Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Telerehabilitation has been proposed as an effective strategy to deliver post-stroke specific exercise.
OBJECTIVE:
To assess the effectiveness and feasibility of core stability exercises guided by a telerehabilitation App after hospital discharge.
METHODS:
Extension of a prospective controlled trial. Subacute stage stroke survivors were included at the time of hospital discharge where they had participated in a previous 5-week randomized controlled trial comparing conventional physiotherapy versus core stability exercises. After discharge, patients from the experimental group were offered access to telerehabilitation to perform core stability exercises at home (AppG), while those from the control group were subject to usual care (CG). The Spanish-version of the Trunk Impairment Scale 2.0 (S-TIS 2.0), Function in Sitting Test (S-FIST), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Spanish-version of Postural Assessment for Stroke Patients (S-PASS), the number of falls, Brunel Balance Assessment (BBA) and Gait were assessed before and after 3 months intervention.
RESULTS:
A total of 49 subjects were recruited. AppG showed greater improvement in balance in both sitting and standing position and gait compared with CG, although no statistically significant differences were obtained.
CONCLUSION:
Core stability exercises Telerehabilitation as a home-based guide appears to improve balance in post-stroke stage. Future studies are necessary to confirm the effects as well as identifying strategies to increase telerehabilitation adherence.
Introduction
Stroke is one of the most disabling cerebrovascular diseases in the adult population and represents a serious problem in the social health system in developed countries (Hankey, 2017; Katan & Luft, 2018; Feigin et al., 2017). Stroke survivors often require long-term medical care and rehabilitation (Lopez-Bastida et al., 2012; Lekander, 2017; Carvalho-Pinto & Faria, 2016). Spasticity, hypertonia, paralysis, hypotonia and paresthesia, are the most frequent sensory and motor disorders and balance and gait are the most important disability in stroke survivors (Suri et al. 2018; Kessner et al., 2016).
In the subacute stage, trunk impairments are frequent (Van Criekinge, 2017; Tasseel-Ponche et al., 2015). Trunk function is closely related to balance and gait (Jijimol et al., 2013). Previous studies reveal the association between trunk performance and the ability to maintain balance while sitting, standing, and even during the gait cycle (Kong & Ratha Krishnan, 2021; Quintino et al, 2018). On the other hand, the greater affectation of the trunk control is a factor of poor functional prognosis among stroke survivors. (Ishiwatari, 2021).
Lumbopelvic stability or core stability exercises should be included in the physiotherapy and rehabilitation sessions especially in the subacute stage (Cabanas-Valdés et al., 2016; Karthikbabu et al., 2018; Souza et al., 2019). Core stability exercises can be adapted to the needs and capacities of the patient; they do not need significant material resources and therefore are a good therapeutic exercise program to perform at home (Powers et al., 2019; Furie & Jayaraman, 2018). From this standpoint, telerehabilitation could be introduced as a guide to specific therapeutic exercises for stroke survivors (Saywell, 2021).
Telerehabilitation is understood as a rehabilitation method through the use of telecommunication devices. The health professional uses electronic devices to give therapeutic strategies and to follow up on patients who are in their homes (Chen et al., 2015; Sarfo et al., 2017). Currently, in the western world, it is considered a simple system that lacks special devices and is quite accessible. Devices for daily use (eg: smartphone or tablet) can support telerehabilitation tools in App format (Moral-Munoz et al., 2021).
Telerehabilitation has the advantage of reducing regional inequality in health care, reducing costs, and reducing the saturation of rehabilitation services, among other potential benefits (Schwamm et al., 2009). On the other hand, it can be a strategy to provide continuity to rehabilitation after discharge from the hospital of the stroke patients facilitating intensity in therapies when material and human resources are not sufficient (Cramer et al., 2021).
The demand for the use of telerehabilitation has increased during the lockdown situation due to the COVID-19 pandemic (Moradi et al., 2021). As a preventive measure in Spain rehabilitation services have been closed and care for patients affected by COVID-19 was prioritized. Many rehabilitation centres and home rehabilitation services closed their doors due to the scarcity of material, human and economic resources and the lack of mandatory characteristics according to approved regulations such as guaranteeing minimum distance or having ventilation systems (Sainz de Murieta & Supervía, 2020; López et al., 2020).
Building on current knowledge and professional practice in performing specific exercises adapted to the needs of stroke patients and the use of assistive devices for telerehabilitation, the aim of this work is to study the effectiveness and feasibility of core stability exercises guided by a telerehabilitation App.
Methods
Participants and procedure
A prospective controlled trial was developed. Forty-nine subjects were recruited from 4 hospitals in Catalonia, Spain (Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Fundació Hospital de la Santa Creu de Vic, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí de Sabadell and Hospital Germanes Hospitalaries del Sagrat Cor de Martorell), from March 2019 to April 2021. All subjects were recruited after finalizing a previous 5-week randomized controlled trial comparing conventional physiotherapy versus core stability exercises (Cabanas-Valdés et al., 2021), at the moment of hospital discharge and return to home. Subjects were invited to participate in this extension study if they or the caregiver were regular users of a smartphone. Subjects with a worsening of their stroke symptoms or any of the comorbidities (eg: another neurological disease or orthopaedic problem of the lower limbs), suffering another stroke or fracture of any of the lower limbs or presenting important structural alterations were excluded. Written consent was obtained from all participants, along with participation in the previous study (Cabanas-Valdés et al., 2021).
At the time of hospitalization in the post-stroke rehabilitation services that participated in this study, patients had been randomly allocated to conventional physiotherapy (control group) or a core stability exercise program (experimental group) conducted by a physiotherapist for 5 weeks. After discharge, all participants continued with their usual care, but participants in the core-stability exercise group (AppG) (n = 20) were offered individualized access to a telerehabilitation application called “Farmalarm” in addition to the usual care (Salgueiro et al., 2021). After the initial assessment, participants in both groups were followed up at 3 months after hospital discharge (Fig. 1).

Study flowchart.
Individuals in AppG had individual access to the “Farmalarm” App (instructions and private username and passwords) as a telerehabilitation tool to guide home-based core stability exercises (Salgueiro et al., 2021). Users have been able to voluntarily access the exercises guide on demand (description, photo and video) and to confirm and to evaluate their performance (Fig. 2). The core stability exercise program proposed in the “Farmalarm” App was known to the participants because they had used it previously during their hospital stay. All the exercises were produced by an experienced neurologic physiotherapist, who was also available for video calls using the App.

App user interface.
The principal researcher (CS) had access to the administration panel of the App for individual monitoring of each user and contacted them by phone call to encourage the use of the application and to clarify any possible doubts.
The main outcome was balance in sitting position, assessed using the Spanish-version of Trunk Impairment Scale 2.0 (S-TIS 2.0) and the Spanish-version of Function in sitting Test (S-FIST). Secondary variables were standing balance, assessed by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Spanish-version of Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke patients (S-PASS), and number of falls. Gait analysis using the third section from Brunel Balance Assessment (stepping) (3-BBA) and the G-Walk system has also been included as a secondary variable. Two face-to-face assessment sessions were held. An initial pre-intervention assessment session and a final assessment session after 3 months.
The data extracted from the App administration panel have been used to assess adherence.
Ethical approval
The study protocol was approved by the Parc Taulí Hospital Ethics Committee and Universitat Internacional de Catalunya Research Ethics Committee (FIS-2020-01). ClinicalTrials.gov register number NCT03975985. This work has been supported by the Marató TV3 telethon grant number 201737-10.
Data analysis
The characterization of the sample was based on descriptive statistical analysis. Participants’ characteristics were described using frequencies and percentages. The mean value (mean) and standard deviation (SD) were calculated for quantitative variables in both groups. The R Project software has been used for inferential statistics. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine whether the CG and AppG were homogeneous at the baseline. The changes within the group and the differences between groups before and after intervention have been studied with Student’s t-test (normal distribution). The level of significance was set at p-value < 0.05. All analyzed data are available in this publication.
Results
Table 1 presents the data related to the characterization of the sample at the baseline. All the results of this preliminary study can be consulted in Table 2.
Baseline characteristics of the participants
Baseline characteristics of the participants
Control group (GC), Experimental group (AppG), standard deviation (SD), Kilogram (Kg), centimeter (cm).
Results
Control group (CG), Experimental group (AppG), Mean (MD), Standard Deviation (SD), Baseline (TO), 3 months (T1), statistical significance (p-value), Spanish version of Trunk Impairment Scale 2.0 (TlS 2.0), Spanish version of Function in Sitting Test (S-FIST), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Spanish version of Postural. Assessment Scale for Stroke patients (PASS), Third section of brunel balance Assessment (3-BBA).
Therapeutic techniques such as muscle stretching, passive and functional mobilization of the affected body segments, balance exercises and gait training were included as usual care (Teasell et al., 2020). Core stability exercises were not included in usual care therapies. The treatments frequency ranged from 0 to 3 days per week, with an average of 2.5 sessions per week, depending on the needs of the subjects, medical prescription and availability of the rehabilitation centers whose operations were affected by the COVID-19 health crisis.
An improvement was observed in both groups without statistically significant. The improvement in the AppG was greater than CG. AppG was a rise of 0.95 points on the S-TIS 2.0, while in the CG the rise was 0.65 points which represents an improvement of 5.93% and 4.06% respectively of the maximum score of this scale. In the comparison between groups, a p value with statistical significance was not obtained, so it cannot be determined that one intervention is better than another.
No significant differences were observed between groups either for the S-FIST scale. Although there is an evident improvement in the AppG, the comparison between groups does not display statistical significance.
Standing balance
An increase in the BBS scale score was observed in AppG while the reverse was not observed in the CG. However, the difference between groups was not statistically significant.
Similar results were observed with the S-PASS where an evident improvement was observed in the AppG while it was quite modest in the CG. This difference did not exhibit statistical significance.
Regarding the number of falls associated with loss of balance at 3 months after hospital discharge, while the number reported in the CG was higher (0.13), it was slight for the AppG (0.02); however, this difference was not statistically significant.
Gait
The participants of the AppG showed an improvement in 3-BBA while in the CG the trend seems to be of stabilization of the results. Although differences can be observed for the AppG, the results do not acquire statistical significance and it can be understood that the number of participants with the ability to walk is low.
Only 5 participants had the gait capacity to be able to perform the gait analysis with the G-Walk system. After 3 months, only 4 gait analysis could be performed involving two individuals from each group.
Related to cadence after 3 months, individuals in CG show 30 steps fewer per minute compared with the reference values. In the same analysis, individuals in AppG show 26 fewer steps per minute compared with normal values. Related to gait speed, individuals in CG presented lower differences compared with reference values (0.63 meters/seconds). Individuals in AppG presented a speed reduction of 0.79 meters / second compared to normal values.
App adherence
Of the 13 subjects from the AppG who completed the study, only 4 participants (30.77%) regularly used the App. The participants carried out on average 4 exercises of the 32 daily exercises (5 days / week). These data correspond to 12.5% of the exercise program proposed.
Discussion
The use of a telerehabilitation App “Farmalarm”, as a guide for core stability exercises, seems to bring effectiveness to the usual care in relation to the balance of stroke survivors. However, the results of this preliminary study are not conclusive. In addition the levels of adherence to the use of the App have been very low.
It was not possible to carry out a previous homogenization of the study groups because the participants were recruited after completing a 5-week in-hospital study. However, the groups presented similar characteristics at the beginning of this study. Usual care has not been defined exhaustively. The participants underwent rehabilitation in different rehabilitation services and their management was left to the discretion of each therapist who followed the clinical practice guidelines. It is known that the participants in both groups have undergone an average of 2.5 hours of therapy per week. At the time of hospital discharge, care for the stroke survivor depends on their disabilities, medical recommendations, social and health resources from the public and private, and the involvement of the affected person and their caregiver.
This feasibility study not only focuses on the use of telerehabilitation but also on its content, in this case, core stability exercises, whose efficiency is known in previous studies (Van Criekinge et al., 2019; Cabanas-valdés et al., 2017). The results suggest the introduction of the trunk approach in the recovery process of stroke survivors (Teasell et al., 2020; Arienti et al., 2019).
In a recent review by Cabrera-Martos et al. (2020), the authors conclude that core stability exercises performed in isolation or in combination with other physiotherapy techniques are effective in relation to trunk performance. Similar results were found in this preliminary study. The greatest changes have been observed in sitting balance, directly related to trunk function.
The use of the Telerehabilitation App “Farmalarm” also seems to add benefits to users with regard to balance while standing. The results of this preliminary study were not significant enough to assume a definitive conclusion and establish a correlation with the performance of the proposed exercises.
In the recent study by Wu et al. (2020), significant improvements in balance were found in patients who underwent telerehabilitation immediately after deinstitutionalization, even compared to patients who only underwent regular rehabilitation. The study had a greater number of participants and a shorter intervention time.
Telerehabilitation seems to have had a positive influence on gait. The results of the specific gait analysis have been scattered due to the poor number of participants with autonomous gait. Even so, there was an improvement in patients who have been offered to use the App to perform exercises at home. In the early stage of stroke rehabilitation, some patients may not have had the ability to walk. However, previous studies establish the relationship between the trunk and balance and gait (Van Criekinge et al., 2017; Kong et al., 2021). Specifically, the correlation between sitting balance and mobility has been recently studied by Lee et al. (2021).
The lack of greater results may be related to poor adherence to performing exercises autonomously at home and for the loss of participants. This practice can go through telerehabilitation that seems to be as effective as performing therapy in person in the health services (Chen et al., 2019; Knepley et al., 2021). Although there are no clear results, telerehabilitation can be effective in maintaining the physical condition of users and preventing deterioration (Saywell et al., 2021).
In Spain, as in the rest of the countries affected by COVID-19 pandemic, rehabilitation and physical medicine services have been indirectly affected by the decrease and / or absence of face-to-face activity and by the transfer of physical and human resources to the care of patients affected by COVID-19 (Expósito Tirado et al., 2020). Although it is recommended to incorporate telemedicine into clinical practice, this has only been observed with the health crisis of COVID-19 (Beare et al., 2021; Anil et al., 2021). With this analysis, the lack of information and the absence of publications, it is assumed that telerehabilitation, in the case of survivors of stroke, is not established in the health system in Spain, although it is recommended by clinical practice guidelines (Winstein et al., 2016).
Currently, it is possible to see the improvement of digital systems for remote rehabilitation, in this case easily accessible Apps, and their possible usefulness as a complement to regular care. They are not only emerging in the face of periods of isolation such as confinement by COVID-19 (Moradi et al., 2021; Sainz de Murieta & Supervía, 2020) but they can also be beneficial in cases of geographic isolation to reduce the costs of transfers or the saturation of rehabilitation services (Schwamm et al., 2009). The Apps offer the immediate continuity of rehabilitation at the time of hospital discharge (Chen et al., 2015; Zerna et al., 2018; Halbert & Bautista, 2019). The increasing cost of institutional healthcare to society has triggered an ever-growing interest in moving healthcare services beyond the boundaries of hospitals and clinics. Moving parts of healthcare processes into the private homes and everyday life of the patients means an increased responsibility for people to actively engage in managing their health conditions.
Self-responsibility behaviors of stroke survivors should be reinforced in their recovery process (Burns et al., 2020). One of the strategies could be to clarify the participants and their families the relationship between the recommended exercises and the possible achievements at a functional level and the contribution of greater intensity to the rehabilitation process (Cramer et al., 2021).
Limitations
The main limitation of this study has been the adaptation of the health system to the health crisis due to COVID-19. Rehabilitation services were required to follow strict action protocols. Contact with patients and / or their relatives before hospital discharge has been very limited and negatively influenced the introduction of the use of the App at the time of hospital discharge. Although there is continuous contact with the participants via telephone to reinforce and motivate the use of the “Farmalarm” App as a guide for specific exercises, adherence has been low.
Since the participants in this study were recruited continuously and distributed between the two groups according to their precedence, the same number of participants in both groups could not be guaranteed.
In this study, usual care could not be protocolized because the participants were cared for by different health and social institutions after hospital discharge and after the inclusion in this study. For this same reason, the calculation of group homogenization was not performed. Although at the start of the study the groups appeared to be identical in relation to demographic variables.
Future studies
It will be necessary to find methods of introducing and promoting telerehabilitation in healthcare. Adherence factors should be detected and complementary strategies should be studied to improve adherence and motivation to the use of telerehabilitation Apps. Regular phone calls and video calls by health professionals, as performed in this study, seem not to be the best strategy to promote adherence and maintain motivation in telerehabilitation.
Future studies will be necessary to unify care strategies for stroke patients immediately after hospital discharge and define usual care or conventional physiotherapy at this stage of rehabilitation.
After this preliminary study, more robust studies will be necessary to assess the effectiveness of telerehabilitation in subacute stroke patients.
Conclusion
The use of the Telerehabilitation App “Farmalarm” as a core stability exercise guide seems to improve the balance and gait of patients with stroke in the subacute stage. Telerehabilitation could be included in current clinical practice but future studies and strategies must be explored to increase adherence to its use.
The education process before discharge from hospital seems to be essential to involve and increase the compromise, engagement and self-responsibility of the patient and / or their caregiver in the rehabilitation process.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank INMovens Solutions S.L., the Hospital Vall d’Hebron (Barcelona) research team and the Institut de Recerca de l’Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau research team for the technical support and expenses related to it (Marató TV3 Telethon grant: 201737-10).
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest. None of the authors have any type of relationship with the “Farmalarm” App company. All services were contracted and the associated expenses were supported by the research team.
