Abstract
Cerebrovascular diseases are well established causes of cognitive impairment. Different etiologic entities, such as vascular dementia (VaD), vascular cognitive impairment, subcortical (ischemic) VaD, and vascular cognitive disorder, are included in the umbrella definition of vascular cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID). Because of the variability of VCID clinical presentation, there is no agreement on criteria defining the neuropathological threshold of this disorder. In fact, VCID is characterized by cerebral hemodynamic alteration which ranges from decreased cerebral blood flow to small vessels disease and involves a multifactorial process that leads to demyelination and gliosis, including blood-brain barrier disruption, hypoxia, and hypoperfusion, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation and alteration on neurovascular unit coupling, cerebral microbleeds, or superficial siderosis. Numerous criteria for the definition of VaD have been described: the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Association Internationale pour Recherche'-et-l’Enseignement en Neurosciences criteria, the State of California Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnostic and Treatment Centers criteria, DSM-V criteria, the Diagnostic Criteria for Vascular Cognitive Disorders (a VASCOG Statement), and Vascular Impairment of Cognition Classification Consensus Study. Neuroimaging is fundamental for definition and diagnosis of VCID and should be used to assess the extent, location, and type of vascular lesions. MRI is the most sensible technique, especially if used according to standardized protocols, even if CT plays an important role in several conditions. Functional neuroimaging, in particular functional MRI and PET, may facilitate differential diagnosis among different forms of dementia. This systematic review aims to explore the state of the art and future perspective of non-invasive diagnostics of VCID.
INTRODUCTION
Cerebrovascular disease has long been recognized as an important cause of cognitive impairment, but the conceptualization of the resulting disorder presented considerable methodological complexities. Cerebrovascular pathology, including microinfarcts, lacunar infarcts, larger infarcts (of embolic or thrombotic origin), and white matter lesions, is moderately to strongly associated with cognitive decline [1–5]. Numerous subsequent proposals have tried to capture the clinical and etiologic complexity of cognitive impairment caused by heterogeneous cerebrovascular disease and pathologies [6–8]. The term vascular cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID) is recently being used as an umbrella term [9] that include vascular dementia (VaD), vascular cognitive impairment (VCI), subcortical (ischemic) VaD, and vascular cognitive disorder. Nevertheless, several criteria and research guidelines have been produced in order to focus on this group of pathologies [2, 10–13]. These factors contribute to variable prevalence estimates in the literature, as do descriptions of clinical manifestations. Although the term VaD is used to describe a severe form in the continuum of the VCID spectrum, it represents the second most common cause of dementia after Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [9, 14]. Recently, due to this heterogeneity, the Society for Vascular Behavioral and Cognitive Disorders (VASCOG) produced criteria for vascular cognitive disorder [15], which can be harmonized with the DSM-5 criteria. Core features include stepwise progression, focal neurological signs and symptoms, unequal distribution of cognitive deficits, history of multiple ischemic strokes, neuroimaging evidence of cerebrovascular disease and temporal relationship between cerebrovascular disease and cognitive impairment, even neuropsychiatric symptoms in temporal lobe stroke subtypes [16, 17]. The signs or symptoms that occur during the disease depend on the type, extent, and location of the underlying cerebrovascular pathology [18]. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Association Internationale pour Recherche'-et-l’Enseignement en Neurosciences (NINDS-AIREN) criteria require “multiple large-vessel strokes” or “a single strategically placed infarct” (angular gyrus, thalamus, basal forebrain, or posterior carotid artery or anterior carotid artery territories), “multiple basal ganglia and white matter lacunes,” or “extensive periventricular white matter lesions” [19, 20]. A single large vessel infarct may be sufficient to produce mild VCID, but it must either be strategically placed or be very extensive to cause a VaD [15, 21]. For the latter, multiple large vessel infarcts are usually necessary, which are more likely to be in the left hemisphere and are often bilateral [22] and at least one of these should be outside the cerebellum. Furthermore, a temporal association should be reported, with the cognitive impairment being evident within 3 months of the infarction and persisting beyond that period [23]. Generally, more than 2 lacunes outside the brainstem are considered necessary to support a diagnosis of VCID [24]. Nevertheless, a single large lacune placed strategically in the striatum or the thalamus may lead to a VCID diagnosis if a temporal relationship with the cognitive syndrome is present [25], or when associated with extensive periventricular and deep white matter lesions (WMLs) [26]. VCID may be present in the absence of lacunar or large infarcts if extensive WMLs are present. WMLs may be focal or multifocal and confluent. WMLs are nonspecific but, according to literature data in old subjects, mainly ischemic in origin [12, 27]. However, WMLs are also common in AD, dementia with Lewy bodies, and frontotemporal dementia, but they may also be related to mixed pathologies. For mild VCID, WMLs may be sufficient in the absence of other vascular pathology. For VaD, the additional evidence of vascular pathology signs is necessary, better if supported by temporal relationship to the cognitive impairment [28]. WMLs are more extensive in the periventricular regions and extend to the deep white matter [20, 29]. Cognitive disorders have been associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage due to vascular pathology, while subdural hemorrhage is an uncommon cause of the cognitive disorder, usually a result of trauma [30]. Multiple hemorrhages or hemorrhagic infarcts caused by cardiovascular risk factors (for example, hypertension) and sporadic or hereditary conditions associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) are closely tied to VCID development, as well cortical and subcortical microbleeds [13, 32]. The distinction between the mild and major (or dementia) levels is based on the severity of cognitive deficits, and even more on the functional impairment secondary to them. It is also particularly important in the VCID that impairment should be attributable to cognitive and not a motor, sensory, or speech impairment [15]. The mild disorder can also affect functioning but in general, such individuals can function close to their previous levels by instituting compensatory strategies with the maintenance of independent functioning. The commonly used definitions of VaD, for example, NINCDS-AIREN [19], require impairment in≥2 cognitive domains, with memory being one of these domains. However, an individual with severe impairment in one cognitive domain may in some cases have enough consequent disability to justify a diagnosis of VaD [15]. Dementia after ischemic stroke appears a result of multiple independent factors as stroke features (dysphasia, major dominant stroke syndrome), host characteristics (educational level), and prior cerebrovascular disease each independently contributes to the risk [22].
MECHANISMS/PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
The heterogeneity of cerebrovascular disease makes it challenging to elucidate the neuropathological substrates and mechanisms of VCID. VCID is an entity whose heterogeneous clinical manifestations are due to a substrate of multiple pathogenic and structural factors and several biological mechanisms might link the vascular disease to cognitive impairment. Due to the variability of cerebrovascular disease, the common comorbid pathologies, and the diverse clinical phenotypes of VCID, no widely accepted criteria defining the neuropathological threshold of this disorder are available [33, 34]. Nevertheless, decreased cerebral blood flow is the major cerebral hemodynamic alteration in VCID and pathologies, which cause a reduction in global cerebral blood flow, such as atherosclerosis and arterial stenosis are involved [3, 35–37]. Factors that define the subtypes of VCID include the nature and extent of vascular pathologies (such as ischemic infarcts, hemorrhages, and white matter changes), the degree of involvement of extra and intracranial vessels, and the anatomical location of tissue changes. One prospective screening study showed that seven pathologies, including large infarcts, lacunar infarcts, microinfarcts, myelin loss, arteriolosclerosis, leptomeningeal CAA, and perivascular space dilation, predicted cognitive impairment [38–41]. Neuroimaging and neuropathology studies have established that clinically silent cerebrovascular disease is sufficient to cause relevant cognitive impairment in the absence of stroke [15]; small vessel disease (SVD) is, in fact, the most common damage in VCID [42, 43]. SVD is characterized by arteriolosclerosis and lacunar infarcts, and causes cortical and subcortical microinfarcts and diffuse damage to the white matter (ischemic leukoencephalopathy) [38, 44], usually mainly localized in frontal and occipital regions [45–47]. Vessel wall modifications, such as arteriolosclerosis, atherosclerosis, and CAA, have been suggested to be very common and of key importance in VCID [39, 48]. The mechanism underlying VCID damage involves a multifactorial process that leads to demyelination and gliosis, including blood-brain barrier disruption, hypoxia, and hypoperfusion, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation and alteration on neurovascular unit coupling, cerebral microbleeds, or superficial siderosis [9]. Common radiologic features of SVD are lacunar infarcts, white matter lesions, brain atrophy, and visible enlarged perivascular spaces, but their relationship to VCI, however, is not well established [49]. Further causes of VCID described in the literature are arteritis, vasculitis [50], including both local and systemic inflammatory syndromes, subdural or subarachnoid hemorrhage, venous thromboses/infarcts, infectious vasculitis, hippocampal sclerosis, angiomatous lesions/vascular tumors with local steal phenomenon, and chronic migraine [2, 52]. VCID is usually a sporadic disease; however, there are also monogenic forms that should be recognized to make an accurate diagnosis and a correct family counseling [9], as cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) [53–55]), cerebral autosomal recessive arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CARASIL) [56], and the Cathepsin A-related arteriopathy with strokes and leukoencephalopathy (CARASAL) [57]. Moreover, other adult-onset genetic leukoencephalopathies have recently been described, such as hereditary diffuse leukoencephalopathy with spheroids [58]. In addition, other pathophysiological processes are likely to play a role in VCID within a mixed pathological process, including possible interactive injury with AD and other neuropathological processes, including α-synucleinopathy, tau pathology, TAR DNA-binding protein pathology and microglial reactions, in addition to local tissue injury or dysfunction, including innate immune processes and disruption of the neurovascular unit leading to blood-brain barrier alterations [16, 59].
AIM AND PURPOSE
This systematic review aims to explore the state of the art and future perspective of non-invasive diagnostics of VCID. Vascular dementia is associated with multiple, asymmetric, perfusion deficits in multi-infarct dementia and evidence for significant vascular pathology in the brain are commonly reported by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [4]. Nevertheless, nuclear medicine and, particularly, positron emission tomography (PET) provide functional information adding diagnostic and prognostic value [60]. PET can provide the necessary understanding of the abnormal cellular biochemical processes that occur in response to perfusion insufficiencies in humans [18]. Combining MRI and PET allows identification of patients with mixed dementia, with MRI showing white matter injury and PET demonstrating regional impairment of glucose metabolism and deposition of amyloid [61]. Nuclear medicine techniques such as perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET described typical patterns of hypometabolism due to dementia with differences in term of accuracy [62]. Both FDG and amyloid brain PET or PET/computed tomography (CT) for patients with cognitive decline have been considered as parameters by the American College of Radiology and the American Society for Neuroradiology in dementia population [63].
METHODS
A literature search was performed from 1 January 1989 to 15 August 2019 including the following databases: Pubmed and Scopus. The terms used for Pubmed were: ((((“Positron-Emission Tomography”[Mesh]) OR “Magnetic Resonance Imaging”[Mesh]) OR “Radionuclide Imaging”[Mesh]) OR “Computed Tomography Angiography”[Mesh]) AND (“Dementia, Vascular/diagnosis”[Mesh] OR “Dementia, Vascular/diagnostic imaging”[Mesh]). The terms used for Scopus were: TITLE (“PET”) OR TITLE (“positron emission tomography”) OR TITLE (“magnetic resonance”) OR TITLE (“MRI”) OR TITLE (“nuclear medicine”) OR TITLE (“computed tomography”) AND TITLE-ABS (“vascular dementia”). The search was made both without and with addition of filters (such as the English language only; type of article: original article, research article, review article; human only). Two reviewers (V.F. and M.R.) performed the literature search and an independent review (A.P.) selected the studies eliminating off-topic articles and made data extraction in duplicate. Clinical reports, meeting abstracts, reviews, and editor comments were excluded. All the recognized records were combined, and the complete texts were recovered which were subsequently evaluated by all the reviewers. Selection process flowchart was shown in Fig. 1 and the presentation of results was made according to the PRISMA guidelines. The basics characteristics of the included studies are reported in Table 1.

Flowchart summarizing the selection process of included studies.
Characteristics of selected studies
95% CI, 95% confidence interval; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; aMCI, amnestic mild cognitive impairment; Aβ, amyloid-β; CAA, cerebral amyloid angiopathy; CADASIL, cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy; CARASAL, cathepsin A-related arteriopathy with strokes and leukoencephalopathy; CBF, cerebral blood flow; CMRglu, cerebral metabolic rate of glucose; DLB, dementia with Lewy bodies; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; DWML, deep white matter lesions; FA, fractional anisotropy; FDG, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; FTLD, frontotemporal lobar degeneration; HMPAO SPECT, single photon emission computed tomography with 99mTC hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime; LI, lacunar infarctions; MBs, microbleeds; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MTA, medial temporal lobe atrophy; NC, normal controls; OR, odds ratio; PD, Parkinson’s disease; PET, positron emission tomography; PiB, 11C-Pittsburgh Compound-B; PSMD, peak width of skeletonized mean diffusivity; rCBF, regional cerebral blood flow; rMRGlu, glucose metabolism; SUVR, standardized uptake value ratio; SVaD, subcortical vascular dementia; SVD, small vessel disease; svMCI, subcortical vascular mild cognitive impairment; TIA, transient ischemic attack; VaD, vascular dementia; VCI, vascular cognitive impairment; VRS, Virchow-Robin spaces; WM, white matter; WMH, white matter hyperintensities.
NEUROIMAGING IN VASCULAR DEMENTIA
Neuroimaging is an essential part of the workup of patients presenting for the first time with cognitive decline [64–66]. In patients with suspected VCID, neuroimaging should be used to assess the extent, location, and type of vascular lesions. Evidence for significant vascular pathology in the brain usually relies on CT or structural MRI, with the latter being more sensitive, especially if the standardized protocols recommended by the harmonization group are followed [67]. The first applications of brain MRI were developed to understand and analyze the morphological alterations induced on white and grey matter, by using specialized software [68–70]. The data obtained from these elaborations were used to characterize the neurodegenerative processes and related to the affected physical areas with the associated cognitive functions [71]. While atrophy or deformation of gray matter integrity is visualizable and measurable through macrostructural evaluations, white matter lesions are often injuries at the microstructural level, thus not measurable in macroscopic morphology [72]. MRI should include T1-weighted imaging to detect atrophy, T2-weighted imaging to detect lacunar infarcts and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences to detect white matter lesions. Furthermore, susceptibility-weighted imaging may detect microbleeds and superficial siderosis. Also, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can detect microinfarcts and changes in the white matter tracts; however, these advanced MRI techniques are not routine in clinical practice and are only used in research settings [72, 73]. Another structural hallmark of SVD is the alteration of the Virchow–Robin or perivascular spaces (PVS) [74]. In healthy tissue, these spaces are proposed to form part of a complex brain fluid drainage system that supports interstitial fluid exchange and may also facilitate the clearance of waste products from the brain. The pathophysiological signature of PVS and what this implies regarding their function and interaction with the brain microcirculation, as well as the subsequent downstream effects on the development of lesions in the brain has not been established [75]. It is possible to evaluate the PVS alterations both with a semi-quantitative grading system or with quantitative automatic methods [72, 76]. The latter category produces quantitative measures, which can contribute to an estimate of the global cerebrovascular risk, together with other brain measurements [72]. Also, CT can be used to detect atrophy and some vascular lesions [16]. The findings are varied and should be interpreted in the clinical context, and their nature, severity, location, and no feature are pathognomonic of VCID. PET imaging with FDG describe regional cortical hypometabolism corresponding to a vascular territory injury both in large vessel injuries and in lacunes [77]. Amyloid PET tracers appear to label vascular amyloid in patients with CAA-related, improving differential diagnosis [13]. In fact, patients with negative amyloid imaging and VaD were better at memory but worse at frontal function than patients with AD [78] and VCID was distinct from mild cognitive impairment due to AD in terms of neuropsychological and PET findings [79]. Lacunar infarction appears on T1-weighted or T2-weighted MRI FLAIR sequence as a small hypointense area, surrounded by a rim of hyperintensity, although in some cases the central cavity fluid is not suppressed on FLAIR and it can appear entirely hyperintense despite a clear cerebrospinal fluid-like intensity on other sequences. A lacune has most commonly been regarded as a lesion between 3 and 15 mm [80, 81] (the VCID harmonization standards recommend that up to 1 cm be classified as “small” infarcts) [43, 67]. Because of the poorer spatial resolution of CT, lacunes are seen as small hypodensities areas but they are more likely to be missed. Microinfarcts, which are not visible on gross neuropathological examination, nor generally with neuroimaging, cannot be taken into account for clinical diagnosis [15, 80]. On CT, WMLs are seen as hypodensities or leukoaraiosis described as “extensively patchy or diffuse areas of low attenuation with ill-defined margins extending to the centrum semiovale (from the ventricular margin)” [15]. On MRI, which is much more sensitive to white matter pathology than CT, WMLs are hypointense areas on T1-weighted and hyperintensities on T2-weighted imaging. The T2-FLAIR sequence is useful to high light regions of T2 prolongation in the white matter, corresponding to regions of increased water content with respect to normal white matter. Hyperintensity in the T2-FLAIR sequence represents a region where the white matter is undergoing a process of demyelination or axonal loss (generally present in SVD) [72, 82]. Characterization of WMLs was first qualitative (based on the appearance and position of the identifiable lesions), then, quantitative trough software improvements that allow the quantification of the volume of white matter involved [83]. The WMLs are described in T2 MRI as “hyperintensities extending into the periventricular and deep white matter; extending caps (>10 mm as measured parallel to the ventricle) or irregular halo (>10 mm with broad, irregular margins and extending into deep white matter) and diffusely confluent hyperintensities (>25 mm, irregular shape) or extensive white matter changes (diffuse hyperintensity without focal change)”[15]. DTI is a technique that can be used to obtain a parametric representation of the microstructural organization of structures like the myelinated axonal fibers composing the white matter [43]. The white matter which appears normal on T2-weighted imaging may also have abnormal anisotropy or diffusivity which relates to neuropathology and may have relevance for cognitive function [84]. Abnormalities on DTI are, however, not delineated well enough at present to be incorporated into diagnostic criteria. Nevertheless, a previous paper suggest that SVD alters white matter network integration and segregation, which further predicts cognitive dysfunction [43]. The main parameters obtained from DTI are fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AxD), and radial diffusivity (RD), allowing the assessment of the status of white matter microstructure. A decrease in FA can usually be considered an index of white matter fascicle disorganization due to demyelination or axonal degradation. One of the most common approaches used to analyze DTI is the use of tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) [85], which acquires a group of images to a common space, projects the mean FA or MD values to the skeletonized profile of the white matter, and then computes cross-subject voxel wise statistics to assess the differences in some regions between various conditions. This method allows the identification of signs of damage and the differential diagnosis between VaD and pure [86]. Other approaches have tried to further increase the sensitivity of DTI to tackle rare genetic diseases such as CADASIL and compared to sporadic SVD and AD [87]. Cortical and subcortical bleeds are best visualized on T2-weighted gradient-recalled echo sequences and susceptibility-weighted MRI scans. The diagnosis of VCID due to microbleeds is an exclusion diagnosis: microbleeds are common in cognitively normal elderly, while microbleeds associated with hypertension are seen in the deep nuclei and brainstem and those with AD are generally lobar in location [88] (see Table 2).
Imaging techniques in vascular dementia
FUTURE PERSPECTIVE
As mentioned above, DTI is an MRI technique capable of evaluating the integrity of white matter in greater detail, and will often detect abnormality not visible with other modalities. Its utility in discriminating VCID from other cognitive disorders remains to be established [72]. Functional MRI is a promising tool in neuroimaging research study field but is not suggested in clinical practice. The most common implementation of functional MRI is a T2-weighted sequence of images with a weighting approximatively equal to the tissues T2 relaxation time and with a scan time lower than 5 s to correctly sample the hemodynamic response function. Thus, the analysis of blood oxygen level-dependent signals allows for the indirect measurement of regions of brain activation, often performed during several kinds of stimuli. Therefore, a consistent pattern of synchronized activation in healthy subjects called functional networks has been described, closely associated with the cerebral function driven by those synchronized regions [72]. Further multicenter trials are needed to define a clear golden standard in algorithms, software, and techniques of functional MRI. AD research was one of the first fields where the use of functional MRI has brought major advancements to the understanding of the pathophysiological processes underlying the resulting cognitive decline. A consistent body of work demonstrated that AD alters the functional connectivity in the default mode network, a network that contributes to the default function of the brain and is deactivated during cognitively active tasks [89, 90]. After these first investigations, with the increase of available data and improvements in data quality, many projects have also focused on different functional networks and different degrees of cognitive impairment as well as considering mild cognitive impairment. Other reports evidenced different graph connection properties in patients stratified by the presence of white matter lesions and VaD, describing the constructive reorganization of brain networks secondary to WMLs [91, 92]. Cerebral perfusion is also assessed using SPECT and xenon-contrast CT in clinical practice, and even if rare diseases can be studied with these techniques, MRI is more sensitive [15, 93]. PET enables the imaging of regional glucose metabolic rates, using FDG, which may assist in the differential diagnosis of the various types of cognitive disorders describing several patterns of hypometabolism [94]. According to the EAMN-EAN consensus panel, the use of FDG-PET is supported to facilitate differential diagnosis among different forms of dementia [95, 96]. Literature searches, assessment, and consensual decisions answered the PICO questions whether FDG-PET should be performed, as adding diagnostic value (in terms of increased accuracy, and versus pathology, biomarker-based diagnosis or diagnosis at follow-up) as compared to standard clinical/neuropsychological assessment alone. PET imaging seems particularly useful to differentiate among main forms of dementia, e.g., between AD and VaD, and in patients with atypical presentation or atypical course [96, 97]. Associated patterns of hypometabolism include the thalamus, brainstem, and cerebellum in VaD, as opposed to the posterior cingulate and temporoparietal pattern of AD patients [79, 99]; these results have not, however, been confirmed in other papers [100]. The main problems also according to panelists are the difficulty of using a clinical reference standard in the issue of mixed pathologies. Nevertheless, panelists supported the utility of FDG-PET in identifying AD in patients with vascular pathology if the characteristic AD pattern of bilateral posterior temporoparietal hypometabolism is present, providing the consideration that hypometabolic regions are not colocalized with large vessel cortical or subcortical infarcts on a structural scan [96]. Furthermore, PET also allows the imaging of specific molecular abnormalities. Further PET tracers are used to focus both on better knowledge about the pathophysiology and early diagnosis, with several implications in therapeutic management and clinical evidence. In vivo measurements of the cerebral amyloid burden (amyloid-β) have been used in the management of patients with AD, but seems promising also in the VCID research field. The imaging of amyloid with compounds, such as the radiolabeled Pittsburgh compound B (11C-PiB) or [18F]-labelled amyloid-PET tracers such as Florbetapir, Flutemetamol, and Florbetaben, has received much interest and can be considered a biomarker of AD [101–105]. Amyloid-β imaging has recently been used to support the diagnosis of pure subcortical VaD [106] as well as post-stroke dementia [107], suggesting that the latter is generally a combination of AD and VaD and helped improve the accuracy of diagnosis of dementia subtype [106, 108–111]. Furthermore 11C-PiB papers suggested that cumulative ischemia without amyloid pathology could lead to hippocampal atrophy and shape changes [52, 112], even if amyloid pathology and vascular pathology may have different effects on the shape of the hippocampus and amygdala [59]. In subcortical VaD patients, amyloid burden, independently or interactively with SVD, contributed to longitudinal cognitive decline [113]. Moreover, amyloid tracers binding may be common even in post-stroke dementia [107]. Furthermore, PET imaging with tau tracers ([18F]AV-1451, [18F]THK535149, and [11C]PBB3) is a useful tool in AD research [114-116] and future involvement of these tracers in further dementia study protocols seems promising.
CONCLUSIONS
Cerebrovascular disease is a leading cause of cognitive impairment, accounting for up to 20% of cases of dementia. Neuroimaging is a rapidly developing field and future advances in the methodology will likely offer stronger support to increase the diagnostic accuracy of specific cognitive disorders. PET new tracers, such as amyloid-β and tau ligands, promise a significant impact on future research in dementia. Although vascular dementia is commonly studied using MRI, nuclear medicine provides functional information adding diagnostic and prognostic value.
As the take home message, the combination of MRI and PET allows the identification of patients with mixed dementia, with MRI showing lesions of white matter and PET demonstrating regional impairment of glucose metabolism and amyloid deposition. Functional neuroimaging, in particular, functional MRI and FDG-PET, allows the detection of the localized and/or diffuse metabolic disturbances, and are effective in differentiating vascular from degenerative dementia, like AD.
