The effect of therapeutic abdominal drawing-in maneuver using ultrasonography on lateral abdominal muscle thickness and balance

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Lateral abdominal muscles control the lumbar region and this manages the stability of the trunk through co-contraction. Abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) is the basis method for spine stabilization to restore proper neuromuscular control.

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate the effect of therapeutic abdominal drawing-in maneuver on abdominal muscle thickness and balance.

METHODS:

Twenty healthy adults were divided into 2 groups. The experimental group performed a bridging exercise with ADIM whereas the control group performed a bridging exercise without ADIM. The exercise was conducted 3 times a week for 4 weeks. Ultrasonography was used to measure the thickness of abdominal muscles. Balance ability was evaluated using Tetrax device. The Wilcoxon signed ranks test for comparison of pre and post values and Mann Whitney U test for comparison between groups were used.

RESULTS:

After 4 weeks, there was a significant difference in the thickness of TrA between groups ( $p<$ 0.05) whereas no significant difference in IO and EO ( $p>$ 0.05). In stability values, the experimental group showed significant changes in stability indexes of standing with eyes open (NO) and standing on the pillow with eyes closed (PC) after the exercise period and there was a significant difference in NO between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Performing the bridging exercise with abdominal drawing-in maneuver is a more effective way to strengthen the abdominal muscles and stabilize the body than bridging exercise only.

Keywords

Abdominal drawing-in maneuver abdominal muscle stability ultrasonography

1. Introduction

The lateral wall of the abdomen is composed of the transversus abdominal (TrA) muscle, the abdominal internal oblique (IO) muscle and the abdominal external oblique (EO) muscle. These muscles play an important role in the stabilizing the segmental spine [1]. Especially, TrA is one of the core muscles and it is important in maintaining the stability and proprioceptive sense of the lumbar trunk [2].

The core muscles control the lumbar region’s joint because of its location and the direction of tissue. It manages the stability of the body trunk through co-contraction without a movement of joint. Core muscle system is the total component of a protective mechanism which reduces the stress that harmful forces are applying to spine during the functional movement [3]. These days, core training is on the rise as rehabilitation for the body balance which was described as a program for trunk strength and stability.

Stability is a fundamental skill to maintain the postural alignment for daily task and sport activities [4]. The lack of stability in the core muscles is a risk factor for developing back pain and this problem is associated with postural balance. Postural stability is usually measured by tracking the center of pressure sway [5]. Higher instability conditions increase postural control and balance requirements.

To strengthen these core muscles, various trunk stabilization exercises have been used in clinical practice. Abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) is the basic exercise for spine stabilization and its goal is to restore proper neuromuscular control as strengthening the deep muscles such as TrA, IO, and EO [6, 7]. ADIM is the exercise method which increases the abdominal pressure by pulling the abdominal walls to the inside that TrA and oblique abdominal are contracted [8]. Because of the increased abdominal pressure, lumbar trunk stability training is effectively accomplished.

In previous studies, the abdominal drawing-in maneuver was effective in increasing the cross-sectional area of the abdominal muscles more than performing the general stabilization exercises only [1, 9].

Many studies have reported that ADIM stimulates deep muscles and some studies reported that core stability is increased while performing the ADIM. The ADIM has been discussed as an exercise regimen for improving trunk stability and it has been widely used in sports and physical therapy fields. However, there is insufficient number of studies that the effect of constant ADIM on the lateral muscles thickness and balance. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of therapeutic abdominal drawing-in maneuver on thickness of abdominal muscle and balance ability.

2. Subjects and methods

A total of 20 healthy students (6 males and 14 females) at Sunmoon University were recruited for this study based on the calculation of sample size in the previous studies [10, 11]. They had no neurological problems or musculoskeletal diseases and mainly lived a sedentary life. All subjects were informed of the study purpose and methods, and signed an informed consent form. All subjects understood the purpose of this study and provided written informed consent prior to participation in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki. The subject characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1
General characteristics of subjects ( $N=$ 20)

	Experimental		Control group		t
	group
Age (years)	20.10	$\pm$ 0.32	20.15	$\pm$ 0.49	$-$ 0.477
Weight (kg)	60.50	$\pm$ 16.87	56.30	$\pm$ 10.08	0.68
Height (cm)	165.60	$\pm$ 8.96	164.40	$\pm$ 9.78	0.54

Data are presented as mean $\pm$ standard deviation.

Participants were randomly allocated to two groups: the experimental (ADIM) group ( $n=$ 10) and control group ( $n=$ 10), by using simple randomization (tables of random numbers). A pre-test was performed before the exercise intervention and a post-test was performed after the intervention. Subjects in experimental groups performed a bridging exercise with abdominal drawing-in maneuver, and those in the control group performed only a bridging exercise. According to the command of “pelvis up”, the participant raised the pelvis and maintained the raised pelvic position for 10 seconds. Then, in the “pelvis down” command, the participant lowered the pelvis and rested for 10 seconds. The procedure was repeated 15 times per one set. The intervention was conducted for 4 weeks, and 3 sets per session were performed 3 times a week.

The ultrasonography (eZono 3000, Germany) with linear-array transducer was used to obtain images of the abdominal muscles, TrA, IO and EO. To minimize the difference between the testers, the measurement was carried out by one skilled examiner. Measurements were conducted three times on the right side of the subjects while the subjects were in a hook-lying position. In this position, their hips flexed to almost 30 ${}^{\circ}$ and upper limbs were placed along the sides of the trunk. To measure the abdominal muscles thickness, the transducer was placed on the anterolateral abdominal wall, between the 12th rib and the iliac crest, perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the body [10]. The images were frozen and stored at the end of normal expiration and the thickness of each muscle was determined using image $J$ software program. The measurements were taken three times each before and after exercise intervention. The Tetrax (sunlight, Israel) was used to measure balance ability. The measurements were performed in four conditions; standing with eyes open (NO), standing with eyes closed (NC), standing on pillows with eyes open (PO), standing on pillows with eyes closed (PC). The participants maintained standing position for 32 seconds each. The stability index obtained by evaluating the total amount of sway from the four force plates (right and left heels, toes of right and left foot), which was summed and then divided by the subject’s weight. This value shows that the higher the score, the greater the posture instability.

The measured data were analyzed by the statistical package for the social science (SPSS) for Windows version 18.0 (Chicago, IL, USA). And all data were calculated to an average and standard deviation. Nonparametric statistical methods, Wilcoxon signed ranks test for comparison of pre and post values and Mann Whitney U test for comparison between groups, were used. A statistical significance level was set at 0.05.

3. Results

3.1 Lateral abdominal muscle thickness

The values of the lateral abdominal muscle thickness are listed in Table 2. The pre- and post-tests showed significant differences in TrA in experimental group ( $p<$ 0.05). However, there is no significant difference in the IO and EO between pre- and post-tests. There was a significant difference in the thickness of TrA between the groups after intervention and no significant difference in IO and EO.

3.2 Stability index

The stability index is shown in Table 3. In comparison between pre- and post-test, the experimental group showed a significant difference in NO and PC values ( $p<$ 0.05). There was a significant difference between the experimental group and the control group after exercise intervention in NO and no significant difference in other values.

4. Discussion

Clinically, the selective trunk stabilization exercise like ADIM improves the trunk control ability and the abdominal muscles stabilize the trunk. Moreover, TrA is one of the important muscles in maintaining the stability and proprioceptive sense of the lumbar trunk [2]. Successful performance of ADIM is typically judged by the relative increase in TrA thickness compared with that of the IO and EO muscles, measured using ultrasonography.

Table 2
Comparison of lateral abdominal muscle thickness between two groups

	Experimental group	Control group	t
TrA
Pre-test	3.62 $\pm$ 0.63	3.60 $\pm$ 0.67	0.59
Post-test	4.28 $\pm$ 0.69	3.68 $\pm$ 0.47	2.17 ${}^{*}$
t	$-$ 2.97 ${}^{*}$	$-$ 0.38
IO
Pre-test	7.38 $\pm$ 2.44	6.74 $\pm$ 1.46	0.72
Post-test	8.39 $\pm$ 2.50	7.32 $\pm$ 0.79	1.29
t	$-$ 1.35	$-$ 1.17
EO
Pre-test	5.27 $\pm$ 1.65	5.12 $\pm$ 1.15	0.25
Post-test	4.93 $\pm$ 1.98	5.06 $\pm$ 1.73	$-$ 0.17
t	0.55	0.08

Data are presented as mean $\pm$ standard deviation.

Table 3

Comparison of stability index between two groups

	Experimental group	Control group	Z
NO
Pre-test	17.21 $\pm$ 5.77	18.91 $\pm$ 3.54	$-$ 0.907
Post-test	14.09 $\pm$ 4.24	19.02 $\pm$ 4.45	$-$ 2.343 ${}^{*}$
Z	2.59 ${}^{*}$	$-$ 0.46
NC
Pre-test	20.13 $\pm$ 4.69	21.96 $\pm$ 5.28	$-$ 0.907
Post-test	17.27 $\pm$ 5.40	20.75 $\pm$ 4.90	$-$ 1.739
Z	1.53	0.87
PO
Pre-test	19.13 $\pm$ 5.39	21.49 $\pm$ 4.64	$-$ 0.983
Post-test	16.41 $\pm$ 3.69	19.34 $\pm$ 3.74	$-$ 1.814
Z	1.38	1.38
PC
Pre-test	28.09 $\pm$ 5.82	26.07 $\pm$ 3.29	0.454
Post-test	23.51 $\pm$ 4.56	25.43 $\pm$ 3.65	$-$ 0.756
Z	1.99 ${}^{*}$	1.07

Data are presented as mean $\pm$ standard deviation. NO: normal position with eyes open, NC: normal position with eyes closed, PO: eyes open on pillows, PC: eyes close on pillows.

Some previous studies reported that there was a strong correlation relationship between muscle activity measured by electromyography and the muscle change in thickness of TrA muscle during ADIM [12, 13]. Hodge et al. [14] concluded that the use of real-time ultrasound imaging would be more effective because a surface EMG feedback is difficult to distinguish signals from each electrode on muscles overlap in the abdomen. In this study, we used the ultrasonography to examine the thickness of abdominal muscles.

For healthy subjects, Hodge et al. [14] reported that the thickness of IO and TrA has increased but the thickness of EO has decreased during ADIM. In other previous study, the TrA has activated up to 109 percent after the lumbar region stabilizing training by ultrasonic imaging [15]. Teyhen et al. [16] examined that the changes in TrA and IO thickness in individuals with and without unilateral lumbopelvic pain while at rest and during the ADIM and found that preferential change in TrA muscle thickness during the ADIM. Cho [17] reported that bridge exercise with ADIM on an unstable surface showed significant increase in abdominal muscles after 6 weeks. In our study, the TrA muscle thickness was significantly increased in the trunk stabilization exercise with ADIM for 4 weeks, which was consistent with previous studies. However, there was no significant difference in IO and EO muscle thickness between experimental group and control group. This shows the improvement in selective TrA muscle recruitment after the ADIM training.

These findings indicate that a bridging exercise with ADIM, selectively stimulated the deep target TrA muscle leading to augmented core stability, is more beneficial for reinforcing the trunk muscles than the bridging exercise alone.

The spinal column and balance are closely related with each other. In a recent study of the correlation between body stabilization and balance, core training is on the rise as rehabilitation for the body balance [18]. Some researchers have reported that core stability training could improve not only trunk function and muscle thickness but also balance [19, 20]. In this study, stability index of NO and PC position in the experimental group showed a significant difference pre- and post-tests. It is considered that ADIM provides effective muscle contraction strategy for core stabilization via the synkinetic activation of the deep abdominal muscles, which in turn reduced the postural sway that typically occurs during stance.

No significant improvements were seen in PO and PC, stability index with eyes closed, between groups. Balance measurements in the closed eye state have the same effect as blocking the visual information, which increases the dependency upon the remaining somatosensory and vestibular systems. Such visual conditions state change could explain our results.

Previous study showed that the effects of trunk stabilization exercise on balance control and gait enhancement [21, 22, 23, 24]. Carpes et al. [24] reported that there was a significant difference in balance after trunk stabilization exercise. Lee et al. [25] suggested that ADIM training with visual feedback has the positive effects on core and postural stability in non-athletes with core instability. Some study examined the effects of ADIM and myofascial release on back pain, flexibility, and balance in the elderly women and stability index of NO, NC, PO, and PC [26]. As a result of Sim’s study [26], they reported that no significant difference between the two groups. In our study, after 4 weeks of experimental intervention, there was a significant difference in the stability index of NO and PC position between the experimental group and the control group. Although this results were not consistent with some study’s findings, the application of the ADIM for 4 weeks seems to have increased spinal stability because of improved neurological adaptation of deep muscles such as TrA. The deep abdominal muscles, TrA and IO, in coordination with the deep multifidus muscle, play a central role in contributing to core stability [27]. Consequently, ADIM, which focus on the deep muscle system, seems to be more effective for improving balance ability than just trunk stabilization training.

There are some limitations to this study. The number of subjects is small and the population is concentrated in the early 20s, so the results of this study cannot be generalized to the general public. In addition, when measuring muscle thickness, only the lateral abdominal muscles were measured, and the effect on the back muscles was not known. Therefore, further studies should be considered whole trunk stabilization muscle thickness and the relationship between muscle thickness and trunk stabilization.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, when performing bridge exercises to treat and strengthen the lumbar region, the combined application of ADIM should be used to increase the effectiveness of the exercise.

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Sun Moon University Research Grant of 2016.

Conflict of interest

None to report.

References

Hodges

Cresswell

Thorstensson

. Preparatory trunk motion accompanies rapid upper limb movement. Exp Brain Res. 1999; 124(1): 69-79.

O’Sullivan

Phyty

Twomey

Allison

. Evaluation of specific stabilizing exercise in the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiologic diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997; 22(24): 2959-67.

Barr

Griggs

Cadby

. Lumbar stabilization: core concepts and current literature, Part 1. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 84(6): 473-80.

Ebenbichler

Oddsson

Kollmitzer

Erim

. Sensory-motor control of the lower back: implications for rehabilitation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001; 33(11): 1889-98.

Valles

Schneider

Long

Riedel

Johnson

Harris

. Combined sagittal and coronal plane postural stability model. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006; 1: 4576-9.

Urquhart

Hodges

Allen

Story

. Abdominal muscle recruitment during a range of voluntary exercises. Man Ther. 2005; 10(2): 144-53.

Richardson

Snijders

Hides

Damen

Pas

Storm

. The relation between the transversus abdominis muscles, sacroiliac joint mechanics, and low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(4): 399-405.

Hodges

Richardson

. Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain. A motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(22): 2640-50.

Akuthota

Nadler

. Core strengthening. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85(3 Suppl 1): S86-92.

10.

Noormohammadpour

Kordi

Dehghani

Rostami

. The effect of abdominal resistance training and energy restricted diet on lateral abdominal muscles thickness of overweight and obese women. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2012; 16(3): 344-50.

11.

Larson

Brown

SHM

. The effects of trunk extensor and abdominal muscle fatigue on postural control and trunk proprioception in young, healthy individuals. Hum Mov Sci. 2017; 57: 13-20.

12.

McMeeken

Beith

Newham

Milligan

Critchley

. The relationship between EMG and change in thickness of transversus abdominis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004; 19(4): 337-42.

13.

Chon

Chang

You

. Effect of the abdominal draw-in manoeuvre in combination with ankle dorsiflexion in strengthening the transverse abdominal muscle in healthy young adults: a preliminary, randomised, controlled study. Physiotherapy. 2010; 96(2): 130-6.

14.

Hodges

Pengel

Herbert

Gandevia

. Measurement of muscle contraction with ultrasound imaging. Muscle Nerve. 2003; 27(6): 682-92.

15.

Teyhen

Miltenberger

Deiters

Del Toro

Pulliam

Childs

, et al. The use of ultrasound imaging of the abdominal drawing-in maneuver in subjects with low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005; 35(6): 346-55.

16.

Teyhen

Bluemle

Dolbeer

Baker

Molloy

Whittaker

, et al. Changes in lateral abdominal muscle thickness during the abdominal drawing-in maneuver in those with lumbopelvic pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009; 39(11): 791-8.

17.

Cho

. The effects of bridge exercise with the abdominal drawing-in maneuver on an unstable surface on the abdominal muscle thickness of healthy adults. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015; 27(1): 255-7.

18.

Park

. The effects of abdominal draw-in maneuver and core exercise on abdominal muscle thickness and Oswestry disability index in subjects with chronic low back pain. J Exerc Rehabil. 2013; 9(2): 286-91.

19.

Freeman

Gear

Pauli

Cowan

Finnigan

Hunter

, et al. The effect of core stability training on balance and mobility in ambulant individuals with multiple sclerosis: a multi-centre series of single case studies. Mult Scler. 2010; 16(11): 1377-84.

20.

Cabanas-Valdes

Bagur-Calafat

Girabent-Farres

Caballero-Gomez

Hernandez-Valino

Urrutia Cuchi

. The effect of additional core stability exercises on improving dynamic sitting balance and trunk control for subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2016; 30(10): 1024-33.

21.

Kim

Wang

Park

Choi

. The effects of isometric trunk exercises and dynamic trunk exercises on gait in elderly people. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015; 27(6): 1685-9.

22.

Koumantakis

Watson

Oldham

. Trunk muscle stabilization training plus general exercise versus general exercise only: randomized controlled trial of patients with recurrent low back pain. Phys Ther. 2005; 85(3): 209-25.

23.

Yoo

Jeong

Lee

. The effect of trunk stabilization exercise using an unstable surface on the abdominal muscle structure and balance of stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014; 26(6): 857-9.

24.

Carpes

Reinehr

Mota

. Effects of a program for trunk strength and stability on pain, low back and pelvis kinematics, and body balance: a pilot study. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2008; 12(1): 22-30.

25.

Lee

You

Kim

Choi

. Unipedal postural stability in nonathletes with core instability after intensive abdominal drawing-in maneuver. J Athl Train. 2015; 50(2): 147-55.

26.

Sim

. The effects of abdominal muscle drawing-In exercise and MFR application on back pain, flexibility and balance in elderly women: Graduate school of Han-Yang University; 2015.

27.

Henry

Westervelt

. The use of real-time ultrasound feedback in teaching abdominal hollowing exercises to healthy subjects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005; 35(6): 338-45.

The effect of therapeutic abdominal drawing-in maneuver using ultrasonography on lateral abdominal muscle thickness and balance

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

OBJECTIVE:

METHODS:

RESULTS:

CONCLUSIONS:

Keywords

1. Introduction

2. Subjects and methods

Table 1 General characteristics of subjects ( N = 20)

3.1 Lateral abdominal muscle thickness

3.2 Stability index

4. Discussion

Table 2 Comparison of lateral abdominal muscle thickness between two groups

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

Table 1
General characteristics of subjects ( $N=$ 20)

Table 2
Comparison of lateral abdominal muscle thickness between two groups