Reaction of Ge2Ph6 (1) with trichloroacetic acid at 95°C in toluene for 4 days yields a mixture of the two digermanes (Cl3CCOO)Ph2GeGePh2(OOCCCl3) (2) and Ph3GeGePh2(OOCCCl3) (3) that are converted to a mixture of ClPh2GeGePh2Cl (4) and Ph3GeGePh2Cl (5) using ethereal HCl. Treatment of the mixture of 4 and 5 with LiAlH4 affords the two digermanes HPh2GeGePh2H (6) and Ph3GeGePh2H (7). The digermane 7 was separated from 6 by crystallization and its X-ray crystal structure was determined. Digermane 7 crystallizes in two different morphologies, where one contains three independent molecules in the unit cell (7a) and the other contains only one independent molecule (7b). The Ge – Ge bond distances in these two structures are 2.4234(7) Å (average) in 7a and 2.4213(5) Å in 7b. Compound 7 is thermally unstable and releases Ph3GeH upon heating this material to 200°C in the solid state, with concomitant formation of the germylene Ph2Ge: that polymerizes.
The replacement of an aryl substituent at each of the two germanium atoms to give compounds of the general formula Ge2Ar4X2 is relatively facile, and Dräger et al. reported the conversion of Ge2Ph6 (1) to (Cl3CCOO)Ph2GeGePh2(OOCCCl3) (2) using trichloroacetic acid (TCA) in reasonable yield in 1984 [1]. Digermane 1 could also be converted to both Ge2Ph4Cl2 and Ge2Ph2Cl4 with liquid HCl under pressure [2]. However, replacement of only one aryl group to generate monosubstituted digermanes Ge2Ar5X represents a more difficult synthetic challenge. These substances are potentially useful synthons since they can be used as two-atom end-capping reagents for the construction of oligogermanes or mixed group 14 element oligomers or polymers. Recently, Zaitsev et al. have reported the successful synthesis of several mono-substituted digermanes, including Ph2(OTf)GeGeMe3, [3] ClPh2GeGeMe3, [3] Ph2Ge(OTf)GePh3, [4] Ph2Ge(OTf)GeButMe2, [4] and ClPh2GeGePh3 [4]. These species were fully characterized by spectroscopic techniques and the X-ray structure of Ph2Ge(OTf)GePh3 was determined [4].
We have recently found that the method of Dräger et al. [1] can be used to prepare the monosubstituted digermane Ph3GeGePh2(OOCCCl3) (3) as a mixture with 2 by variation of the experimental conditions. We have converted the mixture of 2 and 3 to the chloro-substituted species ClPh2GeGePh2Cl (4) and Ph3GeGePh2Cl (5), which can subsequently be used to prepare the hydrides HPh2GeGePh2H (6) and Ph3GeGePh2H (7). The digermane 7 can be obtained in pure form by selective crystallization, and its X-ray crystal structure has been obtained. The potential use of 7 for the synthesis of higher oligogermanes was also investigated. However, this species decomposes under the thermal conditions of the hydrogermolysis reaction, [5–9] and the thermal decomposition products of 7 have been identified.
Experimental section
Reagents
All manipulations were carried out using standard Schlenk, syringe, and glovebox techniques. The reagents Cl3CCOOH, LiAlH4-, LiNMe2, 2,3-diethyl-1,4-butadiene, and HCl (1.0 M in Et2O) were purchased from Aldrich and Ge2Ph6 was purchased from Gelest, and all were used without further purification.
Methods
Solvents were dried using a Glass Contour solvent purification system. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were acquired using a Bruker Avance 400 MHz spectrometer operating at 400.00 and 100.58 MHz, respectively. Infrared spectra were acquired using a Varian 800 FTIR spectrometer. Elemental analyses were carried out by Gailbraith Laboratories.
Synthesis of ClPh2GeGePh2Cl (4)/Ph3GeGePh2Cl (5)
A Schlenk tube was charged with 1.00 g (1.64 mmol) of Ge2Ph6 (1) that was dissolved in 15 mL toluene. To this was added a suspension of 1.15 g (7.04 mmol) trichloroacetic acid in 10 mL of toluene. The reaction mixture was sealed in the Schlenk tube with a Teflon plug and heated at 95°C for 72 h, after which time the solution was free of solid material. The solution was allowed to cool and 2.5 equiv. of a 1.0 M ethereal HCl solution (4.11 mL, 4.11 mmol) was added via syringe. The Schlenk tube was sealed and the reaction mixture was heated for a further 18 h at 95°C. The reaction mixture was cannulated into a Schlenk flask and the volatiles were removed in vacuo to yield a white solid that was washed with hexane (3×15 mL) and dried under vacuum to yield 0.390 g of solid product. The 13C NMR spectra for 4 [1] and 5 [4] match those reported in the literature. 1H (CDCl3, 25°C) δ 7.58–7.46 (m, aromatic hydrogens), 7.44–7.40 (m, aromatic hydrogens), 7.38–7.30 (m, aromatic hydrogens) ppm. For 4: 13C NMR (CDCl3, 25°C) δ 135.5 (ipso-C6H5), 133.9 (o-C6H5), 130.6 (p-C6H5), 128.8 (m-C6H5). For 5: 13C NMR (CDCl3, 25°C) δ 137.9 (ipso-Cl(C6H5)2GeGePh3), 135.4 (ipso-ClPh2GeGe(C6H5)3), 135.0 (o-Cl(C6H5)2GeGePh3), 133.8 (o-ClPh2GeGe(C6H5)3), 129.9 (p-Cl(C6H5)2GeGePh3), 129.4 (p-ClPh2GeGe(C6H5)3), 128.6 (m-Cl(C6H5)2GeGePh3), and 128.5 (m-ClPh2GeGe(C6H5)3) ppm.
Synthesis of HPh2GeGePh2H (6)/Ph3GeGePh2H (7)
The mixture of 4 and 5 (0.360 g) was dissolved in 10 mL of THF and to this was added a suspension of LiAlH4 (0.062 g, 1.63 mmol) in 10 mL THF. The reaction mixture was stirred for 18 h at 25°C and the volatiles were then removed in vacuo. The resulting solid was washed with 3×15 mL of hot benzene and the combined washes were filtered though Celite. The volatiles from the filtrate were removed in vacuo to yield a mixture of 6 and 7 along with a trace amount of Ph3GeH (0.33 g total material). Pure 7 was obtained from the product mixture by recrystallization from a concentrated toluene solution at –35°C (0.240 g, 28% based on 1). For 6: 1H NMR (C6D6, 25°C) δ 7.54–7.50 (m, 8H, o-C6H5), 7.08–7.04 (m, 12H, m-C6H5 and p-C6H5), 5.57 (s, 2H, Ge – H) ppm. 13C NMR (C6D6, 25°C) δ 136.0 (ipso-C6H5), 135.7 (o-C6H5), 129.1 (p-C6H5), 128.7 (m-C6H5) ppm. IR (Nujol): 2033 cm–1 (νGe - H). For 7: 1H NMR (C6D6, 25°C) δ 7.59 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 6H, o-(C6H5)3GeGePh2H), 7.54 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 4H, o-Ph3GeGe(C6H5)2H), 7.10–7.03 (m, 15H, p-(C6H5) and m-(C6H5)), 5.72 (s, 1H, Ge – H) ppm. 13C NMR (C6D6, 25°C) δ 137.5 (ipso-HPh2GeGe(C6H5)3), 135.9 (ipso-H(C6H5)2GeGePh3), 135.8 (o-HPh2GeGe(C6H5)3), 135.5 (o-H(C6H5)2GeGePh3), 129.2 (p-HPh2GeGe(C6H5)3), 129.1 (p-H(C6H5)2GeGePh3), 128.8 (m-HPh2GeGe(C6H5)3), 128.7 (m-H(C6H5)2GeGePh3) ppm. IR (Nujol): 2020 cm–1 (νGe - H). Anal. Calcd. for C30H26Ge2: C, 67.76; H, 4.93. Found: C, 67.87; H, 4.89.
Thermal decomposition of 7 in CH3CN solution
A Schlenk tube was charged with 7 (0.050 g, 0.094 mmol) and CH3CN (10 mL) was added. The Schlenk tube was sealed with a Teflon plug and heated in an oil bath at 85°C for 48 h. The reaction mixture was transferred via cannula into a Schlenk flask and the volatiles were removed in vacuo to yield a yellow oil that was analyzed by 1H NMR spectroscopy in benzene-d6.
Thermal decomposition of solid 7
A round bottom flask was charged with 7 (0.100 g, 0.188 mmol) and was connected to a receiving bulb cooled to –78°C. The round bottom flask was heated to 160°C in a Kugelrohr oven for 2 h under vacuum (0.010 torr) after which time a white solid collected in the receiving bulb. The substance in the receiving bulb was identified to be Ph3GeH (0.049 g, 86%) by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy (benzene-d6) by comparison of the spectra to an authentic sample.
Thermal decomposition of 7 in toluene in the presence of DMB
A Schlenk tube was charged with 7 (0.075 g, 0.14 mmol) and toluene (15 mL) was added. To the solution was added 2,3-dimethyl-1,4-butadiene (0.120 g, 1.46 mmol). The Schlenk tube was sealed with a Teflon plug and the reaction mixture was heated to 95°C for 72 h. The reaction mixture was transferred to a Schlenk flask and the volatiles were removed in vacuo to yield a colorless oil. The by 1H and 13C NMR spectra in benzene-d6 were acquired.
X-ray structural determinations of 7
The single crystal X-ray diffraction studies were carried out on a Bruker X8 APEX II CCD diffractometer equipped with Mo Kα radiation (λ= 0.71073). Crystals were mounted on a Cryoloop with Paratone oil. Data were collected in a nitrogen gas stream at 100(2) K using ω scans. Crystal-to-detector distance was 40 mm using 20 s exposure time with a scan width of 1.0°. The data were integrated using the Bruker SAINT software program and scaled using the SADABS software program. Solution by direct methods (SHELXT) produced a complete phasing model consistent with the proposed structure. All nonhydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically by full-matrix least-squares (SHELXL). All hydrogen atoms were placed using a riding model. Their positions were constrained relative to their parent atom using the appropriate HFIX command in SHELXL. Crystallographic data are collected in Table 3. ORTEP diagrams were drawn using ORTEP-3 [10]. CCDC 1419713 (7b) and CCDC 1419714 (7a) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/products/csd/request or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EZ, UK. Fax: +44 1223 336 033; email: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk.
Results and discussion
The preparation of (Cl3CCOO)Ph2GeGePh2(OOCCCl3) (2) from Ge2Ph6 (1) reported by Dräger et al. was carried out using a 5 : 1 molar ratio of trichloroacetic acid (TCA) to 1 in boiling toluene [1]. If a molar ratio if 4.3 : 1 of TCA:1 is employed under the same conditions, the complete conversion of 1 to 2 does not occur and a mixture of 2 and Ph3GeGePh2(OOCCCl3) (3) is obtained (Scheme 1). The digermanes 2 and 3 were not isolated but rather were converted to the corresponding chlorides ClPh2GeGePh2Cl (4) and Ph3GeGePh2Cl (5) by addition of ethereal HCl [1, 11]. Although it is not possible to determine the ratio of 4 to 5 that is formed by integration of their 1H NMR resonances since the signals overlap the 13C NMR of the mixture indicates both species are present in the product mixture since there are twelve aromatic resonances that match the literature values for 4 [1] and 5 [4].
Synthesis of 6 and 7.
The mixture of 4 and 5 was subsequently treated with LiAlH4 to yield a mixture of the digermanes HPh2GeGePh2H (6) and Ph3GeGePh2H (7). The 1H NMR spectrum of the product mixture after treatment contains three resonances in the Ge – H region (Fig. 1), where the peak at δ 5.57 ppm corresponds to 6 [11] and the peak at δ 5.85 ppm corresponds to a small amount of Ph3GeH that was generated during the course of the reaction (vide infra). The most intense peak present at δ 5.72 ppm corresponds to the digermane 7. Integration of these three resonances indicated that the mixture was ca. 79% 7, 10% 6, and 11% Ph3GeH. Compound 7 was separated from 6 and Ph3GeH by crystallization from a concentrated toluene solution at –35°C, and was isolated in 28% yield based on the starting digermane Ge2Ph6 (1). Pure 7 was prepared previously by the action of Ph3GeLi on Ph2GeHCl and the NMR data reported here is identical to that of the previously prepared material [12].
1H NMR spectrum of the Ge – H region after treating the mixture of 4 and 5 with LiAlH4.
The crystals of 7 that were obtained were suitable for X-ray analysis and it was found that two different morphologies of 7 crystallized out of solution, and the bond distances and angles are collected in Tables 1 and 2. The physically larger crystals (7a) contained three independent molecules in the unit cell and the ORTEP diagrams of these are shown in Fig. 2. Both of the germanium atoms in all three of the independent molecules in 7a are disordered over two sites but each have occupancies of greater than 97.8% in one position versus the other such that the occupancy of the second position has virtually no effect on the bond distances and angles within each molecule. The ORTEP diagrams shown in Fig. 2 for 7a contain the germanium atoms drawn in their sites of major occupancy.
Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°) for Ph3GeGePh2H (7a)
Molecule 1
Molecule 2
Molecule 3
Ge(1) – Ge(2)
2.4219(7)
Ge(1a) – Ge(2a)
2.4205(7)
Ge(1b) – Ge(2b)
2.4279(7)
Ge(2) – H(2)
1.35(4)
Ge(2a) – H(2a)
1.41(4)
Ge(2b) – H(2b)
1.38(3)
Ge(1) – C(1)
1.944(4)
Ge(1a) – C(1a)
1.953(4)
Ge(1b) – C(1b)
1.949(4)
Ge(1) – C(7)
1.957(4)
Ge(1a) – C(7a)
1.948(4)
Ge(1b) – C(7b)
1.970(4)
Ge(1) – C(13)
1.958(4)
Ge(1a) – C(13a)
1.958(4)
Ge(1b) – C(13b)
1.950(4)
Ge(2) – C(19)
1.969(4)
Ge(2a) – C(19a)
1.969(4)
Ge(2b) – C(19b)
1.964(4)
Ge(2) – C(25)
1.952(4)
Ge(2a) – C(25a)
1.952(4)
Ge(2b) – C(25b)
1.954(4)
C(1) – Ge(1) – C(7)
109.6(1)
C(1a) – Ge(1a) – C(7a)
109.6(2)
C(1b) – Ge(1b) – C(7b)
107.4(2)
C(1) – Ge(1) – C(13)
109.7(2)
C(1a) – Ge(1a) – C(13a)
108.8(2)
C(1b) – Ge(1b) – C(13b)
110.0(2)
C(7) – Ge(1) – C(13)
108.3(2)
C(7a) – Ge(1a) – C(13a)
110.0(1)
C(7b) – Ge(1b) – C(13b)
108.0(2)
H(2) – Ge(2) – C(19)
104(2)
H(2a) – Ge(2a) – C(19a)
100(2)
H(2b) – Ge(2b) – C(19b)
107(1)
H(2) – Ge(2) – C(25)
106(2)
H(2a) – Ge(2a) – C(25a)
106(2)
H(2b) – Ge(2b) – C(25b)
101(1)
C(19) – Ge(1) – C(25)
108.2(2)
C(19a) – Ge(1a) – C(25a)
110.7(2)
C(19b) – Ge(1b) – C(25b)
106.2(2)
C(1) – Ge(1) – Ge(2)
108.0(1)
C(1a) – Ge(1a) – Ge(2a)
106.9(1)
C(1b) – Ge(1b) – Ge(2b)
115.2(1)
C(7) – Ge(1) – Ge(2)
110.6(1)
C(7a) – Ge(1a) – Ge(2a)
110.5(1)
C(7b) – Ge(1b) – Ge(2b)
109.5(1)
C(13) – Ge(1) – Ge(2)
110.7(1)
C(13a) – Ge(1a) – Ge(2a)
111.0(1)
C(13b) – Ge(1b) – Ge(2b)
106.6(1)
H(2) – Ge(2) – Ge(1)
114(2)
H(2a) – Ge(2a) – Ge(1a)
114(2)
H(2b) – Ge(2b) – Ge(1b)
118(1)
C(19) – Ge(2) – Ge(1)
113.1(1)
C(19a) – Ge(2a) – Ge(1a)
110.1(1)
C(19b) – Ge(2b) – Ge(1b)
115.9(1)
C(25) – Ge(2) – Ge(1)
111.4(1)
C(25a) – Ge(2a) – Ge(1a)
114.8(1)
C(25b) – Ge(2b) – Ge(1b)
108.1(1)
Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°) for Ph3GeGePh2H (7b)
Ge(1) – Ge(2)
2.4213(5)
C(7) – Ge(1) – C(13)
108.0(1)
Ge(2) – H(2)
1.49(3)
H(2) – Ge(2) – C(19)
106(1)
Ge(1) – C(1)
1.958(3)
H(2) – Ge(2) – C(25)
106(1)
Ge(1) – C(7)
1.951(3)
C(19) – Ge(2) – C(25)
110.2(1)
Ge(1) – C(13)
1.953(3)
C(1) – Ge(1) – Ge(2)
110.3(1)
Ge(2) – C(19)
1.956(3)
C(7) – Ge(1) – Ge(2)
106.3(1)
Ge(2) – C(25)
1.954(3)
C(13) – Ge(1) – Ge(2)
114.7(7)
H(2) – Ge(2) – Ge(1)
109(1)
C(1) – Ge(1) – C(7)
110.5(1)
C(19) – Ge(2) – Ge(1)
116.0(1)
C(1) – Ge(1) – C(13)
107.0(1)
C(25) – Ge(2) – Ge(1)
108.9(1)
ORTEP diagrams of the three crystallographically independent molecules of 7a and the single crystallographically independent molecule of 7b.
Disregarding the minor contribution of the disordered atoms the Ge – Ge bond distance in molecule 1 is 2.4219(7) Å, in molecules 2 and 3 these distances are 2.4205(7) and 2.4279(7) Å, respectively. The average Ge – Ge bond distance among the three molecules of 7a is 2.4234(7) Å. The Ge – H bond distances among the three independent molecules are 1.35(4), 1.41(4), 1.38(4) Å for molecules 1, 2, and 3, respectively, which average 1.38(4) Å. The Ge – Cipso bond distances in the three molecules average 1.956(4), 1.956(4), and 1.959(4) Å for molecules 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and average 1.957(4) Å, which are typical bond distances for germanium-bound phenyl rings. The environment around Ge(1) in all three molecules of 7a is nearly idealized tetrahedral, and the C – Ge – C bond angles at Ge(1) average 109.0(2)° among the three molecules. The environment at Ge(2) is slightly distorted from tetrahedral with an average bond angle of 106(1)° due to the presence of the hydrogen atom.
The second crop of smaller crystals (7b) crystallized with only one independent molecule in the unit cell and the atoms were again disordered with occupancies of one site greater than 97.3%. Again ignoring the contribution of the less occupied atoms in 7b, the Ge – Ge bond distance is 2.4213(5) Å and the Ge – H bond distance is 1.49(3) Å, while the Ge – Cipso bond distances average 1.954(3) Å. The average C – Ge – C bond angle at Ge(1) in 7b is 108.5(1)° and the average bond angle of 107(1)° at Ge(2). Thus, both 7a and 7b are structurally similar, although the Ge – H distance in 7b is longer than each of the three Ge – H bonds in 7a.
The Ge – Ge bond distance in Ge2Ph6 (1) is 2.437(2) Å and measures 2.446(1) Å [14] and in its dibenzene solvate 1•2C6H6, while the C – Ge – C bond angles average 108.6 and 108.1° for 1 and 1•2C6H6, respectively. The replacement of one phenyl substituent with a less sterically encumbering hydrogen atom results in the shortening of the Ge – Ge bond by only ca. 0.02 Å, and slightly distorts the environment at the germanium atom that is bound to the hydrogen atom. The Ge – H bond distances found in the three molecules of 7a and the single molecule of 7b are typical for refined Ge – H bond distances. For example, the Ge – H bond distances in Ph3GeH, (o-ButC6H4)3GeH, (Ph3Ge)3GeH, Ph3Ge(GePh2)3H are 1.48(3), [15] 1.37(2), [16] 1.45(3), [17] and 1.50(4) Å, [18] respectively.
We had envisioned using 7 as a two-germanium atom building block for the construction of oligogermane chains, such that we might be able to prepare a heptagermane Ge7Ph16 or an octagermane Ge8Ph18 from 7 and the amides Me2N(GePh2)3NMe2 and Me2N(GePh2)4NMe2, which could be the longest structurally characterized germanes that have been reported. As a proof of concept experiment, we treated 7 with one equiv. of Ph3GeNMe2 in an attempt to prepare the known trigermane Ge3Ph8 [19, 20]. However, after stirring the reaction mixture at 85°C for 48 h in CH3CN solvent and removing the volatiles in vacuo an intractable mixture of products was obtained, although Ph3GeH could be identified by 1H NMR spectroscopy due to the presence of a resonance at δ 5.85 ppm. These findings suggested that 7 might be thermally unstable and decomposed under the reaction conditions employed.
This was investigated by heating a sample of 7 alone in acetonitrile for 48 h in CH3CN solvent. A yellow oil resulted after evaporation of the volatiles, and the 1H NMR spectrum of the product contained multiple overlapping aromatic resonances as well as a peak at δ 5.85 ppm indicating the presence of Ph3GeH. A solid sample of 7 was also heated in a Kugelrohr oven at 160°C at a pressure of 0.010 torr, and a white solid had collected in the receiving flask after heating for 2 h. This was identified as Ph3GeH and it was obtained in 86% yield based on 7. A thick oil remained in the distillation pot, and the 1H NMR of this material contained numerous overlapping resonances in the aromatic region suggesting that it was a polygermane.
These findings indicate that 7 is thermally unstable and decomposes both in the solid state and in solution. In order to determine decomposition pathway, a sample of 7 was heated in toluene solution in a sealed tube at 95°C in the presence of 10 equiv. of 2,3-dimethyl-1,4-butadiene (DMB). After heating for 72 h and removal of the volatiles, the 1H NMR spectrum of the resulting product mixture indicated that Ph3GeH and a germacyclopentene 8 [21] were present, along with some polymeric material (Scheme 2). The presence of 8 and the polymer indicate that 7 decomposes by extrusion of the germylene Ph2Ge: to generate Ph3GeH, and the Ph2Ge: is subsequently trapped by DMB to provide 8 and also undergoes rapid polymerization to yield the polygermane [Ph2Ge]n.
Thermal decomposition of 7 in solution.
Conclusions
The digermane Ph3GeGePh2H (7) was separated from a mixture with HPh2GeGePh2H (6) by selective crystallization. The mixture of 6 and 7 was synthesized via treatment of Ge2Ph6 (1) with 4.3 equiv. of trichloroacetic acid to provide (Cl3CCOO)Ph2GeGePh2(OOCCCl3) (2) and Ph3GeGePh2(OOCCCl3) (3) that were converted to ClPh2GeGePh2Cl (4) and Ph3GeGePh2Cl (5) with ethereal HCl, and finally to 6 and 7 using LiAlH4. The digermane 7 was found to crystallize in two different morphologies, where one contains three unique molecules in the unit cell and the other contains only one. The average Ge – Ge bond length among the two structures of 7 is 2.4223(5) Å. Although 7 might be expected to serve as a two-germanium atom building block for the synthesis of higher oligomers, it undergoes thermal decomposition under the conditions of the hydrogermolysis reaction to produce Ph3GeH and Ph2Ge:, the latter of which polymerizes or can be trapped with DMB.
Crystallographic data for the structures 7a and 7b
Structure
7a
7b
Empirical formula
C30H26Ge2
C30H26Ge2
Formula weight
531.69
531.69
Temperature (K)
100
100
Wavelength (Å)
0.71073
0.71073
Crystal system
Triclinic
Triclinic
Space group
P-1
P-1
a, Å
10.084(1)
9.4057(6)
b, Å
13.899(1)
9.8810(6)
c, Å
27.553(3)
13.8179(9)
α,°
93.627(3)
96.726(2)
β,°
98.798(3)
105.752(2)
γ,°
102.790(3)
95.146(2)
V, Å3
3702.9(6)
1217.5(1)
Z
6
2
ρ (g cm-1)
1.431
1.450
Absorption coefficient (mm-1)
2.450
2.484
F(000)
1620
540
Crystal size (mm3)
0.3×0.12×0.11
0.2×0.09×0.05
Theta range for data collection
1.503 to 26.376
1.548 to 26.342
Index ranges
–12 ≤ h ≤ 12
–11 ≤ h ≤ 11
–17 ≤ k ≤ 17
–12 ≤ k ≤ 12
–34 ≤ l ≤ 34
–17 ≤ l ≤ 14
Reflections collected
75897
15686
Independent reflections
15133 (Rint = 0.0977)
4930 (Rint = 0.0468)
Completeness to θ
99.9
99.7
Absorption correction
Semi-empirical from equivalents
Semi-empirical from equivalents
Refinement method
Full-matrix least squares on F2
Full-matrix least squares on F2
Data/restraints/parameters
15133/0/880
4930/0/294
Goodness-of-fit on F2
1.004
1.010
Final R indices (I<2σ(I))
R1
0.0404
0.0396
wR2
0.0618
0.0712
Final R indices (all data)
R1
0.0921
0.0631
wR2
0.0860
0.0781
Largest diff. peak and hole (e Å–3)
0.654 and –0.642
0.977 and –0.758
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a research grant from the National Science Foundation (Grant CHE-1464462) and is gratefully acknowledged.
References
1.
SimonD., HäberleK. and DrägerM., J Organomet Chem267 (1984), 133–142.
2.
HäberleK. and DrägerM., Z Naturforsch42B (1987), 323–329.