Cross-national comparability of census data as uniformity was intensely debated from the First International Statistical Congress(ISC), held in Brussels at Quetelet's initiative in 1853, until an agreement was reached at the Eighth ISC, in St. Petersburg, in 1872. However, not much progress was made until the last half of the twentieth century, when the Statistical Commission of the United Nations issued the first set of principles and recommendations for the national population censuses in 1958. In this paper, the progress of statistical internationalism is investigated from Quetelet's vision of census data uniformity and the first international decision to conduct decennial censuses directed at the actual population to Kish's definition of cross-national sample survey comparability. The presentation is based on the detailed documentation of the Integrated Public Use Mictodata Series (IPUMS)-International. As this database is comprised of samples drawn from censuses, it relates to this first international decision on census data comparability.
AllbardtE., Implications of within-nation variations and regional imbalances for cross-national research, in: Comparing Nations: The Use of Quantitative Data in Cross-National Research, MerrittR.L. and RokkanS., eds, Yale University Press, New Haven, London, 1966, pp. 337-348.
2.
AltermanH., Counting People, Harcourt, New York, 1969.
3.
BrownR.W.C., Comparing census data in 90 countries, The American Statistician25 (1971), 32-37.
4.
BrownS., Report on the Eighth International Statistical Congress, held at St. Petersburg, 22nd/10th August to 29th/ 17th, 1872, Journal of the Statistical Society of London35 (1872), 431-457.
5.
CampionH., International statistics, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A112 (1949), 105-143.
6.
CareyS., ed., Measuring Adult Literacy: The International Adult Literacy Survey (IALS), Office for National Statistics, London, 2000.
7.
DesrosièresA., Measurement and its uses: Harmonisation and quality in social statistics, International Statistical Review68 (2000), 173-187.
8.
DesrosièresA., The history of statistics as a genre: Styles of writing and social uses, Bulletin of Sociological Methodology119 (2013), 8-23.
9.
DrezeJ. and LohJ., Literacy in India and China, Economic and Political Weekly30 (1995), 2868-2878.
10.
EhlingM., Harmonising data in official statistics, in: Advances in Cross-National Comparison: A European Working Book for Demographic and Socio-Economic Variables, Hoffmeyer-ZlotnikJ.H.P. and WolfC., eds, Kluger Academic-Plenum, New York, 2003, pp. 17-31.
11.
EsteveA., McCaaR., RugglesS. and SobekM., International comparisons based on census microdata (IPUMS): Methods and applications, Les Lundis de l' Institut National Etudes Démographiques (INED) Seminar, Paris, France, June 6, 2005, http://www.ined.fr/fichier/t_rendezvous/47/rendezvous_fichier_esteve.pdf.
12.
European Social Survey, Sampling for the European Social Survey Round VI: Principles and Requirements, European Social Survey, GESIS, Mannheim, 2012, http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=53&Itemid=80.
13.
Eurostat, EU Legislation on the 2011 Population and Housing Censuses: Explanatory Notes, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2011, doi: 10.2785/12778.
14.
FestyP. and PriouxF., An Evaluation of the Fertility and Family Surveys Project, United Nations, New York, Geneva, 2002, http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/pau/_docs/ffs/FFS_2000_Prog_EvalReprt.pdf.
15.
GeoHive, Senegal Population Statistics, 2012, http://www.geohive.com/cntry/senegal.aspx.
16.
GeyerM.H., One language for the world: The metric system, international coinage, gold standard, and the rise of internationalism, 1850-1900), in: The Mechanics of Internationalism: Culture, Society, and Politics From the 1840s to the First World War (studies of the German Historical Institute London)GeyerM.H. and PaulmanJ., eds, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001, pp. 55-92.
17.
HankinsF.H., Adolphe Quetelet as statistician, in: Studies in History, Economics and Public Law (Vol. XXXI, No. 4), Columbia University Press, New York, 1908.
18.
HarknessJ.A., Van De VijverF.J.R. and MohlerP.Ph., eds, Cross-Cultural Survey Methods, Wiley, New York, 2003.
19.
KishL., Multi-population survey designs: Five types with seven shared aspects, International Statistical Review62 (1994), 167-186.
20.
KertzerD.I. and ArelD., Censuses, identity formation, and the struggle for political power, in: Census and Identity: The Politics of Race, Ethnicity, and Language in National Censuses, KertzerD.I. and ArelD., eds, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002, pp. 1-42.
21.
LiY., Samples of anonymized records (SARs) from the UK Censuses: A unique source for social science research, Sociology38 (2004), 553-572, doi: 10.1177/0038038504043218.
22.
LinzJ.J. and De MiguelA., Within-nation differences and comparisons: The eight Spains, in: Comparing Nations: The Use of Quantitative Data in Cross-National Research, MerrittR.L. and RokkanS., eds, Yale University Press, New Haven, London, 1966, pp. 267-319.
23.
MaloutasT., Socio-economic classification models and contextual difference: The `European Socio-economic Classes' (ESeC) from a South European angle, South European Society & Politics12 (2007), 443-460, doi: 10.1080/13608740701731382.
24.
MeierA., McCaaR. and LamD., Creating statistically literate global citizens: The use of IPUMS-International integrated census microdata in teaching, Statistical Journal of the IAOS27 (2011), 145-156, doi: 10.3233/SJI-2011-0733.
25.
MichalopoulouC., Comparability issues of the IPUMS-International microdata for Greece, 1971-2001, in: Modern Greek Studies Yearbook (Vol. 22/23), StavrouT.S., ed., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 2012, pp. 175-197.
26.
Minnesota Population Center, Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, International: Version 6.1 [Machine-readable database], University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 2014.
27.
National Census Service, The General Census of Population and Housing, Rwanda: 16-30 August 2002, Report on the Preliminary Results, Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning, Kigali, 2003, http://www.countrystat.org.
28.
National Institute of Statistics, General Population Census of Cambodia 2008: Provisional Population Totals, Ministry of Planning, Phnom Penh, 2008, http://www.stat.go.jp/english/info/meetings/cambodia/pdf/pre_rep1.pdf.
29.
ØyenE., The imperfections of comparisons, in: Comparative Methodology: Theory and Practice in International Social Research, ØyenE., ed., Sage, London, 1992, pp. 1-18.
30.
PerlmannJ., Review: IPUMS, The Journal of American History90 (2003), 339-340.
31.
PetterssonH., Survey design and sample design in household budget surveys, in: Household Sample Surveys in Developing and Transition Countries, United Nations, New York, 2005, pp. 557-570. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/hhsurveys/pdf/Household_surveys.pdf.
32.
PorterT.M., The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820-1900, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1986.
33.
PowerO. and ClermontY., Practical issues in achieving comparability in international surveys: The experience of Adult Literacy and Lifeskills survey (ALL), International Conference on Survey Methods in Multinational, Multi-regional, and Multicultural Contexts (3MC), Berlin, Germany, June 25-28, 2008.
34.
PrzeworskiA. and TeuneH., The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry, Wiley, New York, 1970.
35.
Roberts-JonesP., Préface, Actualité et universalité de la pensée scientifique d' Adolphe Quetelet, Actes du Colloque Organisé à l'Occasion du Bicentenaire de sa Naissance, Palais des Académies, 24-25 Octobre 1996, Académie Royale de Belgique, Brussels, 1997.
36.
SchweberL., Disciplining Statistics: Demography and Vital Statistics in France and England, 1830-1885, Duke University Press, Durham, London, 2006.
37.
SheyninO.B., Quetelet as a statistician, Archive for History of Exact Sciences36 (1986), 281-325.
38.
``State of literacy,'' Census of India 2011: Provisional Population Totals (Chapter 6), Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India, 2011, http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/prov_results_paper1_india.html.
39.
StiglerS.M., The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty Before 1900, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, (1986).
40.
StiglerS.M., Adolphe Quetelet: Statistician, scientists, builder of international institutions, Actualité et universalité de la pensée scientifique d' Adolphe Quetelet, Actes du Colloque Organisé à l'Occasion du Bicentenaire de sa Naissance, Palais des Académies, 24-25 Octobre 1996, Académie Royale de Belgique, Brussels, 1997.
41.
United Nations, Principles and Recommendations for National Population Censuses (Statistical Papers, Series M, No. 27), New York, 1958, http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.35112101514745;view=1up;seq=5.
42.
United Nations, Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses: Revision 2 (Series M, No. 67/Rev2), New York, 2008. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demo graphic/sources/census/docs/&R_Rev2.pdf.
43.
United Nations, Composition of Macro Geographical (Continental) Regions, Geographical Sub-Regions, and Selected Economic and Other Groupings, 2013, http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm.
44.
ValenteP., Census taking in Europe: How are population counted in 2010?Population & Societies467 (2010), 1-4, http://unstats.un.org/unsd/censuskb20/Attachment473.aspx.
45.
VermaV., Comparative surveys in Europe: Problems and possibilities, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute49 (1995), 527-528.
46.
VermaV., Combining national surveys for the European Union, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute58 (1999), 1-2, http://www.stat.fi/isi99/proceedings.hmtl.
47.
VermaV., Comparability in multi-country survey programmes, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference102 (2002), 189-210.
48.
VermaV., Comparability in international survey statistics (Key note address), International Conference on Improving Surveys, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 25-28, 2002, http:// www.unisi.it/ricerca/dip/dmq/verma/mannheim/2.1%20Comparability%20%28Verma%20Keynote%20Copenhagen%202002%29.pdf.
49.
VermaV., Issues in data quality and comparability in EU-SILC, Conference on Comparative EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions: Issues and Challenges, Helsinki, Finland, November 6-7, 2006, http://www.stat.fi/eusilc/conf_verma.pdf.
50.
VermaV. and GabilondoL.G., Family Budget Surveys in the EC: Methodology and Recommendations for Harmonisation (Theme 3, Series E), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1993.
51.
WestergaardH., Contributions to the History of Statistics, S.R. Publishers Ltd, Wakefield, England, 1932.
