This article identifies and presents the generalized difference (g-difference) of fuzzy numbers, Fréchet and Gâteaux generalized differentiability (g-differentiability) for fuzzy multi-dimensional mapping which consists of a new concept, fuzzy g-(continuous linear) function; Moreover, the relationship between Fréchet and Gâteaux g-differentiability is studied and shown. The concepts of directional and partial g-differentiability are further framed and the relationship of which will the aforementioned concepts are also explored. Furthermore, characterization is pointed out for Fréchet and Gâteaux g-differentiability; based on level-set and through differentiability of endpoints real-valued functions a characterization is also offered and explored for directional and partial g-differentiability. The sufficient condition for Fréchet and Gâteaux g-differentiability, directional and partial g-differentiability based on level-set and through employing level-wise gH-differentiability (LgH-differentiability) is expressed. Finally, to illustrate the ability and reliability of the aforementioned concepts we have solved some application examples.
Many studies have focused on the theoretical and practical aspects of the fuzzy sets since Zadeh [19] began the basic concepts and definitions of fuzzy theory. Zadeh proposed the concept of fuzzy numbers in [20, 21] so that the fuzzy numbers have been extensively researched by many researchers so far. In mathematical models, fuzzy numbers are used as a tool for modeling uncertainty, processing ambiguous concepts, or dealing with subjective information. Fuzzy numbers have been developed in different ways and are used in many different practical problems such as fuzzy optimization [1], fuzzy transport problems [25, 31], fuzzy differential equations [8, 32], etc. Subsequently, several researchers have begun to study and use the differentiability and integrability of fuzzy mapping to develop fuzzy numbers theory and its applications. First, Puri and Ralescu [24] began to develop the fuzzy mapping derivative from an open subset of a normed space into the n-dimensional fuzzy numbers, and then they generalized the concept of Hukuhara differentiability to set-valued mappings. In 1987, Kaleva [26] discussed fuzzy differentiability and considered the necessary and sufficient conditions for H-differentiability of fuzzy mappings from [a, b] into E. In 2003, Wang and Wu [9] proposed fuzzy mappings from into E by using H-difference, directional derivative, differentiability, and subdifferential. However, the H-difference between two fuzzy numbers occurs only in very restricted conditions [26] and the H-difference between two fuzzy numbers cannot always come into existence [12, 13]. Then the gH-difference between two fuzzy numbers is defined under less restrictive conditions, although the gH-difference is not always existed [11, 12]. As a result, the generalized difference proposed in [3, 13] as well as in [10], by Gomes and Barros, eliminates all the short-comes discussed in the above differences so that the g-difference of two fuzzy numbers always exists [3, 14]. In 2013, Bede and Stefanini studied and introduced the concept of generalized differentiability for fuzzy-valued functions by using the new generalization of gH-difference. We introduce the concept of g-differentiability for fuzzy multi-dimensional mappings based on the concept of g-differentiability [3], so that it exists for a larger class of fuzzy multi-dimensional mappings. We present the concepts of Fréchet and Gâteaux g-differentiability, directional and partial g-differentiability for fuzzy multi-dimensional mappings. In this regard, characterization is appointed for Fréchet and Gâteaux g-differentiability; based on level-set and through differentiability of endpoints real-valued functions a characterization is also offered and explored for directional and partial g-differentiability. The sufficient condition for Fréchet and Gâteaux g-differentiability, directional and partial g-differentiability in terms of level-set and through employing uniformity of level-wise gH-differentiability (LgH-differentiability) is expressed. Fréchet and Gâteaux gH-differentiability, directional and partial gH-differentiability are introduced for interval-valued functions [7, 18], however, the advantage of our work in this paper is that all the concepts of fuzzy differentiability that were already mentioned, are investigated for fuzzy multi-dimensional mappings using the g-differentiability based on the concept of fuzzy g-(continuous linear) function. The purpose of this paper is to implement the fuzzy g-differentiability proposed by Bede and Stefanini [3] and to extend it to the g-differentiability of fuzzy multi-dimensional mappings. This article is divided into the following:
In Section 3, the generalized differentiability and the concept of Fréchet and Gâteaux g-differentiability based on the new concept of fuzzy g-(continuous linear) function for fuzzy multi-dimensional mappings are presented, as well as the relationship between Fréchet and Gâteaux g-derivative and their properties have been expressed and discussed. we present the directional generalized differentiability and its properties in section 4. Section 5, the partial generalized differentiability and its relation to the Fréchet and directional g-differentiability are stated, and eventually, for better understanding and showing of the strength of the relationships between the above concepts, several practical examples are provided.
Preliminaries
The basic definitions and theorems that we need in this article are considered. In addition, some new concepts are proved here.
We denote E, the set of fuzzy numbers, that is, normal, fuzzy convex, upper semi-continuous, and compactly supported fuzzy sets that are defined over the real line. Let u ∈ E be a fuzzy number; for 0 < r ≤ 1, the r-level set (or r-cut) of u is defined by , and for r = 0 is defined by the closure of support . We denote , so the r-level set [u] r is a closed interval for all r ∈ [0, 1].
If u, v ∈ E and , the addition and scalar multiplication are defined as having the r-levels of [u + v] r = [u] r + [v] r and [λu] r = λ [u] r, respectively.
A trapezoidal fuzzy number, denoted by u = 〈a, b, c, d〉, where a ≤ b ≤ c ≤ d, has level-set [u] r = [a + r (b - a) , d - r (d - c)] for 0 ≤ r ≤ 1; if b = c we have a triangular fuzzy number. The support of fuzzy number u is defined as follows:
where cl is the closure of set . Here, conv (X) denotes the convex hull of set X. We indicate En as the set of fuzzy numbers [5, 27]. It is clear that any can be regarded as a fuzzy number defined by
Particularly, the fuzzy number is expressed as if x = 0, otherwise .
[u] r is a nonempty compact convex subset of for any r ∈]0, 1],
[u] r1 ⊆ [u] r2, whenever 0 ≤ r2 ≤ r1 ≤ 1,
if rk > 0 and rk is a nondecreasing sequences converging to r ∈]0, 1], then .
Conversely, if verifies the conditions (1)-(3), then there exist a unique u ∈ En such that [u] r = [A] r for each r ∈]0, 1] and [u] 0 = cl (⋃ r∈(0,1) [u] r) ⊆ A0.
Let u, v ∈ En and . For any , the addition u + v and scalar multiplication ku can be defined, respectively, as:
It is obvious that for any u, v ∈ En and , the addition u + v and the scalar multiplication ku have the level-sets
For x = (x1, x2, . . . , xn), , d (x, y) denote the Euclidean metric between x and y, and ∥x∥ denote the Euclidean norm of x. Let be the space of non empty compact and convex sets of . The gH-difference of two sets (gH-difference for short), which we recall from [3, 27], is defined as follows:
Note that the difference of sets and itself is zero, that is . Also, the gH-difference of two intervals always exists and is equal to
Definition 2.1. [13] Let u, v ∈ E be two fuzzy numbers. Then the gH-difference is the fuzzy number w, if it exists, such that
In term of r-levels we have , and if the H-difference exists, then . The conditions for the existence of are case (i)
case (ii)
It is easy to show that (i) and (ii) are both valid if and only if w is a crisp number.
Definition 2.2. [3] Let u, v ∈ E, write u ⪯ v ⇔ ≤ for any r ∈ [0, 1]. And [u] r ≤ [v] r ⇔ and . And u ≺ v ⇔ u ⪯ v and u ≠ v.
Definition 2.3. [3] The generalized difference (or g-difference for short) of two fuzzy number u, v ∈ E is defined by its level sets as
where the gH-difference is with interval operands [u] β and [v] β.
Proposition 2.1.[3]The g-difference (5) is given by the expression
The following proposition gives a simplified notation for and .
Proposition 2.2.[3] For any two fuzzy numbers u, v ∈ E the two g-difference and exist and, for any r ∈ [0, 1], we have with
where
and the sets Dr are
Proposition 2.3.[3] Let u, v ∈ E be two fuzzy numbers; then
, whenever the expression on the right exists; in particular ,
,
,
if and only if w = - w; furthermore, w = 0 if and only if u = v.
Definition 2.4. Let φ : K ⊆ X ⟶ E be a fuzzy mapping. The fuzzy mapping φ is said to be fuzzy g-continuous at x0 ∈ K, if for any h ∈ X with x0 + h ∈ K, we have
Definition 2.5. Let φ : X ⟶ E be a fuzzy mapping. The fuzzy mapping φ is said to be fuzzy g-linear function if
φ (λx) = λ ⊙ φ (x), for all and
, for all x1, x2 ∈ X.
Definition 2.6. Let (X, ∥ . ∥ ) be a normed space and L (X, E) = {Λ : X ⟶ E | Λ isafuzzyg - (continuous linear) function}. Where we denote L (X, E) is the set of all fuzzy g-(continuous linear) functions from X in to E.
Note that g-(continuous linear) function} = {U = (u1, u2, . . . , un) |ui ∈ E, i = 1, 2, . . . , n} = En .
Note 2.1. The set of all fuzzy g-(continuous linear) functions from X into E, i.e., L (X, E), in a special case En equipped with the norm ∥ . ∥ E = D (. , 0) is a normed quasi-linear space with respect to the operations .
Definition 2.7. [3] The Hausdorff distance on E is defined by
where, for an interval [a, b], the norm is
The metric D is well defined since the gH-difference of intervals, always exists. Also, this allows us to deduce that (E, D) is a complete metric space.
Definition 2.8. [18] We denote by the collection of all bounded closed intervals in , i.e.,
Proposition 2.4.[3] For all u, v ∈ E we have
where ∥ . ∥ = D (. , 0) .
Remark 2.2. [3] We observe that since whenever the right side exists we can also conclude
whenever exists.
Proposition 2.5.[3] A fuzzy number u is completely determined by any pair u = (u-, u+) of functions , defining the end-points of the level-set, satisfying the three conditions:
is a bounded monotonic nondecreasing left continuous function ∀ r ∈]0, 1] and right continuous for r = 0;
is a bounded monotonic nondecreasing left continuous function ∀ r ∈]0, 1] and right continuous for r = 0;
for r = 1, which implies ∀ r ∈]0, 1].
Proposition 2.6.[3] Let {Ur|r ∈]0, 1]} be a family of real intervals such that the following three conditions are satisfied:
Ur is a nonempty compact interval ∀r ∈]0, 1];
if 0 < r < β ≤ 1 then Uβ ⊆ Ur;
given any nondecreasing sequence rn ∈]0, 1] with it is .
Then three exists a unique LU-fuzzy quantity u such that [u] r = Ur, ∀r ∈]0, 1] and [u] 0 = cl (⋃ r∈]0,1]Ur).
Lemma 2.1. [3] Let be a fuzzy number-valued function. Let . Then if
uniformly with respect to r ∈ [0, 1],
fulfill the conditions in Proposition 2.5 or equivalently Ur fulfill the conditions in Proposition 2.6, then , with .
Remark 2.3. [3] We observe that there are other possible different expressions for the g-difference as e.g.,
The next proposition shows that the g-difference is well defined for any two fuzzy numbers u, v ∈ E.
Proposition 2.7.[13] For any fuzzy numbers u, v ∈ E the g-difference exists and it is a fuzzy number.
Definition 2.9. [3] Let x0 ∈] a, b [ and h be such that x0 + h ∈] a, b [, then the gH-derivative of a function φ :] a, b [→ E at x0 is defined as
If satisfying (6) exists, we say that φ is generalized Hukuhara differentiable (gH-differentiable for short) at x0.
Definition 2.10. [3] Let x0 ∈] a, b [ and h be such that x0 + h ∈] a, b [, then the level-wise gH-derivative (LgH-derivative for short) of a function φ :] a, b [⟶ E at x0 is defined as the set of interval-valued gH-derivatives, if they exist,
If is a compact interval for all r ∈ [0, 1], we say that φ is level-wise generalized Hukuhara differentiable (LgH-differentiable for short) at x0 and the collection of intervals is the LgH-derivative of φ at x0 denoted by .
Definition 2.11. [3] Let φ : [a, b] ⟶ E and x0 ∈ (a, b), with and both differentiable at x0. Hence we say that
φ is [i - gH]-differentiable at x0 if
φ is [ii - gH]-differentiable at x0 if
Proposition 2.8.[3] The (i)-gH derivative and (ii)-gH derivative are additive functions, i.e., if φ and g are both (i)-gH-differentiable or both (ii)-gH-differentiable then
,
.
Remark 2.4. [3] From Proposition 2.8, it follows that (i)-gH derivative and (ii)-gH derivative are semi-linear functions (i.e., additive and positive homogeneous). They are not linear in general since we have if k < 0.
Theorem 2.2.[3] Let φ :] a, b [⟶ E be such that . Suppose that the functions and are real-valued functions, differentiable with respect to x, uniformly with respect to r ∈ [0, 1]. Then the function φ (x) is gH-differentiable at a fix x ∈] a, b [ if and only if one of the following two cases holds:
is increasing, is decreasing as function of r, and , or
is decreasing, is increasing as function of r, and .
Also, ∀ r ∈ [0, 1] we have
Definition 2.12. [3] Let x0 ∈] a, b [ and h be such that x0 + h ∈] a, b [, then the g-derivative of a function φ :] a, b [⟶ E at x0 is defined as
If satisfying (10) exists, we say that φ is generalized differentiable (g-differentiable for short) at x0.
Theorem 2.3.[3] Let φ : [a, b] ⟶ E be such that . If and are differentiable real-valued functions with respect to x, uniformly for r ∈ [0, 1], then φ (x) is g-differentiable and we have
Theorem 2.4.[3] Let φ :] a, b [⟶ E be uniformly LgH-differentiable at x0. Then φ is g-differentiable at x0 and for any r ∈ [0, 1],
Definition 2.13. A mapping is called to be fuzzy mapping. For each r ∈ [0, 1], we associate with φ the collection of interval-valued functions given by φ (x) r = [φ (x)] r, for all r ∈ [0, 1], we denote . Here, the endpoint are called lower and upper mappings of φ.
g-differentiability of fuzzy multi-dimensional mappings
In this segment, a concept of the g-differentiability for fuzzy multi-dimensional functions is introduced. From now on, K indicates an open subset of . In the following, using the new g-difference the g-differentiability of Fréchet and Gâteaux for fuzzy multi-dimensional mappings on are defined and the relation between them is discussed.
Definition 3.1. Let be a normed space. Let and let x0 ∈ K, be such that x0 + h ∈ K for all with ∥h ∥ < δ for a given δ > 0. We say that the fuzzy mapping is Fréchet generalized differentiable (Fg-differentiable for short) at x0, if there exist a fuzzy g-(continuous linear) function U = (u1, u2, . . . , un) ∈ En such that
If U ∈ En uniquely determined by (11). In this case, U ∈ En is called Fréchet generalized derivative (Fg-derivative for short) of φ at x0 and denoted by , i.e., . Notice that, the above definition is equivalent to the following definition.
Definition 3.2. Let be a normed space. Let be a fuzzy mapping and let x0 ∈ K be such that x0 + h ∈ K, for any with ∥h ∥ < δ for a given δ > 0. We say that φ is Fg-differentiable at x0 if and only if there exist a fuzzy g-(continuous linear) U = (u1, u2, . . . , un) ∈ En and fuzzy function ɛ (h) with , such that, for any ,
also we get η (h) = ∥ h ∥ ⊙ ɛ (h), we have
where η (h) →0 when h → 0. The fuzzy g-(continuous linear) function defined, for , by
is called the Fg-differential of φ at x0 and is the fuzzy g-(continuous linear) function Fg-differential of φ at x0 with respect to h.
Using the same concept of fuzzy g-(continuous linear) function on En, the definition of Gâteaux generalized derivative is as follows:
Definition 3.3. Let and x0 ∈ K, , there exists δ > 0 such that x0 + αy ∈ K for any real number α ∈ (0, δ). We say that the fuzzy mapping is Gâteaux generalized differentiable (Gg-differentiable for short) at x0, if there exist a fuzzy g-(continuous linear) function U = (u1, u2, . . . , un) ∈ En such that for all
If U ∈ En is uniquely determined by (12) (by unicity of the limit for all ), and U = (u1, u2, . . . , un) ∈ En is called Gâteaux generalized derivative (Gg-derivative for short) of φ at x0, and denoted by ∇gφ (x0) = (u1, u2, . . . , un) ∈ En, i.e., ∇gφ (x0) = U.
Example 3.1. Let be defined by
where U1, U2 ∈ E. Given x0 = (0, 0) and for any indeed, we have
Clearly ∇gφ (0, 0) on is fuzzy g-(continuous linear) in y1. So, φ is Gg-differentiable at x0 = (0, 0).
Theorem 3.1.Let be a fuzzy mapping and x0 ∈ K. If the Fg-derivative of φ at x0 exists, then the Gg-derivative of φ at x0 for any exists and both the g-derivative values are equal.
Proof. Let be the Fg-derivative of φ at x0, enough we get h = αy, α > 0 and , then we have
or
By the hypothesis since with respect to y is g-(continuous linear) function, and then , from (13), we have
or
Hence, φ is Gg-differentiable at x0 and
□
For instance, consider the following example.
Example 3.2. There are some the fuzzy mappings which are Gg-differentiable of φ at x0 but does not Fg-differentiable of φ at x0. For instance, consider the fuzzy mapping be defined by φ (x1, x2) =
Where U ∈ E. Given and , we obtain
Since, the function ∇gφ (0, 0) ⊙ y = 0 is fuzzy g-(continuous linear) in y then φ is Gg-derivative at x0 = (0, 0) and ∇gφ (0, 0) ⊙ y = 0 for all .
If φ is Fg-differentiable at x0 = (0, 0), then by Theorem 3.1, . However, we have
which does not exist. Hence, φ is not Fg-differentiable at x0 = (0, 0).
The above definitions of Fg-differentiability and Gg-differentiability for fuzzy mapping on a subset , which is an extension of the g-differentiability for the fuzzy-valued function on .
The following definition provides a natural extension of LgH-differentiability of the fuzzy-valued function for the fuzzy mapping, defined on a subset in .
Definition 3.4. Let and x0 ∈ K, , there exists δ > 0 such that x0 + αy ∈ K for any real number α ∈ (0, δ), the given r ∈ [0, 1], the level-wise generalized Gâteaux derivative (GLgH-derivative for short) of a fuzzy mapping φ : K ⟶ E at x0 of the corresponding interval-valued functions at x0 for all is defined as
where
if exists for all r ∈ [0, 1].
Then we say that φ is the level-wise generalized Gâteaux differentiable (GLgH-differentiable for short) at x0, the collection of intervals {∇ LgHφ (x0) r : r ∈ [0, 1] } is the GLgH-derivatives of φ at x0 and denoted by ∇LgHφ (x0).
The next theorem indicates the Gg-derivative is well defined for a large class of fuzzy mappings. Furthermore, a characterization and a practical formula for fuzzy mappings on a subset are introduced. The symbol ∇g is used For the Gg-derivative of fuzzy mapping with an associated fuzzy g-(continuous linear) function and the symbol ∇ is used the Gâteaux derivative of real-valued mappings with an associated continuous linear function .
Theorem 3.2.Let be a fuzzy mapping and x = (x1, x2, . . . , xn) ∈ K be such that . If real-valued multi variables functions and are real-valued Gâteaux differentiable with respect to x for all , uniformly for r ∈ [0, 1], then φ is Gg-differentiable at x for all with an associated fuzzy g-(continuous linear) function , and we have
Proof. According to Proposition 2.1, we have
Then
Then by the hypothesis the functions and are real-valued multi variables Gâteaux differentiable at x, we have
i.e.,
for each and r ∈ [0, 1]. Also, let us consider that if and are left continuous with respect to r ∈]0, 1] and right continuous at 0. Taking a sequences αn ⟶ 0, the functions and are left continuous for r ∈]0, 1] and right continuous at 0. Also, for all the functions
satisfying the same properties. Therefore, it follows that
are left continuous at r ∈]0, 1] and right continuous at 0. It is easy to see that for all
is increasing function with respect to r ∈ [0, 1] and
is decreasing function with respect to r ∈ [0, 1], by Proposition 2.5, they define a fuzzy number. Consequently, the level-sets of ∇gφ (x) r . y for each and r ∈ [0, 1], define a fuzzy number, and hence, by Lemma 2.1, we obtain that φ (x) is Gg-differentiable at x for each . □
In the following theorem, the uniform GLgH- differentiability is sufficient for the Gg-differentiability.
Theorem 3.3.Let be uniformly GLgH-differentiable at x0. Then the fuzzy mapping φ is Gg-differentiable at x0 with an associated fuzzy g-(continuous linear) function , and for every r ∈ [0, 1]
Proof. The proof is similar to Theorem 2.4 in [3]. □
Example 3.3. Consider the fuzzy function be defined by
It is easy to see that φ is Fg-differentiable at x0 = 0, i.e.,
then .
Directional g-differentiability
Now, we introduce a definition of directional g-derivative for multi-dimensional fuzzy mapping on a subset .
Definition 4.1. Let be a fuzzy mapping, where K is any open subset of . Let x0 ∈ K, . We say that φ has the one-sided directional generalized derivative (directional g-derivative for short) at x0 in the direction of y
If also
of the above fuzzy mapping exists and two are equal, we say that φ has two-sided directional g-derivative at x0 in the direction of y.
If satisfying (14) exists, we say that φ is directional generalized differentiable (directional g-differentiable for short) at x0 in the direction of y.
Definition 4.2. Let be a fuzzy mapping. Let x0 ∈ K, . We say that φ is directionally g-differentiable at x0 if exist, for any .
Theorem 4.1.Let be a fuzzy mapping and x0 ∈ K. Then on is a fuzzy positively homogeneous.
Proof. Let λ > 0, x0 ∈ K be fixed and arbitrary. Consider
Let s : = αλ, since α → 0+ ⇔ αλ → 0+, ∀ λ > 0, i.e., s → 0+
Hence, on is fuzzy positively homogeneous. □
Proposition 4.1.Let be a fuzzy mapping and x = (x1, x2, . . . , xn) ∈ K be such that .
If and are real-valued multi variables functions directional differentiable at x in the direction of y, uniformly for r ∈ [0, 1], then φ (x) is directional g-differentiable at x in the direction of y, and we have
Proof. According to Proposition 2.1, we have
Then by the hypothesis the function and are real-valued multi variables directional differentiable at x in the direction of y, we have
for all r ∈ [0, 1]. Also, let us consider that if and are left continuous with respect to r ∈ [0, 1] and right continuous at 0. Taking a sequence αn → 0, the functions and are left continuous for r ∈]0, 1] and right continuous at 0. Also, the functions
satisfying the same properties. Therefore, it follows that
are left continuous at r ∈]0, 1] and right continuous at 0. It is easy to see that is increasing function with respect to r ∈ [0, 1] and is decreasing function with respect to r ∈ [0, 1], by Proposition 2.5 they define a fuzzy number.
Consequently, the level-sets of define a fuzzy number, and hence, by Lemma 2.1, we obtain that φ (x) is directional g-differentiable at x in the direction of y. □
Definition 4.3. [18] Let K be a non-empty open subset of and be a fuzzy mapping, with x0 ∈ K. If is any admissible direction at x0 ∈ K, then given r ∈ [0, 1], the directional level-wise generalized derivative (directional LgH-derivative for short) of corresponding interval-valued function at x0 in the direction of y is defined as
if it exists.
(1) If exists for all r ∈ [0, 1], then φ is said to have the directional LgH-derivative at x0 in the direction of y;
(2) We say that φ is directionally (or weak) level-wise generalized differentiable (directionally or weak LgH-differentiable) at x0 if φ admits directional LgH-derivatives at x0 in any direction and for all r ∈ [0, 1]; the collection of intervals is the directional LgH-derivative of φ at x0 in direction y, denoted as ;
(3) We say that φ is directionally (weak) gH-differentiable at x0 if it is directionally (weak) LgH-differentiable at x0 in any direction y and the directional LgH-derivative defines a fuzzy interval (i.e., the intervals define the level-cuts of a fuzzy interval);
(4) φ is said directionally (weak) LgH-differentiable on K if it is directionally LgH-differentiable at each point x0 ∈ K and is said directionally (weak) gH-differentiable on K if it is directionally gH-differentiable at each point x0 ∈ K.
Proposition 4.2.Let be a fuzzy mapping and x = (x1, x2, . . . , xn) ∈ K is directional LgH-differentiable at x in the direction of uniformly for r ∈ [0, 1]. Then φ is directional g-differentiable at x in the direction of y, for any r ∈ [0, 1]
Proof. The proof is similar to Theorem 4 in [3]. □
Definition 4.4. Let be a fuzzy mapping, x ∈ K. If for , there exists δ > 0 such that x + αy ∈ K for any real number α ∈ (0, δ), then the quotient fuzzy mapping has the generalized Hukuhara difference as follows:
as a function of α at x in the direction of y, for given r ∈ [0, 1], the quotient of interval-valued function has the level-wise generalized Hukuhara difference (LgH-quotient for short) at x in the direction of y is defined as
If for all r ∈ [0, 1] and the collection of intervals is the LgH-quotient of φ as a function of α at x in the direction of y, and denoted by .
Example 4.1. Let be defined by
its level-set, r ∈ [0, 1], are defined by
For all r ∈ [0, 1], the functions and are real-valued Gâteaux differentiable at each point , then and . Now for all r ∈ [0, 1], the two functions and are not real-valued Gâteaux differentiable at x = 0. Also φ (x) is not GLgH-differentiable at x = 0.
However, for all r ∈ [0, 1] the functions and are real-valued multi variables directional differentiable at in any direction , and satisfy the conditions in Proposition 2.5, in fact for all , r ∈ [0, 1] we have
it is follows that
Hence φ is directionally g-differentiable at x = 0 in any direction .
Partial g-derivative
Below, we define the generalized partial derivative a natural extension of g-derivative for multi-dimensional fuzzy mapping . Denote ei = (t1, t2, . . . , ti, . . . , tn) with
Where ei is the ith unit vector (all components or 0 accept for the ith component which is 1).
Definition 5.1. Let be a fuzzy mapping, fix some x = (x1, x2, . . . , xn) ∈ K, and consider the expression
If satisfying (17) exists, it is called generalized partial derivative of φ (((g-p))-derivative for short) at x with respect to xi, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n).
Definition 5.2. Consider be a fuzzy mapping, where K is any open subset of . If y = ei is any admissible direction at x ∈ K, we say that φ to be right and left generalized partial differentiable (right and left ((g-p))-differentiable for short) at x with respect to xi, denoted by
and
If and both exist and are equal, we obtain the ((g-p))-derivative of φ at x ∈ K with respect to xi:
Proposition 5.1.Let be a fuzzy mapping, fix some x = (x1, x2, . . . , xn) ∈ K. If and are real-valued multi variables functions partially differentiable at x with respect to xi, uniformly for r ∈ [0, 1], then φ (x) is ((g-p))-differentiable at x with respect to xi and we have
Proof. The proof is similar to the Proposition 4.1, in particular, for y = ei, i = 1, . . . , n. □
Definition 5.3. [18] Let with x = (x1, x2, . . . , xn) ∈ K, the given r ∈ [0, 1], the partially level-wise generalized derivative (partially LgH-derivative for short) at x with respect to xi of corresponding interval-valued functions at x with respect to xi partially gH-derivatives, if they exist
If exists for all r ∈ [0, 1], we say that φ is partially level-wise generalized Hukuhara differentiable (partially LgH-differentiable for short) at x with respect to xi and the collection of intervals is the partially LgH-derivative of φ at x with respect to xi (i = 1, 2, . . . , n), denoted by .
Definition 5.4. Let be a fuzzy mapping, x ∈ K. If for , there exists δ > 0 such that x + αei ∈ K for any real number α ∈ (0, δ), then the quotient fuzzy mapping has the generalized Hukuhara difference as follows
as a function of α at x in the direction of ei, if .
Definition 5.5. Let be a fuzzy mapping, x ∈ K. If for , there exists δ > 0 such that x + αei ∈ K for any real number α ∈ (0, δ), then for given r ∈ [0, 1], the quotient of interval-valued function has the level-wise generalized Hukuhara difference (LgH-quotient for short) at x in the direction of ei is defined as
If for all r ∈ [0, 1] and the collection of intervals is the LgH-quotient of φ as a function of α at x in the direction of ei, and denoted by , (i = 1, 2, . . . , n).
Example 5.1. Let be a fuzzy mapping and be define by φ (x1, x2) = 〈1, 2, 3〉 ⊙ |x1 - 2| + x2 for any . Its level-sets are, for any r ∈ [0, 1]
Then the quotient fuzzy mapping of φ has the (LgH-quotient) as follows:
for all r ∈ [0, 1], as a function of α at x in the direction of ei with i ∈ {1, 2}. Given x = (2, 0), we have that for any r ∈ [0, 1] and for i = 1, 2, the (LgH-quotient) of φ as a function of α at x in the direction of ei is given by
and
The collection is the LgH-quotient of φ as a function of α at x in the direction of ei, and denoted by .
Theorem 5.1.Let be a fuzzy mapping, x ∈ K and , if there exist δ > 0 such that x + αy ∈ K for every real-number α ∈ (0, δ), the function φ (x) uniformly partially LgH-differentiable at x with respect to xi. Then φ (x) is ((g-p))-differentiable at x with respect to xi, and
uniformly with respect to r ∈ [0, 1] converge to as α → 0, respectively (i = 1, 2, . . . , n).
Proof. Assume that x ∈ K, there exists δ > 0 such that x + αy ∈ K for any α ∈ (0, δ), and consider for r ∈ [0, 1] be fixed, the intervals
Suppose that the fuzzy sets and Bi be the fuzzy number having the collection of intervals and {Bi (r) : r ∈ [0, 1]} as level-sets respectively.
In fact, we show that the fuzzy numbers and Bi in Proposition 5.1 the level-sets and {Bi (r) : r ∈ [0, 1]} satisfying the conditions in Proposition 2.5. We observe that the following limit exists, i.e.,
As a conclusion, that the ((g-p))-derivative of φ at x with respect to xi exist and equal to Bi.
Consider the intervals
and
such that
then by the hypothesis of φ is uniformly partially LgH-differentiability at x with respect to xi (i = 1, 2, . . . , n), for the chosen ɛ > 0 be given for each i = 1, 2, . . . , n there exists δi > 0, such that
In the other words, from the definition of infimum and supremum, we have for ɛ > 0 be arbitrary and for any r ∈ [0, 1] and any α, there exist λ1 ≥ r, λ2 ≥ r, λ3 ≥ r, λ4 ≥ r, such that
and finally, for the sufficiently small α, we have
Passing to limit as α → 0, we obtain
The proof is complete.□
Proposition 5.2.Let be a fuzzy mapping. If φ is Fg-differentiable at x0 ∈ K, then all ((g-p))-derivative of φ at x0 exist, it is
Proof. By using the definition of Fg-differentiability of φ at x0, taking h = αei, α ≠ 0, we have that for all i = 1, 2, . . . , n,
with ; then the following limit exists
Hence
The proof is complete. □
Proposition 5.3.Let be a fuzzy mapping. If φ is Fg-differentiable at x0 ∈ K, then for a given i, the ((g-p))-derivative exists, then
Proof. Suppose that φ is Fg-differentiable at x0. We get h = αei for α > 0, we have
and, passing the limit for α → 0+, we obtain
similarly, if we get h = - αei, α > 0, we have
therefore
The ((g-p))-derivative of φ at x with respect to xi, i.e.,
exists and, from (18) we obtain .
The proof is complete. □
Definition 5.6. Let be a fuzzy mapping, is Gg-differentiable at x0 ∈ K. Then n-dimensional vector of fuzzy ui ∈ E, i = 1, 2, . . . , n is called the g-gradient of φ at x0 and denoted by ∇gφ (x0) = (u1, u2, . . . , un). Note that the g-gradient is well-defined by Definition 3.3 is unique.
Let us consider that the g-gradient of a (g-p)-differentiable and LgH-gradient of a partial LgH-differentiable function for each level-sets of fuzzy mapping as follows.
Definition 5.7. Let be a fuzzy mapping. The g-gradient of a fuzzy mapping φ at x ∈ K is given
where , i = 1, 2, . . . , n the ((g-p))-derivative of φ at x with respect to xi. In this case, the ith partial LgH-derivative of φ at x, as follows:
the collection of intervals is the partial LgH-derivative of φ at x with respect to xi and denoted by .
Also, the collection of intervals {∇ LgHφ (x) r : r ∈ [0, 1]} is the LgH-gradient of φ at x and denoted by ∇LgHφ (x) as follows:
In the following theorem connection between directional g-derivative and Gg-derivative is given.
Theorem 5.2.Let be a fuzzy mapping. If φ is Gg-differentiable at x0, i.e., ∇gφ (x) exist at , then the directional g-derivative of φ at x0, i.e., exists for any fixed direction , and satisfies
Proof. Suppose that φ is Gg-differentiable at , then by Definition 3.3 for all there exists the following limit:
It follows from (19) that , , i.e., φ′ (x0, .) on is a fuzzy g-(continuous linear) function whenever g-gradient of φ at x0, i.e., ∇gφ (x0) exists.
The proof is complete. □
Corollary 5.1.Let be a fuzzy mapping. If φ is Gg-differentiable at x0, then all the ((g-p))-derivatives of φ at x0 exist, and
for i = 1, 2, . . . , n. Furthermore, all directional g-derivatives of φ at x0 exists, and
Note 5.1. In Theorem 5.2, we have shown the Gg-differentiability of φ at x0, i.e., ∇gφ (x0) exists, then exists for all . But, the converse is not true, i.e., the existence of all directional g-derivatives of φ at x0 does not imply the Gg-differentiability of f at x0.
Considering the following example:
Example 5.2. Let be defined by
Where U1, U2 ∈ E. The directional g-derivative of φ at in the direction of ; indeed, we have
Therefore, φ is directionally g-derivative at x0 = (0, 0) in any direction . But ∇gφ (0, 0) is not fuzzy g-continuous, and hence φ does not the Gg-derivative at x0 = (0, 0).
In particular, in the one-dimensional case, we can state a rule to calculate the directional g-derivative via the g-derivative as follows.
Proposition 5.4.Let be a fuzzy-valued function. If φ is g-differentiable on K, then φ is directionally g-differentiable on K, and
Proof. Let x0 ∈ K and be arbitrary by Definition 4.2, we have
exists, since φ is g-differentiable at x0 then, by Definition 2.12, there exist the following limit:
where . As a conclude, we have the following expressions:
From (20) and (21), it follows:
□ In the next examples, we have shown the description and relations of directional g-derivative, (g-p)-derivative, directional LgH-differentiability, and partial LgH-derivative with details.
Example 5.3. Let be a fuzzy mapping be define by
for every . Its level-set, for all r ∈ [0, 1],
Given x0 = (0, 0) and , for all r ∈ [0, 1], we have
Then, φ is directionally LgH-differentiable at x0 = (0, 0) in any direction and
Hence, φ is directionally g-differentiable at x0 = (0, 0) in any direction . But, if we get r = 0.25 and define the unit vector e1 = (1, 0), we have
which does not exist. Finally, φ does not the partial LgH-differentiable at x0 = (0, 0) with respect to x1.
Example 5.4. Let be a fuzzy mapping be define by
for x0 = (0, 0) and , we have
Therefore φ is directionally g-differentiable at x0 = (0, 0) in any direction y1 i.e., on is a fuzzy g-(continuous linear) function in y1.
But, for x0 = (0, 0), and the unit vector e1 = (1, 0), we have that
Therefore, φ is the (g-p)-derivative at x0 = (0, 0) with respect to x1.
Example 5.5. Let be a fuzzy mapping be define by the level-set
Given and for all r ∈ [0, 1], take note of it is well defined. Given r ∈ [0, 1] and , if x1 ≠ 0, x2 ≠ 0 and x3 ≠ 0, then the real-valued functions and are differentiable at x. If x1 = x2 = x3 = 0, we have
Therefore φ is the partial LgH-derivative at . However, there does not exist the directional LgH-derivative of φ at .
Consider the direction of and r ∈ [0, 1], we have
hence the limit does not exist, consequently, φ is not directional LgH-derivative at x = (0, 0, 0) in the direction of y = (2, 1, - 1).
Conclusion
In this article, g-differentiability to fuzzy multi-dimensional mappings based on a new concept of fuzzy g-(continuous linear) function from into E was extended by using the new g-difference. Moreover Fréchet and Gâteaux g-differentiability and the relation of them were defined and analyzed. The directional g-differentiability and partial g-derivatives proposed here and their properties, and so association of them in terms of a level-wise gH-differentiability were discussed. Furthermore, some examples to illustrate the ability and reliability of our concepts were solved. The results of this study could directly be applied to the fuzzy optimization. In line with the content suggested in this article, the next step could be to investigate the g-subdifferential of fuzzy multi-dimensional mappings plus the applications in the convex fuzzy optimization.
References
1.
EbrahimnejadA., New method for solving fuzzy transportation problems with LR flat fuzzy numbers, Inform Sci357 (2016), 108–124.
2.
BedeB., Mathematics of Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing295, Springer, (2013).
BedeB., GalS.G., Generalizations of the differentiability of fuzzy number-valued functions with applications to fuzzy differential equations, Fuzzy Sets Syst151 (2005), 581–599.
5.
NegoitaC.V., RalescuD.A., Application of Fuzzy Sets to Systems Analysis, Wiley, New York, (1975).
6.
WuC.X., MaM., FangJ.X., Structure Theory of fuzzy Analysis, Guizhou Scientific Publication (1994), (in Chinese).
7.
GhoshD., Surat ChauhanR.,
MesiarR.
and Kumar DebnathA., Generalized Hukuhara Gâteaux and Fréchet Derivatives of Interval-valued Functions and their Application in Optimization with Interval-valued Functions, Information Sciences (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.09.023.
8.
RadiD., SoriniL., StefaniniL., On the Numerical Solution of Ordinary, Interval and Fuzzy Differential Equations by Use of F-Transform, Axioms9(1) (2020), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms9010015.
9.
WangG.X., WuC.X., Directional derivatives and subdifferential of convex fuzzy mappings and application in convex fuzzy programming, Fuzzy Sets Syst138 (2003), 559–591.
10.
GomesL.T., BarrosL.C., A note on the generalized difference and the generalized differentiability, Fuzzy Sets Syst280 (2015), 142–145.
11.
StefaniniL., On the generalized LU-fuzzy derivative and fuzzy differential equations, in: Proceeding sof the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, London, (2007), 710–715.
12.
StefaniniL., A generalization of Hukuhara difference, in: D. Dubois, M.A. Lubiano, H. Prade, M.A. Gil, P. Grzegorzewski, O. Hryniewicz (Eds.), Soft Methods for Handling Variability and Imprecision, in: Series on Advances in Soft Computing, Springer (2008).
13.
StefaniniL., A generalization of Hukuhara difference and division for interval and fuzzy arithmetic, Fuzzy Sets Syst161 (2010), 1564–1584.
14.
StefaniniL., BedeB., A New gH-Difference for Multi-Dimensional Convex Sets and Convex Fuzzy Sets, Axioms8(2) (2019), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms8020048.
StefaniniL., BedeB., Generalized Hukuhara differentiability of interval-valued functions and interval differential equations, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications71(34) (2009), 1311–1328.
17.
StefaniniL., SoriniL., AmiciziaB., Interval Analysis and Calculus for Interval-Valued Functions of a Single Variable—Part II: Extremal Points, Convexity, Periodicity. Axioms8(4) (2019), 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms8040114.
18.
StefaniniL., JimenezM.A., Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions for interval and fuzzy optimization in several variables under total and directional generalized differentiability, Fuzzy Sets and Syst283 (2018).
ZadehL.A., The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-i, Inform Sci8 (1975), 199–249.
21.
ZadehL.A., The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III, Inform Sci9 (1975), 43–80.
22.
KeshavarzM., et al., A Study of Fuzzy Methods for Solving System of Fuzzy Differential Equations, New Mathematics and Natural Computation doi: 10.1142/S1793005721500010.
23.
MaM., On embedding problems of fuzzy number spaces: Part 5, Fuzzy Sets Syst55 (1993), 313–318.
24.
PuriM.L., RalescuD.A., Differentials of fuzzy functions, J Math Anal Appl91 (1983), 552–558.
25.
GasilovN.A., AmrahovS.E., FatullayevA.G., HashimogluI.F., Solution method for a boundary value problem with fuzzy forcing function, Inform Sci317 (2015), 349–368.
DiamondP., KloedenP., Characterization of compact subsets of fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets Syst29 (1989), 341–348.
28.
AlikhaniR., et al., Differential calculus of fuzzy multi-variable functions and its applications to fuzzy partial differential equations, Fuzzy Sets Syst (2019).
29.
MoghaddamR.G., AllahviranlooT., On the fuzzy Poisson equation, Fuzzy Sets Syst (2018).
30.
AllahviranlooT., GouyandehZ., ArmandA., HasanogluA., On fuzzy solutions for heat equation based on generalized Hukuhara differentiability, Fuzzy Sets and Systems265 (2015), 1–23.
31.
LupulescuV., Hukuhara differentiability of interval-valued functions and interval differential equations on time scales, Inform Sci248 (2013), 50–67.
32.
Chalco-canoY., et al., New Properties of the switching points for the generalized Hukuhara differentiability and some results on calculus, Fuzzy Sets Syst (2020).