Abstract
The chemistry of British Anti-Lewisite (BAL) and copper in relation to the therapeutic action for the treatment of Wilson’s disease was studied by reacting selected Cu(I) and Cu(II) compounds with a range of thiol compounds. Optimum conditions for the preparation of cuprous mercaptides, CuI–SR, from thiophenol, 3-mercapto-1,2-propanediol (MPDH), cysteine (CysH), and glutathione (GSH), were established. BAL displaced Cu(I) from CuI–MPD giving CuI2–BAL irrespective of stoichiometry, while from CuI–cys and CuI–SG, Cu–BAL were obtained. BAL passivated CuI–SPh. The direct reaction of BAL with either Cu(II) or Cu(I) gave insoluble amorphous solids assumed to be CuI2-(oxidized dimeric BAL) or CuI2–BAL, respectively, that could not be completely analyzed or solubilized under various conditions. Thus, the detection of elevated copper in the urine of Wilson’s disease patients treated with BAL may not be directly due to the solubilization of endogenous copper by BAL. Cuprous mercaptides are easily autoxidized by attack of O2 to CuI to give CuII probably as peroxo complexes.
Introduction
Wilson’s disease [45] (hepatolenticular degeneration) is a rare genetic disorder of copper metabolism leading to copper accumulation in the liver and extrahepatic organs such as the brain and cornea [2]. Patients may present with combinations of hepatic, neurological and psychiatric symptoms. Copper overload in patients with Wilson’s disease is caused by impairment to the biliary route for excretion of dietary copper. For the majority of patients, Wilson’s disease is a treatable condition but requires life-long use of drugs.
Five drugs have commonly been used to treat Wilson’s disease [30]: BAL; D-penicillamine; zinc sulfate (or acetate); trientine dihydrochloride; and ammonium tetrathiomolybdate, Fig. 1. The BAL analogues, meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) or its disodium salt and sodium 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanesulfonate (DMPS), Fig. 1, have also been investigated, particularly in China [46]. Each drug can promote excretion of copper from the body and/or transform copper into a metabolically unavailable form in the patient. Four of these drugs contain thiol groups: the monothiol D-penicillamine and the dithiols BAL, DMSA and DMPS.

Compounds used to treat Wilson’s disease in chronological order of their introduction.
Thiols, RSH, containing non-functional groups are quickly oxidized by Cu(II) to the corresponding disulfide with concomitant reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I) [12], Equation (1). Copper(I) then forms the cuprous mercaptide, Cu–SR, Equation (2). If steric effects hinder the formation of the disulfide, Cu(II) does not form a cuprous mercaptide [12]. The mechanism of this redox process is not well understood, but it is believed to involve an electron transfer within [CuII-RS]+ from sulfur to Cu(II) to give Cu(I) and a thiyl radical, RS·, which dimerizes to the disulfide [12].
The end product can be more complicated in examples where the thiol contains functional groups, the stoichiometry [Cu(II)]:[thiol] is not 1:2, and air (which oxidizes cuprous mercaptides) is present or absent. For example, the interaction of Cu(II) with cysteine can produce a complex [CuI(cys)2]– [6]. With penicillamine, mixed valence compounds can be obtained [4, 36], and ternary complexes such as albumin/copper (I or II)/penicillamine [37] are possible. A water-soluble neutral mixed valence complex, CuIICuI(DL-pen)2, is obtained from excess CuCl2 and DL-penicillamine at pH 6.2 [36], while [Cu6IICu8I(D-pen)12Cl]5– has been characterised in the intensely purple solution obtained by mixing D-penicillamine and CuCl2·2H2O in sodium acetate buffer at pH 6.2 [4]. However, there are doubts whether this copper–penicillamine solution chemistry operates as a route for the decoppering properties of penicillamine in vivo [41], and other mechanisms have been suggested, for example the induction of hepatic metallothionein [35].
British Anti-Lewisite (BAL, dimercaprol, 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), Fig. 1, has an interesting story [42] as an antidote to Lewisite (ClCH = CHAsCl2); its interaction with many heavy metal cations in vivo [39] and in vitro [17] has been reviewed. BAL is a viscous oil, moderately soluble in water (6–8 g/100 mL). Racemic BAL is marketed for clinical use as a solution in peanut oil with the addition of benzyl benzoate as a stabilizer [40].
An observation that BAL promoted the urinary excretion of copper led J.N. Cumings to suggest in 1948 that BAL might be a rational therapy for the treatment of Wilson’s disease [30, 31]. This followed Cumings’ (and others’) finding of an excessive accumulation of copper in the brain and the liver of Wilson’s disease patients [31]. In 1951, Cumings in the UK and independently Denny-Brown and Porter in the USA reported the use of BAL for treating Wilson’s disease patients, thus identifying copper chelation as a rational therapy for this metabolic disorder [31]. Although BAL produced relief of symptoms in some Wilson’s disease patients, it also gave rise to toxic reactions, and resistance, both biochemical and clinical, developed in many patients [43].
Three pathways have been suggested by which BAL can detoxify heavy metals and metalloids: The formation of a five-membered chelate ring (e.g. with As(III)). This was postulated [39, 42], and verified in vitro [18], and the term “chelation therapy” was established in the literature [8]. The water insoluble Pb–BAL·H2O most likely forms such a chelate [17]. If the formation of a five-membered ring is prevented, (e.g. with Hg(II) [7]) an oligomer or polymer may be formed, which is insoluble in aqueous solutions at physiological pH. A redox reaction between BAL and a reducible cation, such as Au(III) [17] or Cu(II), and further reactions of the formed products.
There are only two reports on the interaction of Cu(II) with BAL in vitro. In the first [44], mixing a very dilute aqueous solution of excess CuSO4 and a known amount of BAL afforded a dark blue solid that on drying turned green. Titration of unreacted Cu(II) revealed that the solid had a copper/BAL 1:1 molar ratio. In the second report [26], an aqueous mixture of CuII/BAL/HCl 1:32:320 molar ratio formed a butanol-soluble complex with a 1:1 molar ratio of copper/BAL.
In this paper, we report the reactions of four monothiols [thiophenol, 3-mercapto-1,2-propanediol (MPDH), cysteine and glutathione] and a dithiol (BAL) with selected Cu(II) {CuCl2·2H2O, CuSO4·5H2O, Cu(AcO)2·H2O and cis-Cu(gly)2·H2O [28]} and Cu(I) {CuCl, Cu2O, (Ph3P)3Cu–Cl [19, 32] and (Ph3P)2Cu (NO3) [14]} compounds. The monothiols, a priori, were expected to react with Cu(II) compounds according to Equations (1) and (2) using a 2:1 molar ratio of monothiol to Cu(II). The chemistry of Cu(II) and BAL was anticipated to be more complicated. Copper(I) compounds such as CuCl and Cu2O should react with monothiols according to Equation (2), while (Ph3P)3Cu–Cl should react with monothiols according to Equation (3) [32]. For the reaction of BAL with Cu(I), the products will depend on the ratio CuI:BAL. We checked if BAL can sequester Cu(I) from isolated cuprous-organic acids, cuprous-amino acids and cuprous mercaptides. The oxidized (by H2O2) BAL was studied in the presence of Cu(II) and Cu(I) compounds for comparative reasons. We examined whether the copper–BAL insoluble compounds can be solubilized under various conditions, especially by selected urinary constituents. Attempts were also made towards elucidating the process of autoxidation of cuprous mercaptides by 1H NMR.
From the pharmacological point of view our results agree with the suggestion that chelating agents act therapeutically by mobilizing relatively small amounts of toxic metals [8]. However, the observation that BAL glucoside (BAL-Intrav) (2–4 g/man) increased the excretion of copper in urine of six subjects about 20 times (3.6–14.0μg/h before to 65.8–235.0μg/h after treatment) [27] raises questions about the mechanism of this enhanced copper excretion. The finding [25, 41] that the water insoluble Cu(I) complexes with cysteine, penicillamine and glutathione forms water soluble ternary complexes in the presence of a second thioamino acid, e.g. CuI–cysteine-penicillamine, may offer a new explanation for the detoxification of heavy metal ions, including copper, by chelatingagents.
Materials and methods
Silica gel 60 H for thin layer chromatography (TLC) was obtained from Merck. Deionized water pH 6.5, aqueous NaCl solutions pH 5.6–6.27, aqueous urea solutions pH 7.8–8.07 and phosphate buffer pH 7.00 were used. Water and methanol solvents were deaerated by boiling and bubbling nitrogen just before use and are regarded as not strictly deoxygenated. TLCs were run on microslides and the spots were made visible by iodine vapors. IR spectra were taken in KBr discs on a Perkin-Elmer, model 16PC, FT-IR spectrometer, 1H NMR (at 400 MHz) spectra were obtained on a Bruker, model DPX Avance, spectrometer and X-ray powder diffractograms were recorded with a Siemens powder X-ray diffractometer, model D5000. Electrospray ionization (ESI positive ion detection) mass spectra of the products of oxidation of BAL with hydrogen peroxide in methanol were recorded on a Micromass-Platform LC spectrometer. Elemental analyses were obtained through the Center of Instrumental Analyses, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Copper(II) chloride dihydrate (Alfa Aesar), copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate (Riedel – de Haën), copper(II) acetate monohydrate (Ferak), 3-mercapto-1,2-propanediol [95%; (TLC (Et2O) was used to exclude glycerol or 3-chloro-1,2-propanediol as impurities) (Aldrich), and BAL (Merck; TLC (Et2O) determined traces of oxidized BAL at Rf 0.60) were used as received. The following copper compounds were prepared by literature methods and had the following properties:
cis-B is(glycinato)copper(II) monohydrate 28] {85%; insoluble in CHCl3, MeOH, 95% EtOH, slightly to moderately soluble in H2O and moderately soluble in DMSO; IR (KBr): as in ref. [28].
C opper(I) chloride [21] {IR (KBr): ṽ = 3446 s, broad, 1000 vs, very broad}.
C opper(I) oxide from CuSO4·5H2O (80 mmol), glucose (40 mmol), NaOH (200 mmol) in warm water (150 mL) [33] as a brick-colored solid (100%) after filtration and washing with water, methanol and ether.
Tris(triphenylphosphine)copper(I) chloride [19] {96%; recrystallized from methanol (1.00 g/100 mL) with 75% recovery, insoluble in Et2O, Me2CO, sparingly-to-moderately soluble in DMSO and soluble in CHCl3; m.p. at 163°C shrinks to a globule, at 168°C gives an opalescent globule that clears at approx. 210°C, lit. [19] 7–170°C, lit. [10] 166°C that clears at 202°C; IR (KBr): ṽ = 3046 m, 1480 s, 1434 s, 1090 s, 744 vs, 734 vs, 694 vs, 618 s, 518 vs, 508 vs, 482 vs, see Costa et al. [10]; 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ= 7.23 (m, 2 H, meta Ph-H), 7.33 (m, 3 H, ortho and para Ph-H).
B i s(triphenylphosphine)copper(I) nitrate [14] {98%; recrystallized from methanol (1.00 g/100 mL) with 50% recovery; soluble in CHCl3, CH2Cl2, MeCN, DMSO, DMF, sparingly to moderately soluble in MeOH, EtOH, insoluble in Et2O, Me2CO; m.p. 6–247°C dec., lit. [14] 248°C dec.; IR (KBr): has a medium ionic NO3 - at 1384 cm–1 [16] and a very strong chelated NO3 at 1464 and 1274 cm–1 [11, 20]. 1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS): δ= 7.29 (s, 2 H, meta Ph-H), 7.37, 7.48, 7.54 and 7.67 (m, 3 H, ortho and para Ph-H). The NMR solution in 30 min gave a bluish fluffy solid.
The yellow C u–S Ph [1] is insoluble in MeOH and CHCl3 and sparingly soluble in DMSO. M.p.: at 245°C darkens to brownish and at 260°C shrinks and turns black. IR (KBr): ṽ = 3048 m, 1576 s, 1540 w, 1474 vs, 1436 s, 1296 w, 1175 w, 1078 s, 1066 m, 1022 s, 998 m, 956 w, 898 w, 730 vs, 684 vs, 476 s.
The very pale yellow (Ph3P)2Cu–S Ph [32] {calculated for C42H35SP2Cu (Mr 697.20): C 72.35, H 5.06, S 4.59%; found C 71.80, H 4.22, S 5.35% } is soluble in CHCl3, sparingly soluble in Et2O, Me2CO and MeOH, and moderately soluble in DMSO. M.p. 0–162°C; lit. [32] 0–162°C. IR (KBr): ṽ = 3048 m, 1570 m, 1476 m, 1466 m, 1432 s, 1308 w, 1182 w, 1154 w, 1090 s, 1082 s, 1020 m, 996 m, 850 w, 744 vs, 732 s, 692 vs, 618 m, 520 s, 512 vs, 500 s, 422 m. 1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS): δ= 7.25 (m, all Ph-H protons).
Preparation of cuprous 2,3-dihydroxypropyl-1-mercaptide, Cu I -MPD
To a centrifuge tube 3-mercapto-1,2-propanediol (MPDH) (450 mg, 4.16 mmol) was dissolved in non deaerated water (1 mL) and copper(I) chloride (375 mg, 3.78 mmol) was added. At once a yellow gel was formed that on stirring at room temperature (RT) gave a yellow solution. After 30 min stirring at RT, methanol (9 mL) was added drop-wise to give a yellowish suspension that was stirred at RT for 2 h. TLC (Et2O) showed the excess MPDH that had not reacted at Rf 0.36 and the impurity in the 3-mercapto-1,2-propanediol at Rf 0.16. Centrifugation, washing with methanol (5 mL) and drying in vacuo gave CuI-MPD as a yellow powder containing approx. 5% methanol (628 mg, 97%) insoluble in methanol, sparingly soluble in water and soluble in DMSO giving a yellow solution that in approx. 15 min turned brown. M.p.: at approx. 60°C starts shrinking slowly, at 85°C swells and bubbles, at 125°C shrinks to a glassy oily mass, at approx. 190°C starts darkening, at approx. 200°C turns light orange and at 210°C turns black. Calculated for C3H7O2SCu (Mr 170.69): C 21.11, H 4.14, S 18.78%; found C 21.63, H 4.53, S 18.22%. IR (KBr, yellow disc): ṽ = 3332 vs, broad, 2920 s, 2860 s, 1643 m, 1408 s, 1326 m, 1288 m, 1218 m, 1064 vs, 1012 vs, 924 w, 878 s, 814 w, 730 m, 628 m, 544 m. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, TMS; yellow solution): δ= 2.70 (m, broad, 1 H, CHHSCu), 2.89 (m, broad, 1 H, CHHSCu), 3.3–3.6 (m, broad, 2 H, CH2OH), 3.62 (m, broad, 1 H, CHOH), 4.70 (very broad, 1 H, CH2OH), 5.50 (very broad, 1 H, CHOH), Fig. 2A. At the end of the run a brown tint was visible at the top of the solution. 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, TMS; brown solution: run 3 h after running the yellow sample): δ= 2.72 (m, broad, 1 H, CHHSCu), 2.90 (m, broad, 1 H, CHHSCu), 3.43 (broad,1 H, CHHOH), 3.48 (broad, 1 H, CHHOH), 3.64 (m, broad, 1 H, CHOH), 4.09 (broad, 0.03 H, MeOH), 4.63 (t, J 5.6 Hz, 0.23 H, OH), 4.72 (broad, 0.72 H, OH), 4.87 (d, J 5.2 Hz, 0.14 H, OH), 5.50 (broad, 0.62 H, OH). The methanol singlet was broadened, Fig. 2B. After 12 h the OH signals were broad and their integrations became 0.28, 0.23, 0.89, 0.20 and 0.78, respectively.

The yellow cuprous 2,3-dihydroxypropyl-1-mercaptide (CuI-MPD) in DMSO-d6 gave a yellow solution that was run just after dissolution,
The product stored at –20°C became darker yellow and remained so for 10 days while it developed a greenish tint after 2 months. After 1 month storing at +4°C the solid CuI-MPD turned brown and had the following thermal behavior: at 68°C starts shrinking slowly, at approx. 80°C shrinks, at 108°C brown bubbles formed, at approx. 130°C a brown film forms, at 185°C orange bubbles appeared and at 210°C turns black. 1H NMR of the brown solid (DMSO-d6, TMS; brown solution): nearly the same as the above brown solution, Fig. 2C. At room temperature the solid in an open vial turned brown in 7 days while when stored in a closed vial at room temperature darkened in 1 day, turned khaki in 3 days, light brown in 6 days and brown in 10 days.
A variety of starting conditions (e.g. adding a mixture of the solid reagents to a deaerated solvent or vice versa, adding a solution of a copper compound to a solution of cysteine in the absence and in the presence of a base to scavenge the acid produced etc.) were tried. The best preparation, as regards the stability of the CuI–cys during its preparation, was from Cu2O: In a 50 mL round-bottomed flask containing a nitrogen inlet, water (10 mL) was deaerated at 100°C while bubbling nitrogen. A mixture of Cu2O (143 mg, 1 mmol) and cysteine (242 mg, 2 mmol) was then added and the system stirred at 100°C (oil bath temperature) for 3 h. Cu2O had reacted in approx. 45 min. The cooled to RT suspension was transferred to a centrifuge tube and the solid was washed with methanol (2 mL) and ether (3 mL) and dried in vacuo to give the product, CuI–cys, (315 mg, 86%) as an off-white powder insoluble in H2O and DMSO (no signals in D2O or DMSO-d6 in the 1H NMR spectra). M.p.: from 50°C starts darkening slowly, at 140°C turns brownish and at approx. 170°C turns brown. Calculated for C3H6NSO2Cu (Mr 183.69): C 19.61, H 3.29, N 7.63, S 17.45%; found C 19.52, H 3.00, N 8.13, S 17.01%. IR (KBr): ṽ = 3416 m, broad, 3000 s, very broad, 1620 vs, 1598 vs, 1560 s, shoulder, 1502 s, 1426 s, 1396 vs, 1336 s, 1298 s, 1180 m, 1146 w, 1104 w, 1038 m, 782 w, 656 w, 606 w, 544 m. The powder X-ray spectrum of CuI–cys showed some crystallinity.
Reactions of glutathione with copper(II) and copper(I) compounds. Preparation of cuprous glutathionate, Cu I –SG
These reactions were generally carried out by adding the solid reactants to a deaerated solvent in centrifuge tubes. Pure CuI–SG was prepared from Cu(AcO)2·H2O, cis-Cu(gly)2·H2O or Cu2O. To a centrifuge tube containing deaerated water (5 mL) was added together Cu(AcO)2·H2O (40 mg, 0.2 mmol) and GSH (123 mg, 0.4 mmol) and stirred at RT for 2 h. The white suspension formed was centrifuged, washed with deaerated water (2 mL) and dried in vacuo over P2O5 to give the product, CuI–SG, as a white, somewhat hard solid (71 mg, 95%), insoluble in H2O, MeOH and warm DMSO. M.p.: at approx. 180°C darkens to brown and at 200°C swells to a brown foam. Calculated for C10H16N3O6SCu (Mr 369.85): C 32.47, H 4.36, N 11.36, S 8.67; found C 32.52, H 4.65, N 11.54, S 9.02%. IR (KBr): ṽ = all bands broad: 3400 s, 3280 s, 3078 s, 2900 m, 1726 m, 1640 vs, 1538 vs, 1412 m, 1222 m, 668 w. The powder X-ray spectrum of CuI–SG revealed a total absence of crystallinity.
Reactions of BAL with some Cu(II) compounds
In a centrifuge tube containing a solution of BAL (0.5 mmol) in deaerated methanol (1 mL) was added a solution of CuCl2·2H2O (0.5 mmol) in deaerated water (3 mL) and the dark blue to grey solvated suspension stirred at RT for 3 h. TLC (Et2O) of the supernatant did not show BAL at Rf 0.82 but traces of oxidized BAL at Rf 0.61. Centrifugation and washing (by stirring for 5 min each time) with H2O (1×3 mL), MeOH (3×3 mL) and Et2O (1×4 mL) gave a dark blue to grey solid (92.8 mg, 100%) probably as a mixture of isomers

Powder X-ray spectrum of the dark blue to grey colored solid assumed to be mixture A (Fig. 4) obtained from the reaction of BAL with Cu(II) compounds. The same spectra were obtained from the dark green solids from the reaction of BAL with Cu(I) compounds assumed to be CuI2–BAL and CuI–BAL.

Mixture
In a centrifuge tube containing a solution of BAL (248 mg, 2 mmol) in deaerated methanol (7 mL) was added solid CuCl (396 mg, 4 mmol) and the dark green suspension was stirred at RT for 30 h. TLC (Et2O) of the supernatant showed traces of oxidized BAL. Centrifugation, washing with methanol (4×3 mL) by stirring for 5 min each time (the last washing gave an opalescent supernatant) and drying in vacuo over P2O5 gave a dark green solid assumed to be CuI2–BAL (454 mg, 91%) insoluble in boiling MeCN and warm DMSO. M.p. 198°C shrinks and turns black. Calculated for C3H6OS2Cu2 (Mr 249.28): C 14.45, H 2.43, S 25.72%; found C 14.42, H 2.45, S 25.06%. IR (KBr): Similar to that described in Section 2.5. Its powder X-ray spectrum showed absence of crystallinity (see Fig. 3). CuCl and BAL under 1:1 and 1:2 molar ratios after 18 h gave CuI2–BAL and BAL that had not reacted was detected by TLC. The product CuI2–BAL keeps tenaciously methanol and if not dried over P2O5 it was analyzed as the green methanolate: C3H6OS2Cu2·2CH3OH (Mr 313.36): C 19.16, H 4.50, S 20.46%; found C 20.20, H 3.19, S 21.02% and its IR (KBr) spectrum now had a stronger –OH band.
Cu2O and BAL (1:1 molar ratio) did not react in methanol (105% Cu2O recovered), while (Ph3P)3Cu-Cl and BAL (2:1 molar ratio) in toluene at 110°C for 6 h gave a greenish light suspension from which on cooling to room temperature 33% (Ph3P)3Cu-Cl was recovered.
Reaction of BAL with cuprous mercaptides
Reaction of BAL with Cu–SPh
To a suspension of Cu–SPh (30 mg, 0.17 mmol) in deaerated MeOH (2 mL), BAL (17μL, 0.17 mmol) was syringed in and the greenish suspension stirred at RT for 2 days. TLC (Et2O) showed the presence of BAL, traces of oxidized BAL and PhSH/PhSSPh while TLC (petroleum ether) showed the presence of PhSH and/or PhSSPh at Rf 0.43. Centrifugation and washing with MeOH gave a green powder (30 mg) that by IR (KBr) contained sharp bands due to Cu–SPh. The same IR (KBr) spectra were obtained from Cu–SPh and BAL under 2:1 and 1:2 molar ratios.
Reaction of BAL with Cu I -MPD
To a suspension of the mercaptide (176 mg, 1.032 mmol) in deaerated water (1 mL) was added a solution of BAL (64 mg, 0.516 mmol) in deaerated methanol (2 mL) and the greenish suspension stirred at RT for 5 h. TLC showed only MPDH at Rf 0.42. Centrifugation and washing of the green precipitate by methanol (3×3 mL) by stirring for 5 min each time removed all MPDH. After drying in vacuo, CuI2–BAL·2MeOH as a green powder (156 mg, 97%) was obtained, insoluble in DMSO. M.p.: at 185°C darkens and at 0–202°C shrinks and turns black. IR (KBr): same as described in Section 2.5.
When the reaction was run in deaerated methanol it took 24 h for BAL to react, while when a solution of MPDH and solid CuCl in deaerated water was treated with BAL (2:2:1 molar ratio) no BAL was detected by TLC after 30 min. Centrifugation and washing with methanol (2×3 mL) to extract MPDH and HCl gave the product CuI2–BAL·2MeOH (64 mg, 100%), insoluble in DMSO and having the same IR and thermal behavior as the one obtained above.
Running the above reactions under 1:1 molar ratios, BAL was detected by TLC and CuI2–BAL·2MeOH was obtained in nearly 100% yields. The in situ preparation and reaction of CuI-MPD with BAL under 1:1:1 and 1:1:2 molar ratios again gave CuI2–BAL·2MeOH in nearly 100% yields.
Reaction of BAL with Cu I –cysteinate
To a suspension of CuI–cys (0.5 mmol) in deaerated water (3 mL), BAL (0.5 mmol) was syringed in and the greenish suspension was stirred at RT for 2 days. TLC (Et2O) showed traces of BAL and an intense spot at Rf 0.0 due to cysteine. Because the product did not settle on centrifugation, it was filtered (sintered glass, porosity 4, very slow filtration rate with a water aspirator), washed with deaerated water, and dried in vacuum to give the product assumed to be isomers of CuI–BAL (78 mg, 84%) as a greenish powder insoluble in warm DMSO. M.p.: at approx. 165°C starts darkening, at approx. 185°C turns brown-black and at 1–203°C shrinks and turns black. Calculated for C3H7OS2Cu (Mr 186.75): C 19.29, H 3.78, S 34.34%; found C 19.04, H 3.56, S 32.85%. IR (KBr): ṽ = 3382 vs, broad, 2918 s, 2850 s, 1630 m, 1408 m, 1258 m, 1220 w, 1050 s, 1004 s, 884 w, 616 w. The powder X-ray spectrum of the solid showed a total absence of crystallinity.
Reaction of BAL with Cu I -glutathionate
To a suspension of CuI–SG (0.38 mmol) in deaerated water (2 mL), BAL (0.38 mmol) was syringed in and the greenish suspension that was formed at once was stirred at RT for 2 days and worked up as above. The product as isomers CuI–BAL (89%) was a greenish powder having the same solubility and thermal characteristics, IR (KBr) spectrum and analyzed as C3H7OS2Cu indicating the same product as that obtained from CuI–cys of 2.7.3 but different from that obtained from CuI-MPD.
CuI–SG formed in situ from the reaction of GSH and CuCl2·2H2O, Cu(AcO)2·H2O, cis-Cu(gly)2·H2O or Cu2O in the presence of added NaCl in water, reacted with BAL (1:1 molar ratio) giving greenish suspensions. The isolated greenish solids were by weight isomers CuI–BAL, had the same IR (KBr) spectra as the solid obtained from solid CuI–SG and their powder X-ray spectra revealed no crystallinity.
Oxidation of BAL
The oxidation of BAL with 0.88 M H2O2 (2:1 molar ratio) in methanol was complete after approx. 30 h when TLC (Et2O) showed no BAL at Rf 0.79 but only spots at Rf 0.65 (main) and Rf 0.0 (minor). Evaporation and drying in vacuum gave 100% of a clear, colorless, very viscous oil. Its IR (neat) spectrum revealed the presence of –OH (3354 cm–1, very strong, broad), –SH (2550 cm–1) and –CH2–OH (1038 cm–1, very strong), while the 1H NMR spectra in CD3OD and DMSO-d6 showed six signals that could not positively assigned and the 13C NMR spectra in the same solvents revealed the presence of many signals grouped as 3–5 bundles of singlets that obviously indicate many closely related compounds. The ESI mass spectrum (positive mode) in methanol did not show the presence of a {dimer·Na+} at 269 but the presence of {trimer·Na+} at 391, {tetramer·Na+} at 513 and {pentamer·Na+} at 647.5.
The oxidation of BAL in CDCl3 with I2 till the color persisted showed that it was incomplete by 1H NMR, while the oxidation of BAL with I2 (1:1 molar ratio) either in Et2O or CHCl3 gave colored solids (insoluble in ether, chloroform and acetone) and supernatants whose TLC (Et2O) showed a spot at Rf 0.95 and not at 0.65. Chromatographic isolation of the product(s) at Rf 0.95 revealed very complex 1H and 13C NMR spectra that could not be analyzed. The oxidation of BAL by O2 was very slow and incomplete the product running on TLC (Et2O) at Rf 0.56 and a spot at Rf 0.0 was present as well.
The reaction of the colorless oil with various copper compounds will be summarized in the Section 3.4.
Results and discussion
Selection and preparation of some starting compounds
Of the four monothiols used for this study, thiophenol and 3-mercapto-1,2-propanediol (MPDH) are useful control compounds while cysteine and glutathione are cellular constituents. These monothiols, on reaction with Cu(I) and Cu(II) compounds should afford the mercaptides CuI-thiophenolate (Cu–SPh), CuI-1,2-propanediol-3-mercaptide (CuI-MPD), CuI–cysteinate (CuI–cys) and CuI-glutathionate (CuI–SG), respectively. The water-soluble Cu(II) compounds were chosen in order to study their reactivities and the effect of the anion on the solubility of the mercaptides. Of the Cu(I) compounds used in this study, CuCl and Cu2O can reveal reactivities and, especially, the effect of Cl– on the solubility of cuprous mercaptides, while (Ph3P)3Cu–Cl might afford a derivative, (Ph3P)2Cu–SR, suitable for X-ray determination. The complex (Ph3P)2Cu(NO3) was not studied in detail because the HNO3 produced may partly oxidize the thiol and/or the cuprous mercaptide as has been shown in a previous study with Bi(III) thiolates [16].
Thiophenol reacted with the Cu(II) and Cu(I) compounds to form the yellow [1] polymeric [32] Cu–SPh. The optimum preparation of Cu–SPh in terms of its stability on storage [13] was from Cu2O. CuCl2·2H2O and CuCl, in methanol, produced yellow gels, while (Ph3P)3Cu–Cl and (Ph3P)2Cu(NO3) in CHCl3/MeOH reacted only in the presence of an equivalent amount of NaOH, which scavenged the HCl or HNO3, to give moderate yields of Cu–SPh.
3-Mercapto-1,2-propanediol reacted with CuCl in deaerated water to give a yellow solution from which the yellow mercaptide was obtained by adding methanol. The isolated CuI-MPD was virtually insoluble in water suggesting that the HCl solubilized it during its preparation by binding to Cu(I), because Cu(I) has free coordination site(s). The product as a solid and in solution was not stable (see Section 2.2). The probable product(s) of the autoxidation of CuI-MPD will be discussed in Section 3.4.
Cysteine reacted with the four Cu(II) compounds under 2:1 molar ratios of cysteine to Cu(II) according to Equations (1) and (2) [24], and formed an inseparable mixture of CuI–cys and cystine, both insoluble in water. The tint of the solid mixture indicated autoxidation of CuI–cys. Pure, off-white to yellowish CuI–cys was obtained from water with CuCl plus NaOH at room temperature or Cu2O at 100°C. CuCl gave low yields of CuI–cys·HCl, (Ph3P)3Cu-Cl in methanol under reflux did not react, and (Ph3P)2Cu(NO3) in methanol gave colored suspensions indicating oxidation by O2 and/or HNO3 [16]. It is of interest that the titration of cysteine by gives CuI(cys)1.2 which is a polymer (with bridging cysteine sulfur), that was not reactive towards CuCl2 [34].
Glutathione and CuCl2·2H2O (2:1 molar ratio) in water reacted at once to give a clear colorless solution, indicating that the product, CuI–SG, and HCl interacted and solubilized the water insoluble CuI–SG. On neutralizing the HCl with NaOH, a gel was formed from which no product could be isolated. However, CuSO4·5H2O gave a white suspension from which low yield of CuI–SG was obtained, again indicating some solubilization in the presence of H2SO4. CuCl and GSH (1:1 molar ratio) in water gave a gel for CuI–SG·HCl that did not settle on centrifugation. However, under a 1:2 to 1:8 of CuCl/GSH stoichiometries a soluble polymeric complex, CuI(SG)1.2, has been obtained where each Cu(I) is coordinated to three sulfur atoms [9]. The water soluble CuI(cys)1.2 and CuI(SG)1.2 seems to be equivalent with the water soluble ternary complexes [25, 41] mentioned in the Introduction. A complex CuI(GS)2 has also been reported [3]. As with cysteine, GSH did not react with (Ph3P)3Cu-Cl in refluxing MeOH and from the clear solution on cooling 60% (Ph3P)3Cu-Cl was recovered. Pure and not autoxidized CuI–SG was obtained using Cu(AcO)2·H2O, cis-Cu(gly)2·H2O or Cu2O. The product (white solid) was insoluble in water and warm DMSO, had no sharp m.p., its IR (KBr) was not informative and the only criterion of purity was its elemental analyses. Glutathione, by powder X-ray analysis, was crystalline, but the product CuI–SG was non-crystalline.
The reaction of BAL with various Cu(II) and Cu(I) compounds
The two reports [26, 44] on the interaction of Cu(II) and BAL under different conditions were mentioned in the Introduction. In both cases the oxidation state of copper [Cu(I) or Cu(II)] and of BAL (reduced or oxidized) was not reported. Based on Equations (1) and (2) the solid obtained [44] should contain Cu(I) and oxidized BAL.
The reaction of BAL with CuCl2·2H2O and with CuSO4·5H2O (1:1 molar ratios) in H2O/MeOH gave dark blue to grey solvated suspensions that settled on centrifugation. In the supernatant liquid, BAL was not detected by TLC. The yields were 100% (based on the mixture
The solids obtained from BAL and Cu(II) compounds are thought to be mixtures based on the following considerations. Addition of CuL2 to BAL should give the monothiolate which is not reduced but, because of the proximity of a second –SH group, will give a chelated Cu(II) dithiolate,
Dihydro-α-lipoic acid (6,8-dimercaptooctanoic acid) and its amide have α,γ-SH groups. On treatment with CuCl in DMF, both compounds gave bis-copper(I) salts as yellow solids, which were presumably insoluble in organic solvents, and were not analyzed further [5]. BAL, which has α,β-SH groups, on reaction with CuCl [1:2 molar ratio of BAL to Cu(I)] in methanol gave the bis-copper(I) salt CuI2–BAL as a dark green solid insoluble in organic solvents, which has the same IR (KBr) spectrum as the product obtained from CuCl2·2H2O or CuSO4·5H2O and BAL (1:1 molar ratio). With excess BAL again the salt CuI2–BAL was produced. The powder X-ray spectra of the solids of various runs showed total absence of crystallinity. CuI2–BAL retains tenaciously methanol forming the green methanolate CuI2–BAL·2MeOH. No reaction between Cu2O and stoichiometric or excess BAL in methanol was observed at room temperature, while BAL and (Ph3P)3Cu-Cl in toluene at 110°C gave a small amount of a green solid and recovered (Ph3P)3Cu-Cl. Reichle [32] obtained the Cu(II) salt of a dithiol by refluxing (Ph3P)3Cu-Cl with the disodium salt of a phenyl-1,2-dithiol.
The reaction of BAL with cuprous mercaptides
Although BAL and (Ph3P)2Cu–SPh (1:1 molar ratio) in CHCl3 reacted (by TLC), no pure product could be isolated corresponding to (Ph3P)2Cu–SCH2CH(SH)CH2OH. BAL reacted incompletely (by TLC) with Cu–SPh (2:1, 1:1 or 1:2 molar ratios) in methanol because the green solids obtained were mainly Cu–SPh (by IR). It seems that BAL reacted at the surface of the granules and the green product passivated the core Cu–SPh.
In contrast to Cu–SPh, BAL did extract Cu(I) from CuI-MPD under 1:1 and 2:1 molar ratios of mercaptide to BAL giving the green methanolate CuI2–BAL·2MeOH. The reaction was slow in MeOH, faster in H2O/MeOH 1:2 v/v and even faster in H2O. In these cases, too, excess BAL gave the bis-copper(I) and not the mono-copper(I) salt.
If CuI–cys and CuI–SG in any form are cellular constituents, then the possibility arises that their copper(I) ion may be sequestered by BAL. Experiments using CuI–cys and CuI–SG as suspensions in deaerated water showed that they both reacted at once with added BAL under 1:1 stoichiometry giving greenish suspensions that did not settle on centrifugation. The greenish products, isolated by filtration, were analyzed as the adduct CuI–BAL, and were most likely mixtures of isomers, with CuI binding to either α or β –SH groups. Their IR (KBr) spectra did not show bands due to cysteine and glutathione and we did not detect a band for free –SH at approx. 2550 cm–1 the spectrum of the latter being identical to that of CuI2–BAL·2MeOH. The same results were obtained when the white suspension of CuI–SG formed i n situ from GSH and Cu(AcO)2·H2O, cis-Cu(gly)2·H2O or Cu2O in water containing added NaCl was treated with BAL under 1:1 stoichiometry.
The observation that BAL and CuI-MPD (1:1) gave CuI2–BAL, while BAL and CuI–cys (1:1) or BAL and CuI–SG (1:1) gave CuI–BAL could not be explained.
Oxidation of BAL by O2, I2 and H2O2 and reaction of the products with Cu(I) and Cu(II) compounds
In order to verify the production of the disulfides of Fig. 4, BAL was treated with O2, I2 and H2O2, respectively. Complete oxidation only occurred with H2O2.
The oxidation of BAL by H2O2 (1:1 molar ratio) in methanol for 17 h gave a glassy mass insoluble in methanol and chloroform. A 2:1 molar ratio of BAL to H2O2 stirred for 30 h at room temperature afforded a clear, colorless oil that had quite complex 1H and 13C NMR spectra in CD3OD and DMSO-d6 solvents. Its mass spectrum did not show the disulfide dimers (precursors of mixture
The reaction of this oily product with the water soluble CuCl2·2H2O gave a grey colored solid, while the products from the water insoluble CuCl, CuI–cys and CuI–SG, were greenish. The IR (KBr) spectra of the solids from CuCl2 and CuCl were quite similar but those from CuI–cys and CuI–SG were dominated by the cysteine and glutathione bands. In all cases the solids were water (and DMSO) insoluble that can not be excreted in urine.
Attempted solubilization of Cu I –BAL compounds
With urea/NaCl
Because patients with Wilson’s disease treated with BAL showed elevated copper levels in their urine [27, 30], and because the main constituents of urine are urea (9.3 g/L), Cl– (1.87 g/L) and Na+ (1.17 g/L) with K+ (0.75 g/L), we investigated the possibility of solubilization of BAL/Cu(I) solids by urea and NaCl.
The reaction of BAL with CuSO4·5H2O (0.5 mmol each) in deaerated water (5 mL) in the presence of 1.55×0.5 or 15.5×0.5 mmol urea and then adding 0.55×0.5 or 5.5×0.5 mmol NaCl gave dark blue to grey solvated suspensions from which 2–99% blue hard solids were isolated, which when powdered gave green powders. Their IR (KBr) spectra were identical featuring absence of –SH and presence of –OH and –CH2–OH bands. The same results were obtained reversing the mode of addition: first NaCl and then urea.
Attempted solubilization of various solids assumed to be CuI2–BAL·2MeOH and mixtures of Fig. 4 by urea followed by NaCl and stirring at room temperature for 24 h all produced green suspensions that settled easily giving, after drying, dark green solids in nearly quantitative recoveries the IR (KBr) of which were dissimilar and resembled those of the starting solids.
With excess BAL
With excess BAL to Cu(II) compounds, a more complicated mixture of products can be obtained. Thus, performing the reactions of CuCl2·2H2O and CuSO4·5H2O with excess BAL (1:2 molar ratios) in deaerated water green colored solvated suspensions were formed. The green solids isolated had identical IR (KBr) spectra with the products obtained from BAL and CuCl2·2H2O or CuSO4·5H2O under 1:1 stoichiometries.
With excess Cu(II) compounds
Attempted solubilization of mixtures of Fig. 4 by adding CuSO4·5H2O in water resulted in nearly quantitative recovery of the dark blue to grey starting solid (by weight and IR). However, with CuCl2·2H2O the recovery of the dark green to grey solid was >100% and its IR (KBr) spectrum was different from that of the starting indicating a probable involvement of chloride ions.
Summarizing, qualitative experiments on the solubilization of the insoluble solids: CuI2–BAL and mixtures of Fig. 4 gave negative results and, therefore, the increase of copper excretion in the urine in the microgram/hour range [27] of patients with Wilson’s disease is not likely to be due to these binary CuI/BAL compounds and the enhanced excretion must follow another mechanism that presently remains unknown. A similar mechanism can lead to the detoxification [39] of the water insoluble [17] Pb–BAL·H2O.
The structure and stability of cuprous mercaptides and of the copper(I)/BAL compounds
The simple cuprous thiolates, such as Cu–SPh, are yellow [1,13, 1,13] and are polymeric due to secondary Cu…S bonds [9 and references therein]. In yellow cuprous–thiolate multimetallic clusters, e.g. [Cu4(SPh)6]2–, the Cu…Cu distances are approx. 270 pm [29 and references therein]. Functionalized monothiols, such as 3-mercapto-1,2-propanediol, cysteine and glutathione gave yellow, yellowish and nearly colorless cuprous mercaptides, respectively. The α,γ-dithiols: dihydrolipoic acid and its amide also gave yellow insoluble bis-copper(I) mercaptides [5] but with the α,β-dithiol (BAL) the insoluble copper(I) compounds, such as CuI2–BAL, CuI2–BAL·2MeOH, isomers of CuI–BAL or mixtures of Fig. 4, were not yellow but dark green or dark blue to grey colored solids probably indicating Cu…Cu interactions. However, mixed valence complexes cannot a priori be excluded if they contain CuII–BAL,
It was reported that the solid obtained from CuSO4 and BAL at high dilution, apparently remained (visually) unchanged after several months [44], but as early as 1931 [13], it was found that simple cuprous mercaptides were not stable to storage, obviously being autoxidized. The nature of the products has not been reported. An attempt was, therefore, made to identify the site of attack of O2 (Cu+ and/or the organic part of a mercaptide) by 1H NMR using the easily autoxidized CuI-MPD in DMSO-d6.
The 1H NMR spectrum of MPDH in DMSO-d6 [15] showed sharp carbon-hydrogen and sulfur-hydrogen but broad oxygen-hydrogens signals due to hydrogen bonding to DMSO. A yellow solution of CuI-MPD in DMSO-d6, run just after dissolution, Fig. 2A, did not show the –SH proton (at 2.06 ppm). The carbon-hydrogen signals became a little broad and resonated approx. 0.1 ppm downfield compared to those of MPD except those of diastereomeric –CH2SCu which resonated approx. 0.25 ppm downfield indicating bonding of CuI to sulfur. However, the –CH2OH and >CHOH protons were very broad (reaching the base line) and resonated at 4.70 and 5.50 ppm, respectively, probably indicating a rearranging process the nature of which could not be established because of a quick development of a brown coloration due to production of Cu2+. The brown solutions obtained in DMSO-d6 under various conditions, Fig. 2B and 2C, differed from the yellow one in that the carbon-hydrogen signals were broader but without shifting indicative of the presence of Cu2+ which causes long relaxation times [23]. Thus, the brown coloration indicates preferential attack of O2 at the Cu+ and not at –S– or –CH2OH to give a superoxo (RSCuII-O2·) or more likely [22] a peroxo (RSCuII-O-O-CuIISR) product. The paramagnetic Cu2+ can then affect the 1H NMR spectra of both the peroxo product and the starting CuI-MPD.
Conclusions
In an attempt to understand the pharmacology of BAL in the treatment of Wilson’s disease, BAL was treated with a variety of Cu(II) and Cu(I) compounds. BAL with CuCl2·2H2O and CuSO4·5H2O, respectively, gave an insoluble mixture of compounds assumed to be
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
We thank Professor P.G. Koutsoukos of the Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Patras, for running the powder X-ray spectra.
