In this study, using Yuan and Lee’s definition of fuzzy group based on fuzzy binary operation and Aktas and Cagman definition of fuzzy ring, we give a new kind of definition to (A : B). The concept of fuzzy regular and fuzzy left strongly regular are introduced and we create a new study on their basic properties equivalent to those of ordinary rings. We have shown that if (R, G, H) is strongly regular, then for any a ∈ R, left annihilator of “a” is an ideal.
The study of fuzzy algebraic structure has been pursued in many directions such as groups, rings, modulus, vector spaces, topology and so on. In 1965, the American cyberneticist L.A. Zadeh [8] introduced the concept of fuzzy subsets and studied their properties on the parallel lines to set theory. In 1971, Rosenfeld [5] defined the fuzzy subgroup and gave some of its properties. Rosenfeld’s definition of a fuzzy group is a turning point for pure Mathematicians. In the definition of fuzzy subgroups, Rosenfeld has assumed that the subsets of a group G are fuzzy and the binary operation on G is nonfuzzy in the classical sense. Another approach is to assume that the set is nonfuzzy or classical and the binary operation is fuzzy in the fuzzy sense. Deviating a little away from this approach, Demirci [3, 4] introduced the concept of smooth group by the use of fuzzy binary operation and the concept of fuzzy equality, and Aktas [1] studied its application using Demirci’s concept.
So far fuzzy sets and fuzzy subgroup were defined on a given group G. Yuan and Lee [7] defined fuzzy binary operation on a set G. Aktas and Cagman [2] defined two fuzzy binary operation on a set R and defined fuzzy ring. In this paper our aim is to introduce the well known definition of (A : B) in a fuzzy ring R. In a ring (R, + , .) if A and B are subsets of R then (A : B) = {x ∈ R ∣ xB ⊆ A}. It has been shown that (A : B) is an ideal of the ring R if A and B are ideals of the ring R. We extend this notation as (A : B) = {x ∈ R ∣ ⋁ b∈BH (x, b, y) > θ ⇒ y ∈ A} . We extend all the results obtained for (A : B) for classical ring to (A : B) in a fuzzy ring R.
Preliminaries
Let θ ∈ [0, 1). In this section the preliminarydefinition is summarized for understanding the concepts better; that is required in this paper. Most of the contents of this section are contained in [2, 7].
Definition 2.1. [7, Definition 2.2] Let G be a nonempty set and R be a fuzzy subset of G × G × G (R : G × G × G ⟶ [0, 1]). R is called a fuzzy binary operation on G if
∀ a, b ∈ G, ∃ c ∈ G such that R (a, b, c) > θ
∀a, b, c1, c2 ∈ G, R (a, b, c1) > θ and R (a, b, c2) > θ implies c1 = c2.
Let R be a fuzzy binary operation on G, then we have a mappingwhere F (G) = {A|A : R → [0, 1]is a mapping} and
Let A = {a} and B = {b}, and let R (A, B) be denoted as a ∘ b, then
Definition 2.2. [7, Definitin 2.3] Let G be a nonempty set and R be a fuzzy binary operation on G. (G, R) is called a fuzzy abelian group if the following conditions are true:
* (G1) ∀ a, b, c, z1, z2 ∈ G, ((a ∘ b) ∘ c) (z1) > θ and (a ∘ (b ∘ c)) (z2) > θ implies z1 = z2;
* (G2) ∃e0 ∈ G such that (e0 ∘ a) (a) > θ and (a ∘ e0) (a) > θ for any a ∈ G (e0 is called an identity element of G);
* (G3) ∀ a ∈ G, ∃ b ∈ G such that (a ∘ b) (e0) > θ and (b ∘ a) (e0) > θ (b is called an inverse element of a and is denoted as a-1).
* (G4) ∀ a, b ∈ G, (a ∘ b) (z1) > θ and (b ∘ a) (z2) > θ implies z1 = z2.
Proposition 2.1. [7, Proposition 2.1] Let (G, R) be a fuzzy group, then
the identity element of G is unique;
(a ∘ a) (a) > θ implies a = e;
(a ∘ b) (d) > θ and (a ∘ c) (d) > θ implies b = c;
(b ∘ a) (d) > θ and (c ∘ a) (d) > θ implies b = c;
for each a ∈ G, the inverse element of a is unique.
(a-1) -1 = a;
(b-1 ∘ a-1) (c) > θ and (a ∘ b) (d) > θ implies c = d-1.
Definition 2.3. [2, Section 3] Let G and H be a fuzzy binary operations on R. Then we get a mapping as:where F (R) = {A|A : R → [0, 1] is a mapping} and
Let A = {a} and B = {b}, and let G (A, B) and H (A, B) be denoted as a ∘ b and a ∗ b respectively. Then
Using the notation of equations (5)–(10), we candefine a kind of fuzzy ring as:
Definition 2.4. [2, Definition 9] Let R be a nonempty set, and G and H be two fuzzy binary operation on R. Then (R, G, H) is called a fuzzy ring if the following conditions hold.
(R, G) is an abelian fuzzy group.
∀ a, b, c, z1, z2 ∈ R, ((a ∗ b) ∗ c) (z1) > θ and (a ∗ (b ∗ c)) (z2) > θ implies z1 = z2;
∀ a, b, c, z1, z2 ∈ R, ((a ∘ b) ∗ c) (z1) > θ and((a ∗ c) ∘ (b ∗ c)) (z2) > θ implies z1 = z2, and (a ∗ (b ∘ c)) (z1) > θ and ((a ∗ b) ∘ (a ∗ c)) (z2) > θ implies z1 = z2
If (a ∗ b) (u) > θ ⇔ (b ∗ a) (u) > θ for all a, b ∈ R, then (R, G, H) is said to be a commutative fuzzy ring. If (R, G, H) contains an element e∗ such that (a ∗ e∗) (u) > θ and (e∗ ∗ a) (v) > θ implies u = v for all a ∈ R, then (R, G, H) is said to be a fuzzy ring with identity.
The identity element e0 is called the zero element of the fuzzy ring.
A fuzzy ring has the following properties:
Theorem 2.1.If e0 is the zero element of (R, G) in the fuzzy ring (R, G, H) then for any a ∈ R, H (a, e0, x) > θ ⇒ x = e0
Proof. Let a, z ∈ R. Now
Let x ∈ R such that H (a, e0, x) > θ.
Now [a ∗ (e0 ∘ e0)] (x) > θ since H (a, e0, x) > θ and G (e0, e0, e0) > θ
Hence ((a ∗ e0) ∘ (a ∗ e0)) (x) > θ
Thus H (a, e0, x) ∧ H (a, e0, x) ∧ G (x, x, x) > θ.
Hence G (x, x, x) > θ
Therefore x = e0 by proposition 2.1
Thus H (a, e0, e0) > θ
Theorem 2.2.If (R, G, H) is a fuzzy ring with zero element e0, then for any a, b ∈ R:
Let b-1 be the inverse of b in (R, G). Then H (a, b, x) > θ ⇔ H (a, b-1, x-1) > θ.
Let a-1 be the inverse of a in (R, G). Then H (a, b, x) > θ ⇔ H (a-1, b, x-1) > θ.
Definition 2.5.[2, Definition 18] A nonempty subset I of a fuzzy ring R is called a fuzzy left (resp. right) ideal of R if the following conditions are satisfied.
∀ x, y ∈ I, (x ∘ y) (z) > θ ⇒ z ∈ I for z ∈ R
∀ x ∈ I, x-1 ∈ I.
For all s ∈ I, for all r ∈ R, (r ∗ s) (x) > θ ⇒ x ∈ I and ((s ∗ r) (y) > θ ⇒ y ∈ I), for any elements x, y ∈ R.
Main Results
Definition 3.1. Let A and B be any subset of R then
Theorem 3.1.Let (R, G, H) be a fuzzy ring and A be any fuzzy ideal of R and B be any subset of R then (A: B) is a fuzzy left ideal of (R, G, H).
Proof. 1. Let x1, x2 ∈ (A : B). Suppose (x1 ∘ x2) (z) > θ, let us show that z ∈ (A : B). Since (x1 ∘ x2) (z) > θ,
Now, suppose
Hence there exist b1 ∈ B such that
Now consider
Therefore ((x1 ∘ x2) ∗ b1) (y) > θ
Thus ((x1 ∗ b1) ∘ (x2 ∗ b1)) (y) > θ
Hence
By definition there exists unique d1 ∈ R and unique e1 ∈ R such that H (x1, b1, d1) > θ, H (x2, b1, e1) > θ . Hence G (d1, e1, y) > θ
Since x1 ∈ (A : B) and H (x1, b1, d1) > θ ⇒ d1 ∈ A
Since x2 ∈ (A : B) and H (x2, b1, e1) > θ ⇒ e1 ∈ A
Since d1, e1 ∈ A and A is fuzzy ideal of R and G (d1, e1, y) > θ ⇒ y ∈ A
Thus
Therefore z ∈ (A : B).
2. Let x ∈ (A : B). Let us show that x-1 ∈ (A : B).Suppose
Hence there exists b1 ∈ B such that H (x-1, b1, y) > θ . By Theorem 2.2, H (x, b1, y-1) > θ ⇒ y-1 ∈ A . Since A is an ideal, y ∈ A. Therefore x-1 ∈ (A : B).
3. Let x ∈ (A : B) and let r ∈ R. Suppose (r ∗ x) (z) > θ
Let us show that z ∈ (A : B).
Suppose
Hence there exists b1 ∈ B such that
Now
Hence (r ∗ (x ∗ b1)) (y) > θ
Therefore
By definition there exists unique d1 ∈ R such that H (x, b1, d1) > θ and hence H (r, d1, y) > θ .
Since x ∈ (A : B) and H (x, b1, d1) > θ implies d1 ∈ A .
Since H (r, d1, y) > θ implies y ∈ A .
Therefore z ∈ (A : B) .
(r ∗ x) (z) > θ implies z ∈ (A : B) .
Therefore (A : B) is a fuzzy left ideal.
Theorem 3.2.If A and B are fuzzy ideals of (R, G, H) then (A : B) is a fuzzy ideal of (R, G, H).
Proof. By Theorem 3.1, (A : B) is a fuzzy left ideal.
Let x ∈ (A : B) and r ∈ R .
Suppose (x ∗ r) (z) > θ .
HenceLet us show that z ∈ (A : B).
SupposeHence there exists b1 ∈ B such thatNowHence (x ∗ (r ∗ b1)) (y) > θ
ThereforeBy definition there exists d1 ∈ R such that H (r, b1, d1) > θ and hence H (x, d1, y) > θ . Since B is an ideal and H (r, b1, d1) > θ implies d1 ∈ B .
Since d1 ∈ B and H (x, d1, y) > θ implies y ∈ A.
Thus z ∈ (A : B) .
(x ∗ r) (z) > θ implies z ∈ (A : B)
Therefore (A : B) is a fuzzy ideal
Definition 3.2. For any a ∈ R, the left annihilator of a in R is l (a) = {x ∈ R ∣ H (x, a, y) > θ implies y = e0}
Theorem 3.3.For any a ∈ R, the left annihilator of a is a left ideal.
Proof. In Theorem 3.1, by taking A = {e0} and B = {a} we get (A : B) = l (a) and hence l (a) is a left ideal.
We have proved that the left annihilator of “a” is the left ideal by using the fact that (A : B) is a left ideal. In general, left annihilator of " a " is not an ideal, but when the ring R is strongly regular then it is proved that the left annihilator of " a " is an ideal.
Strongly regular rings
Definition 4.1. A fuzzy ring (R, G, H) is said to be regular if for each a in (R, G, H) there exists x ∈ (R, G, H) such that ((a ∗ x) ∗ a) (a) > θ.
Theorem 4.1.Let (R, G, H) be a regular ring and I be an ideal of (R, G, H). Then for any a ∈ I, we can find x, y ∈ I such that (x ∗ y) (a) > θ.
Proof. Let I be an ideal of R and let a ∈ I. Since R is regular there exists x ∈ R such that ((a ∗ x) ∗ a) (a) > θ
Hence,
By definition of H there exists unique d1 ∈ R such that H (a, x, d1) > θ and since a ∈ I implies d1 ∈ I .
Hence H (d1, a, a) > θ where d1 ∈ I .
Therefore (d1 ∗ a) (a) > θ where d1, a ∈ I .
Definition 4.2. A fuzzy ring (R, G, H) is said to be left strongly regular if for each a, b ∈ (R, G, H) there exists x ∈ (R, G, H) such that (a ∗ b) (z) > θ ⇔ (x ∗ (a ∗ b) ∗ (a ∗ b)) (z) > θ.
Theorem 4.2.Let (R, G, H) be a fuzzy ring and e∗ be the identity element of (R, H) and for any a, b in R, ((a ∗ e∗) ∗ b) (z) > θ ⇒ (a ∗ b) (z) > θ.
Proof. Assume ((a ∗ e∗) ∗ b) (z) > θ. HenceWe must have f = a and H (a, b, z) > θ .
Therefore (a ∗ b) (z) > θ.
Theorem 4.3.If R is left strongly regular then given a ∈ (R, G, H) there exists x ∈ (R, G, H) such that (x ∗ (a ∗ a)) (a) > θ.
Proof. Assume R is left strongly regular.
Let a ∈ (R, G, H) and e∗ be the identity element of (R, H). Now take b as e∗ . Then there exists x ∈ R such that (a * e∗) (z) > θ ⇔ (x ∗ (a ∗ e∗) ∗ (a ∗ e∗)) (z) > θ .
Since (a ∗ e∗) (a) > θ we have (x ∗ (a ∗ e∗) ∗ (a ∗ e∗)) (a) > θ By Theorem 4.2. we have (x ∗ a ∗ a) (a) > θ.
Theorem 4.4.Let I be an ideal of a strongly regular ring (R, G, H). For any a ∈ R,if H (a, a, y) > θ implies y ∈ I then a ∈ I.
Proof. Let I be an ideal of R and let a ∈ R. Since R is left strongly regular by Theorem 4.3, there exists x ∈ R such that (x ∗ (a ∗ a)) (a) > θ . Hence
Hence there exists unique d1 ∈ R such that H (a, a, d1) > θ and H (x, d1, a) > θ.
By assumption H (a, a, d1) > θ implies d1 ∈ I. Thus H (x, d1, a) > θ with d1 ∈ I implies a ∈ I .
Theorem 4.5.Let I be an ideal of a fuzzy ring (R, G, H) and for any a, b, c ∈ R,if (a ∗ b) (y) > θ ⇒ y ∈ I then ((a ∗ b) ∗ c) (z) > θ ⇒ z ∈ I.
Proof. Suppose (a ∗ b) (y) > θ ⇒ y ∈ I .
Thus H (a, b, y) > θ ⇒ y ∈ I .
Assume ((a ∗ b) ∗ c) (z) > θ .
NowBy definition of H there exists unique d ∈ R such that H (a, b, d) > θ and hence we have H (d, c, z) > θ .
Since H (a, b, d) > θ implies d ∈ I .
Since d ∈ I and H (d, c, z) > θ implies z ∈ I .
Therefore ((a ∗ b) ∗ c) (z) > θ implies z ∈ I .
Theorem 4.6.Let I be an ideal of a fuzzy ring (R, G, H) and for any a, b, c ∈ R, if (a ∗ b) (y) > θ ⇒ y ∈ I then (c ∗ (a ∗ b)) (z) > θ ⇒ z ∈ I.
Proof is similar to Theorem 4.5.
Theorem 4.7.Let I be an ideal of a strongly regular ring (R, G, H) and let x ∈ R for any a, b ∈ I such that H (a, b, x) > θ ⇒ x ∈ I then H (b, a, y) > θ ⇒ y ∈ I.
Proof. Since R is a left strongly regular, there exists x ∈ R such that (a ∗ b) (z) > θ ⇔ (x ∗ (a ∗ b) ∗ (a ∗ b)) (z) > θ . Let H (b, a, y) > θ. Hence (b ∗ a) (y) > θ using Theorem 4.5 and 4.6 we have ((b ∗ a) ∗ b) (y) > θ and hence (x ∗ (a ∗ b) ∗ (a ∗ b)) (y) > θ. Hence (a ∗ b) (y) > θ . Thus y ∈ I .
Theorem 4.8.If e0 is the zero element of (R, G) in the fuzzy ring (R, G, H) then for any a, b, c ∈ R, (a ∗ b) (e0) > θ ⇒ (c ∗ (a ∗ b)) (e0) > θ and ((a ∗ b) ∗ c) (e0) > θ .
Proof. Let a, b, c be in R such thatNowSimilarly ((a ∗ b) ∗ c)) (e0) > θ .
Definition 4.3. An element a of a ring R is called a nilpotent element if there exists some positive integer n such that (a ∗ a ∗ a ∗ . . . ∗ a) (e0) > θ implies a = e0.
Theorem 4.9.If (R, G, H) is a left strongly regular then (R, G, H) is without non-zero nilpotent elements.
Proof. Suppose (a ∗ a) (e0) > θ . Since R is a left strongly regular there eists x ∈ R such that
By Theorem 4.6, since (a ∗ a) (e0) > θ implies
From (20) and (21), a = e0
Theorem 4.10.Suppose (R, G, H) is a left strongly regular. If (a ∗ b) (e0) > θ for some a, b ∈ R then (b ∗ a) (e0) > θ .
Proof. GivenBy Theorem 4.6 (b ∗ a ∗ b ∗ a) (e0) > θ . Since (R, G, H) is a left strongly regular there exists x ∈ R such that (x ∗ (b ∗ a) ∗ (b ∗ a)) (e0) > θ. Therefore (b ∗ a) (e0) > θ
Definition 4.4. A fuzzy ring R is said to fulfill the insertion of factors property (IFP) provided that for all a, b ∈ R, (a ∗ b) (e0) > θ ⇒ (a ∗ r ∗ b) (e0) > θ for all r ∈ R .
Theorem 4.11. Let (R, G, H) be a left strongly regular fuzzy ring. Then for any a, b ∈ R, (a ∗ b) (e0) > θ ⇒ (a ∗ r ∗ b) (e0) > θ for all r ∈ R.
Proof. Given (a ∗ b) (e0) > θ . By Theorem 4.7 (b ∗ a) (e0) > θ . Let r ∈ R using Theorem 4.6 we have (r ∗ b ∗ a) (e0) > θ and hence (a ∗ r ∗ b ∗ a ∗ r ∗ b) (e0) > θ . Then there exists x ∈ R such that (x ∗ a ∗ r ∗ b ∗ a ∗ r ∗ b) (e0) > θ . Since R is left strongly regular (a ∗ r ∗ b) (e0) > θ . Therefore R has insertion factors property.
Theorem 4.12. If (R, G, H) is left strongly regular, then for any a ∈ R, left annihilator of “a” is an ideal.
Proof. By Theorem 3.3, l (a) is a left ideal. Let x ∈ l (a) and r ∈ R,Let us show that (x ∗ r ∗ a) (e0) > θ . Since (x ∗ a) (e0) > θ, By Theorem 4.4, R has insertion factors property, (x ∗ r ∗ a) (e0) > θ.
Conclusion and further suggestions
In Section 3, we have proved that if A and B are fuzzy ideals of (R, G, H) then (A : B) is an ideal of (R, G, H). In Section 4, we have shown that if I is an ideal of a strongly regular ring (R, G, H) and let x ∈ I for any a, b ∈ I such that H (a, b, x) > θ ⇒ x ∈ I then H (b, a, y) > θ ⇒ y ∈ I. We also prove that if (R, G, H) is strongly regular, then for any a ∈ R, left annihilator of a is an ideal.
For further investigation, characterization of prime ideals, quasi-ideal and bi-ideal may be investigated. One can extend the results obtained fuzzy ring to fuzzy ternary ring.
References
1.
AktasH., Successive sums in smooth groups and smooth cyclic group, Utilitas Math17 (2006), 23–31.
2.
AktasH. and CagmanN., A type of fuzzy ring, Arch Math Logic46 (2007), 165–177.
RosenfeldA., Fuzzy groups, J Math Anal Appl35 (1971), 512–517.
6.
YetkinE. and OlgunN., Direct product of fuzzy groups and fuzzy rings, International Mathematical Forum6(21) (2011), 1005–1015.
7.
YuanXuehai and LeeE.S., Fuzzy group based on fuzzy binary operation, An International Journal Computers and Mathematics with Applications47 (2004), 631–641.
8.
ZadehL.A., Fuzzy sets, Inform and Control8 (1965), 338–353.