Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Mathematical procedures involved in the calculation of fatigue index (FI) and power drop (PD) are the main reasons why these traditional fatigue-related indices of Wingate All-out Test (WAT) are the least reliable indices.
OBJECTIVE:
To suggest a highly reliable fatigue-related output calculated by drop in mechanical work production (DMW).
METHODS:
Twenty-one well-trained male athletes (age: 21.8 ± 1.9 years, peak power [PP]: 14.7 ± 1.3 W ⋅ kg - 1) participated in a series of WAT sessions, using 10% of their body mass as the workload, separated by 2-4 days. These WAT sessions were continued until the difference in PP between successive trials was less than 5%. Traditional FI and PD values were calculated using mean power data obtained from 5, 3, 2 and 1-second time intervals and using instantaneous power data, while DMW was calculated by predetermined areas in power-time curve.
RESULTS:
Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficient of variations (CV) revealed that DMW had higher reliability level (ICC = 0.92, CV = 4.53%) than that of traditional fatigue-related indices (ICC ≤ 0.91, CV ≥ 5.71%). In addition, DMW had the lowest limit of ``real change'' with 10.2% as the minimum detectable change score at 90% confidence.
CONCLUSIONS:
DMW might be used as a reliable output to evaluate fatigue-related power data of the anaerobic capability. Besides, Monark Inc. may easily modify its Peak Bike 894E software to make 30-second all-out test more reliable for the assessment of fatigability levels.