Abstract
BACKGROUND:
This study explores the influence of Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) payment reform on hospital cost control and offers pertinent cost management strategies for public hospitals. It situates the research by elucidating the significance of the DRG payment method and comparing its advantages and drawbacks with the traditional ‘pay per project’ model.
OBJECTIVE:
The primary aim is to assess the impact of DRG payment reform on hospital cost control and propose effective cost management strategies for public hospitals. The objective is to provide insights into DRG payment implications and attempt practical recommendations for its implementation in the public healthcare sector.
METHODS:
Employing a comprehensive approach, the study analyzes DRG payment, delineates advantages and drawbacks, and proposes cost management strategies. Methods include staff training, an information management platform, disease analysis, and optimized cost accounting. The study highlights the potential for improved medical diagnosis and treatment through industry-finance integration.
RESULTS:
Findings reveal advantages and limitations of DRG payment, emphasizing strategies for optimizing hospital operations. Enhanced medical diagnosis and treatment procedures through industry-finance integration contribute to overall cost control effectiveness.
CONCLUSION:
The study serves as a practical guide for implementing DRG payment reforms, offering valuable insights for policymakers and healthcare professionals in navigating the complexities of cost control in public healthcare.
Keywords
Introduction
The ongoing reform of payment methods, specifically the shift towards Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG), stands as a critical focal point in contemporary hospital management. DRG, intertwining medical expenses with distinct disease types, offers a paradigm shift in resource allocation within healthcare [1]. This method presents an avenue to significantly enhance the rational distribution of medical resources, bolster operational efficiency within hospitals, and catalyze the overarching enhancement of medical quality [2]. This paper aims to comprehensively examine the profound influence of DRG payment reform on hospital cost control, delving into its multifaceted implications. Furthermore, it aims to present a comprehensive and strategic roadmap outlining effective cost management methodologies specifically tailored for implementation in public hospitals. By exploring the intricate interplay between DRG reform and hospital dynamics, this paper seeks to offer valuable insights into optimizing healthcare resource utilization and fortifying cost-effective medical service delivery.
Background of DRG payment method
The inception of the DRG payment method traces back to the mid-20th century, primarily emerging from a transformative era in the United States healthcare system during the 1960s [3]. This period witnessed a profound reconsideration of the prevalent fee-based medical payment model [3]. At its core, the conventional ‘pay-per-item’ approach encountered a myriad of challenges that impeded the efficiency and fairness of healthcare provision [2, 3]. One of the foremost issues was the opacity surrounding costs, where patients, providers, and insurers often struggled to ascertain the true expenses incurred for various medical services. This lack of transparency not only hindered financial predictability but also led to inefficiencies in resource allocation [1, 4].
Moreover, the fee-based model incentivized healthcare providers to increase the volume of services rendered rather than focusing on delivering comprehensive and outcome-driven care [5]. This led to concerns about overutilization of medical services, sometimes at the expense of patient well-being [5, 6]. Equitable distribution of resources also proved to be a daunting task within this framework, as it did not account for the varying complexities and costs associated with different medical conditions [5, 7].
In response to these systemic shortcomings, the DRG payment method was conceptualized and implemented [1, 2]. Its fundamental departure from the traditional model lies in its systematic categorization of patients based on their diagnoses and medical conditions. Each diagnosis is assigned to a specific DRG category, which comes with a predefined cost structure. This structured approach allows for a more standardized and transparent method of reimbursing healthcare providers for the services rendered [1, 5, 8].
By aligning compensation with predetermined cost standards associated with specific diagnoses, the DRG system aims to provide a more scientific and equitable reimbursement framework. It incentivizes efficiency in healthcare delivery by focusing on optimizing patient outcomes within a predetermined cost structure [6, 9]. Additionally, it encourages healthcare providers to streamline their services, promote cost-effective practices, and ensure optimal resource utilization [5, 10].
Ultimately, the DRG payment method represents a significant paradigm shift in healthcare reimbursement, aiming to enhance the quality, efficiency, and fairness of medical services rendered while fostering a more accountable and value-based healthcare system [6, 11].
The features of DRG payment
Advantages
The DRG payment method, settling medical expenses by disease type, exhibits clear advantages over the traditional ‘pay-per-item’ model [1]. Primarily, it significantly bolsters hospital cost control. The conventional ‘pay-by-project’ approach often leads to issues like misuse and wastage of surgical materials, medications, and other project-related expenses, resulting in uncontrollable medical costs [12]. In contrast, the DRG payment method hinges on disease diagnosis as its foundation. It considers diverse factors such as patient age, hospitalization duration, gender, clinical diagnosis, disease severity, and more to determine hospital compensation. This payment method necessitates hospitals to delve into more scientific and rational approaches for cost settlement and management, thereby enhancing their ability to control and manage medical expenses more effectively [13].
Moreover, DRG payment enhances hospital efficiency. Unlike the ‘pay-as-you-go’ model that focuses merely on service quantity and frequency while overlooking service quality, DRG payment integrates the medical service process and cost with the patient’s diagnosed disease [1]. Placing the patient at the center, this method incentivizes hospitals to provide high-quality, efficient medical services. This not only enhances medical outcomes but also conserves medical resources, enabling hospitals to attain more sustainable economic benefits [14].
Furthermore, the DRG payment method serves as a catalyst for elevating hospital quality management and fostering transparency in medical services. By categorizing and tallying medical services based on disease types, it enables more precise and effective hospital quality management. Through vigilant tracking and monitoring of DRG classification and costs, hospitals can promptly address and rectify issues in medical service quality, thereby enhancing the overall service standards [11]. Simultaneously, this payment model enhances transparency in hospital medical services, enabling patients and the public to better comprehend the hospital’s medical services and expenses. Ultimately, this fosters greater credibility and bolsters the hospital’s societal standing [15].
Limitations
While the DRG payment method presents clear advantages as a novel approach to hospital cost management, it also harbors certain limitations that impact cost control strategies.
Firstly, the inflexibility of the DRG payment method poses challenges in addressing specialized diseases. This method operates under the assumption of uniform treatment costs across all cases, disregarding instances where diseases necessitate specialized, high-cost treatments [16]. For example, rare diseases often require unique medical technologies and expensive medications, rendering the DRG payment method unable to accurately reflect the actual costs associated with these conditions. Consequently, this limitation affects the comprehensive cost management of hospitals [17].
Secondly, the DRG payment method influences hospitals’ treatment decisions. Payments under DRG are structured in groups based on cases, incentivizing hospitals to maximize economic benefits within predefined expenditure standards. In this mode, hospitals aim to reduce the length of hospital stays and enhance recovery rates to maintain diagnosis and treatment costs within a specific range [18]. Consequently, patients with conditions not meeting DRG standards may be unable to access necessary treatments, resulting in a reduction in overall treatment costs.
Additionally, the implementation of the DRG payment method imposes greater demands on hospital management. Its requirements call for extensive information infrastructure [19]. For smaller hospitals operating with limited resources, meeting these demands might prove challenging, thus limiting the effectiveness of their cost management strategies [6].
Methods of cost management in public hospitals under DRG payment
Full staff training
To effectively bolster cost management and accounting in public hospitals operating under the DRG payment method, comprehensive staff training within these institutions becomes imperative. This training aims to elevate awareness and comprehension of the DRG payment approach, emphasizing the significance of adept cost management and accounting within hospital operations [20].
Primarily, the training curriculum must encompass the fundamental principles underlying the DRG payment method. This involves organizing specialized lectures, seminars, and diverse educational formats to ensure medical staff possess a lucid grasp of the DRG system’s intricacies and recognize its pivotal role in hospital cost regulation [1].
Furthermore, the training regimen should concentrate on methodologies and proficiencies essential for effective cost management and accounting. Medical personnel must adeptly gather and accurately document cost-related data pertinent to the DRG payment method – such as expenses on medications, consumables, and bed occupancy – to ensure the precision and credibility of cost accounting [11]. Simultaneously, equipping medical staff with foundational principles and strategies for cost management becomes pivotal. This knowledge enables them to judiciously control expenditures and optimize resource allocation, ultimately enhancing the hospital’s efficiency and competitiveness [5].
Moreover, fostering inter-departmental collaboration and communication assumes paramount importance [4]. Within the framework of DRG payment, the collaborative prowess and communicative aptitude of medical personnel prove pivotal for effective cost management and accounting. Thus, the training program should emphasize bolstering team spirit, nurturing effective communication skills, and fostering a culture of collaboration among medical staff. This cultivates an environment conducive to proficiently executing cost management and accounting responsibilities [13].
Information management platform establishment
Establishing an information management platform within the framework of DRG payment and implementing standardized, unified coding for data stands as a critical pillar for public hospitals to effectively execute cost management strategies [7].
Primarily, hospitals need to achieve comprehensive cost data collection [11]. Constructing an information management platform tailored to DRG payment facilitates the integration of diverse datasets encompassing patient information, medical service expenses, pharmaceutical costs, consumables expenditures, and other pertinent data from systems such as medical information systems, human resource management systems, financial management systems, and medical record systems. This integration furnishes a specific foundation and data framework crucial for robust cost management practices [6].
Additionally, instituting standardized and universally coded data assumes paramount importance in developing the information management platform under the DRG payment model [10]. Harmonizing various hospital systems such as HIS, LIS, RIS, along with standardizing codes for medications, consumables, and diverse diagnostic and treatment procedures becomes essential. Adopting established coding standards like ICD-10 for disease diagnoses and ICD-9 for surgical operation codes ensures data uniformity. This unique coding system, facilitated through the information management platform, enables effective cost data collection. The assimilation and consolidation of this data empower hospitals to comprehensively oversee and manage costs, thus optimizing their financial strategies [18, 20, 21].
Disease type analysis and DRG group determination
Within the framework of the DRG payment model, conducting disease category analysis stands as a pivotal undertaking for public hospitals. By scrutinizing various diseases, we gain insight into their individual characteristics and allocate them to specific groups within the DRG, laying the foundation for hospital cost management and revenue accounting.
Pooling extensive case data and DRG enrollment criteria based on disease types facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the cost makeup within each disease group. Building upon this disease-specific analysis, optimization of the disease structure becomes essential [10]. Determining the categorization of diseases within the DRG allows hospitals to identify their advantageous disease categories, adjust their structure based on cost composition and management, and foster the growth of these advantageous categories. Simultaneously, enhancing the accuracy of DRG inclusion necessitates the establishment of a DRG inclusion inquiry system. This system accurately categorizes diagnoses and surgical procedures, scientifically predicting the actual pricing standards for diseases, consequently determining patient expenses during medical processes [6].
In the realm of cost management, heightened expenditures prompt hospitals to reassess their disciplinary construction approach and select treatment activities aligning with their functional positioning. This not only enhances the level of societal service but also tackles the issue of medical losses [22]. Through this approach, hospitals can effectively achieve precision and efficacy in controlling costs, ensuring both effective service levels and financial stability.
Clinician education and data accuracy
Under the DRG payment system, clinicians hold a pivotal position as their case data directly shapes hospital costing and payment outcomes. Hence, it’s imperative to heighten clinicians’ understanding of DRG principles and bolster accuracy in front-page case data [13, 21].
Primarily, clinicians must comprehend the operational guidelines of the DRG payment system, delineating DRG classifications within each department and correlating them with respective costs. Accurate completion of information on the first page of medical records significantly impacts DRG inclusion. Recognizing this, clinicians realize their pivotal role in shaping DRG data. Research [17] indicates that issues stemming from incomplete filling of the initial page of medical records result in cases being classified into high-frequency disease groups, low-frequency disease groups, or idiosyncratic disease groups. This classification discrepancy disrupts standard medical insurance payments and leads to avoidable economic losses [23].
Moreover, clinicians need to adhere to norms and requisites when documenting data on the initial case page. Precise recording of patients’ personal information, diagnoses, surgical procedures, medication usage, and other vital treatment details is imperative to avoid omissions or inaccuracies. This meticulous approach ensures that hospital cost calculations and payments accurately mirror the factual circumstances. To bolster clinicians’ comprehension of DRG and enhance accuracy in front-page case data, hospitals organize specialized training sessions. These courses enlighten clinicians about the background and significance of the DRG payment model and impart methods and techniques for accurately documenting initial case data [21].
Simultaneously, hospitals employ medical record quality control systems to oversee clinicians’ initial case page data. This system detects and rectifies errors or non-standard data entries promptly, elevating data accuracy and consistency. By integrating training initiatives and quality control measures, hospitals reinforce clinicians’ understanding of DRG and ensure precision in recording case data, aligning hospital practices with the requirements of the payment model [14].
Full cost accounting system establishment
Establishing a robust cost accounting methodology stands as a crucial component of effective cost management within the DRG payment system [1]. Ensuring the accuracy of cost accounting requires the unified collection and integration of departmental cost data, encompassing labor, materials, equipment maintenance, and other pertinent expenses. This consolidated data serves as the foundation for precise future cost calculations and analyses.
Furthermore, determining the elements and procedures for cost accounting involves analyzing disease types, optimizing their structure, and categorizing diseases within the DRG framework. Delving into disease analyses enables a comprehensive understanding of cost composition and variations among different illnesses. This analysis furnishes a scientific basis for cost accounting strategies. For instance, attributing costs to factors like personnel expenses, medications, consumables, asset depreciation, and other cost items aids in establishing standard costs for DRG groups and specific diseases. By comparing actual resource allocation and consumption against standard costs, discrepancies are identified, illuminating key control points and enhancing cost management practices [19].
Moreover, integrating DRG as the cornerstone of a comprehensive cost accounting system necessitates aligning with industry financial integration [19]. Employing financial cost analysis aids in refining medical diagnostic norms and standardizing diagnosis-treatment processes. This analytical method scrutinizes costs associated with diverse diagnostic and treatment procedures, identifying high-cost-low-benefit projects. Standardizing treatment plans and processes helps pinpoint inefficiencies, thereby curbing unnecessary expenses and fortifying cost control measures [14].
Top of Form
Integration of industry and finance
Firstly, financial cost analysis stands as a pivotal component in industry-finance integration. It involves dissecting various hospital costs, understanding their composition, and monitoring changing trends. This analysis aids hospital management in regularly evaluating cost-benefit ratios and devising corresponding adjustment strategies. Specifically, under the DRG payment method, financial cost analysis assumes heightened significance. It enables hospitals to discern the cost proportions associated with different diseases, facilitating targeted measures for precise cost management.
Secondly, medical diagnostic norms form the bedrock of clinical operations in hospitals and serve as the foundation for disease classification and grouping under DRG payment. Adherence to standardized medical diagnoses curtails unnecessary medical expenses and enhances the precision and consistency of disease classification. Hospitals must bolster clinician training to deepen their understanding of medical diagnostic norms, ensuring adherence to these standards in clinical practice. Simultaneously, hospitals ought to enhance their clinical pathway management, streamline the diagnosis and treatment protocols, and standardize the procedures for various examinations and treatments necessary for effective disease management. This approach aims to minimize disparities in hospitalization durations and the delivery of diagnosis and treatment services. By doing so, hospitals can optimize the allocation of medical resources in a rational and efficient manner, thereby achieving substantial cost savings [6, 16, 24].
Finally, standardizing the diagnosis and treatment processes proves an effective avenue for cost control. Clarity in these procedures and operational norms mitigates waste and unnecessary expenses [11]. Hospitals can initiate process improvement initiatives, introducing advanced management methodologies to optimize and reform diagnosis and treatment processes [7, 15]. Such enhancements elevate hospital work efficiency and service quality [25]. Additionally, leveraging information technology, such as hospital information systems and electronic medical records, facilitates the optimization of diagnosis and treatment processes [8, 10]. This reduces human-related errors, interventions, and missteps, thereby enhancing medical quality, safety, and overall efficiency [21, 23].
Conclusions
This study aims to examine the impact of DRG payment reform on hospital cost control and propose effective cost management methodologies in public hospitals by contrasting DRG payment with the traditional ‘pay according to the project’ approach, yielding the following insights.
DRG payment presents distinct advantages. Firstly, it enhances hospital cost control by grouping diseases, allowing a deeper understanding of their cost dynamics and efficient resource utilization assessment. Additionally, DRG encourages a focus on cost-effectiveness in clinical decisions, boosting resource efficiency. Secondly, it fosters hospital collaboration as it encourages interdisciplinary teamwork during diagnosis and treatment, elevating medical quality and efficiency. Thirdly, it drives hospital development by incentivizing the provision of high-quality, efficient medical services, spurring internal management enhancements, improving competitiveness, and facilitating sustained growth.
Nevertheless, the DRG payment method has limitations. Errors in grouping criteria may arise due to evolving medical knowledge and technology, potentially misclassifying new diseases and resulting in under or overpayment. Moreover, it might concentrate medical resources in stronger hospitals, causing imbalance due to the fixed payment model, hampering weaker hospitals’ ability to handle high-risk or high-cost cases.
To effectively navigate the challenges posed by DRG reform, public hospitals must adopt specific cost management approaches. These include comprehensive staff training to instill understanding of DRG principles and operational requirements, building an information management platform with standardized coding for comprehensive cost data collection, optimizing disease structures through analysis, improving medical staff’s grasp of DRG, and bolstering accuracy in case data to ensure precise cost accounting. Additionally, establishing a full DRG-centered cost accounting system and refining cost accounting methods empower hospitals to comprehend cost scenarios and guide resource allocation better. Financial cost analysis aids in evaluating medical diagnosis norms scientifically, standardizing the diagnosis-treatment process, and enhancing cost control. Implementing these measures enables hospitals to address DRG reform challenges, optimize resource allocation, and augment the quality and efficiency of medical services.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest
None to report.
