Targeting PKM2 promotes chemosensitivity of breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) was overexpressed in many cancers, and high PKM2 expression was related with poor prognosis and chemoresistance.

OBJECTIVE:

We investigated the expression of PKM2 in breast cancer and analyzed the relation of PKM2 expression with chemotherapy resistance to the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We also investigated whether PKM2 could reverse chemoresistance in breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS:

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed in 130 surgical resected breast cancer tissues. 78 core needle biopsies were collected from breast cancer patients before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The relation of PKM2 expression and multi-drug resistance to NAC was compared. The effect of PKM2 silencing or overexpression on Doxorubicin (DOX) sensitivity in the MCF-7 cells in vitro and in vivo was compared.

RESULTS:

PKM2 was intensively expressed in breast cancer tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues. In addition, high expression of PKM2 was associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer patients. The NAC patients with high PKM2 expression had short survival. PKM2 was an independent prognostic predictor for surgical resected breast cancer and NAC patients. High PKM2 expression was correlated with neoadjuvant treatment resistance. High PKM2 expression significantly distinguished chemoresistant patients from chemosensitive patients. In vitro and in vivo knockdown of PKM2 expression decreases the resistance to DOX in breast cancer cells in vitro and tumors in vivo.

CONCLUSION:

PKM2 expression was associated with chemoresistance of breast cancers, and could be used to predict the chemosensitivity. Furthermore, targeting PKM2 could reverse chemoresistance, which provides an effective treatment methods for patients with breast cancer.

Keywords

Breast cancer chemotherapy pyruvate kinase M2

1. Introduction

Chemotherapy for primary breast cancer is frequently given neoadjuvantly to reduce tumor size with the aim of avoiding mastectomy. Although the majority of patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy achieve a clinical response to chemotherapy, only a minority achieve a pathological complete response, and eventually develop chemoresistance despite the on-going treatment, rendering reduced effectiveness of chemotherapeutic agents [1]. Clinical observations have shown that once tumors become resistant to a certain drug in chemotherapy, they will rapidly acquire tolerance to other drugs, suggesting there are mechanisms involved in inducing multi-chemoresistance [2]. Therefore, better understanding of the molecular mechanism of chemotherapy resistance is urgently needed for effective and individualized chemotherapies, and to establish a reliable method for predicting and overcoming the chemoresistance.

Pyruvate kinase is an enzyme that functions in the glycolytic pathway and catalyzes the last, rate-limiting step of glycolysis by converting phosphoenolpyruvate and ADP to pyruvate and ATP [3]. Of the four known isoforms, the muscle-type pyruvate kinase (PKM) gene is expressed ubiquitously and capable of producing two mRNA products through alternative use of exon 9 (PKM1) or exon 10 (PKM2) [4]. While normally PKM1 is present in adult cells, PKM2 is expressed abundantly in embryogenic tissues. During tumorigenesis, however, a major isoform switch occurs that replaces PKM1 with PKM2. Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) is a key glycolytic enzyme that regulates the Warburg effect and is necessary for tumor growth. However, how to target PKM2 in cancer treatment is not conclusive, since both inhibition and activation of PKM2 have been shown to suppress cancer cell growth [5]. This is at least partially due to the fact that in cancer cells, PKM2 can exist as either a tetramer with higher activities or a dimer with lower activities.

PKM2 can also translocate to nucleus and exerts both kinase and non-kinase activities [5]. However, its role in chemoresistance has not been fully elucidated. At present, a few studies on the relationships between PKM2 and cell sensitivity to chemotherapy have been carried out. Fukuda et al. [6] reported that PKM2 expression is associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma chemoresistance, and PKM2 inhibition can restore cisplatin sensitivity by inactivating PPP. Similar results were showed in human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells [7] and ovarian cancer cells [8]. Shin et al. [9] reported that PKM2 expression increased significantly in 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-resistant colon cancer cells, but Yoo et al. [10] reported that there was no significant relevance between the expression of PKM2 and resistance to 5-FU. Recent research has indicated that PKM2 upregulation promotes chemosensitivity in colorectal cancer [12]. However, the clinical significance of PKM2 expression in breast cancer and the relation of PKM2 expression with chemosensitvity in breast cancer is currently unknown.

In this study, we detected PKM2 expression in breast cancers and breast cancers before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and analyzed the relation of PKM2 expression with clinical data, chemoresistance and chemosensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs. Using DOX-resistant or sensitive breast cancer cells, we investigated the effect of PKM2 in regulating DOX sensitivity or resistance in breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Our study indicated that PKM2 was up-regulated in breast cancer and chemoresistant breast cancer or cells. Higher PKM2 expression was related to multi-drug resistance to the neoadjuvant chemotherapy and shorter survival. Knockdown of PKM2 expression decreases the resistance to DOX in breast cancer cells and tumors. Our findings provide a helpful marker to distinguish which patients will respond to chemotherapy in advance, so that effective treatment strategies can be applied.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Cell culture

The human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 (MCF-7 ${}^{\text{WT}}$ ) was obtained from Institute of Cell Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Beijing, China). Doxorubicin (DOX)-resistant MCF-7 cells (MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ ) were established by induction with gradient concentrations (0.1–5 $\mu$ mol/L) of DOX. MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells were cultured at a final concentration of 2.0 $\mu$ M. Cells were cultured in DMEM (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco), 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 $\mu$ g/ml streptomycin (Gibco), and anti-fungal agent. Cells were cultured in a 5% CO ${}_{2}$ in air incubator at 37 ${}^{\circ}$ C and passaged by 0.25% trypsin-EDTA when they reached confluence. Cells of more than 60–70% viability evaluated by trypan blue dye exclusion were used in further experiments.

2.2 Patient samples

Breast cancer samples were obtained from Breast disease Center, the affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. In all, 130 surgical resected tumors and 78 core needle biopsies of breast cancer before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) were collected from Oct. 2011 to Jan. 2013 and Jan. 2011 to Dec. 2013, respectively. The patients were followed up for 1–106 months and 1–102 months (median follow-up are 64 months and 59 months). Among the 130 tumor samples, there are 51 corresponding adjacent normal tissues. Pathological diagnosis, as well as ER, PR, and HER2 status, were verified by two pathologists independently. All human samples were collected with informed consents from the donors according to the International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects (CIOMS). The study was performed after approval by the institutional review board (IRB) of the affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. Written informed consent was obtained from each individual or patient.

2.3 Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PKM2 was performed according to the standard protocol. The IHC score, H-score, or PKM2 score, were determined by combining the percentage of positively stained tumor cells and the staining intensity of positively stained tumor cells. The staining intensity was graded as follows: 0, no staining; 1, weak staining (light yellow); 2, moderate staining (yellow–brown); 3, strong staining (brown). The percentage of cells at each staining intensity level is calculated, and finally, an H-score is assigned using the following formula: [ $1\times(\text{\%cells}1+)+2\times(\text{\%cells}2+)+3\times(\text{\%cells}3+)$ ]. We use the median value as the cut-off to define PKM2-high and PKM2-Low in breast cancer samples for PKM2 expression analysis and that in all patients in neoadjuvant therapy evaluation.

2.4 Lentiviral vector-mediated downexpression of PKM2

PKM2-specific shRNAs originate from the “MISSION shRNA Library” designed and developed at BioLink Biotechnology (Shanghai City, P.R. China). Two PKM2 hairpins (NM_182471.1-1706s1c1-#2 and NM_182471.1-1493s1c1-#4) that showed high efficacy knock-down were selected. Short hairpin RNAs (shRNA) of PKM2 shRNAs were inserted into pLenR-GPH vector (BioLink Biotechnology). Lentiviruses were generated from 293 T cells according to the protocol of Single Oligonucleotide RNAi Technology for Gene Silencing. Stable MCF-7 cells (MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ /Lv-PKM2 shRNA) were selected by puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich) 48 hs after lentiviral transduction.

2.5 Lentiviral vector-mediated overexpression of PKM2

EGFP-encoding lentiviral constructs for PKM2 overexpression were manufactured by Sunbio Medical Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai City, P.R. China). The cDNA sequence for human PKM2 was cloned into XbaI and BamHI restriction sites of pLenO-GTP vector. Three helper plasmids pMDLg/pRRE, pRSV-REV, and pCMV-VSV-G were cotransfected into 293 T cells ( $3\times 10^{4}$ /ml) in serum-free medium using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The medium was replaced with complete medium following 8 h incubation at 37 ${}^{\circ}$ C. The high-titer recombinant lentiviral vectors carrying PKM2 were harvested 48 h following transfection. Stable MCF-7 cells (MCF-7 ${}^{\text{wt}}$ /Lv-PKM2) were selected by puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich) 48 hs after lentiviral transduction.

2.6 MTT assay

The MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ or MCF-7 ${}^{\text{wt}}$ cells were plated at a density of 5000 cells/well in a 96-well plate and transfected with the next day with Lv-PKM2 shRNA (MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells) or Lv-PKM2 (MCF-7 ${}^{\text{wt}}$ cells) or their controls Lv-NC for 24–72 h; or treated with DOX (1.5 $\mu$ M) for 24–72 h before Lv-PKM2 shRNA or Lv-PKM2 transfection for 16 h. MTT was added at the end point to determine the cell viability as the manufacture’s instruction.

2.7 Colony formation assay

The stable Lv-PKM2 transfected MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells or the stable Lv-PKM2 shRNA transfected MCF-7 ${}^{\text{wt}}$ cells or their controls (1 $\times$ 10 ${}^{3}$ ) were seeded into 6-well plates and cultured for 10 days. To explore the effect of DOX on colony formation, the cells above were seeded (1 $\times$ 10 ${}^{3}$ ) in six well plates and treated with vehicle (DMSO) or DOX (1.5 $\mu$ M) for 5–7 days. Fresh media without DOX was then added to the cells and cultured for another 3 days. After which, the cells were fixed and stained with MayGrunwald-Giemsa. The number of colonies were counted and reported in graphs.

2.8 Western blot assay

The separation of cytoplasmic fractions was performed using the PARIS Kit (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat milk and incubated with primary antibodies for PKM2 (CST, 1:200) and a-Turbulin (Beyotime, 1:1000).

Figure 1.

PKM2 upregulation indicates worse prognosis in patients with breast cancer. A, Representative immunohistochemistry images of PKM2 expression in the breast cancer ( $n=$ 130) and adjacent normal tissues ( $n=$ 51). B, Immunohistochemical staining scores of PKM2 in breast cancer and adjacent tissues. C, Higher levels of PKM2 in breast tumors were associated with poor disease-free survival (DFS) in all breast cancer patients ( $n=$ 130); D, higher levels of PKM2 were associated with poor disease-free survival (DFS) in NAC patients; E, higher levels of PKM2 were associated with poor overall survival (OS) in NAC patients.

2.9 Animal experiment

Female BALB/c nude mice (5–6 weeks of age, 16–18 g) were obtained from National Rodent Shanghai Experimental Branch Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). All experimental procedures involving animals were conducted in accordance with the institutional guidelines by the Affiliated hospital of Qingdao University. BALB/c mice ( $n=$ 4/group) were divided into 4 experimental groups. A total of 5 $\times$ 10 ${}^{6}$ MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells with Lv-PKM2 shRNA or Lv-NC shRNA, 5 $\times$ 10 ${}^{6}$ MCF-7 ${}^{\text{WT}}$ cells with Lv-PKM2 or Lv-NC were injected s.c. to the left front flank of mice on day 0. From day 3 to day 9, DOX was administered to all groups of mice by i.v. injection (0.1 mL, 10 mg/kg) for a total of 4 times at 2 day intervals. Tumor dimensions were measured in 2 dimensions with microcalipers every other day and tumor volume was calculated by the following formula: tumor volume $=$ (length $\times\text{width}^{2}$ )/2.

2.10 Statistical analysis

Unpaired two-sided Student’s t test and one-way ANOVA was used to compare cell viability and colony formation and tumor volume with different treatments, and post hoc tests were used to test difference between groups. Chi-square test was used to analyze the relationship between PKM2 expression and clinicopathological status. Kaplan-Meier method was for survival analysis. Value of $p<$ 0.05 were considered significant. Data are expressed as mean $\pm$ SD.

Table 1
Correlations of PKM2 expression with clinicopathological status in 130 cases of patients with breast cancer

	PKM2 expression
Variable	H-score $\leqslant$ 120 ( $n=$ 46)	H-score $>$ 120 ( $n=$ 84)	$p$ -value ( $X^{2}$ test)
Age (year)			0.2780
$\leqslant$ 50	14	26
$>$ 50	32	58
Grade			0.0697
I $+$ II	29	39
III	17	45
$T$ stage			0.0547
T1 $+$ T2	37	54
T3 $+$ T4	9	30
$N$ stage
N0	30	34	0.0070
N1 $+$ N2 $+$ N3	16	50
$M$ stage			0.8450
M0	40	72
M1	6	12
TNM stage			0.0290
I $+$ II	30	38
III $+$ IV	16	46
ER expression			0.2360
Positive	19	26
Negative	27	58
PR expression			0.0856
Positive	14	40
Negative	30	44
HER2 expression			0.8100
Positive	9	15
Negative	37	69

3. Results

3.1 Clinical significance of PKM2 expression in surgical excised breast cancer

To further validate the expression of PKM2 in breast cancers, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed in 130 surgical excised breast cancer tissues and 51 cases of the adjacent normal tissues. We found that PKM2 was intensively expressed breast cancer tissues compared to the adjacent normal tissues (Fig. 1A). As shown in Fig. 1B, PKM2 score was higher in the breast cancer tissues compared to the adjacent normal tissues ( $P<$ 0.001). High PKM2 expression was associated with high $N$ stage ( $P=$ 0.007) and TNM stage ( $P=$ 0.029), but not with age, grade, distant metastasis, ER, PR and HER2 in breast cancer (Table 1). In addition, high expression of PKM2 was associated with poor disease-free survival (DFS) ( $P=$ 0.0051) in 130 breast cancer patients (Fig. 1C). When analyzing the correlation of PKM2 expression in 78 NAC patients, we discovered that the NAC patients with high PKM2 level had the worst DFS (Fig. 1D, $P=$ 0.002) and OS (Fig. 1E, $P=$ 0.036). Multivariable analysis showed that PKM2 expression ( $p=$ 0.047) and TNM stage ( $p=$ 0.003) was an independent prognostic predictor for DFS in 130 surgical resected breast cancer (Table 2). PKM2 expression ( $p=$ 0.033) and TNM stage ( $p=$ 0.012) was an independent prognostic predictor for DFS in 78 NAC patients (Table 3).

Table 2
Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis of 130 cases of breast cancer

Variable	$x^{2}$	$P$ value	HR	95% CI
PKM2 expression	9.539	0.047	1.386	0.954–2.038
TNM stage	11.43	0.003	1.892	1.536–3.981
$N$ stage	2.182	0.068	2.035	1.104–4.183

Table 3

Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis of 78 NAC patients

Variable	$x^{2}$	$P$ value	HR	95% CI
PKM2 expression	10.04	0.033	2.638	1.452–6.271
TNM stage	6.723	0.012	5.267	2.245–17.348
$N$ stage	2.562	0.0531	2.119	1.562–8.137

3.2 Clinical significance of PKM2 expression with breast cancer chemoresistance

Chemoresistance was defined as stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) after NAC treatment, while chemosensitive patients had a completed response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.16 [12]. To further validate the correlation of PKM2 expression with breast cancer chemoresistance, we collected 78 core needle biopsies from breast cancer patients before neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which were then treated with platinum-based drugs, Taxanes, and Doxorubicin. Our clinical studies discovered that patients with high PKM2 expression (Fig. 2A) and high PKM2 score (Fig. 2B) has poor outcome to neoadjuvant treatment in the breast cancer patients. We also compared the relation between PKM2 expression and clinical significance in 78 NAC patients, and found that high PKM2 expression was associated with high $N$ stage ( $P=$ 0.001), TNM stage ( $P=$ 0.037) and NAC treatment response ( $P=$ 0.019) (Table 4). Importantly, ROC curve showed that high PKM2 level significantly distinguished chemoresistant cases from sensitive cases of the breast cancers patients (Fig. 2C). These results suggested that high PKM2 level was associated with chemoresistance of breast cancers, and the expression level of PKM2 in tumor tissues can be used to predict the outcome of chemotherapy.

Figure 2.

PKM2 upregulation indicates worse neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcome. A, Representative immunohistochemical images showed that PKM2 level was highest expressed in PD (progress disease) tumors ( $n=$ 27), following by that in SD (stable disease) ( $n=$ 19), PR (partial response) ( $n=$ 25) and CR (complete response) tumors ( $n=$ 17) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy treated breast cancer patients. B, Immunohistochemical staining scores of PKM2 in CR, PR, SD and PD breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapies. C, ROC curve showed the diagnostic value of PKM2 in distinguishing neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcome of 78 breast cancer patients (Mann-Whitney U test). Bar graphs represent the mean $\pm$ SD of indicated samples. * $p<$ 0.05, ** $p<$ 0.01, and *** $p<$ 0.001.

Table 4

Correlations of PKM2 expression with clinicopathological status in 78 breast cancer patients with Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

	PKM2 expression
Variable	H-score $\leqslant$ 99 ( $n=$ 31)	H-score $>$ 99 ( $n=$ 47)	$p$ -value ( $X^{2}$ test)
Age (year)			0.0910
$\leqslant$ 50	8	21
$>$ 50	23	26
Grade			0.5320
I $+$ II	20	27
III	11	20
$T$ stage			0.1450
T1 $+$ T2	24	29
T3 $+$ T4	7	18
$N$ stage
N0	23	17	0.0010
N1 $+$ N2 $+$ N3	8	30
$M$ stage			0.8380
M0	25	37
M1	6	10
TNM stage			0.0373
I $+$ II	20	19
III $+$ IV	11	28
ER expression			0.0525
Positive	16	14
Negative	15	33
PR expression			0.7360
Positive	12	20
Negative	19	27
HER2 expression			0.3700
Positive	7	15
Negative	24	32
Treatment response			0.0180
CR	12	5
PR	10	15
SD	5	14
PD	4	13

3.3 Overexpression of PKM2 confers resistance to chemotherapy in breast cancer cells in vitro

To explore the common mechanisms that promote the chemoresistance in breast cancers, we generated DOX-resistant MCF-7 cell line (MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ ) and compared with its parental MCF-7 ${}^{\text{WT}}$ cells. PKM2 was overexpressed in MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells compared to the MCF-7 ${}^{\text{WT}}$ cells (Fig. 3A). The Lv-PKM2 or Lv-NC was transfected into MCF-7 ${}^{\text{wt}}$ cells for 24 h, then treated with DOX (1.5 $\mu$ M) for 72 h. We observed that PKM2 expression was significantly increased in MCF-7 ${}^{\text{WT}}$ cells transfected with Lv-PKM2 alone compared to the MCF-7 ${}^{\text{WT}}$ cells transfected with Lv-NC alone (Fig. 3B). DOX (1.5 $\mu$ M) treatment alone enhanced PKM2 expression in the MCF-7 ${}^{\text{WT}}$ cells or Lv-NC transfected MCF-7 ${}^{\text{WT}}$ cells (Fig. 3C). PKM2 expression was more significantly increased in the Lv-PKM2 transfected MCF-7 ${}^{\text{WT}}$ cells with DOX (1.5 $\mu$ M) treatment (Fig. 3C). In addition, enhanced PKM2 expression alone increased cell viability (Fig. 3D) and promoted colony formation in the MCF-7 ${}^{\text{WT}}$ cells compared to the Lv-control transfected MCF-7 ${}^{\text{WT}}$ cells (Fig. 3E). Furthermore, enhanced PKM2 expression dramatically decreased the sensitivity of MCF-7 ${}^{\text{wt}}$ cells to DOX (1.5 $\mu$ M), as shown by the increased cell viability (Fig. 3D) and colony formation (Fig. 3E) upon drug treatment.

Figure 3.

PKM2 regulates the chemosensitivity of breast cancer cells to DOX in vitro. A, PKM2 protein levels in MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells or MCF-7 ${}^{\text{wt}}$ cells by western blots. B, PKM2 protein levels in MCF-7 ${}^{\text{wt}}$ cells after transient transfection of Lv-PKM2 or Lv-NC as detected by western blots. C, PKM2 protein levels in MCF-7 ${}^{\text{wt}}$ cells treated with DOX (1.5 $\mu$ M) in combination with transient Lv-PKM2 or Lv-NC transfection. D, Cell viability was detected by MTT in MCF-7 ${}^{\text{wt}}$ cells treated with Lv-PKM2 or Lv-NC transfection in combination with DOX (1.5 $\mu$ M). E, Cell survival was detected by colony formation assays in MCF-7 ${}^{\text{wt}}$ cells treated with Lv-PKM2 or Lv-NC transfection in combination with DOX (1.5 $\mu$ M). F, PKM2 protein levels in MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells after transient transfection of Lv-PKM2 shRNA or Lv-NC shRNA as detected by western blots. G, Cell viability was detected by MTT in MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells treated with Lv-PKM2 shRNA or Lv-NC shRNA transfection in combination with DOX (1.5 $\mu$ M). H, Cell survival was detected by colony formation assays in MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells treated with Lv-PKM2 shRNA or Lv-NC shRNA transfection in combination with DOX (1.5 $\mu$ M). ${}^{*}p<$ 0.05, ${}^{**}p<$ 0.01, and ${}^{***}p<$ 0.001.

3.4 Targeting PKM2 promotes chemosensitivity in breast cancer cells in vitro

The Lv-PKM2 shRNA or Lv-scrambled shRNA (Lv-NC shRNA) were transfected MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells for 16 h, then treated with DOX (1.5 $\mu$ M) for 72 h, and the cell growth and DOX sensitivity of MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells were evaluated using MTT assay and colony formation assay. We found that PKM2 expression was significantly decreased in the Lv-PKM2 shRNA teansfected MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells compared to the Lv-NC shRNA-transfected MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells (Fig. 3F). DOX treatment alone did not significantly induced PKM2 expression in the MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells (Fig. 3F). We found that targeting PKM2 expression alone decreased cell viability (Fig. 3G) and colony formation ability (Fig. 3H) in the MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells compared to the Lv-NC shRNA transfected MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells. Furthermore, targeting PKM2 dramatically increased the sensitivity of MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells to DOX, as shown by the decreased cell proliferation (Fig. 3G) and colony formation (Fig. 3H) upon drug treatment.

3.5 PKM2 knockdown increases the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to chemotherapies in vivo

To determine whether the effect of targeting PKM2 on chemosensitivity in vitro also extended to tumors growing in vivo, we injected female BALB/c mice with 5 $\times$ 10 ${}^{5}$ MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells or 5 $\times$ 10 ${}^{5}$ MCF-7 ${}^{\text{wt}}$ cells and then evaluated their response to DOX treatment. Starting on day 3, and every 2 days thereafter, mice were treated i.v. with DOX and tumor sizes tracked. Mice were sacrificed on day 23 and tumors were resected. Following termination of chemotherapy, the MCF-7 ${}^{\text{wt}}$ / PKM2 group of mice exhibited enhanced tumor growth relative to control group (Fig. 4A). Among MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells with PKM2 knockdown, chemotherapy had a significant impact on early tumor development. While these tumors did continue to grow, they propagated at a markedly reduced rate (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4.

PKM2 expression influences chemosensitivity of MCF-7 breast cancer cells in vivo. MCF-7 ${}^{\text{DR}}$ cells (A) or MCF-7 ${}^{\text{wt}}$ cells (B) with varying PKM2 status, were injected s.c. in the left front flank of female BALB/c mice ( $n=$ 4/group) on day 0. All mice were treated with DOX by i.v. injection (day 3–9). When tumor growth became visible, tumor volume was monitored and results were graphically displayed. *, $P<$ 0.05, versus control group.

4. Discussion

PKM2 was overexpressed in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [13], PDAC [14], gallbladder cancer [15], lung adenocarcinoma [16], and higher PKM2 expression is associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis [13, 14, 15, 16]. In the present study, we found that PKM2 is upregulated breast cancer tissues compared with that in normal breast tissues. Moreover, PKM2 expression is significantly associated with poor progression in patients with breast cancer. Higher PKM2 expression correlated with a shorter survival time, indicating that PKM2 plays an important role in breast cancer progression. Furthermore, higher PKM2 expression was an independent prognostic indicator of shorter survival in breast cancer patients. These findings suggested that lower expression of PKM2 would provide a selective advantage in prognosis for breast cancer patients.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) refers to administration of chemotherapeutic agents before tumor resection, with purpose of downstaging locally advanced breast cancer to an operable tumor, as well as eradicating occult distant metastases [17, 18]. However, a subset of patients might not respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, possibly due to intrinsic chemoresistance, resulting in compromise of the treatment efficacy and affecting the success of following surgery [19]. Identification of potential biomarkers to predict the response to NAC might help to guide the chemotherapeutic regimen selection.

PKM2 is strongly upregulated in bladder cancer, and contributes to the cisplatin resistance [20]. PKM2 overexpression is also related chemoresistance in colorectal cancer [21] and multiple myeloma cell [22]. In this study, we demonstrated that PKM2 expression was significantly upregulated in chemoresistant breast cancer or cell lines. High PKM2 expression was correlated with significantly lower disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, higher PKM2 expression was related to the neoadjuvant chemotherapy resistance. These findings suggest that PKM2 may serve as potential biomarkers to predict chemosensitivity.

To further confirm whether PKM2 expression regulates the chemosensitivity of breast cancer cells to therapeutic drug, the PKM2 downexpressing MCF-7 cells and overexpresssing MCF-7 cells were treated with doxorubicin. As might be predicted from prior studies of doxorubicin, a remarkably decreased cell growth was observed in MCF-7 ${}^{\text{dr}}$ cells with suppressed PKM2 expression in vitro and in vivo, whereas more cell growth were detected in MCF-7 ${}^{\text{wt}}$ cells overexpressing PKM2 in vitro and in vivo. Together, these findings show that the expression levels of PKM2 do affect in vitro chemosensitivitiy of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Furthermore, the in vivo data not only confirmed our in vitro observations of the impact of PKM2 on chemosensitivity, but also suggested that PKM2 could become a valuable clinical marker of chemosensitivity.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, PKM2 is overexpressed in breast cancer and chemoresistant breast cancers. High PKM2 expression is related with poor prognosis and chemoresistance in patients with breast cancers. Monitoring PKM2 expression and targeting PKM2 may be utilized to predict chemotherapy response and reverse the chemoresistance of breast cancers. PKM2 may be as a useful biomarker and a potential therapeutic target to sensitize breast cancer to chemotherapies.

Footnotes

Author contributions

Conception: Yu Wang and Xingang Wang

Interpretation or analysis of data: Fengyun HaoHan Zhao and Xingang Wang

Preparation of the manuscript: Yu Wang and Xingang Wang

Revision for important intellectual content: Yu Wang and Xingang Wang

Supervision: Xingang Wang

References

Pondé

N.F.

Zardavas

and Piccart

, Progress in adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer, Nat Rev Clin Oncol 16(1) (2019), 27–44.

Kuo

M.T.

, Roles of multidrug resistance genes in breast cancer chemoresistance, Adv Exp Med Biol 608 (2007), 23–30.

Bayley

J.P.

and Devilee

, The Warburg effect in 2012, Curr Opin Oncol 24(6) (2012), 62–67.

Chen

Zhang

and Manley

J.L.

, Turning on a fuel switch of cancer: hnRNP proteins regulate alternative splicing of pyruvate kinase mRNA, Cancer Res 70(22) (2010), 8977–8980.

Iqbal

M.A.

Gupta

Gopinath

Mazurek

and Bamezai

R.N.

, Pyruvate kinase M2 and cancer: An updated assessment, FEBS Lett 588(16) (2014), 2685–2692.

Fukuda

Miyata

Miyazaki

Makino

Takahashi

Kurokawa

Yamasaki

Nakajima

Takiguchi

Mori

and Doki

, Pyruvate kinase M2 modulates esophageal squamous cell carcinoma chemotherapy response by regulating the pentose phosphate pathway, Ann Surg Oncol 22(Suppl 3) (2015), S1461–1468.

Yuan

Qiao

Zhuang

Chen

Xing

and Zhang

, Knockdown of the M2 isoform of pyruvate kinase (PKM2) with shRNA enhances the effect of docetaxel in human nsclc cell lines in vitro, Yonsei Med J 57(6) (2016), 1312–1323.

S.L.

Cai

W.J.

H.D.

and Ren

, Quantitative proteome analysis of multidrug resistance in human ovarian cancer cell line, J Cell Biochem 109(4) (2010), 625–633.

Shin

Y.K.

Yoo

B.C.

Hong

Y.S.

Chang

H.J.

Jung

K.H.

and Jeong

S.Y.

, Upregulation of glycolytic enzymes in proteins secreted from human colon cancer cells with 5-fluorouracil resistance, Electrophoresis 30(3) (2009), 2182–2192.

10.

Yoo

B.C.

J.L.

Hong

S.H.

Shin

Y.K.

Park

S.Y.

and Kim

H.K.

, Decreased pyruvate kinase M2 activity linked to cisplatin resistance in human gastric carcinoma cell lines, Int J Cancer 108(6) (2014), 532–539.

11.

Martinez-Balibrea

Plasencia

Ginés

Martinez-Cardús

Musulén

Aguilera

Manzano

J.L.

Neamati

and Abad

, A proteomic approach links decreased pyruvate kinase M2 expression to oxaliplatin resistance in patients with colorectal cancer and in human cell lines, Mol Cancer Ther 8(4) (2009), 771–778.

12.

Eisenhauer

E.A.

Therasse

Bogaerts

Schwartz

L.H.

Sargent

Ford

Dancey

Arbuck

Gwyther

Mooney

Rubinstein

Shankar

Dodd

Kaplan

Lacombe

and Verweij

, New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1), Eur J Cancer 45(2) (2009), 228–247.

13.

Qian

Liu

Chen

Wang

and Zheng

, PKM2 upregulation promotes malignancy and indicates poor prognosis for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 44(2) (2020), 162–173.

14.

Chen

Zhu

Jin

Huang

Zou

and Xia

, The combination of PKM2 overexpression and M2 macrophages infiltration confers a poor prognosis for PDAC patients, J Cancer 11(8) (2020), 2022–2031.

15.

Yang

Zou

Yuan

Liang

Zeng

and Chen

, PKM2 and ACVR 1C are prognostic markers for poor prognosis of gallbladder cancer, Clin Transl Oncol 16(2) (2014), 200–207.

16.

Wang

Zhong

Liang

and Ye

, Upregulated expression of pyruvate kinase M2 mRNA predicts poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma, PeerJ 8(4) (2020), e8625.

17.

Bartsch

Bergen

and Galid

, Current concepts and future directions in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer, Memo 11(3) (2018), 199–203.

18.

Pathak

Dwivedi

S.N.

Deo

S.V.S.

Thakur

Sreenivas

and Rath

G.K.

, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens in treatment of breast cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol, Syst Rev 7(1) (2018), 89.

19.

Chuthapisith

Eremin

J.M.

, M. El-Sheemy and Eremin

, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with large and locally advanced breast cancer: Chemoresistance and prediction of response to drug therapy, Surgeon 4(4) (2006), 211–219.

20.

Wang

Hao

Nan

Jia

and Chen

, PKM2 inhibitor shikonin overcomes the cisplatin resistance in bladder cancer by inducing necroptosis, Int J Biol Sci 14(13) (2018), 1883–1891.

21.

Zhang

Chen

and Li

, Nuclear PKM2 contributes to gefitinib resistance via upregulation of STAT3 activation in colorectal cancer, Sci Rep 5(1) (2015), 16082.

22.

Wang

Liu

Tang

Huang

Miao

Wang

and Cheng

, Pyruvate kinase isoform M2 (PKM2) participates in multiple myeloma cell proliferation, adhesion and chemoresistance, Leuk Res 39(12) (2015), 1428–1436.

Targeting PKM2 promotes chemosensitivity of breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

OBJECTIVE:

METHODS:

RESULTS:

CONCLUSION:

Keywords

1. Introduction

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Cell culture

2.2 Patient samples

2.3 Immunohistochemistry

2.4 Lentiviral vector-mediated downexpression of PKM2

2.5 Lentiviral vector-mediated overexpression of PKM2

2.6 MTT assay

2.7 Colony formation assay

2.8 Western blot assay

2.10 Statistical analysis

Table 1 Correlations of PKM2 expression with clinicopathological status in 130 cases of patients with breast cancer

3.1 Clinical significance of PKM2 expression in surgical excised breast cancer

Table 2 Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis of 130 cases of breast cancer

3.5 PKM2 knockdown increases the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to chemotherapies in vivo

5. Conclusion

Footnotes

Author contributions

References

Table 1
Correlations of PKM2 expression with clinicopathological status in 130 cases of patients with breast cancer

Table 2
Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis of 130 cases of breast cancer