Visual perception of upright: Head tilt,visual errors and viewing eye

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Perception of upright is often assessed by aligning a luminous line to the subjective visual vertical (SVV).

OBJECTIVE:

Here we investigated the effects of visual line rotation and viewing eye on SVV responses and whether there was any change with head tilt.

METHODS:

SVV was measured using a forced-choice paradigm and by combining the following conditions in 22 healthy subjects: head position (20° left tilt, upright and 20° right tilt), viewing eye (left eye, both eyes and right eye) and direction of visual line rotation (clockwise [CW] and counter clockwise [CCW]).

RESULTS:

The accuracy and precision of SVV responses were not different between the viewing eye conditions in all head positions (P> 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test). The accuracy of SVV responses was % significantly different between the CW and CCW line rotations (p ≈ 0.0001; Kruskal-Wallis test) and SVV was tilted in the same direction as the line rotation. This effect of line rotation was however not consistent across head tilts and was only present in the upright and right tilt head positions. The accuracy of SVV responses showed a higher variability among subjects in the left head tilt position with no significant difference between the CW and CCW line rotations (P> 0.05; post-hoc Dunn's test).

CONCLUSIONS:

In spite of the challenges to the estimate of upright with head tilt, normal subjects did remarkably well irrespective of the viewing eye. The physiological significance of the asymmetry in the effect of line rotation between the head tilt positions is unclear but it %may suggest suggests a lateralizing effect of head tilt on the visual perception of upright.

Keywords

Subjective visual vertical head tilt line rotation monocular binocular

References

Arshad

I.Q.

, Nigmatullina

and Bronstein

A.M.

, Handedness-related cortical modulation of the vestibular-ocular reflex, J Neurosci 33 (2013), 3221-3227.

Collewijn

, Van der Steen

, Ferman

and Jansen

T.C.

, Human ocular counterroll: Assessment of static and dynamic properties from electromagnetic scleral coil recordings, Exp Brain Res 59 (1985), 185-196.

De Vrijer

, Medendorp

W.P.

and Van Gisbergen

J.A.M.

, Accuracy-precision trade-off in visual orientation constancy, J Vis 9 (2009), 9.1-15.

Dichgans

, Diener

H.C.

and Brandt

, Optokinetic-graviceptive interaction in different head positions, Acta Otolaryngol 78 (1974), 391-398.

Dieterich

, Bense

, Lutz

, Drzezga

, Stephan

, Bartenstein

and Brandt

, Dominance for vestibular cortical function in the non-dominant hemisphere, Cereb Cortex 13 (2003), 994-1007.

Dieterich

and Brandt

, Ocular torsion and perceived vertical in oculomotor, trochlear and abducens nerve palsies, Brain 116 (1993), 1095-1104.

Hoppenbrouwers

, Wuyts

F.L.

and Van de Heyning

P.H.

, Suppression of the E-effect during the subjective visual vertical test, Neuroreport 15 (2004), 325-327.

Howard

I.P.

, Human visual Orientation , Wiley, New York, 1982.

Mezey

L.E.

, Curthoys

I.S.

, Burgess

A.M.

, Goonetilleke

S.C.

and MacDougall

H.G.

, Changes in ocular torsion position produced by a single visual line rotating around the line of sight - visual `entrainment' of ocular torsion, Vision Res 44 (2004), 397-406.

10.

Mittelstaedt

, A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical, Naturwissenschaften 70 (1983), 272-281.

11.

Pagarkar

, Bamiou

D.-E.

, Ridout

and Luxon

L.M.

, Subjective visual vertical and horizontal: Effect of the preset angle, Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134 (2008), 394-401.

12.

Saeys

, Vereeck

, Bedeer

, Lafosse

, Truijen

, Wuyts

F.L.

and Van de Heyning

, Suppression of the E-effect during the subjective visual and postural vertical test in healthy subjects, Eur J Appl Physiol 109 (2010), 297-305.

13.

Sainoo

, Terakado

, Fujiyama

, Kumagami

and Takahashi

, Binocular and monocular measurements of subjective visual vertical in vestibular loss, Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 269 (2012), 57-60.

14.

Schuler

J.R.

, Bockisch

C.J.

, Straumann

and Tarnutzer

A.A.

, Precision and accuracy of the subjective haptic vertical in the roll plane, BMC Neurosci 11 (2010), 83.

15.

Tarnutzer

A.A.

, Bockisch

C.J.

and Straumann

, Head roll dependent variability of subjective visual vertical and ocular counterroll, Exp Brain Res 195 (2009), 621-626.

16.

Tarnutzer

A.A.

, Bockisch

, Straumann

and Olasagasti

, Gravity dependence of subjective visual vertical variability, J Neurophysiol 102 (2009), 1657-1671.

17.

Tarnutzer

A.A.

, Fernando

D.P.

, Kheradmand

, Lasker

A.G.

and Zee

D.S.

, Temporal constancy of perceived direction of gravity assessed by visual line adjustments, J Vestib Res 22 (2012), 41-54.

18.

Van Beuzekom

A.D.

and Van Gisbergen

J.A.

, Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates, J Neurophysiol 84 (2000), 11-27.

19.

Van Beuzekom

A.D.

, Medendorp

W.P.

and Van Gisbergen

J.A.

, The subjective vertical and the sense of self orientation during active body tilt, Vision Res 41 (2001), 3229-3242.

20.

Vandenbussche

, Vogels

and Orban

G.A.

, Human orientation discrimination: Changes with eccentricity in normal and amblyopic vision, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 27 (1986), 237-245.

21.

Vingerhoets

R.A.A.

, De Vrijer

, Van Gisbergen

J.A.M.

and Medendorp

W.P.

, Fusion of visual and vestibular tilt cues in the perception of visual vertical, J Neurophysiol 101 (2009), 1321-1333.

22.

Wade

S.W.

and Curthoys

I.S.

, The effect of ocular torsional position on perception of the roll-tilt of visual stimuli, Vision Res 37 (1997), 1071-1078.

23.

Young

L.R.

, Oman

C.M.

and Dichgans

J.M.

, Influence of head orientation on visually induced pitch and roll sensation, Aviat Space Environ Med 46 (1975), 264-268.