In electric power steering (EPS), spoke type brushless ac(BLAC) motors offer distinct advantages over other electric motor types in terms of torque smoothness, reliability and efficiency. This paper deals with the shape optimization of spoke type BLAC motor, in order to minimization cogging torque. In this paper examines, 3 step skewing rotor angle, optimizing rotor core edge and rotor overlap length for minimize cogging torque in spoke type BLAC motor. The methods were applied to existing machine designs and their performance was calculated using finite- element analysis (FEA). Prototypes of the machine designs were constructed and experimental results obtained. It is shown that the FEA predicted the cogging torque to be nearly reduce using those method.
HanselmanD., Brushless Permanent-Magnet Motor Design. NewYork: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
2.
BretónC., BartoloméJ., BenitoJ.A., TassinarioG., FlotatsI., LuC.W. and ChalmersB.J., Influence of machine symmetry on reduction of cogging torque in permanent magnet brushless motors, IEEE Trans. Magn.36(5) (Sep. 2000), 3819-3823.
3.
ZhuZ.Q. and HoweD., Influence of design parameters on cogging torque in permanent magnet machines, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers15(4) (Dec. 2000), 407-412.
4.
WakaoS., OnukiT., ImJ.W. and YamamuraT., A novel design approach for grasping broad characteristics of magnetic shield problem, IEEE Trans. Magn.34(4) (July 1998), 2144-2146.
5.
FeiW. and ZhuZ.Q., Comparison of cogging torque reduction in PM brushless machines by conventional and herringbone skewing techniques, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers.28(3) (Sep. 2013).
6.
ZhuZ.Q. and HoweD., Analytical prediction of the cogging torque in radial-field permanent magnet brushless motor, IEEE Trans. Magn.28(2) (Mar. 1992), 1371-1374.
7.
GierasJ.F., Analytical approach to cogging torque calculation of PM brushless motor, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl.40(5) (Sep./Oct. 2004), 1310-1316.
8.
GuemesJ.A., IraolagoitiaA.A., DelHoyoJ.J. and FernandezP., Torque analysis in permanent-magnet synchronous motors: a comparative study, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl.47(3) (May/Jun. 2011), 1247-1256.
9.
JinS.-M., ZhuY.-W. and ChoY.-H., Optimal design of auxiliary poles to minimize detent force of permanent magnet linear synchronous motor, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics33(1-2) (2010).
10.
FujishimaY., WakaoS., KondoM. and TerauchiN., An optimal Design of Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor for the Next Generation Commuter Train, IEEE Trans. Magn.14(2) (2004), 1902-1905.
11.
ZhuY.-W., LeeS.-G. and ChoY.-H., Optimal design of PMLSM with low force pulsations using response surface methodology, Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics34 ISBN, 2010.
12.
GaingZ.-L., LinC.-H., TsaiM.-H. and TsaiM.-C., Rigorous design and optimization of brushless PM motor using response surface methodology with quantum behaved PSO operator, IEEE Trans. Magn.50(1) (January 2014).
13.
BurtonA.W., Innovation drives for electric power assisted steering, IEEE control systems Magazine, Nov. 2003, pp. 30-39.
14.
EkiH., TerataniT. and IwasakiT., Power consumption and conversion of EPS systems, Power Conversion Conference (PCC), 2007, pp. 1333-1339.
15.
OmbachG. and JunakJ., Two rotors designs comparison of permanent magnet brushless synchronous motor for an electric power steering application, European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE), 2007, pp. 1-9.
16.
MyersR.H. and MontgomeryD.C., Response Surface Methodology Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, New York: Wiley, 1995.
17.
MontgomeryD.C., Design and Analysis of Experiments, New York: Wiley, 2001.
18.
SeopKohC., Magnetic Pole Shape Optimization of PM motor for Reduction of Cogging Torque, IEEE Trans. Magn.33(2) (March 1997).
