Air embolism is a potentially fatal but underrecognized complication in Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS). Oxygenators containing venous air traps have been developed to minimize the risk of air embolism in daily care.
OBJECTIVE:
We reproduced air embolism as occurring via a central venous catheter in an experimental setting to test the potential of oxygenators with and without venous bubble trap (VBT) to withhold air.
METHODS:
An in vitro ECLS circuit was created and a central venous catheter with a 3-way stopcock and a perforated male luer cap was inserted into the inflow line. Three different oxygenators with and without VBT and their capability to withhold air were examined. After 60 seconds of stable ECLS flow, the stopcock was opened towards the atmosphere for 3 minutes. Afterwards, air accumulation within the oxygenator was determined.
RESULTS:
Comparison of the total air entrapment showed a significant superiority of the oxygenators with VBT (p < 0.001). All oxygenators were able to partly withhold macro air boli, however, the capacity of oxygenators with VBT was higher. Passing through the oxygenator resulted in a reduction of microbubbles in all cases.
CONCLUSIONS:
Macro air emboli can be substantially reduced by usage of oxygenators that contain a VBT, whereas the capability to withhold microbubbles to a vast extent seems to depend on the intrinsic oxygenator's membrane.
GuentherSP, BrunnerS, BornF, FischerM, SchrammR, PichlmaierM, et al. When all else fails: Extracorporeal life support in therapy-refractory cardiogenic shock. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2016; 49(3): 802-9. DOI 10.1093/ejcts/ezv212.
2.
WuMY, LinPJ, TsaiFC, ChuJJ, ChangYS, HaungYK, et al. Postcardiotomy extracorporeal life support in adults: the optimal duration of bridging to recovery. ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs: 1992). 2009; 55(6): 608-13. DOI 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3181b899c0.
3.
WelzA, WelzC, WinklerK, SchillerW, TheuerkaufN. Extrakorporales lebenserhaltungssystem und extrakorporale membranoxygenierung. Zeitschrift für Herz-, Thorax- und Gefãßchirurgie. 2015; 29: 227-40. DOI 10.1007/s00398-015-0021-x.
4.
PadenML, ConradSA, RycusPT, ThiagarajanRR. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry Report 2012. ASAIO Journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs: 1992). 2013; 59(3): 202-10. DOI 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3182904a52.
5.
BeckmannA, BenkC, BeyersdorfF, HaimerlG, MerkleF, MestresC, et al. Position article for the use of extracorporeal life support in adult patients. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2011; 40(3): 676-80. DOI 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.05.011.
6.
ZanattaP, FortiA, BoscoE, SalvadorL, BorsatoM, BaldanziF, et al. Microembolic signals and strategy to prevent gas embolism during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2010; 5: 865-75. DOI 10.1186/1749-8090-5-5.
7.
HogetveitJO, SaatvedtK, NorumH, KristiansenF, ElvebakkO, DahleG, et al. Central venous catheters may be a potential source of massive air emboli during vascular procedures involving extracorporeal circulation: an experimental study. Perfusion. 2011; 26(4): 341-6. DOI 10.1177/0267659111403644.
8.
BurnsideJ, GomezD, PrestonTJ, OlshoveVF, Jr., PhillipsA. In-vitro quantification of gaseous microemboli in two extracorporeal life support circuits. The Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology. 2011; 43(3): 123-9.
9.
ELSO ELSO. ELSO Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Extracorporeal Life Support, Version 1.3, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. www.elsonet.org. 2013.
10.
NguyenTT, BiadillahY, MongrainR, BrunetteJ, TardifJC, BertrandOF. A method for matching the refractive index and kinematic viscosity of a blood analog for flow visualization in hydraulic cardiovascular models. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2004; 126(4): 529-35. DOI 10.1115/1.1785812.
11.
LimWL, ChewYT, ChewTC, LowHT. Pulsatile flow studies of a porcine bioprosthetic aortic valve in vitro: PIV measurements and shear-induced blood damage. Journal of Biomechanics. 2001; 34(11): 1417-27. DOI 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00132-4.
12.
BarakM, KatzY. Microbubbles: pathophysiology and clinical implications. Chest. 2005; 128(4): 2918-32. DOI 10.1378/chest.128.4.2918.
13.
MirskiMA, LeleAV, FitzsimmonsL, ToungTJ. Diagnosis and treatment of vascular air embolism. Anesthesiology. 2007; 106(1): 164-77.
14.
OrebaughSL. Venous air embolism: clinical and experimental considerations. Critical Care Medicine. 1992; 20(8): 1169-77.
15.
LouS, JiB, LiuJ, YuK, LongC. Generation, detection and prevention of gaseous microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass procedure. Int J Artif Organs. 2011; 34(11): 1039-51. DOI 10.5301/ijao.5000010.
16.
von SegesserLK, KalejsM, FerrariE, BommeliS, MaunzO, HorisbergerJ, et al. Superior flow for bridge to life with self-expanding venous cannulas. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery: official Journal of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2009; 36(4): 665-9. DOI 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.05.026.
17.
SuttonRG, SalatichA, JegierB, ChabotD. A 2007 survey of extracorporeal life support members: personnel and equipment. The Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology. 2009; 41(3): 172-9.
18.
De SomerFM, VetranoMR, Van BeeckJP, Van NootenGJ. Extracorporeal bubbles: a word of caution. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2010; 10(6): 995-1001. DOI 10.1510/icvts.2009.229088.
19.
van HulstRA, KleinJ, LachmannB. Gas embolism: pathophysiology and treatment. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging. 2003; 23(5): 237-46. DOI 10.1046/j.1475-097X.2003.00505.x.
20.
HoeperMM, TudoracheI, KuhnC, MarschG, HartungD, WiesnerO, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation watershed. Circulation. 2014; 130(10): 864-5. DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.114.011677.
21.
ReicheltA, PichlmaierM, HaglC, KhaladjN. Malposition of a venous extracorporal life support cannula in a patent foramen ovale. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery: Official Journal of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2013; 43(2): 441. DOI 10.1093/ejcts/ezs476.
22.
JohagenD, AppelbladM, SvenmarkerS. Can the oxygenator screen filter reduce gaseous microemboli? The Journal of Extra-Corporeal Technology. 2014; 46(1): 60-6.
23.
GerrietsT, SchwarzN, SammerG, BaehrJ, StolzE, KapsM, et al. Protecting the brain from gaseous and solid micro-emboli during coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized controlled trial. European Heart Journal. 2010; 31(3): 360-8. DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp178.
