The topic of this paper is the role of benchmarking in Chinese e-government. Through content analysis of documentary material, this paper addresses the following questions: Which benchmarking schemes have been applied to e-government in China? What are the intentions behind the different benchmarking schemes? and Whose interests are served? Whereas previous research finds that benchmarking addresses mainly the front office of e-government (websites), this paper finds that organizational indicators are also used. Benchmarking efforts now increasingly address the back office, and basic benchmarking schemes have become institutionalized into a census. Benchmarking reinforces the interests of the central government and communicates the values of the Communist Party to the fragmented bureaucracy. In this way, benchmarking is used as an integrative mechanism that centralizes governance while maintaining adaptive capacity at the local level.
AndersenKN, MedagliaR, VatrapuR, et al. The forgotten promise of e-government maturity: assessing responsiveness in the digital public sector. Gov Inf Q2011; 28: 439-445.
5.
ArrowsmithJ, SissonK, MarginsonP. What can `benchmarking' offer the open method of co-ordination? J Eur Public Policy2004; 11: 311-328.
6.
BannisterF. The curse of the benchmark: an assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons. Int Rev Adm Sci2007; 73: 171-188.
7.
BannisterF, ConnollyR. Forward to the past: lessons for the future of e-government from the story so far. ICT Public Adm Democr Coming Decade2013; 20: 211-226.
8.
Batlle-MontserratJ, BlatJ, AbadalE. Local e-government Benchlearning: impact analysis and applicability to smart cities benchmarking. Inf Polity2016; 21: 43-59.
9.
BekkersV. The governance of back-office integration. Public Manag Rev2007; 9: 377-400.
10.
BjørnholtB, LarsenF. The politics of performance measurement: `evaluation use as mediator for politics'. Evaluation2014; 20: 400-411.
11.
CodagnoneC, MisuracaG, SavoldelliA, et al. Institutional isomorphism, policy networks, and the analytical depreciation of measurement indicators: the case of the EU e-government benchmarking. Telecommun Policy2015; 39: 305-319.
12.
CriadoJI. Europeanization of egovernment policy: institutional mechanisms and implications for public sector innovation. Inf Polity2009; 14: 315-330.
13.
DengS, MengQ. Methodology and technology of e-government performance measurement. Shehui Kexue Soc Sci2008; 2008: 24-39.
14.
FountainJE. Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2001.
15.
GaoX, SongY, ZhuX. Integration and coordination: Advancing China's fragmented e-government to holistic governance. Gov Inf Q2013; 30: 173-181.
16.
Gil-GarciaJR. Enacting electronic government success. Boston, MA: Springer, 2012.
Guangdong Province Environmental Protection Agency. Guangdong Province environmental protection government website efficiency evaluation report. [online] www.gdep.gov.cn/zwxx_1/zfgw/shbtwj/201301/P0201301103873564826 31.pdf (2013, accessed 30 July 2015).
19.
Hangzhou Municipal Government. Hangzhou Municipal Government e-government performance evaluation indicator system 2014, appendix 2. [online] www.hangzhou.gov.cn/art/2014/9/9/art_811152_78684.html (2014, accessed 15 July 2015).
20.
HeF. Designing an e-government performance evaluation system. Chin Public Adm2007; 2007: 32-34.
21.
HeeksR. e-Government in Africa: promise and practice. Inf Polity Int J Gov Democr Inf Age2002; 7: 97-114.
22.
HeilmannS, MeltonO. The reinvention of development planning in China, 1993-2012. Mod China2013; 6: 580-628.
23.
HoffJ. Technology and social change: the path between technological determinism, social constructivism and new institutionalism. In: Democratic governance and new technology: technologically mediated innovations in political practice in Western Europe. HoffJ, HorrocksI, TopsP, eds, London: Routledge, 2000; pp. 13-32.
24.
HollidayI, YepR. E-government in China. Public Adm Dev2005; 25: 239-249.
25.
IraniZ, LovePE, EllimanT, et al. Evaluating e-government: learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities. Inf Syst J2005; 15: 61-82.
26.
JanssenD, RotthierS, SnijkersK. If you measure it they will score: an assessment of international eGovernment benchmarking. Inf Polity Int J Gov Democr Inf Age2004; 9: 121-130.
27.
JiangM, XuH. Exploring online structures on Chinese government portals: citizen political participation and government legitimation. Soc Sci Comput Rev2009; 27: 174-195.
28.
Jiangxi Provincial Government. Jiangxi Provincial Government website performance evaluation indicator system preparation instructions. [online] www.jxciit.gov.cn/Item/28217.aspx (2013, accessed 15 December 2015).
29.
KluverR. The architecture of control: a Chinese strategy for e-governance. J Public Policy2005; 25: 75-97.
30.
KrepsD, RichardsonH. IS success and failure-the problem of scale. Polit Q2007; 78: 439-446.
31.
KromidhaE. Strategic e-government development and the role of benchmarking. Gov Inf Q2012; 29: 573-581.
32.
LauT-Y, FungA, JiM. E-Government in China: keeping up with the joneses? J E-Gov2006; 2: 15-38.
33.
LeiZ, JiangX. Review on the performance evaluation of e-government in China. Qingbao Zazhi J Inf2006; 2006: 13-17.
34.
LiouKT. E-government development and China's administrative reform. Int J Public Adm2007; 31: 76-95.
35.
LiuW. A Meta-Analysis Research on E-government Performance Evaluation in China. Chin Public Adm2013; 2013: 11-15.
36.
MerthaA. `Fragmented authoritarianism 20': political pluralization in the Chinese policy process. China Q2009; 200: 995-1012.
37.
OksenbergM. China's political system: challenges of the twenty-first century. China J2001; 45: 21-35.
38.
OrlikowskiWJ. Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 2000; p. 404-428.
39.
PandaP, SahuGP. Critical success factors for e-gov project: a unified model. IUP J Supply Chain Manag2013; 10: 19-32.
40.
People's Republic of China Ministry of Commerce. Chinese government website performance evaluation 2013. [online] www.mofcom.gov.cn/article/zt_jxpg2013/ (2013, accessed 30 July 2015).
41.
RorissaA, DemissieD, PardoT. Benchmarking e-government: a comparison of frameworks for computing e-government index and ranking. Gov Inf Q2011; 28: 354-362.
42.
SchlægerJ, WangQ. The limits of planning in China: equalizing basic education through the Internet. Chin J Commun2015; 8: 78-94.
43.
SchroederR. An age of limits: social theory for the 21st century. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
44.
ShanS, WangL, WangJ, et al. Research on e-government evaluation model based on the principal component analysis. Inf Technol Manag2011; 12: 173-185.
45.
SinghA, JohnsonC. A critical impulse to e-governance in the Asia Pacific. New Delhi: Springer, 2013.
46.
StanimirovicD, VintarM. Conceptualization of an integrated indicator model for the evaluation of e-government policies. Electron J E-Gov2013; 11: 293-307.
47.
WangQ. The Internet of Things and government management innovation. Chengdu: Sichuan University Press, 2015.
48.
WangR. Bibliometric analysis of e-government performance evaluation in China. Xiandai Qingbao J Mod Inf2012; 32: 76-81.
49.
WuB. Comprehensive evaluation and performance management: exploring the practices of Hangzhou. Beijing: People's Press, 2012.
50.
WuY, BauerJM. E-government in China: deployment and driving forces of provincial government portals. Chin J Commun2010; 3: 290-310.
51.
YangD, WangJ. Evaluating the level of local e-government development: core index system design and demonstration. E-Gov2014; 20-27.
52.
YangK, XuX. E-government in Mainland China. In: Public Administration in East Asia. BermanE, MoonM, ChoiH, eds, New York: CRC Press, 2010; pp. 165-192.
53.
ZhanX, YangZ. The bottlenecks and breakthroughs of e-government: the case performance assessment in Shandong Province's central agencies. Dong Yue Trib2014; 35: 174-177.
54.
ZhangC, Tang.E-government performance evaluation: research of models and Chinese strategies.Tansuo Investig2004; 2004: 36-40.
55.
ZhangJ. Good governance through e-governance: assessing China's e-government strategy. J E-Gov2006; 2: 39-71.
56.
ZhangM, WuY, HuoC. Research hotspots and tendency analysis of e-government in China. Qingbao Zazhi J Intell2015; 34: 137-141.
57.
ZhouX. E-Government in China: a content analysis of national and provincial web sites. J Comput-Mediat Commun2004; 9: 00-00.
58.
ZhuX, JiaoQ. `New Public Management' in China at the local level: competition-driven local public service reform in Tianjin. Lex Localis2012; 10: 153-170.
59.
Chinese Internet Network Information Centre. [online] www.cnnic.net (2015, accessed 15 July 2015).
