Abstract
Background:
The cognitive trajectories in normal aging may be affected by medial temporal atrophy (MTA) and amyloid burden, as well as vascular pathologies such as cortical microbleeds (CMB) and white matter hyperintensities (WMH).
Objective:
We addressed here the role of imaging markers in their prediction in a real-world situation.
Methods:
We performed a 4.5-year longitudinal study in 90 older community-dwellers coupling two neuropsychological assessments, MTA estimated with the Schelten’s scale, number of CMB, and WMH evaluated with the Fazekas score at inclusion and follow-up, visual rating of amyloid PET and glucose hypometabolism at follow-up, and APOE genotyping. Regression models were built to explore the association between the continuous cognitive score (CCS) and imaging parameters.
Results:
The number of strictly lobar CMB at baseline (4 or more) was related to a 5.5-fold increase of the risk of cognitive decrement. This association persisted in multivariable models explaining 10.6% of the CCS decrease variance. MTA, and Fazekas score at baseline and amyloid positivity or abnormal FDG PET, were not related to the cognitive outcome. The increase of right MTA at follow-up was the only correlate of CCS decrease both in univariate and multivariable models explaining 9.2% of its variance.
Conclusion:
The present data show that the accumulation of more than four CMB is associated with significant cognitive decrement over time in highly educated elderly persons. They also reveal that the progressive deterioration of cognitive performance within the age-adjusted norms is also related to the increase of visually assessed MTA.
INTRODUCTION
Cognitive decline affects a substantial proportion of elderly individuals as part of the normal aging process. It usually starts at mid-to-late life and concerns a wide range of cognitive domains such as information processing, executive functions, visuospatial abilities, and memory [1 –4]. Cognitive trajectories in old age are, however, variable with some persons displaying stable performances, and others showing fluctuations with slow decrement over long time periods. In a limited number of cases, progressive worsening of neuropsychological performances corresponds to the pre-mild cognitive impairment (MCI) state that includes asymptomatic at risk and preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) cases [5 –7]. Recent longitudinal studies in various cultural backgrounds suggested that almost 40% of elderly individuals showed stable and high memory and executive function performances (successful agers) whereas 20% displayed progressive decline (declining agers [8 –10]).
Understanding the determinants of cognitive decrement at its very early phases is essential for improving the effectiveness of early interventions aiming to identify atypical trajectories and sustain brain resilience [11, 12]. Besides demographic, socioeconomic status, physical functioning, and health behaviors (body mass index, physical activity, alcohol and smoking) (for review, see [7]), AD signature-related brain changes such as medial temporal atrophy (MTA) and amyloid burden, as well as vascular lesions, mainly cortical microbleeds (CMB) and white matter hyperintensities (WMH), have all been thought to impact on cognitive performances at the pre-MCI state [13 –22]. However, negative data were also frequently reported [23 –28]. The absence of longitudinal design and short follow-up periods may partly explain these discrepancies. Three additional methodological problems should be taken into account. First, most of the longitudinal investigations in cognitively intact elderly individuals examined the evolution of a limited number of neuropsychological parameters (working and episodic memory as well as executive abilities [25, 29], or screening test (more frequently Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE) scores over time. However, the temporal evolution of cognitive performances in normal aging is highly heterogeneous with some of them declining and others remaining stable or even improving (for review, see [1]).
An accurate approach of cognitive evolution in this population must consider both improvement and decline of task performances in a wide range of cognitive tests. Second, AD-signature and vascular brain changes are partly interdependent with nonlinear trajectories over time [30 –36] so that concomitant consideration of imaging parameters along with well-known confounding factors (age, gender, socioeconomic status, APOE ɛ4) in multivariable models are needed to define the relative weight of each of them in the prediction of cognitive decrement. Third, most observations were made in research settings using sophisticated quantification protocols that are rarely applicable in routine clinical environments. In order to address the role of imaging markers in the prediction of cognitive changes in a “real world” situation, we performed a longitudinal study of 90 community-dwelling elders coupling two neuropsychological assessments during a 4-5-year follow-up period, and visual rating of amyloid burden at inclusion as well as MTA, CMB, and WMH both at inclusion and last follow-up. Our main hypothesis is that cognitive decrement within the normal range is associated with significant changes in at least one AD-signature and vascular burden imaging markers. We also hypothesized that amyloid load per se would not affect cognition in this highly selected series of healthy elders.
Materials and Methods
Participants
The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee and all participants gave written informed consent prior to inclusion. The selection of cases among participants of a still ongoing cohort study was described in detail elsewhere [37]. Briefly, the present cohort included only healthy controls with preserved cognition, no history of psychiatric, neurological, and major medical conditions, and no regular use of psychotropic medication [37 –41]. Substantial vascular burden as evidenced by subtle cardiovascular symptoms, hypertension (non treated), and a history of stroke or transient ischemic episodes were exclusion criteria. All of these cases had three neuropsychological evaluations (baseline, 18 months, and 54 months), structural brain MRI at baseline and 54-months post-inclusion, APOE genotyping, and amyloid and FDG PET at last follow-up. Our sample included 90 individuals (55 (61%) female, age range 74– 91 years).
Neurocognitive assessment
At baseline, all individuals were evaluated with a neuropsychological battery described in details previously [37 –41]. All individuals were also evaluated with the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR) [42]. According to the criteria of Petersen et al. [43], cases with focal or multifocal cognitive impairment with minimal impairment of instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) were classified as MCI. All of these cases had CDR of 0.5 but no dementia and a score exceeding 1.5 standard deviations below the age-appropriate mean in any of the cognitive tests used. Participants with neither dementia nor MCI were classified as cognitively healthy controls and underwent two additional cognitive assessments after a mean period of 18 and 54 months.
In the absence of consensus, the definition of groups within the normal range on the basis of neuropsychological criteria should avoid to include a priori hypotheses on the cognitive fate of cases with unstable cognitive performances. Among them, some cases progress at the first follow-up and remain stable or even improve their performance at the second follow-up. Others are stable at the first follow-up and progress later on (but may improve or remain stable at later time points). To resolve this difficult question, we calculated the number of tests with improved minus the number of tests with decreased performances resulting in a final continuous cognitive score for each time point. Change in cognition between inclusion and last follow-up was defined as the sum of the continuous cognitive scores at two follow-ups. This new approach makes it possible to avoid a priori hypotheses regarding the longitudinal evolution of cognition in our cases. Cognitive trajectories were defined after summing the number of cognitive tests at follow-up with performances at least 0.5 standard deviation (SD) higher or lower compared with the first evaluation (Z-scores). Change in cognition between inclusion and last follow-up was defined as the sum of the continuous cognitive scores at two follow-ups as previously described [44]. This variable was used in all subsequent regression models. The assessment of cognitive changes over time was made using a continuous cognitive score taking into account both the increase and decrease of performances in a given test across the three assessments as described previously. Cognitive trajectories were defined after summing the number of cognitive tests at follow-up with performances at least 0.5 standard deviation higher or lower compared with the first evaluation (Z-scores). Changes in cognition between inclusion and last follow-up were defined as the sum of the continuous cognitive scores at two follow-ups as previously described [37, 44].
MR imaging
At baseline, imaging data were acquired on a 3T MRI scanner (TRIO SIEMENS Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany). The structural high-resolution T1-weighted anatomical scan was performed with the following fundamental parameters: 256×256 matrix, 176 slices, 1 mm isotropic, TR = 2300 ms, TE 2.27 ms; axial T2w sequences: 512×310 matrix, 30 slices, 4 mm thickness, TR 4000 ms, TE 105 ms; susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI): 256×208 matrix, 128 slices, TR 28 ms, TE 20 ms); pulsed ASL: 64×64 matrix, 20 slices, 6 mm thickness, TR 4000 ms, TE 12 ms, inversion time 1800 ms. At follow-up, data were acquired on a 3T MR750w scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI), including a high-resolution anatomical 3DT1 : 254×254 matrix, 178 slices, 1 mm isotropic, TR 7.2 ms; axial T2w sequences: 512×512 matrix, 30 slices, 4 mm thickness, TR 6900 ms, TE 105 ms,; susceptibility-weighted angiography (SWAN): 320×288 matrix, 176 slices, TR 28 ms, TE 20 ms; multi-delay (7) pseudo-continuous ASL (PCASL) 128×128 matrix, 32 slices, 4 mm thickness, TR 5936 ms, TE 10.5 ms, post label delays 1.00, 1.22, 1.48, 1.78, 2.15, 2.62, and 3.32 s.
Amyloid PET imaging
Fifty-nine 18F-Florbetapir- (Amyvid) and thirty-one 18F-Flutemetamol-PET (Vizamyl) data were acquired on two different tomographs (Siemens Biograph™ mCT and GE Healthcare Discovery PET/CT 710 scanners) of varying resolution and following different platform-specific acquisition protocols. The 18F-Florbetapir images were acquired 50 to 70 min after injection and the 18F-Flutemetamol images 90 to 120 min after injection. PET images were reconstructed using the parameters recommended by the ADNI protocol aimed at increasing data uniformity across the multicenter acquisitions. More information on the different imaging protocols for PET acquisition can be found on the ADNI web site (http://adni.loni.usc.edu/methods/).
FDG PET imaging
PET/CT data acquisition was performed on a Siemens Biograph™ mCT or Vision scanner according to the guidelines of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) [45]. The PET acquisition was started approximately 30 min after injection of 200 MBq of 18F-FDG. The PET emission study (20 min, one bed position) followed immediately the CT study used for attenuation correction. Ultra-law dose brain CT imaging was performed under standard conditions (120 kVp, 20 mAs, 128×0.6 collimation, a pitch of 1 and 1 s per rotation).
Visual MR assessment
The visual analysis of brain MRI images was conducted by an independent, board-certified specialist in neuroradiology (SH) blind to the neuropsychological data. MTA was assessed at baseline according to the established score [46], ranging from 0 (no atrophy) to 4 (significant atrophy). The MTA score is a simple and clinically established semi-quantitative scale. At follow-up MR imaging, each case was directly compared with the individual baseline exam and graded from 0 to 3 (0 = stable, 1 = slight increase, 2 = moderate increase, 3 = strong increase). A score of 1 indicates that the MTA score of this individual is still unchanged, yet there is a slight increase in the visual perception of MTA atrophy. Scores of 2 or 3 generally indicate progression from one MTA score to the next, for example MTA 1 to MTA2/MTA3 respectively.
WMH load at baseline was assessed according to the established Fazekas score [47] ranging from 0 (no white matter lesions) to 3 (confluent white matter lesions). Similar to the MTA score described above, the Fazekas score is simple and clinically established yet does not capture small intra-individual progression. At follow-up, the equivalent score of 0– 3 was used (0 = stable, 1 = slight increase, 2 = moderate increase, 3 = strong increase). A score of 1 again indicated a slight increase in lesion load without passing from one Fazekas score to the next.
The number of CMB was assessed based on the SWI or SWAN sequences. Only lesions were considered which are probable CMB, and the corresponding phase images were also analyzed to discriminate probable CMB versus micro-calcifications [48]. At baseline, total number of CMB and number of CMB per location (supratentorial superficial, supratentorial deep, and infratentorial) were evaluated. At follow-up imaging, the number of additional CMB per region was assessed.
Amyloid PET analysis
The visual analysis of amyloid PET images was conducted by an independent, board-certified specialist in nuclear medicine (VG) blind to the neuropsychological data, following the tracer-specific standardized operating procedures approved by the European Medicinal Agency. Specifically, regional positivity was assessed for each scan, specifying if uptake was identified in the lateral frontal, parietal, posterior cingulate and precuneus, anterior cingulate, temporal lateral, and striatal regions in either of the two cerebral hemispheres [49].
In order to assess the global amyloid burden in the present series, we also calculated cortical SUVR values as provided by the centiloid project with pons as reference region [50]. Cortical uptake was calculated using the regions from the Harvard-Oxford atlas [51]. These data were not used in further statistical analysis that focused on visual amyloid rating.
Visual FDG PET analysis
FDG PET reading was performed by visual analysis of the output of an automated voxel-wise comparison with a reference database, as recommended in guidelines [45] and previously described in details [52]. Images were classified as normal when no significant deviations from the normal distribution were observed, and pathological when significant regional reductions of glucose metabolism were documented.
APOE ɛ4 status
APOE ɛ4 status was assessed as described earlier [41]. Subjects were divided according to whether they were a carrier of the APOE ɛ4 allele (4/3 versus 3/3, 3/2 carriers).
Statistical analysis
Gender-related differences in demographic, neuropsychological, and imaging data were assessed with χ 2, Mann-Whitney u test, and unpaired t-test depending on the variable distribution. Simple (Model 1) and multiple linear regression models (Model 2: adjusted for gender, age, education and APOE ɛ4 allele, Model 3: full model) were used explore the association between continuous cognitive score (CCS; dependent variable) and both binary (PET-amyloid, FGD-PET) and ordinal (MTA, CMB, Fazekas score at baseline and in separate models with their changes at follow-up) imaging data as well as potential confounders such as age, gender, education levels, and APOE genotyping. In the full model, we used 9 independent variables that is the maximum authorized given the number of participants according to Harrel’s empirical rule [53]. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. All analyses were performed with Stata release 16.1 (College Station, TX, USA).
Power analysis
In a study involving 126 initially amyloid-negative and cognitively intact participants, Farrel et al. [54] examined the predictors of episodic memory decline. A sample size of 82 achieves 90% power to detect a partial ρ² of at least 0.200 attributed to one independent variable(s) when the significance level (alpha) is 0.050. These results are based on 5000 Monte Carlo samples from the bivariate normal distribution under the alternative hypothesis, computed with PASS v16.0.
RESULTS
Demographic data show no gender-related differences in age, APOE ɛ4 allele frequency, MMSE scores at baseline, and baseline imaging measures. Men were more educated than women in the present series (Table 1). The mean SUVR values were of 0.6±0.1 in amyloid negative cases and 0.8±0.1 in amyloid positive cases confirming the low rate of amyloid burden in this series. Of note, none of our cases evolved to MCI during the follow-up period pointing to the presence of cognitive resilience in these highly educated controls.
Participants’ baseline characteristics by gender (MTA: medial temporal atrophy).
In univariate models, CCS decrement was not related to amyloid positivity, abnormal FDG PET, and MTA. This was also the case for the Fazekas score at baseline. In contrast, the number of CMB at baseline (4 or more) was associated with a 5.2 unit decrease of the CCS change; Table 2). When the location of CMB was considered, this association persisted only for supratentorial superficial (strictly lobar according to [55]) CMB. In multivariable models controlling for age, gender, MMSE score at baseline, education, and APOE ɛ4 allele, the negative association between the number of CMB (≥4) and CCS change was still significant explaining 10.6% of the variance of this latter variable (Table 2). In multivariable models including the above-mentioned variables plus MTA at baseline, Fazekas score, amyloid positivity and abnormal FDG PET, a number of CMB higher than 4 remained associated with the cognitive outcome at follow-up (Table 2). A distinct pattern of clinic-radiologic associations emerged when the evolution of imaging markers was considered. Cognitive decrement was then related to the increase of right MTA at follow-up both in univariate and multivariable models. This imaging parameter explained 6.1% of CCS change variance. In multivariable models including Fazekas score and CMB change as well as amyloid positivity and abnormal FDG PET, the increase of right MTA was the only measure to be associated with CCS change (Table 3).
Baseline variables associated with change in CCS assessed with linear regression (Model 1: univariate, Model 2: adjusted for gender, age, education, and APOE ɛ4 allele, Model 3: full model).
Effect of Fazekas score, MTA, and number of microbleeds change on the evolution of CCS assessed with linear regression (Model 1: univariate, Model 2: adjusted for gender, age, education, and APOE ɛ4 allele, Model 3: full model)
DISCUSSION
In this community-based cohort of older adults, the careful exclusion of neurological and psychiatric disorders, regular use of psychotropic medication, and previous history of cerebrovascular pathologies makes it possible to isolate the relative contribution of neurodegenerative and vascular burden assessed by visual inspection of MRI and PET scans. The present data show that the accumulation of four CMB or more is associated with significant cognitive decrement over time in highly educated elderly persons. They also reveal that the progressive deterioration of cognitive performance within the age-adjusted norms is also related to the increase of visually assessed MTA, a well-known AD-signature marker. In contrast, amyloid burden, synaptic loss (as documented by FDG PET abnormalities), and WMH did not affect cognition in this early pre-MCI state.
The association between CMB and cognition in old age is still a highly disputed issue. Early after their first description, CMB have been suggested to increase the risk of incident dementia [55, 56]. Subsequent meta-analyses led to more ambiguous results. Lei et al. [57] reported a positive association between CMB and cognitive decline using the MMSE score or the Montreal cognitive assessment scale. Another meta-analysis in AD cases failed to identify significant differences in cognition depending on the presence of CMB [58]. Two memory clinic studies including mostly MCI cases [59, 60] and two studies in elderly individuals with vascular risk factors [61, 62] led also to negative data. The most solid data supporting the deleterious effect of CMB on cognition comes from three population-based studies (Rotterdam [63], Framingham Heart [64]; and AGES-Reyjkavik [65]) including non-demented persons. Their meta-analysis yielded a statistically significant association between CMB presence and incident dementia (two-fold risk increase). However, another meta-analysis using the same data found no significant association between CMB presence and incidence of dementia [66]. Besides methodological reasons such as absence of adjustment for other small vessel disease biomarkers and variability in cognitive assessments, one main reason explaining these discrepancies is the absence of CMB quantification in most of these studies.
From a pathophysiological standpoint, it seems plausible that the total number of CMB is more relevant than their single presence. The present data reveal that a number of CMB equal or higher than four is associated with a 5.2 unit decrease of the CCS change at 4.5-year follow-up. This observation concerned only strictly lobar CMB that affect gray matter in neocortical areas and are usually but not exclusively associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy [55, 67]. Importantly, the deleterious effect of CMB on cognition persisted when adjusting for WMH score, amyloid positivity, abnormal FDG PET, and MTA score. This finding contrasts with a recent meta-analysis that simultaneously examined four small vessel disease biomarkers and reported that only WMH burden was associated with high incidence of dementia in general population and at risk individuals [68]. One should, however, keep in mind that the cognitive outcome in the present study was the longitudinal decrement of global cognition in healthy elders and not the occurrence of clinically overt dementia. Taken together, these observations indicate that prior to the emergence of cognitive symptoms, the presence of four or more CMB should be considered as a risk factor for future decline of cognitive performances in healthy elderly persons. Once this cut-off is reached, other MRI biomarkers are better associated with the cognitive outcome. In fact, at the end of the follow-up period, the increase of MTA, and not the accumulation of CMB, was the better correlate of the cognitive outcome.
The association between MTA assessed with the Schelten’s scale and cognitive evolution in old age is also matter of debate. For MCI transition to AD, this single marker has a high specificity but very low sensitivity independently of the cut-off used [69, 70]. Results are even more ambiguous in preclinical AD cases and asymptomatic at-risk cases. In cognitively intact elders, Glodzik et al. [71] found that memory decline at 2-year follow-up was related to longitudinal MTA but not medial temporal lobe volume at baseline. Using the stage classification of preclinical AD cases [72, 73] reported that the rate of change of the medial temporal lobe volume (2.4 years follow-up) in all stages was not related to cognitive decline, yet individuals who progressed to MCI had smaller medial temporal lobe volumes. Based on these observations, they postulate that MTA takes place prior to molecular AD-signature changes possibly reflecting genetic or developmental abnormalities. Our data differ from these observations by the use of visual rating rather than quantitative measures of MTA and longer MRI follow-up (4.5 years). Moreover, we used a CCS rather than memory assessment or MCI progression. Of interest, no case with MCI transition at follow-up was included in our analysis. In this selected sample, the increase of MTA but not its presence at baseline was associated with cognitive decrement. In a recent study focusing on the determinants of MTA, measured with voxel-based morphometry, we reported a weak but still significant association between the cognitive outcome and MTA increase over time when taking into account age, gender, APOE genotype, and amyloid burden [37]. Our observations parallel a recent report by Albert and collaborators [74] who postulated that the combination of six independent measures (hippocampal and entorhinal cortex volume, cognitive tests score, APOE4 allele, amyloid load, and phosphorylated tau) predict cognitive decline in a cohort of cognitively intact elders. Among these parameters and as reported by Pontecorvo and coworkers [75], MTL lobe volumetric changes are mostly related to aging process whereas the development of tau pathology and subsequent loss of grey matter beyond the MTL may be dependent on amyloid accumulation. One intriguing finding is that only right MTA increase was related to the cognitive outcome. Previous reports pointed to the brain asymmetry in respect to MTA with a more frequent and severe involvement of the right hemisphere in AD cases [76, 77]. In another report, Shen and collaborators [78] found that right MTA was the best MRI marker for differentiating amnestic MCI from healthy controls. In line with these contributions, the present findings also suggest that right, but not left, MTA is a reliable correlate of cognitive decrement in normal aging.
Some of the negative data merit consideration. In line with recent findings, visual PET amyloid positivity was not related to subtle cognitive changes in the present cohort [25, 44]. Current evidence about the role of amyloid accumulation in cognitively preserved controls remains ambiguous. Although early data suggested that elevated amyloid levels at baseline (SUVr > 1.5) were associated with greater cognitive decline at follow-up [19], more recent contributions indicated that PIB PET amyloid-β’s relationship to cognitive decline was nonlinear being more prominent at lower amyloid-β levels [26]. The INSIGHT-pre AD data published recently showed no association between this parameter and cognitive fate at 30-month follow-up in healthy controls [25]. Our observations agree with this latter viewpoint implying that the detrimental effect of amyloid burden in cognitively preserved elders is limited. More surprisingly and in contrast to the idea that WMH is more deleterious than CMB in old age [68], the Fazekas score did not correlate with cognitive decrement in our cohort. Previous longitudinal studies also documented an effect of WMH presence and progression on cognitive functions in old age (mainly general intelligence, attention, and executive functions [79 –81]). The use of a global cognitive score that takes into account both improvements and declines and the exclusion of cases with clinically overt cerebrovascular pathologies at baseline may partly explain this discrepancy. However, and as suggested by Alber et al. [82], the effect size of WMH impact is small and possibly below the detection threshold in this selected cohort of healthy elders.
Conclusions
Our data indicate that the number of CMB and progression of MTA are the best proxies of cognitive decrement in normal aging. Strengths and limitations of the present study should also be discussed. Among the first, one can note the inclusion of several imaging modalities covering both upstream (amyloid deposition) and downstream biomarkers of brain aging (MTA, abnormal PET), WMH and CMB, careful neuropsychological assessment considering the evolution of all of the main cognitive functions, and use of multivariable models controlling for the known interdependence between the above mentioned markers. One should, however, consider that in the absence of widely accepted standards in the evolution of cognition at the pre-MCI state, the cutoff values used here (0.5 SD higher or lower compared with the first evaluation (Z-scores)) remain arbitrary. We opted for the use of visual MRI and PET rating in order to be close to the reality of busy routine clinical settings where sophisticated quantification methods are frequently absent. Moreover, and in order to define the relative weight of each imaging marker on cognitive evolution, cases with substantial medical comorbidities (including cerebrovascular ones) were a priori excluded. Our observations should thus be interpreted within this framework and cannot be transposed in other clinical or research settings. Both FDG and amyloid-PET were performed at endpoint so that cannot be considered as strict predictors of cognitive decrement. However, our mean SUVR data document that the amyloid burden is unusually low in our series ranging from 0.6 in amyloid negative cases to 0.8 in amyloid positive cases. The rate of amyloid accumulation is known to be very slow in this particular context so that one cannot expect major changes in amyloid uptake and distribution in the relatively short follow-up period [83]. An additional limitation concerns the absence of tau imaging to complete the AD-signature characterization. The observed effects of CMB and MTA may be considered rather weak (9 to 11% of cognitive variability explained by these variables). When interpreting this modest percentage, one should take into account that, in contrast to MCI and AD cases, healthy controls display an impressive variability in MRI parameters [84, 85]. Finally, MRI imaging was performed twice during the 4.5-year period. In the absence of additional time points and with a single amyloid assessment, we cannot comment on the validity of longitudinal trajectories of imaging parameters in predicting the cognitive fate of asymptomatic elderly individuals. Future studies with multimodal imaging in larger cohorts and multiple time points are warranted to address this issue.
