In this paper, one 3D imidazole cyclophane trivalent cation was chosen with the aim of studying conformational behavior. One novel organic-inorganic hybrid supramolecule {L1·(NH4) [Mo8O26]·(H2O)} (1), has been synthesized through the self-assembly reaction. Compound 1 has been expressly confirmed by PXRD, IR, X-ray single crystal diffraction, and TG. Crystallographic analysis shows that the anion of compound 1 is Multi-core structure. TG shows that the stability of compound 1 is relatively good.
Cyclophanes, which have been receiving much attention for many years, are an important compound for macrocyclic compounds [1]. The synthesis of supramolecule often relies on macrocyclic compounds to achieve host-guest chemistry [2, 3]. Imidazole and benzimidazole cyclophanes have been used in a wide variety of synthesis and studies, such as conformational behavior, anion recognition, [3] and as N-heterocyclic carbene metal complex precursors [4]. The conformational behaviors of the azolium-linked cyclophane induction by transition metal halides in a supramolecular system were rarely studied [5, 6]. Therefore, conformation behavior has become an important research topic [7–11]. Compounds fixed conformational structures were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses, which showed that the cation exhibit breathing behavior of expansion or contraction [11]. The advantage of the method is that the original composition of organics remains untouched during the immobilization, and more conformations information and details can be found and studied.
Supramolecular compounds have attracted widespread attention due to their fascinating structure. These supramolecular compounds are formed from monomeric components and synthesize functional compounds by intermolecular Van der Waals forces, electrostatic forces, π-π stacking and hydrogen bonding. In this paper, the L1 (Scheme 1) [5–7, 12–14] was selected for the first time as a target model for conformational behavior and one kind of imidazolium-based supramolecular cyclophane compound was synthesized by self-assembly. The stability of compound 1 is relatively good.
Conformations of organic cation L13+ in compound 1.
Experimental
Reagents
All chemicals and solvents are of A.R. grade (≥99%) and used without further purification.
Materials and methods
L1 was synthesized according to the reported procedure [5–7, 12–14]. The IR spectra was measured on a Shimazu IR 435 spectrometer adopting KBr pellets in the scale of 400–4000 cm–1. Element analyses of C, H and N were performed using a Perkin-Elmer 240 elemental analyzer.
Supramolecular syntheses and conformation behavior
Synthesis of {L1·(NH4) [Mo8O26]·(H2O)} (1)
Compound 1 was prepared by hydrothermal synthesis method. For compound 1, (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O (0.062 g, 0.05 mmol), L1·Br3 (0.1071 g, 0.15 mmol), CdI2 and 20 mL H2O were mixed well at room temperature, the mixture was stirred with small magnets for 1 hour. The mixture was constantly stirred and reacted at 120°C for 96 hours and then cooled to room temperature within 18 hours. Colorless transparent massive crystals of 1 were obtained with a yield of 30 %. IR (KBr, cm–1): 3530.69(w), 3125.29(m), 3066.93(m), 1553.40(s), 1462.86(m), 1143.76(s), 725.82(s), 618.71(s), 570.73(w), 474.03(w), Anal. Calc: C, 52.19; H, 4.05; N, 18.04; Found: C, 52.3; H, 4.07; N, 18.1%.
X-ray crystallography study
The X-ray single crystal diffraction data of compound 1 was recorded on the Bruckner SMART CCD diffractometer with graphite-monochromatic Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073Å) at 293K. Data reduction and absorption correction were done using the SADABS software package. After absorption correction, employ SHELXTL-97, OLEX-2 and other packages for analysis. The main bond lengths of the crystallographic data of compound 1 are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The purity of compound 1 was studied by X-ray powder diffraction (PXRD).
Crystal data and structure refinement details for 1
Compound
1
Empirical formula
C33H47Mo8N7O28
Formula weight
1757.29
Temperature
293(2)
Crystal system
monoclinic
Space group
C2/c
a/Å
15.6627(4)
b/Å
17.3408(3)
c/Å
18.7814(4)
α/°
90
β/°
101.831(2)
γ/°
90
Volume/Å3
4992.73(18)
Z
4
ρ/g cm3
2.338
μ/mm–1
16.786
F(000)
3416.0
Crystal size/mm3
0.2099×0.1431×0.0996
T/K
293(2)
Reflections collected
9887
Independent reflections
4443 [Rint= 0.0349, Rsigma= 0.0452]
Data/restraints/
parameters
4443/6/347
GOF on F2
1.046
Final R indexes [I > =2σ (I)]
R1 = 0.0363, wR2 = 0.0920
Final R indexes [all data]
R1 = 0.0434, wR2 = 0.0971
Max/Min eÅ–3
0.83/–0.85
Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (°) for compound 1
Compound 1
Mo1-Mo2
3.2154(6)
Mo1-O1
1.698(4)
Mo1-O2
1.712(4)
Mo1-O3
1.985(4)
Mo1-O5
2.339(4)
Mo1-O62
2.335(4)
Mo1-O13
1.904(4)
Mo2-Mo3
3.2073(6)
Mo2-O3
1.962(4)
Mo2-O4
1.696(4)
Mo2-O52
2.388(3)
Mo2-O5
2.118(4)
Mo2-O6
1.951(4)
Mo2-O122
1.752(4)
Mo3-O32
2.357(4)
Mo3-O5
2.333(4)
Mo3-O6
1.995(4)
Mo3-O7
1.707(4)
Mo3-O8
1.709(4)
Mo3-O9
1.898(4)
Mo4-O5
2.452(4)
Mo4-O9
1.933(4)
Mo4-O10
1.714(4)
Mo4-O11
1.711(4)
Mo4-O12
2.272(4)
Mo4-O13
1.915(4)
O3-Mo32
2.357(4)
O5-Mo22
2.388(3)
O6-Mo12
2.335(4)
O12-Mo22
1.752(4)
O1-Mo1-Mo2
85.22(14)
O1-Mo1-O2
104.1(2)
O1-Mo1-O3
97.35(18)
O1-Mo1-O5
93.37(16)
O1-Mo1-O62
164.05(17)
O1-Mo1-O13
101.19(19)
O2-Mo1-Mo2
135.85(15)
O2-Mo1-O3
100.72(18)
O2-Mo1-O5
162.18(16)
O2-Mo1-O62
89.75(16)
O2-Mo1-O13
101.77(19)
O3-Mo1-Mo2
35.20(10)
O3-Mo1-O5
73.23(14)
O3-Mo1-O62
71.94(13)
O5-Mo1-Mo2
41.17(9)
O62-Mo1-Mo2
79.28(9)
O62-Mo1-O5
72.46(12)
O13-Mo1-Mo2
118.87(12)
O13-Mo1-O3
146.22(15)
O13-Mo1-O5
77.70(15)
O13-Mo1-O62
83.27(15)
Mo3-Mo2-Mo1
92.125(15)
O3-Mo2-Mo1
35.69(10)
O3-Mo2-Mo3
125.50(10)
O3-Mo2-O52
77.24(13)
O3-Mo2-O5
78.89(14)
Mo4-Mo2-Mo1
90.79(15)
Mo4-Mo2-Mo3
90.62(14)
O4-Mo2-O3
101.37(18)
O4-Mo2-O52
175.30(17)
O4-Mo2-O6
101.58(18)
O4-Mo2-O122
104.21(19)
Mo5-Mo2-Mo1
46.63(10)
O52-Mo2-Mo1
85.50(9)
Mo5-Mo2-Mo3
46.64(10)
Mo52- Mo2-Mo3
86.64(9)
O5-Mo2-O52
76.06(14)
O6-Mo2-Mo1
125.72(11)
O6-Mo2-Mo3
36.10(11)
O6-Mo2-O3
150.37(15)
O6-Mo2-O52
78.37(14)
O6-Mo2-O5
79.13(14)
O122-Mo2-Mo1
130.42(13)
O122-Mo2-Mo3
133.63(13)
O122-Mo2-O3
94.73(17)
O122-Mo2-O52
80.42(15)
O122-Mo2-O5
156.45(15)
O122-Mo2-O6
97.54(17)
O32-Mo2-Mo3
78.41(8)
O5-Mo2-Mo3
41.31(9)
O5-Mo2-O32
71.34(12)
O6-Mo3-Mo2
35.18(10)
O6-Mo3-O32
71.29(13)
O6-Mo2-O5
73.21(14)
O7-Mo3-Mo2
85.87(16)
O7-Mo3-O32
163.96(18)
O7-Mo3-O5
94.72(19)
O7-Mo3-O6
97.52(19)
O7-Mo3-O8
105.1(2)
O7-Mo3-O9
101.4(2)
O8-Mo3-Mo2
136.05(16)
O8-Mo3-O32
88.60(19)
O8-Mo3-O5
159.94(19)
O8-Mo3-O6
100.89(19)
O8-Mo3-O9
100.8(2)
O9-Mo3-Mo2
118.82(11)
O9-Mo3-O32
83.67(15)
O9-Mo3-O5
77.53(14)
O9-Mo3-O6
146.19(15)
O9-Mo4-O5
73.98(14)
O9-Mo4-O12
77.56(15)
O10-Mo4-O5
159.91(16)
O10-Mo4-O9
100.56(19)
O10-Mo4-O12
89.92(16)
O10-Mo4-O13
103.90(19)
O11-Mo4-O5
95.10(16)
O11-Mo4-O9
98.6(2)
O11-Mo4-O10
104.9(2)
O11-Mo4-O12
165.18(17)
O11-Mo4-O13
98.22(19)
O12-Mo4-O5
70.08(12)
O13-Mo4-O5
74.67(14)
O13-Mo4-O9
145.46(16)
O13-Mo4-O12
78.45(15)
Mo1-O3-Mo32
103.61(15)
Mo2-O3-Mo1
109.10(17)
Mo2-O3-Mo32
110.79(15)
Mo1-O5-Mo22
96.33(13)
Mo2-O5-Mo4
85.51(12)
Mo2-O5-Mo1
92.20(13)
Mo2-O5-Mo22
103.93(14)
Mo2-O5-Mo3
92.06(13)
Mo22-O5-Mo4
91.30(12)
Mo3-O5-Mo4
86.25(12)
Mo3-O5-Mo12
110.22(16)
Mo2-O6-Mo3
108.73(17)
Mo3-O6-Mo12
104.09(15)
Mo3-O9-Mo4
117.38(18)
Mo22-O12-Mo4
118.13(18)
Mo1-O13-Mo4
116.8(2)
Results and discussion
Description of crystal structures
Crystal structure of compound {L1·(NH4)[Mo8O26]·2(H2O)} (1) The conformation of compound 1 was fixed and were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses. X-ray single crystal diffraction shows that compound 1 (Fig. 1a-b) was crystallized in monoclinic system with space group C2/c. Compound 1 consists of three parts: the organic cation L13+, anion [-Mo8O26]4–, NH+, and H2O. As shown in Fig. 1a, the [Mo8O26]4– anion is composed of eight [MoO6] octahedran. As shown in Fig. 1b, the unit of [Mo4O13]2– is approximately C2h symmetrical, and each [Mo4O13]2– unit is formed by four MoO6 octahedrons through co-edges. As shown in Fig. 1a, the oxygen atoms of the [-Mo8O26]4– can be classified into four types according to the form of bonding with Mo atoms: terminal oxygen, two bridge oxygen, triple bridge oxygen and Five bridge oxygen, the four types of Mo-O bond length range are: 1.696–1.714 Å, 1.752–2.271 Å, 1.951–2.357 Å, 2.119–2.452 Å. These bond length data indicate slight distortion of the MoO6 octahedron. As shown in Fig. 1c-d, compare compound 1 with L1·Br3·2H2O1, the structure of L13+ is different from L1·Br3·2H2O (Table 3) [13e, 14e]. The angle between the two benzene rings in compound 1 is 0.731°. The dihedral angles between the imidazole rings are 26°, 51.95° and 26°. The distances between the C2 atoms of the imidazolium are 4.524, 4.864, and 4.524 Å. These findings indicate that the cations of compound 1 and L1·Br3·2H2O are not exactly the same, that is, their conformations are different and alterable to some extent. The complexation of L1 with polyoxometalate results in a cation shrinkage (∼0.03Å) in compound 1, which can be similarly described as a “breathing process”. A compound most similar to 1 is {L1·Ag(SCN)4·(CH3CN)·2H2O} (2) (Fig. 1e-f) [1a]. Its smallest repeating unit consists of the organic cation L1, anion [Ag(SCN)4]3–, H2O and CH3CN. The distance of the benzene ring in the cation is 5.095 Å. The three imidazole rings are asymmetrically arranged, the angles between them are 52.41°, 75.18° and 52.41°, and the C2 distances on the three imidazole rings are 4.592 Å, 4.546 Å and 4.546 Å. The complexation of L1 with AgSCN results in a cation shrinkage (∼0.06Å) in compound 1, which can be similarly described as a “breathing process”. The complexation of metal halides and polymetallic with L1 leads to contraction of the cations, causing breathing behavior.
(a) Structural unit of compound 1; (b) anion ([-Mo8O26]4–) of compound 1; (c-d) the unit of compound 1 (All H atoms were omitted for clarity); (e) Structure unit diagram of 2. The H atoms were omitted for clarity; (f) The hydrogen bonding in compound 2.
Comparison of some important conformational parameters of L1·Br3·2H2O, 1 and 2
Compounds
The vertical height of the cages (Å)
Dihedral angles between imidazole rings (°)
Distance between the 2-C (Å)
Refs.
L1·Br3·2H2O
5.15
54.0,99.1,53.2
4.7,4.71,4.51
13a,14a
L1·Ag(SCN)4·(CH3CN)·2H2O
5.09
52.41,75.18,52.41
4.59,4.55,4.55
1a
L1·(NH4)[Mo8O26]·2(H2O)
5.12
26.0,51.95,26.0
4.524,4.864,4.524
this article
Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD)
Powder X-ray diffraction has been used to confirm the purity of the samples in the solid state. For compound 1 the as-synthesized PXRD patterns closely match the simulated patterns generated from the results of the single crystal diffraction data, indicative of pure products which were shown in Fig. 2. Simulation of the PXRD spectra was carried out by the single-crystal data and diffraction-crystal module of the Mercury (Hg) program available free of charge via the internet at http://www.iucr.org.
Power X-ray Diffraction of compound 1.
TG plot of compound 1.
Thermogravimetric analyses
To investigate thermostability of compound 1, the thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) experiments were performed up to 900°C in a flowing N2 atmosphere, as shown in Fig. 2. Compound 1 is stable up to the temperature of around 315°C, indicating that it is a heat-resistant hybrid [15]. The TG curve of compound 1, which is mainly undergoing one stage of weightlessness. Compound 1 has the largest mass loss at 310–730°C. The biggest reason may be the volatile decomposition of organic cations. Therefore, the stability of compound 1 is relatively good. The stability of compound 1 may be due to the presence of intermolecular Van der Waals forces.
Conclusion
In this article, we successfully synthesized one new multinuclear inorganic-organic hybrid supramolecule using imidazole cyclophane trivalent cation templated self-assembly. The conformation immobilization of cyclophane cation was realized through the metal anion recognition. Comparison of cationic cavities found that organic cation adapted to the anion by cavity contraction. The contraction of the cavity causes breathing process. The stability of compound 1 may be due to the presence of intermolecular Van der Waals forces.
Associated content
Important crystallographic data (Tables 1 and 2), simulated powder XRD patterns (Fig. 2) for 1, comparison of some important conformational parameters of L1·Br3·2H2O (Table 3), comparison of important parameters of crystal structure of compound 1, CCDC reference numbers: 1948524 for 1. This data can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html, or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; Fax: t441223336033 or Email: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk.
References
1.
(a)
WangF.R., LiZ.Y., WeiD.H., NiuY.Y., HouH.W.
and
WuB.L., CrystEngComm20 (2018), 7184–7194; (b)
WuB.D., LiangJ., WangJ.Y.
and
AnC.W., Main Group Chem16(1) (2017), 67.
2.
(a)
BeyehN.K., LiljeströmN.V., MikkilaJ., KorpiA., BochicchioD., PavanG.M., IkkalaO., RasR.H.A.
and
KostiainenM.A., ACS Nano12 (2018), 8029–8036; (b)
NasmanO.S.M., Main Group Chem8(2) (2009), 115.
3.
(a)
ZapataF., CaballeroA., WhiteN.G., ClaridgeT.D.W., CostaP.J., FelixV.
and
BeerP.D., J Am Chem Soc134 (2012), 11533–11541; (b)
AliB.F., Al-FarR.
and
HaddadS.F., Main Group Chem8(3) (2009), 177;