A new method for measuring historical poverty trends: Incorporating geographic differences in the cost of living using the Supplemental Poverty Measure
Available accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2016
A new method for measuring historical poverty trends: Incorporating geographic differences in the cost of living using the Supplemental Poverty Measure
The U.S. Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics recently developed a substantially improved measure of poverty, the Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM). The SPM has only been released since 2009, and prior efforts by researchers to construct a historical SPM time series have not taken into account an essential element of the new measure - geographical differences in the cost of living - which is necessary for accurately describing poverty trends in important demographic and regional subgroups. We build the first historical SPM time series from 1967-2014 that adjusts poverty thresholds for cost of living. We do so bringing together a constellation of data sources - the Current Population Survey, the Decennial Census, the Department of Housing and Urban Development's Fair Market Rents, and others. We find that geographically adjusting thresholds increases poverty rates in metro areas, the Western states, and among Latinos, but decreases poverty rates in non-metro areas and in the South. The geographic adjustment of poverty thresholds is an impactful component of the SPM.
JohnsonL.B.J., Annual message to the congress on the state of the union, 8 January 1964. Available at http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=26787 as of 4/1/2016.
2.
CitroC.F. and RobertT.M., eds, Measuring Poverty: A New Approach, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1995.
3.
ShortK., The supplemental poverty measure: 2014. Current Population Reports, U.S. Census Bureau, 2015.
4.
GarnerT. and ShortK., Identifying the Poor: Poverty measurement for the U.S. from 1996-2005, Review of Income and Wealth56(2) (2010), 237-258.
5.
FoxL., WimerC., GarfinkelI., KaushalN. and WaldfogelJ., Waging war on poverty: Poverty trends using a historical supplemental poverty measure, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management34 (3) (2015), 567-592.
6.
WimerC., FoxL., GarfinkelI., KaushalN. and WaldfogelJ., Progress on poverty? New estimates of historical trends using an anchored supplemental poverty measure, Forthcoming in Demography.
7.
KimberlinS., ShaeferH.L. and KimJ., Measuring poverty using the supplemental poverty measure in the panel study of income dynamics, 1998 to 2010, Journal of Economic and Social Measurement41 (2016), 17-47.
8.
AtenB.H., FigueroaE.B. and MartinT.M., Regional price parities for states and metropolitan areas, 2006-2010, Bureau of Labor Statistics, August 2012.
9.
MorettiE., Poverty, inequality, and cost of living differences, University of Kentucky Center for Poverty Research Discussion Paper Series, DP2010-07, 2010.
10.
BlackD.A., Four Unresolved Issues in the Construction of Regional Cost-of-Living Indices, Research Forum on the Cost of Living and the Supplemental Poverty Measure, Report submitted to the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services), 2011.
11.
GlaeserE.L., Measuring Local Poverty Rates, Research Forum on the Cost of Living and the Supplemental Poverty Measure, Report submitted to the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011.
12.
RobackJ., Wages, rents, and the quality of life, Journal of Political Economy90(6) (1982), 1257-1278.
13.
AlbouyD., Report for Cost of Living and the Supplemental Poverty Measure, Research Forum on the Cost of Living and the Supplemental Poverty Measure, Report submitted to the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011.
14.
HirschB., Adjusting Poverty Thresholds When Area Prices Differ: Labor market evidence, Research Forum on the Cost of Living and the Supplemental Poverty Measure, Report submitted to the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011.
15.
RosenthalS.S., Comments on the U.S. Census Bureau and Interagency Technical Working Group Supplemental Poverty Measure, Research Forum on the Cost of Living and the Supplemental Poverty Measure, Report submitted to the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011.
16.
ZiliakJ.P., Cost of living and the supplemental poverty measure, a research forum report submitted to the office of the assistant secretary for planning and evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011. Available at http://www.ukcpr.org/sites/www.ukcpr.org/files/documents/ UKCPR_COL%26SPM_Forum_withAppendices%20(1). pdf as of 1/12/2016.
17.
U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, Available at http://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cps/about.html as of 10/5/2016.
18.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. Consumer Expenditure Survey. Available at http://www.bls.gov/cex/ as of 10/5/2016
19.
U.S. Census Bureau, Supplemental Poverty Measure Public Use Research Files, Available at https: //www.census.gov/hhes/povmeas/data/supplemental/public-use.html as if 10/5/2016.
20.
U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, Available at http://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/about.html as of 10/5/2016.
21.
Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Fair Market Rents, Available at https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/fmr.html as of 10/5/2016.
22.
RugglesS., GenadekK., GoekenR., GroverJ. and SobelM., Integrated public use microdata series: Version 6.0 [Machine-readable database], Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 2016.
23.
ProvencherA., Unit of Analysis for Poverty Measurement: A comparison of the Supplemental Poverty Measure and the Official Poverty Measure, Presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings, Miami, Florida, August, 2011.
24.
CasperL.M., CohenP.N. and SimmonsT., How does POSSLQ measure up? Historical estimates of cohabitation, U.S. Census Bureau Population Division Working Paper No. 36. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 1999.
25.
BetsonD. and MichaelR., A recommendation for the construction of equivalences scales, Unpublished memorandum prepared for the Panel on Poverty and Family Assistance, Committee on National Statistics, National Research Council, Department of Economics, University of Notre Dame, IN, 1993.
26.
RenwickJ., Geographic adjustments of supplemental poverty measure thresholds: Using the american community survey five-year data on housing costs, 2011, Available at http://beta.census.gov/hhes/povmeas/methodology/supplemental/research/Renwick_SGE2011.pdf as of 1/12/2016.
27.
HuttoN., WaldfogelJ., KaushalN. and GarfinkelI., Improving the measurement of poverty, Social Service Review35 (2011), 39-74.
28.
IsaacsJ.B., MarksJ.Y., SmeedingT.M. and ThorntonK., Wisconsin poverty report: Technical appendix, Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2010.
29.
LevitanM., D'OnofrioC., KoolwalG., KrampnerJ., ScheerD., SeidelT. and VirginV., Using the american community survey to create a national academy of sciences-style poverty measure: Work by the New York city center for economic opportunity, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management29 (2010), 373-386.
30.
WheatonL., GiannarelliL., Martinez-SchiferlM. and ZedlewskiS., How do states' safety net policies affect poverty? Working Families Paper 19, Washington, DC: Urban Institute, 2011.
31.
BohnS., DanielsonC., LevinM., MattinglyM. and WimerC., The california poverty measure: A new look at the social safety net, San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California, 2013.
32.
Food and Nutrition Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, Available at http://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap as of 10/5/2016.
33.
Food and Nutrition Service, United States Department of Agriculture, National School Lunch Program, Available at http://www.fns.usda.gov/nslp/national-school-lunch-program-nslp as of 10/5/ 2016.
34.
Food and Nutrition Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Women, Infants, and Children Program, Available at http://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/women-infants-and-children-wic as of 10/ 5/2016.
35.
Office of Community Services, Office of the Administration for Children & Families, Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), Available at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/ocs/programs/liheap as of 10/5/2016.
36.
U.S. Internal Revenue Service, Credits & Deductions, Available at https://www.irs.gov/credits-deductions as of 10/5/2016.
37.
FeenbergD. and CouttsE., An introduction to the TAXSIM model, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management12 (1993), 189-194.
38.
StataCorp, Stata Statistical Software: Release 14, College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, 2015.
39.
R Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria, 2016. Available at https://www.R-project.org as of 10/5/2016.
40.
BohnS., DanielsonC. and BrandyM., Just the facts: Poverty in California, Available at http://www. ppic.org/main/publication_show.asp?i=261 as of 3/21/2014.
41.
ReedD., How Well Does the Current Population Survey Represent California? Public Policy Institute of California, 2001. Available at http://www.ppic.org/main/publication.asp?i=307 as of 3/17/2016.
42.
OlsenE.O., Report on Adjusting Poverty Thresholds for Geographic Price Differences, Research Forum on the Cost of Living and the Supplemental Poverty Measure. Report submitted to the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011.
