Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Vestibular, neurological and musculoskeletal functions are affected in patients with renal failure. These problems can in turn affect the balance system in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Previously, postural balance changes were shown in hemodialysis patients. This is the first study that evaluates whether there are similar changes in patients with PD.
OBJECTIVE:
This study aimed to compare balance and fall risk between patients undergoing PD treatment and healthy subjects, and aimed to determine the correlation between biochemical parameters and fall risk and balance assessments in PD patients.
METHODS:
This controlled study included 58 patients receiving PD treatment (PD Group) and 75 healthy subjects (Control Group). The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Tetrax
RESULTS:
There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of demographics or BBS scores (
CONCLUSIONS:
Balance was impaired in patients undergoing PD in comparison to healthy subjects. Fall risk may be evaluated using the Tetrax
Introduction
Balance is defined as the ability to maintain a position within the limits of stability or base of support and is therefore classified by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as an activity [1]. It is essential for optimal functioning of the locomotor system and the performance of many activities in daily life [2].
Many aspects of the human body, such as the central nervous system, somatosensorial system (e.g. proprioception), vestibular system, visual system, muscular strength, and cognitive functions are related to balance control. Pathologies of these functions may result in balance impairment and falling [3, 4]. Related health problems may result in severe physical, social, and psychological impairments, decreased ability to work, and high costs.
Neurological and musculoskeletal problems are some of the main quality of life limitations in patients with renal failure, in particular those treated with long-term maintenance dialysis [5]. Vestibular and visual systems, muscular strength, proprioception, and cognitive functions are also affected in patients with renal failure [6, 7].
There are few studies evaluating postural sway in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Those studies showed that the HD is associated with changes in postural sway, which objective hallmark of their functional abilities, in comparison to healty controls. That changes cause poorer physical function and higher accident falls than healthy population [8, 9, 10]. There is only one study evaluating balance before and after HD by electronic posturographic balance system. In that study the balance of ESRD patients before and after a routine session of hemodialysis treatment was evaluated. Fall Index scores were found to be lower in healthy controls than that of ESRD patients and was higher after hemodialysis, indicating a negative effect of hemodialysis on postural stability [10].
This study aimed to compare balance and fall risk between PD patients and healthy subjects. In addition, we aimed to determine whether there is a correlation between biochemical parameters and fall risk and balance assessments in PD patients. This is the first study that evaluates whether there are balance changes in patients with PD.
Methods
This controlled study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All procedures that involved human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Fifty-eight patients (23 females and 35 males) undergoing PD treatment were included in the PD Group and 75 healthy subjects (31 females and 44 males) not diagnosed with renal disease were included in the Control Group. A total of 20 patients undergoing PD treatment were excluded from the study because of limited cooperation with the balance measurements resulting in the inability to obtain proper measurements. The Control Group was selected from individuals in the hospital employee population and patients’ relative. Participants with neurologic or musculoskeletal disorders, diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy, visual or hearing pathologies, or severe bone or rheumatologic disease which might affect the balance system, were excluded from the study.
Age, gender, body mass index (BMI) (body weight [kg]/height
Primary renal disease, Kt/V
All PD patients’ charts were reviewed and the following laboratory parameters were recorded: HbA1C levels of diabetic patients, hemoglobin, C-reactive protein (CRP), serum levels of glucose, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, calcium, phosphorus, sodium, potassium, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), ferritin, and serum iron levels and transferrin saturation index scores. Hemoglobin levels were determined using the Cell Dyn 3700 hematology analyzer (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA) and iPTH levels were measured via electrochemiluminescence immunoassay using the Modular analytics E170 (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Other biochemical parameters were assessed via standard laboratory methods using the Roche Hitachi 902 chemistry analyzer (Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Indianapolis, IN, USA).
All participants were evaluated using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) to measure dynamic and static balance and the Tetrax
Berg balance scale
The BBS is the gold standard clinical test widely used to assess dynamic and static balance in elderly patients. It is designed to measure balance during specific functional tasks which are common in everyday life. It includes 14 simple balance tasks scored on a 5-point ordinal scale (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4), with a maximum total score of 56 [11, 12]. Tasks require subjects to maintain positions of varying difficulty and perform specific tasks such as standing and sitting unsupported, transfers, turning to look over shoulders, picking up an object from the floor, turning 360
Static posturography
Static posturography was measured using the Tetrax
Risk of fall is a numerical value between 0 and 100 (low fall risk, 0–35; moderate fall risk, 36–57; high fall risk, 58–100). This evaluation system provides a hypothetic risk value. The SI is a variable indicating the degree of postural sway and therefore tests the overall stability and ability to control and compensate for changes in posture. Higher SI and fall risk shows poorer postural performance. The Fourier index is a regression analysis of postural sway intensity through the Fourier transform, which shows a different frequency for each lesion that causes instability. Fluctuations of 0.01–0.1 Hz (F1) usually signify normal and comfortable posture and are related to visual control. Fluctuations of 0.1–0.5 Hz (F2-4) usually signify an abnormality in the vestibular organ or fatigue of the musculoskeletal system while those of 0.5–1 Hz (F5-6) show a high index when the subject has an impairment in the somatic sensory response due to a decline in motor functions of the spine and lower extremities. Fluctuations of more than 1 Hz (F7-8) indicate postural instability due to a central nervous system abnormality [3, 16].
Eight different postures can be evaluated with static posturography. For this study, the normal eyes opened (NO) posture with F1 fluctuation and the pillow with eyes closed (PC) posture with a foam-rubber pillow positioned on the floor of the Tetrax
Outcomes were assessed by the same assistant health staff (electromyography technician) using the same method.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical package SPSS (Version 17.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Normal continuous variables were described as the mean
Results
Mean age of patients in the PD Group was 54.2
Clinical characteristics of the study population
Clinical characteristics of the study population
SD: standard deviation.
Static posturography results (mean
NO: normal opened eyes; PC: pillow with eyes closed.
Laboratory parameters of peritoneal dialysis patients (
Mean duration of PD was 63.35
Fall risk was significantly higher in the PD Group than in the Control Group (
In addition, SI scores with NO posture and F8 fluctuations were higher in female patients (p: 0.033; p: 0.031, respectively).
Correlation analysis results of PD patients
BMI was correlated with risk of fall and BBS (r: 0.339; r:
There was no statistically significant correlation between balance measurements and age, duration of PD, blood pressure or Kt/V
Fall risk, SI, and F8 scores were higher in diabetic patients than non-diabetics (
Blood glucose level was correlated with fall risk, SI, and BBS score (r: 0.38;
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge this is the first study in the literature focusing on balance and biochemical parameters in PD patients. The main result of our study is that balance is impaired in patients undergoing PD in comparison to healthy subjects. Our findings demonstrate that patients undergoing PD have balance system pathologies but that these pathologies are not related with the duration of PD, blood pressure, Kt/V
There are a number of measurement tools for the evaluation of balance impairments. In the present study, risk of fall, the stability index, and Fourier index measurements and the Berg Balance Scale were utilized. PD patients had a moderate fall risk while the healthy population had a low fall risk according to static posturography results. The SI and most Fourier measurements were significantly higher in subjects in the PD Group than in the healthy Control Group, revealing that patients undergoing PD treatment have balance impairments and a higher fall risk when compared to healthy individuals. In our study, F1 Fourier fluctuations in the NO posture were similar between the two groups, suggesting that PD patients’ posture was normal in comfortable postures. F2, F6, and F8 parameters were better in the healthy subjects. Balance pathologies related with F2, F6, and F8 may therefore be seen in PD patients even without any vestibular or neuromuscular disease. However, as these fluctuations were independent from the duration of PD, BMI, blood pressure, Kt/V
In previous studies only force plate has been used to evalute balance in ESRD patients. We also evaluated patients with berg balance scale. BBS was used as a measurement tool in this study as patients with renal failure have poor balance when compared to the healthy population of the same age. However, we were unable to find any difference between the two groups using the BBS, while fall risk was significantly higher in the PD Group than in the Control Group. For these reasons, we do not recommend BBS for the evaluation of balance impairment in routine outpatient clinical assessment. Static posturography using the Tetrax system appears to be a more useful evaluation tool than the BBS in PD patients. Despite its high reliability and validity, the BBS may not be the most appropriate test of mobility or balance. Because this clinical observational tool is scored on an ordinal scale, it may not be sufficiently sensitive to change, particularly in active adults with high levels of balancing ability [17]. Important limitations of the BBS such as the need for rescoring of the rating scale, a ceiling effect, and relatively low responsiveness have been reported in the literature. Moreover, dynamic balance (e.g. reacting to a perturbation, gait) is unexplored by the BBS [14].
According to the literature, control of standing balance is an important indicator of fall risk. It is well known that balance is impaired with increasing age with elderly individuals experiencing a loss in strength and sensorimotor processing, increased reaction times, and reduced vision [4, 18, 19]. Our results revealed that the age was correlated with BBS. In addition, SI score and F8 fluctuations were higher in the female population in the present study.
For the PD patients, blood glucose level were correlated with balance. Additionally, fall risk and SI and F8 scores were higher in diabetic patients than non-diabetic patients, suggesting that asymptomatic central nervous system abnormalities might affect postural stability in diabetics. However, as HbA1c was not associated with fall risk, the higher fall risk and SI and F8 scores may be associated with the presence of diabetes and its microvascular complications. In the present study as only the most recent HbA1c results were evaluated, we did not have any information regarding previous blood glucose regulation or the history of previously undetected micro and macrovascular complications which might have affected our results. In addition, spot blood glucose levels were found to affect postural stability. However, blood glucose fluctuations due to the glucose included in the PD solution may also have had an effect on our results.
Neurological complications due to the uremic state or its treatment contribute to morbidity and mortality in patients with renal failure. Despite continuous therapeutic advances, many neurological complications of uremia, such as uremic encephalopathy, peripheral or vestibulocochlear neuropathy, and myopathy fail to fully respond to dialysis [7]. These complications can affect the balance system of these patients. The presence of a variety of toxins such as potassium, calcium, urea, and iPTH contribute to the development of uraemic neuropathy [20, 21, 22]. In the present study, patients did not describe any neurological complications. In addition, the above mentioned biochemical parameters were not correlated with balance measurements, suggesting that more complicated mechanisms or other biochemical parameters not evaluated in this study may affect balance changes in the PD population. Another possible explanation is that asymptomatic neuronal pathophysiologic changes can be seen in the PD population and that these changes may increase the fall risk in this population.
Obesity may decrease static postural control. Cruz-Gómez et al. evaluated 180 patients and reported greater increases in sway in obese subjects than in overweight subjects [23]. In the present study, BMI was associated with fall risk and BBS scores in patients undergoing PD treatment. For this reason, weight management should be recommended to PD patients to improve postural stability.
Osteoarticular disorders such as bone and joint infections, arthropathy, pseudotumours, bone cysts, adynamic bone disease, and pathological fractures significantly limit the quality of long-term survival and can be seen in renal failure [24, 25, 26]. These pathologies can precipitate immobilization, decreased muscle strength, gait abnormalities, and postural instability. Patients in our study did not report the presence of such disorders in their medical history and were thus accepted as not having osteoarticular/neuromuscular problems and further investigation using radiology, computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electroneuromoygraphy (ENMG) or scintigraphic assessments was not performed. For this reason, pathologies which may affect our results cannot be definitively excluded.
Limitations of our study included the small sample size and the reliance on the participant’s self-reporting for the exclusion of osteoarticular/neuromuscular problems. In addition, we did not directly evaluate the relationship between renal failure and physical functioning. The Tetrax
Conclusion
It is important to identify balance pathologies and fall risk in PD patients. Proper identification may contribute to the development of treatment strategies to reduce fall risk and to improve balance in these patients. Fall risk may be evaluated using static posturography instead of BBS. Optimal body weight, and blood glucose level are important for the balance system. Additional studies featuring larger sample sizes would help verify our findings. In addition, radiological technics such as X-ray, CT, MRI, ENMG, or scintigraphic assessments can be used for the definitive exclusion of vestibular, osteoarticular, and neuromuscular problems in further studies.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Çağla Sarıturk for the statistical evaluation and Kevser Aydar for the evaluation of the balance measurements.
Conflict of interest
None to report.
