Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Depression and Anxiety in Parkinson’s Disease

INTRODUCTION

People living with Parkinson’s disease (PD) typically present with motor symptoms, but depressive and anxiety disorders are common and highly disabling neuropsychiatric symptoms in PD, with an estimated prevalence of up to 50% [1]. These symptoms are cited among the most troubling for people with PD and are associated with significant decreased quality of life [1]. Also, depression, with or without comorbid anxiety symptoms, is a prodromal marker of PD [2], manifesting often as first symptom of PD many years before motor symptoms appear. The relatively larger prevalence of anxiety and depression in PD may be explained by PD-related aberrations in brain circuits that are dependent on dopamine, serotonin and noradrenaline; specifically related to the limbic cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuit and the ‘fear’ circuit (with a major role of the amygdala) [3, 4]. Management of depression and anxiety by optimizing dopaminergic treatment can be effective in case the affective dysregulation is related to suboptimal dopaminergic supplementation. The use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors can be considered, as it has shown effectiveness [5]. However, pharmacological options are not always well tolerated, may have suboptimal efficacy and undesirable side effects, and can be complex to implement due to polypharmacy [6]. Therefore, it is important to consider non-pharmacological treatments that may provide an alternative for or augment current pharmacological and neurosurgical treatment options. The objective of this paper is to provide clinicians and researchers with an up-to-date comprehensive review of the current state-of-the-art in key non-pharmacological interventions. We focus on cognitive-behavioral therapy, non-invasive brain stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy, light therapy, and use of physical rehabilitation/exercise for treatment of depression and anxiety in PD. We highlight promising results, hypothesized mechanisms of action, and future directions.

COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPIES

Psychological therapy options are regarded as the gold standard for the treatment of depressive and anxiety disorders. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an umbrella term for the set of therapeutic methods that finds its roots in the conditioning theories. It focuses on improving psychological well-being by challenging negative thoughts and related dysfunctional behavior (such as avoidance). Recently, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), a ‘third-generation’ CBT method, has specifically received attention for the treatment of depressive and anxiety disorders in individuals with chronic illness. ACT, based on the relational frame theory, aims to strengthen two axes of psychological flexibility: mindfulness and acceptance processes, and behavioral change and committed action to personal values (see, e.g., [7]).

The neural correlates of CBT for the treatment of anxiety and depression are still largely unknown, in PD but also in the general population. A hypothesized mechanism of action of CBT is that CBT may strengthen brain circuits that are, for example, involved in cognitive control (frontoparietal network), emotion regulation and response inhibition (cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuits). One study in PD found evidence for normalization of disrupted connectivity in the limbic and fear circuits, in addition to improved cognitive control by enhanced connectivity within and between the central executive and salience resting-state networks, following CBT for the treatment of anxiety symptoms [8]. More research is needed to gain a better understanding of the effect of CBT on brain circuitry.

In the general adult population, CBT is regarded as an evidence-based intervention for depressive disorders and anxiety disorders including panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and social anxiety disorder [9]. The effect sizes of CBT for the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders in the general population are small to moderate (as compared with usual care) [10]. Moreover, the effects are durable [11] and, for most disorders, equal to those of taking antidepressant medication [12]. While psychological interventions for elderly individuals were long thought to be ineffective, nowadays this belief has been refuted [13, 14]. Also, cognitive impairment is often viewed by clinicians as a contra-indication for the use of CBT, but there is meta-analytic—albeit uncertain—evidence that with adaptations, CBT can improve mental health in cognitively impaired individuals [15].

In PD, the use of CBT for the treatment of depressive and anxiety disorders is increasingly common in clinical practice. In general, CBT has shown large, positive effects for the treatment of anxiety symptoms (Standardized mean difference (SMD) –0.85, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) –1.12 to –0.58, p < 0.001, I² = 0%), and large but heterogeneous effects for the treatment of depression compared with waiting-list or treatment as usual control groups (SMD –0.83, 95% CI –1.26 to –0.40, p < 0.001, I² = 55%) [16]. CBT, including mindfulness-based methods like ACT, can additionally improve psychological distress in persons living with neurologic diseases including PD [17]. There are individual studies suggesting durability of CBT effects in PD [18, 19] but more evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is needed, specifically given the progressive neurodegenerative nature of the disease. Remission rates of depressive and anxiety disorders after CBT have rarely been studied in PD to date.

There is room for improvement in the psychological treatment of depression and anxiety in PD. First, disease-specific treatment protocols are important to account for PD-specific anxiety and depression symptoms, that can be related to, e.g., fear of falling, wearing-off related stress responses, and feelings of shame. In PD, depression and anxiety symptoms do not seem to fit the classification system of the DSM-5. Anxiety roughly can consist of episodes without comorbid depressive symptoms, or more persistently with comorbid depression [20]. PD-specific symptoms of anxiety are reportedly related to psychological distress due to the diagnosis or (general and wearing-off related) symptoms of PD, but also social anxiety due to PD-related symptoms, fear of losing control, persistent worrying, feelings of inner unrest, panic episodes and fear of falling [21]. Depression, in turn, can present in an anxious-depressive subtype, or without comorbid anxiety [22]. Moreover, apathy is more common in PD patients with a depression than in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) [23].

Interventions should be adapted to optimize efficacy, for example by constructing specific interoceptive and imaginal exposure interventions to cope with anxiety related to wearing-off. Some small studies have already shown efficacy of such disease-specific CBT protocols [18, 24]. However, PD-specific consensus protocols are needed to work towards best-practice methods. Second, internet-based CBT may enhance the feasibility of intensive psychological treatment, as it may not always be feasible for individuals with PD to have weekly face-to-face therapy sessions due to mobility issues. Studies have already shown promising results of internet-based interventions (see, e.g., [25]). Third, combination interventions may prove more efficacious than use of psychological therapy alone. For example, CBT may be combined with physical therapy for the treatment of wearing-off related affective symptoms [24] or non-invasive brain stimulation may add to the effects of CBT [26]. More knowledge about the neural correlates of CBT in PD will additionally improve the efficacy of combining CBT with non-invasive brain stimulation.

NON-INVASIVE BRAIN STIMULATION

In recent years, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have emerged as potential non-pharmacological interventions for managing motor and non-motor symptoms in PD [26, 27], including cognitive decline and affective symptoms such as depression and anxiety. By targeting specific cortical areas that act as an ‘entry point’ to relevant brain circuits, rTMS and tDCS may normalize cortical excitability, modulate activity in inter-connected brain regions, improve brain network connectivity and promote neuroplasticity [28, 29]. The mechanisms underlying its therapeutic effects in depression and anxiety relate to the modulation of specifically those dysfunctional neural circuits associated with mood and anxiety regulation, and cognitive control.

ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most effective treatment for severe and treatment-resistant depression, by the induction of seizures through electrical brain stimulation under short-term anesthesia [42]. The working mechanism of ECT remains unclear, but recent studies suggest neuroplastic changes induced by ECT. Schurgers and colleagues showed that ECT-induced reduction in depression severity is found to be related to increased mRNA expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and related genes, which correlated with changes in DNA methylation of these genes and increased serum BDNF protein levels after treatment [43]. The dentate gyrus of the hippocampus is especially relevant for the neuroplastic effects of ECT and shows a very region-specific volume increase after ECT [44].

Although ECT has been employed for decades in adult and geriatric populations [45], including PD patients with depression, its effectiveness in individuals with PD is still under-researched [46]. A systematic review on the effects of ECT in PD by Borisovskaya et al. [47] included 43 studies, encompassing one retrospective case study, two retrospective chart reviews, 27 single case reports, and 13 case series. This overview showed that more than 93% of patients experienced an improvement in their depression symptoms and among those for whom motor function was assessed, 83% reported an improvement in motor symptoms along with their depression. Although the often feared negative effects on cognition were limited to a small subgroup, higher occurrence of adverse effects occurred, mainly delirium and transient confusion, probably related to anesthesia, which sometimes led to treatment discontinuation. Considering that autonomic dysregulation and falls are common in PD, ECT may potentially exacerbate issues like urine retention and fall rates [47].

A more recent meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of ECT on motor and non-motor symptoms in PD [46]. Among a total of 14 studies (n = 129), there was one RCT, nine prospective observational studies, and four retrospective studies. ECT had a significant positive impact on motor manifestations in a subpopulation of PD without psychiatric symptoms (SMD 1.18, CI 0.87–1.49). ECT significantly improved depression (SMD 1.33, CI 0.42–2.24) and psychosis (SMD 1.64, CI 0.90–2.38) and was found to be effective in relieving the wearing-off phenomenon (SMD 0.71, CI 0.28–1.14) without causing any worsening of cognitive function (even small improvement, probably related to improved mood).

In summary, despite the scarce literature on controlled studies on the efficacy, durability, and side effects of ECT in PD, ECT can be considered a safe and fast-acting treatment for severe depression in PD when other methods do not sufficiently reduce the burden of depression. However, strategies to deal with transient post-ECT delirium/confusion and risk of relapse after treatment discontinuation warrant further research.

LIGHT THERAPY

In individuals with PD, the circadian rhythm can become disrupted due to various factors, contributing to depressive symptoms and sleep disorders [48, 49]. The circadian rhythm is generated by the ‘circadian pacemaker’, located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus. Its rhythm is entrained to the 24-hour day-night cycle by “zeitgebers”, of which light is the most important one for humans. Light excites specialized melanopsin containing ganglion cells in the retina (melanocytes), that project a “daytime” signal towards the SCN via the retino-hypothalamic tract.

Individuals with PD show decreased neuroplasticity and altered neurophysiology of the SCN neuronal network as well as neurodegeneration of dopaminergic cells in the SCN [50], making individuals with PD more prone to circadian rhythm disturbances. Moreover, treatment with levodopa or dopaminergic agonists can alter the rhythmic expression of CLOCK genes (genes involved in the temporal regulation of the transcriptome), inducing changes in the circadian rhythm [50]. Finally, various PD-related symptoms, like excessive daytimes sleepiness and sleep-disrupting motor and non-motor symptoms, can negatively impact the sleep-wake cycle, leading to further perturbation of the circadian rhythm [48]. Wrist-worn actigraphy shows a phase advance of the sleep–wake cycle in later stage PD and a decrease in the amplitude of the circadian rhythm, due to the presence of greater nocturnal activity and lower daytime activity [51]. A disturbed circadian rhythm in individuals with PD is also expressed in the timing of core body temperature rhythms and secretion patterns of melatonin, the ‘sleep hormone’ [52–55]. As serotonin, noradrenalin and dopamine all have a circadian rhythm in their release, synthesis-related enzymes and the expression and activity of their receptors, it is conceivable that a disturbed circadian rhythm can have a negative impact on both PD-related motor and non-motor symptoms [49, 55].

Light therapy (LT) involves the daily rhythmic exposure to light-emitting devices, restoring the circadian rhythm by stimulating the SCN via melanocytes in the retina. As LT has few contraindications and side-effects, it is an attractive treatment option. LT has been used to treat mood and circadian rhythm sleep disorders for many years, and has received increasing scientific attention in PD research over the past decade. A recent meta-analysis by Sun et al [56] on the efficacy and safety of LT for both motor and non-motor symptoms of PD shows positive effects on depression in PD [56]. This meta-analysis included four RCTs with a total of 234 participants with PD. The included studies compared different phototherapy devices, including light boxes, portable head-mounted devices and fluorescent tubes, to placebo devices with the same appearance. All trials assessed the effect on depressive symptoms, using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [57–60]. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in depression in the LT group as compared to the control group (SMD –0.27, CI –0.52 to –0.02, P = 0.04, high quality of evidence; [56]). Moreover, two studies evaluated the effectiveness of LT in sleep involving 122 participants [57, 60], demonstrated a statistically significant improvement of sleep (Mean Difference 3.45, CI 0.12 to 6.78, P = 0.04, high quality of evidence; n = 122, [56]). The three trials assessing anxiety (n = 141) found no significant improvement in the LT group [56–58, 60]. None of the reviewed studies reported any significant adverse effects, only mild and transient adverse effects like minor eye discomfort and headache. Limitations of the meta-analysis include the limited number of RCTs, some of them with small sample sizes, and the use of different light devices and treatment regimens.

In conclusion, LT can restore the disrupted circadian rhythm in individuals with PD, resulting in a decrease in depressive symptoms and positive effect on sleep. However, there is no evidence, to date, for the efficacy of LT for the treatment of anxiety symptoms. As LT has minimal adverse effects and can be performed at home, it is an interesting treatment option for depression in PD.

PHYSICAL REHABILITATION/EXERCISE

Physical rehabilitation/exercise is expected to affect neurostructural and chemical processes in PD. Studies suggest co-morbid depression or anxiety in PD correlates with abnormalities in expression of inflammatory cytokines, receptor availability, neurotrophin level, brain volume and connectivity, dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin availability [61]. It has been hypothesized that exercise may exert influence on each of these structural and neurochemical processes [61, 62]. Preliminary evidence from human studies in people with PD without depression or anxiety suggests physical rehabilitation/exercise might increase D2/3 dopamine receptor availability [63, 64], increase endogenous release of anti-inflammatory cytokines (including interleukin-10, a valid immunological marker for severity of non-motor features in PD and critical for microglia and astroglia activation) [65], trigger volumetric changes [66, 67], improve functional connectivity [68], enhance dorsal striatal dopamine release [64, 69], and alter neurotrophin levels (including BDNF) [66, 70–72]. Only two studies reported on exercise-induced changes in BDNF in patients with PD with co-morbid depression or anxiety. Sajatovich and colleagues [73] studied group aerobic/resistance exercise in PD with co-morbid depression, and showed improved Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (p < 0.001) associated with a 3-fold increase in plasma BDNF (p < 0.001). Anxiety did not change. Landers and colleagues showed in their trial, comparing “high-intensity exercise boot camp” and usual care, that plasma BDNF and interleukin 10/tumor necrosis factor-α ratio improved; however, BDI scores did not [74].

In the adult healthy population, physical exercise (defined as “subcategory of physical activity that is planned, structured, and repetitive with the primary purpose of improvement or maintenance of physical fitness, physical performance, or health”) is moderately effective in improving depression (SMD –0.62, CI –0.81 to –0.42, 35 studies, N = 1353, [75]). In individuals with PD, a large range of physical rehabilitation and exercise interventions (e.g., aqua-based training, gait/balance/functional training, multi-domain physical training, dance, mind-body training (e.g., tai chi or yoga), endurance training, strength/resistance training have shown positive effects on both motor symptoms and quality of life as shown in a recent Cochrane network meta-analysis (156 studies, 7,939 participants [76]). More intensive exercise is suggested to be more effective, as shown by a large RCT on treadmill training in PD [77].

Regarding its effects on anxiety and depression, a regular exercise regimen is associated with reduced prevalence of depression in PD [78]. However, a limited amount of studies have specifically focused on depression and/or anxiety as main target for exercise interventions in PD. A review by Feller et al. [79] reported significant overall effects of exercise training compared with usual care on depression (SMD –0.49, CI –0.74 to –0.24; 14 RCTs; N = 961). This corresponds to a 2.47-point change in BDI score, which is clinically relevant. General exercise was used in 18 of the included studies (51%) as their experimental intervention. Of the remainder, 7 (21%) used a form of aerobic exercise, 4 (12%) dance, 4 (12%) a combination of yoga and qigong, 1 (2%) Lee Silverman Voice Treatment therapy, and 1 (2%) Ai Chi in water. Subgroup analysis showed that only general exercise (SMD –0.61, CI –0.99 to –0.23, 8 RCTs, N = 573) and dance (SMD –1.22, CI –2.29 to –0.15, 2 RCTs, N = 41) significantly improved depression, which is consistent with an earlier systematic review [80]. However, the quality of evidence was judged as low, so future high-quality studies are needed.

The evidence regarding exercise for the treatment of anxiety in PD is much less convincing. Abuoaf et al. [81] recently reviewed 5 RCTs (N = 328) and concluded that there is not enough high quality evidence in favor of a positive effect of exercise on anxiety in PD. They identified only two controlled studies [82, 83] that compared exercise to usual care. One study found significantly reduced Beck Anxiety Inventory scores after clinic-based endurance training (n = 35, 24 weeks, 2 times a week, 40 minutes): The exercise group reduced anxiety by 32.8%, while usual care reduced anxiety by only 6.6% [83]. Lower dose home-based exercise (n = 98, 8 weeks, 3 times a week, 30–50 minutes) was not effective for reducing anxiety [82]. There is a need for high quality RCTs with anxiety as primary outcome, as well as large sample sizes across the spectrum of disease stages, with longer periods of follow-up.

Overall, the current state-of-the-art scientific evidence suggests that exercise interventions, possibly combined with other non-pharmacologic interventions, can be effective in reducing depression symptoms in individuals with PD, who do not display contraindications to exercise. The effect of exercise on anxiety has been less studied.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Evidence for non-pharmacological interventions for PD with co-morbid depression is promising; however, for anxiety in PD the evidence is limited (due to lack of proper RCTs, Fig. 1). Thus, current application of treatment modalities for depression and anxiety in PD in daily clinical practice is predominantly based on knowledge from the general population and expert opinion. Further research with adequately powered, well controlled, longer term follow-up RCTs is needed to determine the optimal dose, modality, type, duration, intensity, and frequency for interventions targeting affective symptoms in individuals with PD, and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. Standardization of mood scales may help reduce heterogeneity in outcome measurement. In addition, there have been rapid ongoing developments in artificial intelligence (AI) technology and wearable technology (e.g., body worn sensors) for health care and clinical use. Such wearable AI offers numerous advantages for individualizing diagnoses, treatment and monitoring for management of depression and anxiety in individuals with PD [84, 85].

OPEN IN VIEWER

Fig. 1

Non-pharmacological interventions for depression and anxiety in PD. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT), Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS, e.g., (r)TMS, tDCS), Light Therapy (LT); Exercise (Physical Activity). Solid lines: at least moderate evidence for an association, rough dashed lines (LT/NIBS/Exercise –anxiety): limited or no evidence, fine dashed line (ECT/LT –anxiety): not studied/not indicated.

There is a need for PD-specific treatment protocols (e.g., for the use of CBT, ECT NIBS, LT, exercise), and knowledge on what type of non-pharmacological treatment is most effective. It is also noteworthy that more emphasis is needed on the interplay between gender, exercise, depression and anxiety in the rehabilitation of patients with PD and on studies in which people with PD are engaged as true partners or colleagues in their care and research on depression or anxiety [86, 87], in which people living with PD administer non-pharmacological treatments or are even involved in the research as patient-scientists, rather than merely as “subjects” or “objects of the research” [87]. It is plausible that non-pharmacological shared decision making or participatory research approaches may favorably affect anxiety in PD [88]; however, research has rarely examined this. This knowledge may in the end be used to develop evidence-based guidelines for treating anxiety and depressive disorders in PD.

Although research demonstrates that female sex is associated with a higher risk of depression in PD [23], there is a lack of literature on sex-associated differential effects of non-pharmacological interventions in PD. In the general population, a meta-analysis showed no association between sex and the effect of CBT for the treatment of depression [13]. In contrast, TMS may show larger antidepressant effects in females with MDD [89]. Research on PD response to exercise rarely fully considers sex effects (for review, see Subramanian [90]).While some sex specific recommendations for exercise in PD have been proposed, these are not related to mood outcomes [91]. Overall, knowledge about possible differential sex response in PD is still in its early infancy. Robust, longitudinal and controlled trials are needed to scientifically evaluate possible sex differences in response to non-pharmacological interventions for anxiety and depression in PD.

Besides the mentioned main intervention approaches, novel treatment approaches may offer further benefits for individuals with PD experiencing depression or anxiety symptomatology. For example, there may be potential synergistic effects of NIBS and behavioral interventions (e.g., NIBS combined with cognitive training [92]; or exercise [93]). Also, multimodal body awareness training combining physical therapy/exercise, ACT, and CBT components has shown benefit on emotional wellbeing [17, 24]. Other promising approaches may be high intensity interval training [94], acupuncture [95], and vagal nerve stimulation [96], but this needs further study.

CONCLUSION

Overall, it can be concluded that non-pharmacological, non-invasive interventions offer promising avenues for treating anxiety and depression in individuals with PD and may be safe and potentially effective alternative or augmentative treatments to pharmacological and neurosurgical approaches. Effective treatment options for depressive and anxiety disorders in the general population seem to translate well to PD, regarding, e.g., side-effects (BLT, NIBS, ECT) and feasibility (CBT, physical exercise), but more research is needed to tailor these treatment options towards PD-specific affective symptoms.