three dimensions across treadmill activity levels. J Sports Sci. 2011; 29(1): 55-61.
