The purpose of this study was to compare activation of the upper body musculature during the barbell bench press at varying training intensities.
METHODS:
Twelve young, resistance-trained men performed sets of the bench press to momentary muscular failure with two different loads: a high-load(HIGH) set at 80% of 1RM and a low-load (LOW) set at 50% 1RM. Exercise order was counterbalanced so that half the subjects performed the LOW condition first and the other half performed the HIGH first. Surface electromyography (EMG) was used to assess mean, peak, and iEMG muscle activation of the anterior deltoid, triceps brachii, and sternal and clavicular heads of the pectoralis major.
RESULTS:
The main effects for trials were significant for mean EMG (p < 0.001) and iEMG matched (p < 0.001) favoring HIGH and iEMG total favoring LOW(p = 0.001) across all muscle groups in both conditions with varying effect sizes. All other main effects and interactions were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION:
Despite similarities in peak EMG amplitude, the greater results for mean and iEMG matched in HIGH suggests that heavier loads may produce greater muscle activation.
HennemanE, SomjenG, CarpenterDO. Functional Significance of Cell Size in Spinal Motoneurons. J Neurophysiol1965 May; 28: 560-580.
2.
KraemerWJ, RatamessNA. Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc2004 Apr; 36(4): 674-688.
3.
SpieringBA, KraemerWJ, AndersonJM, ArmstrongLE, NindlBC, VolekJS, et al. Resistance exercise biology: manipulation of resistance exercise programme variables determines the responses of cellular and molecular signalling pathways. Sports Med2008; 38(7): 527-540.
4.
CarpinelliRN. The size principle and a critical analysis of the unsubstantiated heavier-is-better recommendation for resistance training. J Exerc Sci Fit2008; 6: 67-86.
5.
BurdNA, MitchellCJ, Churchward-VenneTA, PhillipsSM. Bigger weights may not beget bigger muscles: evidence from acute muscle protein synthetic responses after resistance exercise. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab2012 Jun; 37(3): 551-554.
6.
SchoenfeldBJ. Is There a Minimum Intensity Threshold for Resistance Training-Induced Hypertrophic Adaptations?Sports Med2013; 43(12): 1279-1288.
7.
SchoenfeldBJ, ContrerasB, WillardsonJM, FontanaF, Tiryaki-SonmezG. Muscle activation during low-versus high-load resistance training in well-trained men. Eur J Appl Physiol2014; 114(12): 2491-2497.
8.
CookSB, MurphyBG, LabarberaKE. Neuromuscular function after a bout of low-load blood flow-restricted exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc2013 Jan; 45(1): 67-74.
9.
AkimaH, SaitoA. Activation of quadriceps femoris including vastus intermedius during fatiguing dynamic knee extensions. Eur J Appl Physiol2013 Nov; 113(11): 2829-2840.
10.
KeoghJWL, WilsonGJ, WeatherbyRP. A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Different Resistance Training Techniques in the Bench Press. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research1999; 13: 247-258.
11.
HermensHJ, FreriksB, Disselhorst-KlugC, RauG. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2000 Oct; 10(5): 361-374.
12.
HislopH, MontgomeryJ. Daniels and Wortingham's Muscle Testing: Techniques of Manual Examination. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 2002.
13.
SakamotoA, SinclairPJ. Muscle activations under varying lifting speeds and intensities during bench press. Eur J Appl Physiol2012 Mar; 112(3): 1015-1025.
14.
SakamotoA, SinclairPJ. Effect of movement velocity on the relationship between training load and the number of repetitions of bench press. J Strength Cond Res2006 Aug; 20(3): 523-527.
15.
BurdNA, WestDW, StaplesAW, AthertonPJ, BakerJM, MooreDR, et al. Low-load high volume resistance exercise stimulates muscle protein synthesis more than high-load low volume resistance exercise in young men. PLoS One2010 Aug 9; 5(8): e12033.
16.
OgbornD, SchoenfeldBJ. The role of fber types in muscle hypertrophy: Implications for loading strategies. Strength Cond J2014; 36(2): 20-25.
17.
AdamA, De LucaCJ. Recruitment order of motor units in human vastus lateralis muscle is maintained during fatiguing contractions. J Neurophysiol2003 Nov; 90(5): 2919-2927.
18.
WestadC, WestgaardRH, De LucaCJ. Motor unit recruitment and derecruitment induced by brief increase in contraction amplitude of the human trapezius muscle. J Physiol2003 Oct 15; 552(Pt 2): 645-656.
19.
HoutmanCJ, StegemanDF, Van DijkJP, ZwartsMJ. Changes in muscle fiber conduction velocity indicate recruitment of distinct motor unit populations. J Appl Physiol2003 Sep; 95(3): 1045-1054.
20.
PintoRS, CadoreEL, CorreaCS, CorreaCS, da SilvaBGC, LimaCS, et al. Relationship between workload and neuromuscular activity in the bench press exercise. Med Sport2013; 17(1): 1-6.
21.
BehmDG. Neuromuscular implications and applications of resistance training. J Strength Cond Res1995; 9(4): 264-274.
22.
DimitrovaNA, DimitrovGV. Interpretation of EMG changes with fatigue: facts, pitfalls, and fallacies. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2003 Feb; 13(1): 13-36.
23.
ErtasM, StalbergE, FalckB. Can the size principle be detected in conventional EMG recordings?Muscle Nerve1995 Apr; 18(4): 435-439.
24.
FreundHJ. Motor unit and muscle activity in voluntary motor control. Physiol Rev1983 Apr; 63(2): 387-436.
25.
StockMS, BeckTW, DefreitasJM. Effects of fatigue on motor unit firing rate versus recruitment threshold relationships. Muscle Nerve2012 Jan; 45(1): 100-109.
26.
FarinaD, MerlettiR, EnokaRM. The Extraction of Neural Strategies from the Surface Emg: An Update. J Appl Physiol (1985)2014 Oct 2.
27.
MitchellCJ, Churchward-VenneTA, WestDD, BurdNA, BreenL, BakerSK, et al. Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men. J Appl Physiol2012 Apr 19.
28.
OgasawaraR, LoennekeJP, ThiebaudRS, AbeT. Low-Load Bench Press Training to Fatigue Results in Muscle Hypertrophy Similar to High-Load Bench Press Training. Int J Clin Med2013; 4: 114-121.
