It is currently unclear how participation in different sports affects the angle-specific subtalar pronator and supinator muscle strength and pronator-to-supinator strength ratio (PSR).
OBJECTIVE:
Based on the hypothesis that both differences sport-related patterns of play and foot-ground interaction may lead to sport-specific muscle adaptations, this study compared the angle specific pronator and supinator strength capacity of handball and soccer players.
METHODS:
Eighteen healthy male handball and 19 soccer players performed maximum isometric voluntary isometric contractions using a custom-made testing apparatus. Peak pronator (PPT) and supinator torques (PST), pronator and supinator strength curves (normalised to the peak torque across all joint angles) and PSR were measured in five anatomical joint angles across the active subtalar range of motion (ROM).
RESULTS:
All analysed parameters were dependent on the subtalar joint angle. The ANOVA revealed significant `joint angle' × `group' interactions on PPT, pronator strength curves and PSR. No group differences were found for active subtalar ROM.
CONCLUSION:
In previously uninjured handball and soccer athletes, there were intrinsic differences in angle-specific subtalar pronator muscle strength. The lower PSR, which was found in the most supinated angle, can be seen as a risk factor for sustaining an ankle sprain.
NiggBM, DenothJ, KerrS, LuethiS, SmithD, StacoffA. Load sport shoes and playing surfaces. In: FrederickEC, editor. Sport Shoes and Playing Surfaces. Champaign: Human Kinetics. 1984; 1-24.
2.
ZinderSM, GranataKP, ShultzSJ, GansnederBM. Ankle bracing and the neuromuscular factors influencing joint stiffness. J Athl Train. 2009; 44: 363-369.
3.
DuanXH, AllenRH, SunJQ. A stiffness-varying model of human gait. Med Eng Phys. 1997; 19(6): 518-524.
4.
WagnerH, BlickhanR. Stabilizing function of skeletal muscles: an analytical investigation. J Theor Biol. 1999; 199(2): 163-179.
5.
NielsenAB, NyeJ. An epidemiologic and traumatologic study of injuries in handball. Int J Sports Med. 1988; 9: 341-344.
6.
YdeJ, NielsenAB. Sports injuries in adolescents' ball games: soccer, handball, and basketball. Br J Sports Med. 1990; 24: 51-54.
7.
KarcherC, BuchheitM. On-court demands of elite handball, with special reference to playing positions. Sports Med. 2014; 44(6): 797-814.
8.
SarmentoH, MarcelinoR, AngueraMT, CampaniÇoJ, MatosN, LeitÃoJC. Match analysis in football: a systematic review. J Sports Sci. 2014; 32(20): 1831-1843.
9.
IgaJ, GeorgeK, LeesA, ReillyT. Cross-sectional investigation of indices of isokinetic leg strength in youth soccer players and untrained individuals. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009; 19(5): 714-719.
10.
Tourny-CholletC, LeroyD. Conventional vs. dynamic hamstring-quadriceps strength ratios: A comparison between players and sedentary subjects. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2002; 10: 183-192.
11.
ComettiG, MaffiulettiNA, PoussonM, ChatardJC, MaffulliN. Isokinetic strength and anaerobic power of elite, subelite and amateur french soccer players. Int J Sports Med. 2001; 22(1): 45-51.
12.
FousekisK, TsepisE, VagenasG. Lower limb strength in professional soccer players: profile, asymmetry, and training age. J Sports Sci Med. 2010; 9(3): 364-373.
13.
HayJG. Mechanical basis of strength expression. In Strength and power in sport. Edited by Komi PV. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific. 1992; 197-207.
14.
HagenM, Sanchez-BergmannD, SeidelS, LahnerM. Angle-torque-relationship of the subtalar pronators and supinators in younger and elderly males and females. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015; 8: 64.
15.
HagenM, LemkeM, KutschHP, LahnerM. Development of a functional anatomical subtalar pronator and supinator strength training machine. Tech Health Care. 2015; 23(5): 627-635.
16.
WrightCJ, ArnoldBL, RossSE, LinensSW. Recalibration and validation of the cumberland ankle instability tool cutoff score for individuals with chronic ankle instability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95(10): 1853-1859.
17.
BrodyD. Techniques in the evaluation and treatment of the injured runner. Orthop Clin North Am. 1982; 13: 541-558.
18.
MenzH. Alternative techniques for the clinical assessment of foot pronation. J Am Pod Med Assoc. 1998; 88: 119-129.
19.
MuellerM, HostJ, NortonB. Navicular drop as a composite measure of excessive pronation. J Am Pod Med Assoc. 1993; 83: 198-202.
20.
IsmanR, InmanV. Anthropometric studies of the human foot and ankle. Bull Prosthet Res. 1969; 11: 97-129.
21.
HagenM, LemkeM, PaszotaL, LahnerM. Reliability of two goniometric methods for measuring active subtalar range of motion. Tech Health Care. 2015; 23(3): 323-331.
22.
HagenM, WinhuysenM, LemkeM, LahnerM, MaiwaldC. Reliability of isometric pronator and supinator strength testing. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015; 8: 15.
23.
SaleDG. Testing strength and power. In Physiological testing of the high-performance athlete. 2nd edition. Edited by MacDougallJD, WengerHA, GreenHJ. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics Books. 1991; 21-106.
24.
HertelJ. Functional anatomy, pathomechanics, and pathophysiology of lateral ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2002; 37: 364-375.
25.
HeidtRS, DormerSG, CawleyPW, ScrantonPE, LosseG, HowardM. Differences in friction and torsional resistance in athletic shoe-turf surface interfaces. Am J Sports Med. 1996; 24(6): 834-842.
26.
BrunsJ, StaerkH. Mechanical ankle stabilisation due to the use of orthotic devices and peroneal muscle strength. An experimental investigation. Int J Sports Med. 1992; 13(8): 611-615.
27.
HagenM, MurleyGS, SchwiertzG, LandorfK, MenzHB. Activation patterns of selected lower limb muscles during maximum resisted isometric contractions of the foot and ankle. In: Proceedings of the German Congress of Biomechanics 2015, BourauelC, ed. University of Bonn, Germany. 2015; 50.
28.
Amaral De NoronhaM, BorgesNG. Lateral ankle sprain: isokinetic test reliability and comparison between invertors and evertors. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004; 19: 868-871.
29.
HartsellHD, SpauldingSJ. Eccentric/concentric ratios at selected velocities for the invertor and evertor muscles of the chronically unstable ankle. Br J Sports Med. 1999; 33: 255-258.
30.
LeslieM, ZachazewskiJE, BrowneP. Reliability of isokinetic torque values for ankle-invertors and evertors. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1990; 11: 612-616.
31.
LinW, LiuY, HsiehCC, LeeAJY. Ankle eversion to inversion strength ratio and static balance control in the dominant and non-dominant limbs of young adults. J Sci Med Sport. 2009; 12: 42-49.
32.
WilkersonGB, PinerolaJJ, CaturanoRW. Invertor vs. evertor peak torque and power deficiencies associated with lateral ankle ligament injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997; 26: 78-86.
