Abstract
Background:
Cognitive deficits observed in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients have been correlated with altered hippocampal activity. Although the mechanism remains under extensive study, neurofibrillary tangles and amyloid plaques have been proposed as responsible for brain activity alterations. Aiming to unveil the mechanism, researchers have developed several transgenic models of AD. Nevertheless, the variability in hippocampal oscillatory alterations found in different genetic backgrounds and ages remains unclear.
Objective:
To assess the oscillatory alterations in relation to animal developmental age and protein inclusion, amyloid-β (Aβ) load, and abnormally phosphorylated tau (pTau), we reviewed and analyzed the published data on peak power, frequency, and quantification of theta-gamma cross-frequency coupling (modulation index values).
Methods:
To ensure that the search was as current as possible, a systematic review was conducted to locate and abstract all studies published from January 2000 to February 2023 that involved in vivo hippocampal local field potential recording in transgenic mouse models of AD.
Results:
The presence of Aβ was associated with electrophysiological alterations that are mainly reflected in power increases, frequency decreases, and lower modulation index values. Concomitantly, pTau accumulation was associated with electrophysiological alterations that are mainly reflected in power decreases, frequency decreases, and no significant alterations in modulation index values.
Conclusions:
In this study, we showed that electrophysiological parameters are altered from prodromal stages to the late stages of pathology. Thus, we found that Aβ deposition is associated with brain network hyperexcitability, whereas pTau deposition mainly leads to brain network hypoexcitability in transgenic models
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is related to cognitive decline and memory impairments, where aging is the main risk [1]. Although the etiology remains under extensive study, abnormal neural protein aggregation in several brain areas is proposed as the main cause of disease [2]. Additionally, protein aggregation strongly correlates with the severity of dementia [2]. In AD patients, the brain is affected by extracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), mainly composed of hyperphosphorylated tau protein (pTau) [2, 3]. The leading hypothesis for AD onset suggests that an increase in Aβ triggers the hyperphosphorylation of tau protein, resulting in synaptic dysfunction, dendritic spine loss, early network dysfunction, and neuronal death, with the hippocampus being one of the most affected brain regions [4, 5]. However, brain network impairments rather than cell loss are now suggested as the cause of cognitive decline [1, 6]. Brain network activity is regulated by multiple neural oscillatory rhythms because of interactions between different brain regions [7]. It is proposed that oscillatory rhythms are fundamental for the temporal coding and decoding of active neural ensembles [8]. The largest synchronous signal is the hippocampal theta rhythm [9]. In humans, this activity is measured by the non-invasive technique of the electroencephalogram (EEG). Unsurprisingly, AD patients show a “slowing” of oscillatory brain activity in parameters like spectral power and functional connectivity associated with the severity of dementia and the progression of the pathology [10–12]. The main changes are seen in lower rhythms like theta oscillation [12–14]. Importantly, hippocampal theta oscillations are thought to drive cognitive processes by coding with gamma oscillations (faster oscillatory rhythms), a process called cross-frequency coupling (CFC) [7, 15–19]. CFC has been described in mice, rats, monkeys, and humans in several brain regions like the hippocampus [15] and cortex [20, 21]. A strong CFC has been related to high cognitive performance such as learning, memory [15, 22] and spatial resolution [16]. Accordingly, AD patients show a weak cortical CFC when performing memory tasks [23, 24].
Aiming to study brain network alterations, researchers have developed several transgenic mouse models characterized by Aβ and pTau deposition [25, 26]. While some studies have found evidence of brain network alterations, others have failed to replicate these findings. Moreover, the relationship between network alterations, cognition, and protein deposition is unclear. Although some review papers have provided an overview of AD transgenic (AD-tg) mouse models assessing protein deposition and changes in cognitive performance [27], they lack in-depth assessments of network alterations and overlook the methodological heterogeneity of the studies.
This meta-analysis review aims to determine the state of brain network alterations in AD-tg models during the progression of disease. In recent years, our laboratory has focused on evaluating network alterations in pre-symptomatic stages of AD-tg models [3, 28–30]. Considering the prodromal AD stage, we conducted a meta-analysis review to locate and abstract data from all studies of local field potential (LFP) analysis in AD-tg models that provided frequency, peak power, and modulation index analysis. In this report, we focus on two types of AD mouse models: A) amyloid-only and B) tau-only (Table 1). Of the 84 studies identified, 15 proved useful. This approach has relevance in the field of AD diagnosis since symptoms can vary widely, but physiological parameters would allow for a better approach to disease progression.
AD transgenic models included in this meta-analysis
METHODS
This study aimed to identify and summarize published literature that shows alterations in electrophysiological parameters in AD-tg models (Table 1). Our meta-analysis was conducted following with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). To identify studies for inclusion in this meta-analysis, a PubMed search was conducted to locate all studies published in English from January 2000 to February 2023 using the terms [(amyloid OR Aβ) AND transgenic AND (local field potential OR oscillatory activity)] AND [(tau OR tauopathy) AND transgenic AND (local field potential OR oscillatory activity)]. A total of 84 articles were identified, 15 of which met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Studies identified through database searches were initially screened based on their titles and abstracts. Each article was independently evaluated for full-text eligibility. Studies were included if they simultaneously fulfilled the following criteria: a) the study reported original results from analysis of AD-tg models; b) LFP was recorded in vivo on anesthetized or awake mice; c) basal activity was reported; and d) the report included peak power band, peak frequency, or modulation index for CFC. For this meta-analysis review, we gathered mean values of peak band power, frequency, and modulation index from reported LFP analyses, along with standard deviations, sample size, age, and transgenic model. In accordance with Cochran’s, at least two studies per parameter were required for the meta-analysis. Some of the papers provided insufficient information to conduct a proper meta-analysis, so they were only mentioned.
After subtracting all the data, the information was normalized on a scale of 1 to facilitate comparison. The data was divided into two groups, as follows: Group A: only amyloid mutation (9 studies) [31–39] and Group B: only tau mutation (6 studies) [28, 40–42]. Frequency bands were classified as 1.5–4 Hz delta, 4–10 Hz theta, 10–30 Hz beta, 30–80 Hz low-gamma, and 80–300 Hz high-gamma [43]. All analyses were based on published studies; therefore, no ethical approval is required. Two authors independently performed the data extraction, and any disagreements were resolved by joint discussions. Finally, data were arranged according to age to enhance comprehension of electrophysiological properties during disease progression.
Statistical methods
All data were analyzed using the software Review Manager (RevMan) [computer program] Version 5.4. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020. The meta-analysis results were reported as a standard difference in mean (SDM) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) as the synthesized measure of effect size. Cochran’s Q-test statistic was performed to assess the heterogeneity of the studies, and the I-squared (I2) statistic was performed to indicate heterogeneity as a percentage.
RESULTS
A total of 84 scientific documents were screened, but only 64 resulted in potentially relevant articles. Fifteen were included based on selection criteria. Articles were excluded when mean values, standard error, and/or standard deviation were not reported or could not be obtained. All studies included electrophysiological assessments in a group of AD-tg models with a healthy age-matched control group. Considering that protein accumulation in the brain has been related to network alterations, we aimed to collect data from studies that compared the electrophysiological properties of AD-tg models and age-matched controls at different developmental ages. Two of the screened documents were reviews, one article was unavailable, eleven did not use AD-tg models, twelve did not evaluate LFP, six were not registered in-vivo, twelve did not record the hippocampus, and five did not report parameters of interest. A total of 15 articles contributed data to the final analysis. Importantly, all studies include values at various ages, or pathology stages (Table 1). All results are explained in terms of heterogeneity.
Oscillatory activity is altered in mice that only have the Aβ mutation (group A)
In the pooled analysis, Aβ load caused an increase in beta power (0.77, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.87, Fig. 1a) and an increase in low-gamma power levels (0.44, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.51, Fig. 1b) compared to the age-matched control group. Interestingly, Aβ accumulation did not lead to a significant change in high-gamma power (0.10, 95% CI –0.01 to 0.21, Fig. 1c). Although Kumari et al. [32] and Dávila-Bouziguet [34] reported alterations in theta power, there was no significant difference between Aβ-mouse models and the age-matched control group. Regarding frequency, the theta peak was reduced in Aβ-transgenic mice compared to age-matched non-transgenic mice (–0.12, 95% CI –0.13 to –0.11, Fig. 2). Importantly, there was insufficient information to make a proper meta-analysis of high-gamma peak frequency between Aβ-transgenics and age-matched controls.

Standard mean difference and pooled estimate of each study included in the meta-analysis of beta (a), low-gamma (b) and high-gamma (c) peak power. All the analyses compared Aβ transgenic mouse models with age-matched related non-transgenic mice. Summary includes p = significance level; I2= percentage of heterogeneity; Q = Cochran’s Q. The horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence interval for each mean difference. Weights are from fixed effect analysis.

Standard mean difference and pooled estimate of each study included in the meta-analysis of theta frequency. All the analyses compared Aβ transgenic mouse models with age-matched related non-transgenic mice. Summary includes p = significance level; I2= percentage of heterogeneity; Q = Cochran’s Q. The horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence interval for each mean difference. Weights are from fixed effect analysis.
Regarding the modulation index for theta/low-gamma and theta/high-gamma coupling in Aβ-transgenic mouse models, Aβ accumulation did not change the hippocampal modulation index values for theta/low-gamma coupling (–0.01, 95% CI –0.06 to 0.03, Fig. 3a), but it lowered those for theta/high-gamma coupling (–0.21, 95% CI –0.26 to –0.17, Fig. 3b).

Standard mean difference and pooled estimate of each study included in the meta-analysis of hippocampal theta/low-gamma (a) and theta/high-gamma (b) cross frequency coupling (modulation index). All the analyses compared Aβ transgenic mouse models with age-matched related non-transgenic mice. Summary includes p = significance level; I2= percentage of heterogeneity; Q = Cochran’s Q. The horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence interval for each mean difference. Weights are from fixed effect analysis.
In summary, mutations that lead to Aβ accumulation generate electrophysiological alterations that are reflected in: a) power increases in low- and high-frequency bands; b) frequency decreases in low-frequency bands; and c) lower modulation index values in theta/high-gamma coupling (Figs. 1–3 present a summary of hippocampal electrophysiological parameters for group A).
Oscillatory activity is altered in mice that only have the pTau mutation (group B)
In the pooled analysis, pTau presence caused a decrease in delta peak power (–0.12, 95% CI –0.24 to –0.00, Fig. 4a) and theta peak power (–0.11, 95% CI –0.14 to –0.09, Fig. 4b) compared to the age-matched control group. Concomitantly, high-gamma power was increased in pTau-transgenic mouse models (0.28, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.39, Fig. 4c). Accordingly, we recently found an increase in low-gamma peak power in one-month-old rTg4510 mice [28]. When evaluating peak frequency values, pTau-transgenic mice showed a reduction in theta (–0.14, 95% CI –0.18 to –0.10, Fig. 5a) and high-gamma peak frequency (–0.09, 95% CI –0.11 to –0.07, Fig. 5b).

Standard mean difference and pooled estimate of each study included in the meta-analysis of hippocampal delta (a), theta (b) and high-gamma (c) peak power. All the analyses compared Tau transgenic mouse models with age-matched related non-transgenic mouse. Summary includes p = significance level; I2= percentage of heterogeneity; Q = Cochran’s Q. The horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence interval for each mean difference. Weights are from fixed effect analysis.

Standard mean difference and pooled estimate of each study included in the meta-analysis of hippocampal theta (a) and high-gamma (b) peak frequency. All the analyses compared Tau transgenic mouse models with age-matched related non-transgenic mice. Summary includes p = significance level; I2= percentage of heterogeneity; Q = Cochran’s Q. The horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence interval for each mean difference. Weights are from fixed effect analysis.
Regarding the modulation index in pTau-transgenic mouse models, pTau accumulation did not alter the hippocampal modulation index for theta/gamma coupling (0.06, 95% CI –0.05 to 0.17, Fig. 6).

Standard mean difference and pooled estimate of each study included in the meta-analysis of hippocampal theta/low-gamma cross-frequency coupling (modulation index). All the analyses compared Tau transgenic mouse models with age-matched related non-transgenic mice. Summary includes p = significance level; I2= percentage of heterogeneity; Q = Cochran’s Q. The horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence interval for each mean difference. Weights are from fixed effect analysis.
In summary, mutations that lead to pTau accumulation generate electrophysiological alterations that are reflected in: a) a power and frequency decrease in low-frequency bands; b) an increase in gamma peak power; c) a significant decrease in gamma peak frequency; and d) no alterations in the modulation index for theta/gamma coupling (Figs. 4 to 6 present a summary of hippocampal electrophysiological parameters for group B).
DISCUSSION
Aβ impact on brain network activity
The hippocampus, essential for learning and memory, is one of the most affected structures by Aβ and pTau protein accumulation during AD development [3]. In pathological conditions, molecular alterations such as protein accumulation affect neural activities, resulting in circuit disruption and, ultimately, neurological function failure [1, 4]. Transgenic models have made it possible for researchers to learn more about the underlying mechanisms of AD and to identify biomarkers that can be used for early detection and diagnosis [25, 26]. Since electrophysiological parameters have been suggested as a potential biomarker [4, 28], in this study we analyzed the effect of mutations that lead to protein accumulation in the hippocampus of different AD-tg mouse models (Table 1). Specifically, we focused on brain network alterations caused by Aβ (group A) and pTau (group B) deposition through disease development (Table 1). To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to collect spontaneous hippocampal oscillatory activity in AD transgenic mouse models. First, we aimed to identify power changes induced by Aβ accumulation from prodromal to advanced stages of the disease. Despite the limited number of studies with similar experimental designs, we found that Aβ accumulation caused hippocampal power increases in low- and high-frequency bands (Fig. 1). Interestingly, the power increases were evident from the prodromal stages of disease and persisted through the advanced stages (Fig. 1). Altogether, the data suggested that the Aβ transgenic mice exhibit hippocampal network hyperexcitability from the early stages of the disease. In this regard, it has been shown that several Aβ transgenic lines exhibit network hyperexcitability accompanied by spontaneous epileptiform activity [44–48]. Further supporting these findings, studies by Palop and colleagues demonstrated that Aβ transgenic mice are characterized by spontaneous epileptiform discharges at the parietal cortex, indicating network hypersynchrony, hyperexcitability, and behavioral abnormalities [48].
The coordinated firing of ensembles of neurons gives rise to oscillatory activity that plays a key role in information processing in neuronal networks [18, 50]. Interneurons play a significant role in coordinating network activity [49–51]. In vitro experiments demonstrated that interneurons expressing parvalbumin (PV) and somatostatin (SOM) participated in intrinsic rhythm generation and PC coordination in distal CA1 and subiculum [52–54]. While SOM interneurons strongly modulated temporoammonic inputs, PV interneurons controlled PC network and rhythm generation at low-frequency bands [50, 56].
Slow gamma rhythms are driven by inputs from CA3 that recruit CA1 fast-spiking PV cells which in turn drive slow gamma activity in other interneurons [50]. Fast gamma rhythms are driven by inputs from the media entorhinal cortex and appear to drive an unidentified group of interneurons, that in turn, entrain the local network to fast gamma activity [50]. In vitro studies in CA3 have confirmed that PV cells were phase-locked to gamma oscillations [55]. Subsequent studies indicated that fast-spiking perisomatic targeting interneurons were essential for generating gamma oscillations [57, 58].
Considering that oscillatory activity is mainly generated by inhibitory interneurons, Palop and colleagues demonstrated that network dysfunction arises from PV cells impaired at the voltage-gated sodium channel (Nav1.1) [59]. Aiming to establish that this mechanism was consistent at the hippocampus level, we recently recorded PV cell activity from Aβ transgenic mice as young as one month old [29]. Our data showed that the spike frequency rate is significantly lower in Aβ transgenic mice when compared to age-matched related non-transgenic mice [29], therefore contributing to the increased activity in PC from the hippocampus and the power increase [48].
Further supporting our findings, Chung and colleagues demonstrated the dysfunction of PV and SOM interneurons’ input to CA1 PC as the synaptic mechanism underlying Aβ-induced impairments of hippocampal network oscillations [60].
The exact mechanism underlying Aβ-induced impairments of hippocampal network oscillations remains under extensive study. However, it was shown that perineuronal nets, consisting of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans and hyaluronic acid, protect against Aβ neurotoxicity [61]. Thus, it was reported that perineuronal nets are affected during neurodegeneration [62]. The functions of perineuronal nets include synaptic stabilization and plasticity [61, 63]. Interestingly, perineuronal nets are also associated with GABAergic interneurons [64]. Thus, it was reported that perineuronal nets protect against lipid peroxidation and reactive oxygen damage [61]. Taken together, these results suggest that perineuronal nets might be involved in the modulation of network excitability.
The second result from our meta-analysis showed that frequency decreased in low oscillatory frequency bands (Fig. 2). Knowing that epilepsy is a disorder associated with increased network excitability accompanied by rewiring in the brain circuits [65], most likely these frequency changes may contribute to the altered hippocampal network activity. The third result from our meta-analysis further supported this hypothesis by revealing that Aβ accumulation causes a significant decrease in modulation index values (Fig. 3). In agreement with the power findings, modulation index alterations started from prodromal stages of disease and persisted throughout advanced stages of disease (Fig. 3). Supporting previous findings, we recently reported that modulation indexes, theta/low-gamma and theta/high-gamma, were significantly reduced in one-month-old Aβ transgenic mice when compared to age-matched related non-transgenic mice [29]. Importantly, the reported modulation index disturbances started at the prodromal stages of the disease [29].
In neuroscience, the “communication through coherence” hypothesis is widely accepted. This hypothesis proposes that efficient anatomic communications occur when synchronization increases [66]. Indeed, it has been shown that phase coupling reflects several cognitive processes in humans [21, 67]. Thus, it was suggested that phase coupling between different brain regions could serve as an inter-area communication vehicle [21, 67]. Similarly, the phase coupling between theta and gamma oscillations reflects the interrelations between local microscale and system-level macroscale neuronal networks [19, 69]. Not surprisingly, disturbances in rhythm coherence are highly related to brain pathology development [10–12]. Therefore, a decrease in frequency and modulation index values may contribute to the observed cognitive deficit in the AD-tg models.
In summary, lower modulation index values between theta and gamma, theta power increases, network hyperexcitability, and reduced theta frequency in the Aβ transgenic mouse models indicate that brain network function and communication are affected at several scales. Interestingly, the pooled analysis of the studies showed that these alterations, mainly caused by Aβ accumulation and deposition, were detected at the prodromal stages of disease progression, suggesting that they could be preclinical biomarkers based on electrophysiological changes.
pTau impact on brain network activity
Regarding tau mutations altering brain network activity in transgenic mouse models, the pooled analysis reveals that pTau deposition was reflected in power and frequency decreases in low-frequency bands (Figs. 4 and 5). Thus, the meta-analysis also revealed an increase in gamma peak power but a significant decrease in frequency (Figs. 4 and 5). Overall, these findings suggest that pTau mainly causes a significant decrease in the excitability levels of the hippocampal circuits. The findings of this study are consistent with reports that demonstrated that pTau reduces the activity of single neocortical PC and the neocortical network in young pTau transgenic mice [70]. Aiming to demonstrate that these alterations in brain network activity were consistent at the hippocampal level, we recorded brain network activity from pTau transgenic mice as young as one month old [28]. Our data showed that young pTau transgenic mice exhibit significant reductions in the power and frequency of lower frequency bands such as theta and delta [28]. Thus, we reported that the electrophysiological alterations were correlated with pTau increases in hippocampal PC and PV cells [28]. As previously discussed, PC and PV cells interactions drive network and oscillatory synchrony, and the synchronized inhibitory synaptic input onto excitatory PC produces accurate rhythmic patterns [6, 60]. PC firing is synchronized with low-frequency oscillations like theta, whereas interneurons, particularly PV cells, are synchronized with low- and high-frequency oscillations like theta and gamma [6, 54].
Notably, our previous research demonstrated that increases in pTau levels directly regulate the activity of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-sensitive glutamate receptor [71], leading to increase in phosphorylation of postsynaptic tau, therefore regulating the interaction of tau, Fyn, and the postsynaptic scaffolding protein PSD-95 [71]. In other words, increases in postsynaptic pTau lead to the breakdown of the PSD-95 complex, which reduces NMDA receptor activity [3, 71–73]. Overall, the increase in pTau through disease development contributes to the decrease in power and frequency and the brain network hypoexcitability. The hypoexcitable state caused by pTau indicates that brain network function and communication at several scales are affected. Nevertheless, pooled analysis of the studies showed that theta/gamma modulation index values were not altered (Fig. 6). Indeed, our data showed that pTau accumulation was associated with enhanced cognitive performance [28]. Further supporting our data, Boekhoorn and colleagues [74] reported that young pTau transgenic mice showed increased long-term potentiation (LTP), which is a correlate for learning and memory [75]. According to our findings, Boekhoorn and colleagues also reported that the increase in LTP correlated with improved cognitive performance [74].
Despite the positive role of pTau, the pooled analysis of the studies showed that power and frequency alterations were detected at the prodromal stages of disease progression, suggesting that they could be preclinical biomarkers.
Conclusion and perspective
The pooled analysis revealed brain network alterations from the prodromal stage to the advanced stage of disease progression. Accordingly, electrophysiological changes detected in transgenic models could be valuable biomarkers of disease. However, the pooled analysis also revealed that, even though both proteins generate changes in the brain network activity, they also trigger an opposite effect in brain network activity: Aβ causes hyperexcitability, and pTau mainly causes hypoexcitability.
Another point to consider is that accumulating evidence suggests that both pathologies have synergistic effects [76]. Aβ causes neuronal hyperexcitability leading to impaired network oscillations [76]. However, Aβ-related hyperexcitability depends on endogenous tau levels [3, 76]. Further supporting this relationship, it was reported that the default mode network (DMN), that is a set of widely distributed brain regions in the parietal, temporal, and frontal cortex [77], is hyperexcited with increasing levels of Aβ, which drives hyperexcitability within the medial temporal lobe and this directed hyperexcitation of the medial temporal lobe by the DMN predicts the rate of pTau accumulation within the entorhinal cortex [78].
Interestingly, triple AD-tg mice, marked by the accumulation of Aβ and pTau, are mainly characterized by hypoexcitability at the initial stages of the disease [3]. In agreement, it was demonstrated that Aβ and tau co-expression also suppressed neuronal activity as the tau phenotype seemed to dominate [76]. Overall, evidence suggests that tau, by reducing synaptic overexcitation, suppresses neuronal activity [3, 76]. Taken together, data suggests that co-pathogenic interaction between Aβ and tau drives disease progression [3, 76].
Although the exact mechanism remains under extensive study, we know that both proteins are directly connected through NMDA receptor activity. In other words, Aβ communicates with tau to participate in synapse strengthening or weakening depending on the stage of disease development [71, 79–82]. Therefore, before attempting to use AD transgenic models for biomarker development, the physiological relationship between Aβ and tau at the synapse needs to be fully elucidated. Additionally, more research into the role of Aβ and tau in PC and PV cell modulation is needed to understand brain network alterations. Not only could new biomarkers emerge, but also new therapeutic strategies based on brain circuits remodeling.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Siddhartha Mondragon-Rodriguez (Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Funding acquisition; Investigation; Supervision; Project administration; Writing – original draft; Writing – Review & Editing); Carlos A. Garcia-Carlos (Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Software; Writing – original draft); Gustavo Basurto-Islas (Data curation; Funding acquisition; Supervision); George Perry (Funding acquisition; Resources).
Footnotes
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Jessica Gonzalez Norris for proofreading. We thank the following facilities from INB-UNAM: Proteogenomic Facility Unit, Behavioral Analysis Core Facility and Vivarium Facility. Carlos Antonio García-Carlos is a doctoral student from Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).
FUNDING
This research was supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología CONAHCYT (grant number 269021, 319863 and A1-S-29906). Carlos Antonio García-Carlos was awarded by CONAHCYT (fellowship number 1082520), México. Dr. Mondragón-Rodríguez was awarded a Cátedra position by CONAHCYT, México.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare no competing financial interests. Dr. Mondragón-Rodríguez is an Editorial Board Member of this journal but was not involved in the peer-review process nor had access to any information regarding its peer-review. Dr. Perry is the Editor-in-Chief of JAD but was not involved in the peer-review process nor had access to any information regarding its peer-review.
GP serves on Nervgen (Scientific Advisory Board) and Synaptogenix (Equity and Scientific Advisory Board).
DATA AVAILABILITY
Data is available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictions.
