Analysis of the relationship between the expression of EBV-related antibodies and ET-1 axis in gastric cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:

EBV-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) is a distinct subtype of GC, and EBV plays an important role in tumor progress. The standard method to identify EBV-positive tumor is determined by in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded EBERs in tumor tissues. The present study aims to detect the serological expression of EBV-related antibodies and ET-1 axis to provide a noninvasive method for diagnosis of EBVaGC.

METHODS:

The content of EBV-related antibodies and ET-1 axis in preoperative peripheral blood of GC was performed by Chemiluminescence and ELISA assay. The EBV DNA copy number was measured by qRT-PCR.

RESULTS:

The results showed that the levels of anti-EBV early antigen (EA) IgG, viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgA, nuclear antigen (NA) IgG, and EBV DNA copy number were significantly higher in EBVaGC. The ET-1 axis level was much lower in EBVaGC than EBVnGC.

CONCLUSIONS:

The combined detection of specific anti-EBV antibodies and ET-1 axis might provide new molecular markers for the identification of EBVaGC.

Keywords

1. Introduction

In 1993, Tokunaga et al. defined EBV-encoded small RNAs (EBERs)-positive gastric cancer as EBV-associated gastric carcinoma (EBVaGC), and the remaining gastric cancer types were named EBV-negative gastric carcinoma (EBVnGC) [1]. As well as Helicobacter pylori, EBV has been accepted as an important infective agent causing GC. EBV primarily infects cells in two ways, which are lytic infection and latent infection, and expresses different sets of genes in different processes. In latent state, EBV expresses only 6 nuclear antigens (EBNA1, EBNA2, EBNA3a, EBNA3b, EBNA3c, LP), 3 latent membrane proteins (LMP1, LMP2A, LMP2B) and two small RNAs (EBER1 and EBER2) [2]. The expression of these EBV products can stimulate the body to produce related antibodies to exert humoral immunity, such as anti-EBV early antigen (EA)-IgA, EA-IgG, viral capsid antigen (VCA)-IgM, VCA-IgG, EBV nuclear antigen (NA)-IgG, etc. [3].

EBV-positive tumor is determined by in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded EBERs, the sensitive and specific marker for viral presence. However, in situ hybridization needs to obtain tumor tissue samples, and it is not routinely detected in pathologic examination. Thus, in recent years, serological detection of EBV-related antigens and antibodies has gradually become the main reference for early diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Serological profiles of EBV have been evidenced in clinical practice to be indicative of tumor burden, treatment response, and prognosis of NPC patients [4, 5]. Some studies have also shown that the content of EBV DNA in the plasma is closely related to the patient’s condition [6, 7, 8]. Unlike other EBV-associated malignancies, EBVaGC is a distinct subtype of GC that has unique clinicopathological features, such as overall lower mortality, more frequently occurs in males than females, greater intra- or peritumoral immune cell infiltration than EBV-negative GC [9, 10]. GC has potential precursor lesions that have been identified and can be evaluated in relation to EBV serological markers. In a longitudinal Chinese study of gastric lesions, persons with elevated baseline VCA-IgG and EBNA IgG titers had a higher likelihood of progressing to more severe gastric dysplasia 2 years later, particularly subjects with baseline diagnoses of intestinal metaplasia [11]. Their study suggested a significant association between anti-EBV antibodies and precancerous gastric lesions, and a possible role for EBV reactivation at an early phase of gastric carcinogenesis. However, serological profiles of EBV in gastric cancer are still unknown.

The endothelin 1 (ET-1) gene encodes a 212-amino acid precursor, which is converted by protease to form an intermediate peptide consisting of 38 amino acids, big-ET-1. Big-ET-1 is further cleaved into ET-1 by ET-converting enzymes (ECE-1 or ECE-2), which exerts biological effects by binding to ETR in an autocrine or paracrine manner [12]. Previous study showed that ET-1 was significantly overexpressed in gastric cancer when compared with adjacent normal [13]. In our previous study, it was found that the expression of ET-1 protein in EBVaGC cell lines was much lower than that of in EBVnGC cell lines (unpublished data). In this manuscript, we aim to investigate whether the content of ET-1 and its receptors in peripheral blood of EBVaGC and EBVnGC cases exhibit similar expression patterns of GC cell lines. Furthermore, we intend to account for authentic tumor EBV status by comparing differences in the associations between the humoral immune response to EBV and the levels of ET-1 axis, which may help to elucidate how this ubiquitous virus contributes to EBV-associated tumors. To our knowledge, this is the first serological study regarding to the correlations among ET-1, ETR and EBV infection in gastric cancer.

2. Material and methods

2.1 Samples

All gastric carcinoma cases (28 EBVaGC and 39 EBVnGC) were collected from Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital and Qingdao Municipal Hospital from October 2017 to August 2019, and then were diagnosed by pathological biopsy. EBV-associated gastric carcinoma cases were identified by in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded EBER1. In addition, we collected preoperative blood samples from these patients to reduce the impact of surgery. Of the 67 samples included 28 EBVaGC (mean age: 62.00 $\pm$ 7.18 years; range: 42–71 years) and 39 EBVnGC (mean age: 62.10 $\pm$ 8.14 years; range: 47–76 years). EBV shows an anatomic preference during gastric tumorigenesis [14, 15]. We found that the characteristics of the samples collected are consistent with previous studies, that is, EBVaGC usually occurs in the upper or middle third of the stomach and EBVnGC usually occurs in the antrum (Table 1). Therefore, we will not analyze the impact of tumor location on results in subsequent analyses.

Table 1
Comparison of clinical pathological features between EBVaGC and EBVnGC

Indicators	EBVaGC ( $n=$ 28)	EBVnGC ( $n=$ 39)	$p$ value ${}^{\text{a}}$
Differentiation
Middle and low	5 (17.86%)	6 (15.38%)	1.000
Low	23 (82.14%)	33 (84.62%)
Lymph node metastasis
Yes	16 (57.14%)	25 (64.10%)	0.157
No	12 (42.86%)	14 (35.90%)
Tumor classification
Signet ring cell carcinoma	1 (3.57%)	8 (20.51%)	0.100
Non-signet ring cell carcinoma	27 (76.43%)	31 (79.49%)
Tumor location
Gastric antrum and angle	3 (11.11%)	23 (62.16%)	0.000
Others	24 (88.89%)	14 (37.84%)
Gender
Male	27 (76.43%)	32 (82.05%)	0.159
Female	1 (3.57%)	7 (17.95%)
Years
$<$ 60	8 (28.57%)	16 (41.03%)	0.294
$\geqslant$ 60	20 (71.43%)	23 (58.97%)
Invasion depth
Submucosa and muscularis	6 (21.43%)	6 (16.22%)	0.592
Serosa	22 (78.57%)	31 (83.78%)

EBVaGC, EBV-associated gastric carcinoma; EBVnGC, EBV-negative gastric carcinoma; ${}^{\text{a}}$ From chi-square or Fisher’s exact test.

2.2 Chemiluminescence assay

The contents of EA-IgG (#130215001M, Snibe), EA-IgA (#130215002M, Snibe), VCA-IgG (#130215003M, Snibe), VCA-IgM (#130215004M, Snibe), VCA-IgA (#130215005M, Snibe), and NA-IgG (#130215006M, Snibe) in the serum were measured by Chemiluminescence assay on an Automatic chemiluminescence detector Maglumi 2000 (Snibe, Shenzhen, China). According to manufacturer’s instructions, the reference values of EA-IgG, EA-IgA, VCA-IgG, VCA-IgM, VCA-IgA, and NA-IgG are 2 AU/ml, 3 AU/ml, 4 AU/ml, 3 AU/ml, 2 AU/ml, and 2 AU/ml, respectively. A sample exceeding the reference value is defined as positive case.

2.3 ELISA assay

We detected the concentrations of ET-1, ETAR and ETBR in the serum by ELISA assay (Keshun Bio, Shanghai, China). All experimental operations were carried out in accordance with the instruction, including the standard dilution, samples’ addition, incubation, washing, etc. After adding the termination solution, detect the absorbance value at 450 nm wavelength, then calculate the concentration of the samples (Bio-Tek ELx808, USA). Because hemolysis can affect the accuracy of the test results and cause false positive errors, the samples included in the study are non-hemolytic specimens that met the test requirements.

2.4 Detection of EBV-DNA copy number

EBV nucleic acid amplification fluorescence quantification kits were purchased from Daangene Company (#DA-B065, Guangzhou, China). First, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, the peripheral blood DNA was extracted with the corresponding reagent in the kit, and then the copy number of EBV DNA was detected on Light Cycler instruments according to the procedure (Roche, Switzerland). The conditions were as follows: 95 ${{}^{\circ}}$ C, 2 min; 93 ${{}^{\circ}}$ C, 45 s – 55 ${{}^{\circ}}$ C, 60 s, 10 cycles; 93 ${{}^{\circ}}$ C, 30 s – 55 ${{}^{\circ}}$ C, 45 s, 30 cycles. If the amplification curve does not exhibit $S$ -type or $C_{t}$ is blank, the experimental result is judged as the DNA content of the sample is lower than the lower limit of detection. If the amplification curve shows $S$ -type and $C_{t}$ is lower than 30, the DNA copy number will be calculated according to standard curve.

2.5 Statistical analysis

The chi-squared ( $\chi^{2}$ ) test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the distribution of the anti-EBV related antibodies in EBVaGC and EBVnGC. Comparisons of concentrations were performed using $t$ test. Correlation analysis between two indicators was detected using the Pearson or Spearman method. $p<$ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 17.0 statistical software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1 Higher levels of EBV-related antibodies in EBVaGC than EBVnGC samples

To determine whether different concentrations of EBV-related antibodies are present in the serum of GC cases, we analyzed 28 cases of EBVaGC and 39 cases of EBVnGC using Chemiluminescence assay. The results showed that EA-IgA, VCA-IgM, and VCA-IgG were expressed at comparable levels between EBVaGC and EBVnGC, while EA-IgG, VCA-IgA and NA-IgG were at significant higher levels in EBVaGC than EBVnGC (Table 2). Then, we further analyzed the distribution of anti-EBV related antibodies in EBVaGC and EBVnGC (Table 3). Anti-EA-IgG, EA-IgA, VCA-IgA, VCA-IgM, VCA-IgG and EBNA-1-IgG antibodies in GC were 16.42%, 2.99%, 22.39%, 8.96%, 100% and 89.55%, respectively. These data showed that the positive rate of EA-IgG and VCA-IgA in EBVaGC was significantly higher than that in EBVnGC (EA-IgG: 32.1% vs 5.1%; VCA-IgA: 35.7% vs 14.71%). Interestingly, the distribution of NA-IgG showed no significant difference between EBVaGC and EBVnGC, indicating that NA-IgG had only increased titer in EBVaGC without a change in positive rate. Thus, higher EBV-related antibodies in EBVaGC, especially EA-IgG and VCA-IgA, are positively correlated with the development of EBVaGC.

3.2 EBV DNA copy number in GC samples

Table 2
Expression of anti-EBV related antibodies in EBVaGC and EBVnGC

Indictor	Concentration (AU/ml)		$p$ value
	EBVaGC ( $n=$ 28)	EBVnGC ( $n=$ 39)
EBV EA IgG	3.15 $\pm$ 4.08	0.79 $\pm$ 1.32	0.030
EBV EA IgA	0.81 $\pm$ 0.89	0.68 $\pm$ 0.62	0.481
EBV VCA IgA	3.76 $\pm$ 3.44	2.50 $\pm$ 1.50	0.045
EBV VCA IgM	0.87 $\pm$ 1.39	1.08 $\pm$ 2.34	0.677
EBV VCA IgG	46.29 $\pm$ 11.35	42.97 $\pm$ 12.36	0.266
EBV NA IgG	37.92 $\pm$ 16.33	26.23 $\pm$ 14.93	0.003

EBVaGC, EBV-associated gastric carcinoma; EBVnGC, EBV-negative gastric carcinoma; EA, early antigen; VCA, viral capsid antigen; NA, nuclear antigen.

Table 3

The distribution of anti-EBV related antibodies in EBVaGC, EBVnGC and GC

Indictor	EBVaGC ( $n=$ 28)	EBVnGC ( $n=$ 39)	$p$ value
EBV EA IgG
Positive	9 (32.14%)	2 (5.13%)	0.009
Negative	19 (67.86%)	37 (94.87%)
EBV EA IgA
Positive	1 (3.57%)	1 (2.56%)	1.000
Negative	27 (96.43%)	38 (97.44%)
EBV VCA IgA
Positive	10 (35.71%)	5 (14.71%)	0.027
Negative	18 (64.29%)	34 (85.29%)
EBV VCA IgM
Positive	2 (7.14%)	4 (10.26%)	0.995
Negative	26 (92.86%)	35 (89.74%)
EBV VCA IgG
Positive	28 (100.00%)	39 (100.00%)	1.000
Negative	0 (0.00%)	0 (0.00%)
EBV NA IgG
Positive	25 (89.29%)	35 (89.74%)	1.000
Negative	3 (10.71%)	4 (10.26%)

EBVaGC, EBV-associated gastric carcinoma; EBVnGC, EBV-negative gastric carcinoma; EA, early antigen; VCA, viral capsid antigen; NA, nuclear antigen.

To see whether there is a relationship between the EBV DNA copy number and EBVaGC occurrence, we examined EBV DNA copy number in EBVaGC and EBVnGC. Due to that DNA copy number of all samples was low (less than 5 $\times$ 10 ${}^{3}$ /ml), some of the samples couldn’t detect the DNA copy number by qRT-PCR. Then we divided all samples into two groups: those with detectable DNA copy ( $>$ 0 copy/ml, detected) and those with no detectable expression (no detected), we only analysis the detectable rate of DNA copy number. As shown in Table 4, 7 of the 11 EBVaGC cases (63.64%) and 2 of 20 EBVnGC cases (10.00%) could be detected the EBV DNA copy number, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant ( $p=$ 0.003). This result suggested that EBV DNA copy number was associated with the occurrence of EBVaGC.

3.3 Lower levels of ET-1, ETAR and ETBR in EBVaGC than EBVnGC

Table 4
Comparison of the number of cases in which DNA copy number can be detected in EBVaGC and EBVnGC

Classification	EBVaGC ( $n=$ 28)	EBVnGC ( $n=$ 39)	$p$ value
Detected	7 (63.64%)	2 (10.00%)	0.003
No detected	4 (36.36%)	18 (90.00%)

EBVaGC, EBV-associated gastric carcinoma; EBVnGC, EBV-negative gastric carcinoma.

Table 5

Plasma levels of ET-1, ETAR, ETBR in patients with EBVaGC and EBVnGC

Indictor	Concentration (pg/ml)		$p$ value
	EBVaGC ( $n=$ 28)	EBVnGC ( $n=$ 39)
ET-1	26.12 $\pm$ 14.14	46.50 $\pm$ 29.36	0.001
ETAR	395.73 $\pm$ 227.80	681.60 $\pm$ 347.54	0.000
ETBR	204.94 $\pm$ 151.31	377.84 $\pm$ 279.50	0.004

EBVaGC, EBV-associated gastric carcinoma; EBVnGC, EBV-negative gastric carcinoma.

The levels of ET-1, ETAR, and ETBR in the serum of GC cases were determined by ELISA. As shown in Table 5, the expression levels of ET-1, ETAR, and ETBR in EBVaGC were significantly lower than that of EBVnGC ( $p<$ 0.05). To determine whether these three indicators are needed for combined testing, we performed a correlation analysis (Fig. 1). The results showed that there was a good correlation between any two of these three indicators ( $r>$ 0.900, $p<$ 0.001). Herein, lower levels of ET-1, ETAR, and ETBR are associated with the development of EBVaGC.

3.4 Correlations between plasma levels of ET-1 axis and clinicopathological parameters of cases

Table 6
Correlations between plasma concentration of ET-1, ETAR, ETBR and clinicopathological parameters

Classification	$N^{\text{a}}$	ET-1 concentration (pg/ml)	$p$ value	ETAR concentration (pg/ml)	$p$ value	ETBR concentration (pg/ml)	$p$ value
Differentiation
Middle and low	11	28.21 $\pm$ 15.72	0.176	474.59 $\pm$ 275.90	0.344	233.55 $\pm$ 173.64	0.296
Low	56	39.91 $\pm$ 27.37		579.33 $\pm$ 342.74		319.73 $\pm$ 259.51
Lymph node metastasis
Yes	41	34.90 $\pm$ 23.01	0.227	525.02 $\pm$ 329.38	0.255	274.31 $\pm$ 224.62	0.198
No	26	42.84 $\pm$ 30.16		620.65 $\pm$ 336.92		354.89 $\pm$ 279.45
Tumor classification
Signet ring cell carcinoma	9	49.30 $\pm$ 24.69	0.164	721.03 $\pm$ 300.37	0.125	391.87 $\pm$ 206.15	0.266
Non-signet ring cell carcinoma	58	36.23 $\pm$ 26.06		537.48 $\pm$ 333.47		292.19 $\pm$ 253.27
Gender
Male	59	37.43 $\pm$ 27.11	0.643	546.27 $\pm$ 339.74	0.293	298.02 $\pm$ 256.97	0.503
Female	8	42.04 $\pm$ 17.51		679.13 $\pm$ 268.31		361.35 $\pm$ 175.51
Years
$<$ 60	24	36.59 $\pm$ 25.72	0.747	548.85 $\pm$ 347.70	0.809	287.79 $\pm$ 252.29	0.665
$\geqslant$ 60	43	38.76 $\pm$ 26.56		569.55 $\pm$ 328.63		315.51 $\pm$ 248.78
Invasion depth
Submucosa ${}^{1}$	7	38.15 $\pm$ 13.93	0.402 ${}^{1,2}$	574.25 $\pm$ 172.83	0.455 ${}^{1,2}$	308.62 $\pm$ 103.77	0.424 ${}^{1,2}$
Muscularis ${}^{2}$	5	57.75 $\pm$ 58.05	0.458 ${}^{2,3}$	755.29 $\pm$ 591.70	0.203 ${}^{2,3}$	523.00 $\pm$ 534.72	0.380 ${}^{2,3}$
Serosa ${}^{3}$	53	36.35 $\pm$ 23.19	0.843 ${}^{1,3}$	543.30 $\pm$ 326.11	0.807 ${}^{1,3}$	286.49 $\pm$ 223.48	0.798 ${}^{1,3}$

EBVaGC, EBV-associated gastric carcinoma; EBVnGC, EBV-negative gastric carcinoma.

Figure 1.

Correlation analysis among ET-1, ETAR, and ETBR in GC samples. (a) A linear correlation between ET-1 and ETAR. $r^{2}=$ 0.904, $p<$ 0.0001; (b) A linear correlation between ET-1 and ETBR. $r^{2}=$ 0.939, $p<$ 0.0001; (c) A linear correlation between ETAR and ETBR. $r^{2}=$ 0.931, $p<$ 0.0001. These results indicate good correlation between any two of these three indicators ( $r>$ 0.900, $p<$ 0.001).

Previous studies have shown that the expression of ET-1 and ETAR is associated with clinical pathological parameters [16, 17]. To test the possibility that ET-1 axis is associated with the unique clinical pathology of EBVaGC, we analyzed the correlation between plasma levels of ET-1 axis and clinicopathological parameters (Table 6). These data suggested that the plasma concentration of ET-1 axis is unrelated with differentiation, lymph node metastasis, tumor classification, gender, years and invasion depth ( $p>$ 0.05).

3.5 Correlations between plasma levels of ET-1 axis and EBV-related antibodies

To clarify the relationship between ET-1 axis and EBV-related antibodies in EBVaGC, we further analyzed the relationship between the concentration of ET-1 axis content and antibodies. The data showed that the plasma levels of ET-1, ETAR and ETBR are positively correlated with VCA-IgM ( $p<$ 0.05) and have no correlations with other antibodies (Table 7).

3.6 Expression of ET-1 axis was negatively correlated with EBV DNA copy number

We then analyzed the relationship between the concentration of ET-1 and ETR with the copy number of EBV DNA in the serum of 11 patients with positive EBV DNA copy number (Fig. 2). Interestingly, we find that although the difference in copy number and content of ET-1 or ETR is relatively large among individuals, the copy number of EBV DNA has a negative relationship with ET-1 content. In specimens of patients P15 and P36, the copy number of EBV DNA is the highest, while ET-1 or ETR content is the lowest. Conversely, the P2 patient’s specimen had the lowest copy number of EBV DNA and the highest ET-1 or ETR content. Correlation detection of copy number and ET-1 or ETR content in 11 samples is performed using Spearman test (copy vs ET-1: $r=-$ 0.670, $p=$ 0.024; copy vs ETAR: $r=-$ 0.578, $p=$ 0.063; copy vs ETBR: $r=-$ 0.637, $p=$ 0.035).

4. Discussion

Table 7
Correlation between ET-1 and anti-EBV-related antibody concentrations in plasma

Indicator	Concentration	ET-1 (37.98 $\pm$ 26.09 pg/ml)		ETAR (562.14 $\pm$ 333.09 pg/ml)		ETBR (305.58 $\pm$ 248.45 pg/ml)
	(AU/ml)	$r$	$p$ value	$r$	$p$ value	$r$	$p$ value
EBV EA IgG	1.77 $\pm$ 3.76	$-$ 0.184	0.136	$-$ 0.208	0.091	$-$ 0.174	0.159
EBV EA IgA	0.74 $\pm$ 0.74	$-$ 0.042	0.737	$-$ 0.036	0.774	$-$ 0.018	0.886
EBV VCA IgA	3.02 $\pm$ 2.56	$-$ 0.032	0.796	$-$ 0.031	0.801	$-$ 0.001	0.996
EBV VCA IgM	0.99 $\pm$ 1.99	0.323 ${}^{**}$	0.008	0.290 ${}^{*}$	0.017	0.325 ${}^{**}$	0.007
EBV VCA IgG	44.36 $\pm$ 11.97	$-$ 0.040	0.747	$-$ 0.076	0.539	$-$ 0.065	0.600
EBV NA IgG	31.12 $\pm$ 16.47	$-$ 0.032	0.796	$-$ 0.065	0.602	0.011	0.932

EBVaGC, EBV-associated gastric carcinoma; EBVnGC, EBV-negative gastric carcinoma; EA, early antigen; VCA, viral capsid antigen; NA, nuclear antigen.

Figure 2.

Relationship between the concentrations of ET-1 axis with EBV DNA copy number in 11 patients with positive EBV DNA copy number. (a) Related analysis of ET-1 and EBV DNA copy number. (b) Related analysis of ETAR and EBV DNA copy number. (c) Related analysis of ETBR and EBV DNA copy number. P2, P15, P16, three cases of GC samples. It indicates that copy number of EBV DNA has a negative relationship with ET-1 content.

More than 95% of the world’s population have been infected with EBV at the age of 3 to 5 years and have been infected with latent infection for the lifetime [18]. Under certain circumstances, latent infected viruses will be activated and converted to proliferative infections, which can lead to diseases associated with abnormal B lymphocytes and certain epithelial cell tumors. The antibody spectrum produced by EBV infection has clinical significance for diagnosis and disease identification [19, 20], but their performance in GC remains controversial. Several prospective cohort studies [21, 22, 23] and a case-control study [24] evaluated the relationship between GC and EBV serological markers. Two of these studies [21, 22] found no statistically significant increase in GC risk in subjects with elevated anti-VCA or anti-EA antibody titers. The other two studies [3, 23] making the important distinction between EBV-positive and EBV-negative GC tumors, found that seropositivity rates and titers for anti-EBV antibodies were significantly higher in EBV-positive cases than in EBV-negative cases. In this study, it was showed that EA-IgG, EA-IgA, VCA-IgA and VCA-IgM antibodies were lower in gastric cancer patients (2.99% $\sim$ 22.39%), however, the positive rates of VCA-IgG and EBNA-1-IgG antibodies reached 100% and 89.55%, respectively (Table 3). This is related to the peak time of each corresponding antibody produced by EBV infection and its metabolism in vivo. Anti-EA-IgG, EA-IgA, VCA-IgA and VCA-IgM antibodies are produced early in the body, decaying and disappearing rapidly, while anti-VCA-IgG, and EBNA-1-IgG antibodies can be maintained in vivo for a long time [24]. At the same time, we found that EA-IgG, VCA-IgA, NA-IgG, and DNA copy number were much higher in EBVaGC cases than EBVnGC. The EBV structural protein VCA and DNA copy number are markers of viral reaction. Much evidence has proved that EBV infection can trigger a significantly higher infiltration of immune cells in EBVaGC [25, 26]. The level of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and subclassification of EBVaGC significantly influence recurrence-free survival and disease-free survival in patients with EBVaGC [27]. Our data indicated that EBV might induce chronic inflammation during its viral reaction cycle by recruiting high levels of immune cell infiltration to promote tissue damage. Combined detection of these markers of immune response to EBV in EBVaGC cases might have practical significance in the early diagnosis of tumor.

ET-1, ETAR and ETBR are abnormally expressed in many diseases, such as malignant tumors and cardiovascular diseases. Also, ET-1 and its receptors are involved in the pathogenesis of some viruses, such as HCV [28], HPV [29], HIV [30], and so on. We previously detected the expression of ET-1 by RT-qPCR and Western blot in EBVaGC and EBVnGC cell lines and found that the expression level of ET-1 in EBVaGC was significantly lower than that in EBVnGC. EBV could inhibit the expression of ET-1 through its encoded products (unpublished data). In this report, we further analyzed the expression level of ET-1 in clinical samples. These results were consistent with previous findings. Additionally, there was a negative correlation between ET-1 axis and the copy number of EBV DNA, indicating that ET-1 axis expression is associated with EBV infection both in vivo and in vitro.

ET-1 axis can augment the response of immune cells in the local microenvironment. Particularly, ET-1-driven autocrine or paracrine loops could modulate dendritic cell function, such as increase in cell survival, cytokine production and T cell activation [31]. As the most efficient antigen-presenting cells, dendritic cells produce ET-1 and functional ETAR and ETBR, which are both highly expressed during dendritic cell maturation. Therefore, autocrine or paracrine circuits involving ET-1, ETAR and ETBR seem to regulate the maturation and function of immune system. Herein, low level of ET-1 and ETR in the serum of EBVaGC cases might be related to EBV evading immune surveillance in the body to achieve lifelong latent infection.

In terms of diagnosis, clinical EBV antibody profiles are diverse and inconsistent with EBV-DNA assays. For example, some patients with chronic active EBV infection may have a low EBV antibody upregulation when they have low immunoglobulins or severe splenomegaly, but qRT-PCR assay found a significant increase in viral copy number, suggesting that sometimes EBV antibodies are low, but cross-reactivity due to other factors cannot be ruled out [32, 33]. Here, we found that levels of ET-1 and ETR in the plasma were positively correlated with VCA IgM content but not with other antibodies. This may be due to the fact that VCA IgM is produced in the early stage of acute infection [34], when ET-1 and ETR genes are up-regulated and stimulate the body’s anti-infective immune response. As mentioned above, EBVaGC can only be determined by the presence of virus found directly within tumor cells. For clinical diagnosis, the approaches basing on tumor tissues have more sensitivity and specificity, such as EBERs-ISH and next-generation. While, our study sought to identify noninvasive or minimally invasive markers through the examination of special EBV antibody titers. Based on our research, combined EBV antibody titers and ET-1 axis may provide a useful biomarker for pre-diagnostic screening of EBVaGC.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, this study reports the relationship between ET-1/ETR and EBV-related antibodies or EBV DNA copy number for the first time. Patients with EBVaGC have elevated antibodies to EBV and lower expression of ET-1 axis. Due to the small number of cases, further verification with more samples is required. Although EBERs-ISH has more sensitivity and specificity, EBV status is not routinely assessed in clinical pathologic practice. Sometimes, tumor tissue is unavailable, EBV serology has actual utility for next research. Given the limited options for identifying EBVaGC, multiple markers in combination could be useful in the future. These data can help better understand the unique pathogenesis and clinical features of EBVaGC and provides a new molecular marker for the identification of EBV-positive gastric cancer and -negative gastric cancer.

Abbreviations

EBV: Epstein-Barr virus; EBVaGC: EBV-associated gastric cancer; EBVnGC: EBV-negative gastric cancer; EA: early antigen; VCA: viral capsid antigen; NA: nuclear antigen; NPC: nasopharyngeal carcinoma; ET-1: endothelin-1.

Funding

This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2020MH302; ZR2020 MC020]; China postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020 M682126].

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Author contributions

Conception: Bing Luo.

Interpretation or analysis of data: Yan Zhang, Qianqian Zhang.

Preparation of the manuscript: Qianqian Zhang, Hua Xiao, Weiwen Wang.

Revision for important intellectual content: Lin Xu, Yan Zhang.

Supervision: Bing Luo.

Supplementary data

The supplementary files are available to download from https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.3233/CBM-220001.

sj-docx-1-cbm-10.3233_CBM-220001.docx - Supplemental material

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-cbm-10.3233_CBM-220001.docx

References

Tokunaga

Uemura

Tokudome

Ishidate

Masuda

Okazaki

Kaneko

Naoe

Ito

and Okamura

, Epstein-Barr virus related gastric cancer in Japan: a molecular patho-epidemiological study, Acta Pathologica Japonica 43 (1993), 574–581.

Ribeiro

Oliveira

Malta

and Sousa

, Epstein-Barr virus gene expression and latency pattern in gastric carcinomas: a systematic review, Future Oncol 13 (2017), 567–579.

Shinkura

Yamamoto

Koriyama

Shinmura

Eizuru

and Tokunaga

, Epstein-Barr virus- specific antibodies in Epstein-Barr virus-positive and -negative gastric carcinoma cases in Japan, Journal of Medical Virology 60 (2000), 411–416.

Liu

M.F.

Huang

Q.H.

Fang

Liu

and Jia

W.H.

, Two Epstein-Barr virus-related serologic antibody tests in nasopharyngeal carcinoma screening: results from the initial phase of a cluster randomized controlled trial in Southern China, American Journal of Epidemiology 177 (2013), 242–250.

Hildesheim

, Invited commentary: Epstein-Barr virus-based screening for the early detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a new frontier, American Journal of Epidemiology 177 (2013), 251–253.

Cao

S.M.

Liu

Jia

W.H.

Huang

Q.H.

Liu

Guo

Huang

T.B.

and Hong

M.H.

, Fluctuations of epstein-barr virus serological antibodies and risk for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective screening study with a 20-year follow-up, PloS One 6 (2011), e19100.

K.J.

Hsu

W.L.

Pfeiffer

R.M.

Chiang

C.J.

Wang

C.P.

Lou

P.J.

Cheng

Y.J.

Gravitt

Diehl

S.R.

Goldstein

A.M.

Chen

C.J.

and Hildesheim

, Prognostic utility of anti-EBV antibody testing for defining NPC risk among individuals from high-risk NPC families, Clin Cancer Res 17 (2011), 1906–1914.

Liu

S.L.

Sun

X.S.

X.Y.

Tang

L.Q.

Chen

Q.Y.

Lin

H.X.

Liang

Y.J.

Yan

J.J.

Lin

Guo

S.S.

Liu

L.T.

Xie

H.J.

Tang

Q.N.

Liang

Guo

and Mai

H.Q.

, The diagnostic and prognostic values of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA for residual cervical lymphadenopathy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a retrospective study, Cancer Commun (Lond) 39 (2019), 14.

Shinozaki-Ushiku

Kunita

and Fukayama

, Update on Epstein–Barr virus and gastric cancer (review), Int J Oncol 46 (2015), 1421–1434.

10.

Cho

Kang

M.S.

and Kim

K.M.

, Epstein–Barr virus-associated gastric carcinoma and specific features of the accompanying immune response, J Gastric Cancer 16 (2015), 1–7.

11.

Schetter

A.J.

You

W.C.

Lennette

E.T.

Gail

M.T.

and Rabkin

C.S.

, Association of Epstein-Barr virus antibody levels with precancerous gastric lesions in a high-risk cohort, Cancer Science 99 (2008), 350–354.

12.

Emoto

Giaid

Slaughter

Kaw

deWit

and Yanagisawa

, ECE-1: a membrane-bound metalloprotease that catalyzes the proteolytic activation of big endothelin-1, Cell 78 (1994), 473–485.

13.

Tsai

K.W.

L.Y.

Chen

T.W.

S. C.

M.R.

S.Y.

Y.T.

Chen

W.S.

and Lam

H.C.

, Emerging role of microRNAs in modulating endothelin-1 expression in gastric cancer, Oncology Reports 33 (2015), 485–493.

14.

Park

J.H.

Kim

E.K.

Kim

Y.H.

Kim

J.H.

Bae

Y.S.

Lee

Y.C.

Cheong

J.H.

Noh

S.H.

and Kim

, Epstein-Barr virus positivity, not mismatch repair-deficiency, is a favorable risk factor for lymph node metastasis in submucosa-invasive early gastric cancer, Gastric Cancer 19 (2016), 1041–1051.

15.

Iizasa

Nanbo

Nishikawa

Jinushi

and Yoshiyama

, Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)-associated gastric carcinoma, Viruses 4 (2012), 3420–3439.

16.

Irani

Salajegheh

Gopalan

Smith

R.A.

and Lam

A.K.

, Expression profile of endothelin 1 and its receptor endothelin receptor A in papillary thyroid carcinoma and their correlations with clinicopathologic characteristics, Annals of Diagnostic Pathology 18 (2014), 43–48.

17.

Fathy

and Abdelrahman

A.E.

, EZH2, Endothelin-1, and CD34 as Biomarkers of Aggressive Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Immunohistochemical Study, Turk Patoloji Dergisi 34 (2018), 150–157.

18.

Young

L.S.

Yap

L.F.

and Murray

P.G.

, Epstein–Barr virus: more than 50 years old and still providing surprises, Nat Rev Cancer 16 (2016), 789–802.

19.

Mitrakas

Gravas

Karasavvidou

Dimakopoulos

Moutzouris

Tzortzis

Koukoulis

Papandreou

and Melekos

, Endothelin-1 overexpression: a potential biomarker of unfavorable prognosis in non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer, Tumor Biology 36 (2015), 4699–4705.

20.

Teras

L.R.

Rollison

D.E.

Pawlita

Michel

Brozy

de Sanjose

Blasé

J.L.

and Gapstur

S.M.

, Epstein-Barr virus and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the cancer prevention study-II and a meta-analysis of serologic studies, International Journal of Cancer 136 (2015), 108–116.

21.

Kim

Shin

Gwack

K.P.

Kim

C.S.

Park

S.K.

Hong

Y.C.

Kang

and Yoo

K.Y.

, Epstein-Barr virus antibody level and gastric cancer risk in Korea: a nested case-control study, British Journal of Cancer 101 (2009), 526–529.

22.

Koshiol

Qiao

Y.L.

Mark

S.D.

Dawsey

S.M.

Abnet

C.C.

Kamangar

Lennette

E.T.

Dong

Z.W.

and Taylor

P.R.

, Epstein-Barr virus serology and gastric cancer incidence and survival, British Journal of Cancer 97 (2007), 1567–1569.

23.

Levine

P.H.

Stemmermann

Lennette

E.T.

Hildesheim

Shibata

and Nomura

, Elevated antibody titers to Epstein-Barr virus prior to the diagnosis of Epstein-Barr-virus-associated gastric adenocarcinoma, International Journal of Cancer 60 (1995), 642–644.

24.

Ball

R.J.

Avenell

Aucott

Hanlon

and Vickers

M.A.

, Systematic review and meta-analysis of the sero-epidemiological association between Epstein-Barr virus and systemic lupus erythematosus, Arthritis Research & Therapy 16 (2014), R3.

25.

Sundar

Qamra

Tan

A.L.K.

Zhang

C.C.Y.

Teh

B.T.

Lee

Kim

K.M.

and Tan

, Transcriptional analysis of immune genes in Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer and association with clinical outcomes, Gastric Cancer 21 (2018), 1064–1070.

26.

Cheng

Zhao

Dong

Zhang

Zhao

Chen

and Shao

, Prognostic Value of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Tertiary Lymphoid Structures in Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated and -Negative Gastric Carcinoma, Front Immunol 12 (2021), 692859.

27.

Kang

B.W.

Seo

A.N.

Yoon

Bae

H.I.

Jeon

S.W.

Kwon

O.K.

Chung

H.Y.

Kang

and Kim

J.G.

, Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer, Ann Oncol 27 (2016), 494–501.

28.

Sun

L.J.

and Yu

J.W.

, Hepatitis C virus core protein induces dysfunction of liver sinusoidal endothelial cell by down-regulation of silent information regulator 1, J Med Virol 90 (2018), 926–935.

29.

Venuti

Salani

Manni

Poggiali

and Bagnato

, Expression of endothelin 1 and endothelin A receptor in HPV-associated cervical carcinoma: new potential targets for anticancer therapy, FASEB J 14 (2000), 2277–2283.

30.

Tai

Lai

Jani

Lai

and Kickler

T.S.

, HIV infection and cocaine use induce endothelial damage and dysfunction in African Americans, International journal of cardiology, Int J Cardiol 161 (2012), 83–87.

31.

Guruli

Pflug

B.R.

Pecher

Makarenkova

Shurin

M.R.

and Nelson

J.B.

, Function and survival of dendritic cells depend on endothelin-1 and endothelin receptor autocrine loops, Blood 104 (2004), 2107–2115.

32.

Sohn

M.J.

Cho

J.M.

Moon

J.S.

and Yang

H.R.

, EBV VCA IgM and cytomegalovirus IgM dual positivity is a false positive finding related to age and hepatic involvement of primary Epstein-Barr virus infection in children, Medicine 97 (2018), e12380.

33.

Tosato

Taga

Angiolillo

A.L.

and Sgadari

, Epstein-Barr virus as an agent of haematological disease, Bailliere’s Clinical Haematology 8 (1995), 165–199.

34.

Schmitz

Volz

Krainick-Riechert

and Scherer

, Acute Epstein-Barr virus infections in children, Medical Microbiology and Immunology 158 (1972), 58–63.

Analysis of the relationship between the expression of EBV-related antibodies and ET-1 axis in gastric cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:

METHODS:

RESULTS:

CONCLUSIONS:

Keywords

1. Introduction

2. Material and methods

2.1 Samples

Table 1 Comparison of clinical pathological features between EBVaGC and EBVnGC

2.3 ELISA assay

2.4 Detection of EBV-DNA copy number

2.5 Statistical analysis

3. Results

3.1 Higher levels of EBV-related antibodies in EBVaGC than EBVnGC samples

3.2 EBV DNA copy number in GC samples

Table 2 Expression of anti-EBV related antibodies in EBVaGC and EBVnGC

Table 4 Comparison of the number of cases in which DNA copy number can be detected in EBVaGC and EBVnGC

Table 6 Correlations between plasma concentration of ET-1, ETAR, ETBR and clinicopathological parameters

3.6 Expression of ET-1 axis was negatively correlated with EBV DNA copy number

4. Discussion

Table 7 Correlation between ET-1 and anti-EBV-related antibody concentrations in plasma

Abbreviations

Funding

Competing interests

Author contributions

Supplementary data

sj-docx-1-cbm-10.3233_CBM-220001.docx - Supplemental material

References

Table 1
Comparison of clinical pathological features between EBVaGC and EBVnGC

Table 2
Expression of anti-EBV related antibodies in EBVaGC and EBVnGC

Table 4
Comparison of the number of cases in which DNA copy number can be detected in EBVaGC and EBVnGC

Table 6
Correlations between plasma concentration of ET-1, ETAR, ETBR and clinicopathological parameters

Table 7
Correlation between ET-1 and anti-EBV-related antibody concentrations in plasma