MiR-711 regulates gastric cancer progression by targeting CD44

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been reported to play an important role in tumor progression by regulating the expression of target genes.

OBJECTIVE:

This study attempted to verify the role of miR-711 in gastric cancer (GC) progression by in vitro and in vivo assays.

METHODS:

The expression of miR-711 in tumor tissues and cells was detected by real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR). Expression of MiR-711 in NCI-N87 and SNU-1 cells was detected by FISH. We transfected GC cells with miR-711 mimics or inhibitors. The effects of miR-711 on the proliferation and metastasis of GC cells were detected by CCK-8, wound healing and transwell assays. Dual-luciferase reporter gene assay was used to verify the targeting relationship between miR-711 and CD44. Xenograft assays was used to verify the regulatory effect of miR-711 on tumor growth.

RESULTS:

In GC tissues and cell lines, the expression of miR-711 was down-regulated when compare with adjacent tissues or normal epithelial cells. The results indicated that overexpressing of miR-711 could suppress the GC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion through targeting CD44. The knockdown of CD44 showed similar effects as miR-711 overexpression in GC cells. Moreover, we confirmed these effects in the in vivo assays. Furthermore, we found that miR-711 could play a role by influencing tumor cell stemness.

CONCLUSION:

MiR-711 plays vital roles as a tumor-suppressor by targeting CD44 and may be a therapeutic target for GC treatment.

Keywords

Gastric cancer MiR-711 cancer stem cells CD44 MicroRNAs

1. Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common cancer with poor prognosis and the fourth most common cause of cancer death [1, 2]. Currently, the main method for GC treatment is surgery, combined with chemotherapy, radiotherapy as well as other comprehensive treatments [3, 4]. Despite the relevant treatment, there were still many patients with recurrence or poor prognosis [5, 6]. In general, the occurrence of GC can be seen as a multi-step process that includes environmental factors, genetic changes, and other risk factors that cause cells to gradually transform into cancer [7]. So far, little was known about the regulatory mechanism of GC progression [2].

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) is a class of small noncoding RNA with a length of about 22 nucleotides, which plays as an important regulatory factor in disease progression [8, 9]. It is reported that about 30% of all genetic pathways and human genes are affected by miRNAs induced gene silencing either by translational suppression or by messenger RNA (mRNA) degradation [10]. In the background of GC, some miRNAs were discovered to be closely associated with cell growth, migration, invasion, and recurrence prediction [11, 12, 13]. Our research group used miRNA microarray screening to find that miR-711 was downregulated in GC cells. However, the current research on miR-711 mainly focuses on its expression disorder after tissue and organ injury. There are few reports on tumor related literature. Current studies have found that miR-711 regulates tumor progression by regulating cell proliferation, migration and invasion [14, 15, 16]. However, its mechanism in GC is unclear. Therefore, it is very important to further explore the role and mechanism of miR-711 in GC.

The theory of cancer stem cells (CSCs) is based on the findings of scientists that tumors are mutated from somatic cells, and tumor cells can grow without restriction [17, 18]. With the deepening of research on CSCs, CSCs markers have been discovered one after another, such as CD133 [19], Sox2, and OCT-4 [20]. A recent study found that CD44 $+$ GC cells could form colonies when cultured in vitro. Further inoculation into the stomach and skin of immunodeficient mice could form tumors with the ability to differentiate and proliferate. In contrast, CD44 $-$ tumor cells cultured in vitro reduced the number of colonies and tumor volume of transplanted tumors in vivo. Therefore, researchers propose that CD44 maybe a surface marker of GC cell CSCs and regulates GC progression [21, 22]. Our group found that miR-711 may be involved in regulating the expression of CD44 through bioinformatics analysis, so we further explore its role in GC.

Taken together, we hypothesized that miR-711 and CD44 may be key regulators GC progression. The in-depth discussion of them provides the basis for the screening of gastric cancer biomarkers and targeted therapy.

2. Methods and materials

2.1 Bioinformatic analysis

The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database was used to obtain the miRNA expression data of GC and healthy control. For GSE93415, there were 40 samples, each pair included resected primary tumor and corresponding healthy gastric mucosa. For GSE63121, there were 30 samples (15 paired of gastric cancer vs. normal tissues). For GSE2379, there were 80 samples, which included 40 cancer tissues from Singapore national cancer center and Singapore Singhealth tissue bank and 40 non-cancer tissues. R package was used for analyzing the different expression of miRNAs. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using StarBase (http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/panMirSurvivalExp.php).

2.2 Clinical specimens

GC tissues were isolated from 30 GC patients at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Xinjiang, China). All participating patients understood the purpose of this study and the content of the test and obtained informed consent from all patients. The diagnosis of GC was confirmed by more than two pathologists, and all included patients did not receive local or systemic therapy before surgery. Samples of tissue were obtained at surgery. Samples were immediately frozen using liquid nitrogen and stored at $-$ 80 ${{}^{\circ}}$ C until experiments. The protocols we used were approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee. The clinicopathological characteristics of patients were listed in Table S1.

2.3 Cell culture

GC cell lines, KATO3, HGC-27, MKN-45, NCI-N87 and SUN-1 were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Hyclone, USA) contained 10% fetal-bovine serum (FBS, Gibico, USA), and human gastric epithelial cell strain GES-1 was cultured in DMEM (Hyclone, USA) with 10% FBS as control. All the cell lines were obtained from BeNa and incubated at 37 ${{}^{\circ}}$ C with 5% CO ${}_{2}$ .

2.4 Cell transfection

NCI-N87 and SNU-1 cell lines were inoculated 1 $\times$ 10 ${}^{6}$ cells/well in 6-well plates to a confluency of 80–90% and then cells were transfected with miR-711 mimics, miR-711 inhibitor, si-CD44, pcDNA-CD44, respectively. All plasmids were purchased from GenePharma (Shanghai, China). The cell transfection was introduced with Lipofectamine 2000 Reagent (Life technologies, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

2.5 qRT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from samples with TRIzol reagent according to the kit protocol (Invitrogen, USA) and subsequently quantified using NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher, USA). 1 $\mu$ g total RNA was analyzed using SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix Kit (Thermo Fisher) following the manufacturer. All samples were tested in triplicate with the reference gene GAPDH or U6 for data normalization to correct for variations in RNA quality and quantity. Direct detection of PCR products was monitored by measuring the fluorescence using SYBR ${}^{\@setsize{\scriptsize}{8pt}{\viipt}{\@viipt}\textregistered}$ qPCR Mix (Toyobo, Japan) after every cycle. The fold change in mRNA expression levels was normalized using 2- ${}^{\Delta\Delta\text{Ct}}$ method. The primer sequences were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) and displayed in Table S2.

2.6 Western blot

Proteins were extracted by RAPI lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) and then quantified with DC protein assay (Bio-Rad, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. 30 $\mu$ g denatured samples were fractionated by 8%–15% discontinuous sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. Membranes were blocked using Tris Buffered Saline Tween (TBST) supplemented with 5% skim milk for 1 h, and then co-incubated overnight at 4 ${{}^{\circ}}$ C with primary antibodies purchased from Abcam: rabbit-anti-CD44 (ab138222, 1:1000), rabbit-anti-GAPDH (ab8245, 1:10000) respectively. After washing 3 times with TBST, membranes were incubated with goat-anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled secondary antibodies purchased from Abcam (ab7090, 1:2000) for 1 h. Finally, protein blots were indicated using ECL Plus (Life technologies, USA) and were analyzed by image J software.

2.7 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

MiR-711 expression in NCI-N87 and SNU-1 cells was detected by FISH. The miR-711 probes were designed and purchased from BioSENSE (Guangzhou, China). Slides were hybridized overnight with probes and washed with 50% formamide/2 $\times$ saline sodium citrate (SSC) twice. Followed by 2 $\times$ SSC at 50 ${}^{\circ}$ C (5 min, twice). A confocal microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) was used for visualizing.

2.8 Dual-luciferase reporter assay

The miR-711 binding site in CD44 3’ UTR was predicted using the TargetScan 6.0. The wild-type vector (pmiR-RB-REPORT-h-CD44 WT) and mutant vector (MUT) of the CD44 3’ UTR were constructed by RiBoBio (Guangzhou, China). Cells were seeded in 24-well plates (1 $\times$ 10 ${}^{5}$ cells/well) in triplicate. Twenty-four hours later, 5 nM of miR-711 mimics or control mimics and 400 ng of pmiR-RBREPORT-h-CD44 vector (WT or MUT) were co-transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocols.

2.9 Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay

CCK-8 (Biotechwell, Shanghai, China) was used in cell growth assay. Resuspended NCI-N87 and SNU-1 cells were seeded at 1 $\times$ 10 ${}^{3}$ cells/well in a 96-well tissue culture plates 100 $\mu$ L respectively. Cells were incubated at 37 ${{}^{\circ}}$ C in a humidified 5% (v/v) CO ${}_{2}$ atmosphere. Every 24 h, a plate was subjected to assay by adding CCK-8 solution 10 $\mu$ L per well, and further incubated for 4 hours at 37 ${{}^{\circ}}$ C. The absorbance was measured with a Microplate Photometer at 450 nm.

2.10 Wound healing assay

Seeded the cells in 12-well plates and grown to about 90% in complete medium. Then a 200- $\mu$ L Pipette tip was used to make the artificial wound. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Gibco, NY, USA) was used to remove the isolated cells. After 48 h in serum-free medium, a microscopy was used to assess the cell migration.

2.11 Migration and invasion assay

For the migration assay, 5 $\times$ 10 ${}^{5}$ cells were plated in the upper chambers pre-covered with serum-free medium while the bottom chamber was covered with medium with 10% FBS. After 24 h incubation, cells that migrated into the bottom chamber was rinsed with PBS. Fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and dyed with 0.1% crystal violet stain. Migrating cells were photographed under a microscope and count on the stained membrane. Divide each membrane into four quadrants and calculate the average of the four quadrants.

For invasion assay, transwell chambers coated with Matrigel were used. 5 $\times$ 10 ${}^{5}$ cells were plated in the upper chamber in serum-free medium. The bottom chamber was covered with medium containing 10% FBS. After 24 h culture, cells that invaded into the bottom was washed with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and dyed with 0.1% crystal violet stain. Under the microscope, the invading cells were photographed and counted on the stained membrane. Each membrane was divided into four quadrants and the average from four quadrants was calculated.

Figure 1.

Abnormal expression of miR-711 in GC tissues and cell lines. (A) miR-711 relative expression level in GC tissues and matched adjacent tissues. (B) Comparison of miR-711 expression in GC tissues and normal gastric mucosal tissues in the GEO databases. (C) Overall survival analysis of patients with high or low miR-711 expression in the TCGA databases. (D) Relative expression of miR-711 in all five GC cell lines and in the normal human gastric epithelial cell strain GES-1. (E) Represent FISH images of miR-711 expression. Scale bars, 50 $\mu$ m ( ${}^{\ast\ast}P<$ 0.01).

2.12 Sphere-forming assays

For examining spheroid formation potentials, a total of 1,000 cells were suspended in stem-cell medium for 7 days and the number of spheroids larger than 50 $\mu$ m were counted. The wells formed after collection, without cells were excluded from the analysis range, and the positive wells were defined as wells containing at least one colony according to the visual inspection on the 14th day after the initial transplantation.

Figure 2.

The effect of miR-711 expression on proliferation and metastasis of gastric cancer cells. (A) Relative expression of miR-711 in GC cell lines SNU-1 and NCI-N87 transfected miR-711 mimics, miR-711 inhibitor and empty vector respectively. (B) The OD value of GC cells proliferation in GC cell lines SNU-1 and NCI-N87 transfected miR-711 mimics, miR-711 inhibitor and empty vector respectively. (C) Wound-healing assay and (D) Transwell assay of SNU-1 and NCI-N87 cell lines treated with miR-711 mimics, miR-711 inhibitor and empty vector respectively ( ${}^{\ast\ast}P<$ 0.01).

Figure 3.

Identification of CD44 as an miR-711 target in GC. (A) miR-711 targeting sites in the 3’-UTR of targets genes and corresponding mutations. (B) CD44 relative expression level in GC tissues and matched adjacent tissues. (C) Relative expression of CD44 in GC cell lines SNU-1, NCI-N87 and normal human gastric epithelial cell strain GES-1. (D) Pearson correlation was used to study the correlation between miR-711 and CD44 ( ${}^{\ast\ast}P<$ 0.01).

Figure 4.

The effect of CD44 expression on proliferation and metastasis of GC cells. (A) The mRNA and (B) Protein levels of CD44 in GC cell lines SNU-1 and NCI-N87 treated with si-CD44 and pc-CD44 were examined. (C) The OD value of GC cells proliferation, (C) Wound-healing assay and (D) Transwell assay of SNU-1 and NCI-N87 cell lines treated with si-CD44 and pc-CD44 ( ${}^{\ast}P<$ 0.05, ${}^{\ast\ast}P<$ 0.01).

Figure 5.

miR-711 inhibits the effect of CD44. (A) Relative expression of miR-711 in GC cell lines SNU-1 and NCI-N87. (B) Relative expression of CD44 in GC cell lines SNU-1 and NCI-N87. (C) Protein levels of CD44 in GC cell lines SNU-1 and NCI-N87. (D) The OD value of GC cells proliferation. (E) Wound-healing assay and (F) Transwell assay of SNU-1 and NCI-N87 cell lines. ( ${}^{\ast\ast}P<$ 0.01).

Figure 6.

Effects of miR-711 and CD44 on CSCs. (A) The quantification of sphere diameter (A) and numbers (B) of SNU-1 CSCs and NCI-N87 CSCs with indicated transfection for 14 days were analyzed. (C) The mRNA levels of stem cell genes including SOX2 was analyzed by QRT-PCR. ( ${}^{**}P<$ 0.01 and ${}^{***}P<$ 0.001; ${}^{{\#}{\#}}P<$ 0.01, ${}^{{\#}{\#}{\#}}P<$ 0.001).

Figure 7.

In vivo functional analysis of miR-711. (A) The tumor weight in each group. (B) Growth curve of tumors in the nude mice in response to miR-711-agomir. (C) HE and KI67 staining of tumor tissues of each treatment group. (D) Protein levels of CD44 in vivo $n=$ 5 per group ( ${}^{\ast\ast}P<$ 0.01).

2.13 Xenograft assay

Males C57BL/6 mice (7-week-old) were obtained from Xinjiang Medical University (Xinjiang, China). Each mouse was injected subcutaneously with 2 $\times$ 10 ${}^{7}$ NCI-N87/SNU-1 cells stably transfected with NC plasmid, miR-711-agomir. At 4 weeks post injection, the mice were harvested and examined. Tumor volume was calculated as shown: volume $=$ (long axial length $\times$ short axial length ${}^{2}$ ) $\times$ 0.5. The implementation of this research protocol is based on the principle of reducing the suffering of animals, and all protocols comply with the 3R guidelines. This study protocol has been approved by the ethics committee of this institution.

2.14 Statistical analysis

All quantitative data was presented as the mean $\pm$ standard deviation (S.D.) of at least three repeated individual experiments. Unpaired student’s $t$ test was intended for indicate differences between groups. And the differences among the groups of samples were accomplished by One-way ANOVA. GraphPad Prism v6.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc.) was used for statistical analyses. $P<$ 0.05 was considered significantly.

3. Results

3.1 Expression of miR-711 in GC tissues and cell lines

QRT-PCR results showed that miR-711 was significantly down-regulated in all 30 paired GC tissues relative to the normal tissues (Fig. 1A, ${}^{**}P<$ 0.01). We also analyzed miR-711 expression in three previously published data sets obtained from GC samples deposited in the NCBI GEO (GSE93415, GSE63121, GSE23739). The results showed that, compared to normal tissue, miR-711 downregulated in tumor samples (Fig. 1B). To further assess whether lower expression of miR-711 predicts poor GC patient survival, we used TCGA data for the survival analysis. Results showed that patients with decreased miR-711 expression showed significantly poorer overall survival than patients with high miR-711 expression (log-rank $P=$ 0.043). And this phenomenon had been verified in our sample of 30 cases (log-rank $P=$ 0.049) (Fig. 1C, Supplementary Fig. 1). QRT-PCR results in GC cell lines showed that the expression of miR-711 was significantly down-regulated in all GC cell lines. The miR-711 was observed to be around 2-fold lower in the SNU-1 and NCI-N87 cell lines (Fig. 1D, ${}^{**}P<$ 0.01). Besides we also obtained consistent results from FISH analysis (Fig. 1E).

3.2 The effect of miR-711 expression on proliferation of GC cells

To investigate its role in proliferation and metastasis, we transfected miR-711 mimics or miR-711 inhibitor into GC cell line and verified the transfection efficiency by qRT-PCR. The results showed that the operations to down-regulated and overexpressed miR-711 were successful, the expression of miR-711 had a significantly different in both two groups compared with the control (Fig. 2A, ${}^{**}P<$ 0.01). The CCK-8 assays indicated that the overexpression of miR-711 significantly reduced the proliferation of two GC cells lines (Fig. 2B, ${}^{**}P<$ 0.01). In addition, we investigated the relationship between miR-711 and cell metastasis. Through transwell and wound healing assays, we observed that up-regulation of miR-711 significantly inhibited cell migration and invasion in both SNU-1 and NCI-N87 cells lines (Fig. 2C-D, ${}^{**}P<$ 0.01).

3.3 Identification of CD44 as an miR-711 target in gastric cancer

To test whether the predicted miR-711-binding sites with CD44 3’-UTR regions are subjected to regulation by miR-711, we cloned their wild-type (WT) and mutated 3’-UTR regions into pGL3 downstream from a luciferase reporter gene (Fig. 3A, ${}^{**}P<$ 0.01). Meanwhile, the CD44 expression was also determined to be upregulated in the GC samples (Fig. 3B-C, Supplementary Fig. 2, ${}^{**}P<$ 0.01). Further, we verified the correlation between miR-711 and CD44 in tumor tissue and found that CD44 gradually decreased with the increase of miR-711 (Fig. 3D, $r=-$ 0.68, $P<$ 0.01).

3.4 The effect of CD44 expression on proliferation of GC cells

To test whether overexpression of CD44 affects cancer progression, the si-CD44 and pc-CD44 were introduced into SNU-1 and NCI-N87 cells and verified the transfection efficiency by qRT-PCR and western blot (Fig. 4A-B, ${}^{**}P<$ 0.01). Cell proliferation in GC cell lines with CD44 downregulation or overexpression were investigated by using CCK-8 assay. The results showed that the repression of CD44 significantly decreased cell proliferation in two GC cells lines (Fig. 4C, ${}^{*}P<$ 0.05). Besides we also studied the relationship between CD44 and cell metastasis through transwell assays and wound healing assays. We observed that overexpressed CD44 significantly accelerated cell migration and invasion in both GC cells lines, while the down-regulated of CD44 resulted in the opposite results (Fig. 4D-E, ${}^{**}P<$ 0.01).

3.5 miR-711 inhibits the effect of CD44

In order to verify whether the effect of miR-711 in the regulation of proliferation and invasion is through targeting CD44 in GC. Si-CD44 was used to silence CD44 in SNU-1 and NCI-N87 cells transfected with miR-711 inhibitor (Fig. 5A-B, ${}^{**}P<$ 0.01). The results showed that transfected with si-CD44 could reverse miR-711 inhibitor induced CD44 protein expression level (Fig. 5C). Through CCK-8 assays, we found that in SNU-1 and NCI-N87 cells, after inhibition of CD44, miR-711 down-regulated mediated cell proliferation was decreased (Fig. 5D, ${}^{*}P<$ 0.05). Transwell assays and wound healing assays illustrated that increased migration and invasion ability of cells, which was mediated by miR-711 inhibitor, was canceled by restraining CD44 (Fig. 5E-F, ${}^{**}P<$ 0.01). Thus, we found that miR-711 modulates GC cell viability and motility through targeting CD44.

3.6 Effects of miR-711 and CD44 on CSCs

To test the functional significance of miR-711 in GC cell stemness through regulating CD44, we found that CD44 overexpression facilitated tumor-spheres formation (Fig. 6A-B, ${}^{**}P<$ 0.01) and the stem transcriptional core genes including SOX2 expression. However, this phenomenon was counteracted by co-transfection of miR-711 mimics (Fig. 6C, ${}^{**}P<$ 0.01).

3.7 In vivo functional analysis of miR-711

To investigate whether miR-711 function as a tumor suppressor on GC cells in vivo, we used a mouse xenograft model to detect tumor formation and metastasis. The results showed that tumors produced by the miR-711-agomir cells displayed the slowest growth and the size reached 800 mm ${}^{3}$ with a weight of 0.7 g in four weeks, following the injection (Fig. 7A-B, ${}^{**}P<$ 0.01). Further HE and KI67 staining results showed that miR-711 inhibited the proliferation of tumor cells (Fig. 7C). Besides, we found that miR-711-agomir samples examined exhibited a lower CD44 protein expression than miR-NC group (Fig. 7D). Taken together, we found that miR-711 played an important role in GC through targeting CD44 in vivo.

4. Discussion

Increasing studies have reported that miRNAs play important roles in GC development [23]. We confirmed the inhibitory effect of miR-711 on GC in vitroand in vivo, including inhibition of cell proliferation, migration and invasion. CD44 was predicted as a target gene of miR-711, and luciferase reporter detection validated that miR-711 can target gene CD44. Moreover, in GC cells, the mRNA and protein levels of CD44 were both negatively correlated with miR-711. We also found that knock down of CD44 partially weakened miR-711 inhibitor-mediated effect on SNU-1 and NCI-N87 cells proliferation.

In addition, this study verify that miR-711 regulates CSCs through CD44 through the ball formation experiment. Studies have shown that CD44 can participate in the regulation of gastric cancer stem cells [22, 24]. CD44 $+$ gastric cancer cells have stem cell characteristics and promote the proliferation of GC [22]. The results of this study shown that miR-711 could regulate cancer stem cells by targeting CD44. In this study, there were still some limitations. For example, the direct evidence that CSCs regulate GC progression and its relationship with miR-711 still deserves further exploration. In addition, more clinical studies are needed to investigate whether CD44 can exert the same tumor-accelerating effect in the clinic.

In conclusion, our study showed the important role of miR-711 in GC. Our findings indicated that miR-711 expression was significantly downregulated in GC, while CD44 expression was inversely trending. And we found that miR-711 can play a role by influencing CSCs. These studies on miR-711/CD44 in tumorigenesis will contribute to the clinical therapy and serve as effective therapeutic targets.

Author contributions

Conception: Liang Li.

Interpretation or analysis of data: Jie Gao, Jiangang Li.

Preparation of the manuscript: Liang Li.

Revision for important intellectual content: Jun Wang.

Supervision: Jun Wang.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (No: 2021D01C375).

Supplementary data

The supplementary files are available to download from https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.3233/CBM-210213.

References

Pan

Liu

Shang

Zhou

and Yang

, EMT-associated microRNAs and their roles in cancer stemness and drug resistance, Cancer Commun (Lond) 41 (2021), 199–217.

Yan

Tian

Shi

Xia

and Zhu

, LncRNA SNHG6 is Associated with Poor Prognosis of Gastric Cancer and Promotes Cell Proliferation and EMT through Epigenetically Silencing p27 and Sponging miR-101-3p, Cell Physiol Biochem 42 (2017), 999–1012.

and Zhang

, Development and clinical validation of a 3-miRNA signature to predict prognosis of gastric cancer, PeerJ 9 (2021), e10462.

Xie

H.X.

Z.Y.

Tang

J.N.

Y.A.

Huang

P.F.

and Cheng

X.D.

, Effect of Huaier on the proliferation and apoptosis of human gastric cancer cells through modulation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, Exp Ther Med 10 (2015), 1212–1218.

J.B.Y.

Kapoor

Zhu

Koh

Zhou

Zou

Tang

Y.C.

Goo

P.C.K.

Rha

S.Y.

Chung

H.C.

Yoong

Yap

C.T.

Rao

Chia

C.K.

Tsao

Shabbir

Lee

Lam

K.P.

Hartman

Yong

W.P.

Too

H.P.

and Yeoh

K.G.

, Development and validation of a serum microRNA biomarker panel for detecting gastric cancer in a high-risk population, Gut 70 (2021), 829–837.

Tomii

Inokuchi

Takagi

Ishikawa

Otsuki

Uetake

Kojima

and Kawano

, TPX2 expression is associated with poor survival in gastric cancer, World J Surg Oncol 15 (2017), 14.

Milne

A.N.

Carneiro

O’Morain

and Offerhaus

G.J.

, Nature meets nurture: Molecular genetics of gastric cancer, Hum Genet 126 (2009), 615–628.

Xing

Tian

Zheng

Yang

Yin

Liu

Jia

Huang

Liu

and Deng

, Hypoxia downregulated miR-4521 suppresses gastric carcinoma progression through regulation of IGF2 and FOXM1, Mol Cancer 20 (2021), 9.

Zhu

Hou

Ouyang

Guo

Wang

and Gong

, MicroRNA-19a regulates the proliferation, migration and invasion of human gastric cancer cells by targeting CUL5, Arch Biochem Biophys 662 (2019), 93–100.

10.

Shomali

Shirafkan

Duijf

P.H.G.

Ghasabi

Babaloo

Yousefi

Mansoori

Asadi

Shanehbandi

Baghbani

Mohammadi

and Baradaran

, Downregulation of miR-146a promotes cell migration in Helicobacter pylori-negative gastric cancer, J Cell Biochem 120 (2019), 9495–9505.

11.

Xia

Jiang

Xuan

Sun

Wang

and Xu

, CircFAM73A promotes the cancer stem cell-like properties of gastric cancer through the miR-490-3p/HMGA2 positive feedback loop and HNRNPK-mediated β-catenin stabilization, J Exp Clin Cancer Res 40 (2021), 103.

12.

Zhang

and Wu

, MicroRNA-383-5p inhibits the progression of gastric carcinoma via targeting HDAC9 expression, Braz J Med Biol Res 52 (2019), e8341.

13.

Zhu

S.X.

Tong

X.Z.

and Zhang

, Expression of miR-711 and mechanism of proliferation and apoptosis in human gastric carcinoma, Oncol Lett 14 (2017), 4505–4510.

14.

Zhao

Zhang

Liu

Guan

Gao

and Wang

, Enhanced MiR-711 transcription by PPARgamma induces endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis targeting calnexin in rat cardiomyocytes after myocardial infarction, J Mol Cell Cardiol 118 (2018), 36–45.

15.

Jiang

Y.H.

Liu

Lin

S.Q.

Y.M.

Min

Q.H.

Zhong

Q.H.

Sun

You

X.H.

Liao

K.L.

Qin

T.Y.

Zhao

Huang

and Wang

X.Z.

, K562 cell-derived exosomes suppress the adhesive function of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells via delivery of miR-711, Biochem Biophys Res Commun 521 (2020), 584–589.

16.

Han

Liu

Convertino

Wang

Jiang

Kim

Y.H.

Luo

Zhang

Nackley

Dokholyan

N.V.

and Ji

R.R.

, miRNA-711 Binds and Activates TRPA1 Extracellularly to Evoke Acute and Chronic Pruritus, Neuron 99 (2018), 449–463 e6.

17.

Clara

J.A.

Monge

Yang

and Takebe

, Targeting signalling pathways and the immune microenvironment of cancer stem cells – a clinical update, Nat Rev Clin Oncol 17 (2020), 204–232.

18.

Najafi

Farhood

and Mortezaee

, Cancer stem cells (CSCs) in cancer progression and therapy, J Cell Physiol 234 (2019), 8381–8395.

19.

Butti

Gunasekaran

V.P.

Kumar

T.V.S.

Banerjee

and Kundu

G.C.

, Breast cancer stem cells: Biology and therapeutic implications, Int J Biochem Cell Biol 107 (2019), 38–52.

20.

Bajaj

Diaz

and Reya

, Stem cells in cancer initiation and progression, J Cell Biol 219 (2020).

21.

Tan

S.H.

Swathi

Tan

Goh

Seishima

Murakami

Oshima

Tsuji

Phuah

Tan

L.T.

Wong

Fatehullah

Sheng

S.W.T.

Grabsch

H.I.

Srivastava

Teh

Denil

Mustafah

Tan

Shabbir

Yeoh

K.G.

and Barker

, AQP5 enriches for stem cells and cancer origins in the distal stomach, Nature 578 (2020), 437–443.

22.

Hong

Qin

Zhang

Zhuang

Liu

Deng

Liu

Shi

and Liu

, FNDC3B circular RNA promotes the migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells via the regulation of E-cadherin and CD44 expression, J Cell Physiol 234 (2019), 19895–19910.

23.

Zhang

Deng

Liu

Ning

Yang

Liu

Zhang

Lin

Bai

Wang

Zhang

Yang

Wang

Ying

and Ba

, CAF secreted miR-522 suppresses ferroptosis and promotes acquired chemo-resistance in gastric cancer, Mol Cancer 19 (2020), 43.

24.

T.P.

Wang

W.Y.

Shuai

Wang

Y.F.

Xia

and Shu

Y.Q.

, KLF5 and MYC modulated LINC00346 contributes to gastric cancer progression through acting as a competing endogeous RNA and indicates poor outcome, Cell Death Differ 26 (2019), 2179–2193.