Reducing work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) through design: Views of ergonomics and design practitioners

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) affect the well-being of workers. Unfortunately, user requirements for design to reduce workplace risk factors for MSDs are not always effectively communicated to designers creating a mismatch between the user requirements and what is ultimately produced.

OBJECTIVE:

To understand the views of practitioners of design and ergonomics regarding tools for participatory design and features they would like to see in such tools.

METHODS:

An online questionnaire survey was conducted with a cohort of practitioners of ergonomics and design (n = 32). In-depth interviews were then conducted with a subset of these practitioners (n = 8). To facilitate discussion, a prototype integrated design tool was developed and demonstrated to practitioners using a verbalized walkthrough approach.

RESULTS:

According to the results of the questionnaire survey, the majority (70%) believed an integrated approach to participatory design would help reduce work-related MSDs and suggested ways to achieve this, for example, through sharing design information. The interviews showed the majority (n = 7) valued being provided with guidance on design activities and ways to manage and present information.

CONCLUSION:

It is believed that an integrated approach to design in order to help reduce work-related MSDs is highly important and a provision to evaluate design solutions would be desirable for practitioners of design and ergonomics.

Keywords

Design process participatory design design methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Buckle

. Ergonomics and musculoskeletal disorders: Overview. Occup Med 2005;55(3):164–167.

Haines

, Wilson

, Vink

, Koningsveld

. Validating a framework for participatory ergonomics (the PEF). Ergonomics 2002;45(4):309–327.

Kogi

. Facilitating participatory steps for planning and implementing low-cost improvements in small workplaces. Appl Ergonomics 2008;39(4):475–481.

Zink

, Steimle

, Schröder

. Comprehensive change management concepts: Development of a participatory approach. Appl Ergonomics 2008;39(4):527–538.

Caroly

, Landry

, Cholez

, Davazies

, Bellemare

, Poussin

. Innovation in the occupational health physician profession requires the development of a work collective to improve the efficiency of MSD prevention. Work 2012;41(1):5–13.

Karwowski

Handbook of standards and guidelines in ergonomics and human factors. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbausm Associates Inc.; 2006.

NIOSH. Ergonomic guidelines for manual material handling. California: California Department of Industrial Relations (Cal/OSHA); 2007.

OHSCO. MSD prevention toolbox: Getting started- Musculoskeletal disorders prevention series- Part 3A. Canada: Occupational Health and Safety Council of Ontario (OHSCO); 2008.

Vink

, Lourusen

, Wortel

, Dul

. Rapid communication experiences in participatory ergonomics: Results of a roundtable session during the 11th IEA congress, Paris. July Ergonomics 1992;35(2):123–127.

10.

Kogi

. Participatory methods effective for ergonomic workplace improvement. Appl Ergonomics 2006;37(4):547–554.

11.

Shinnar

, Indelicato

, Altimari

, Shinnar

. Survey of ergonomic features of supermarket cash registers: Short communication. Int J Ind Ergonomics 2004;34(6):535–541.

12.

Broberg

. Integrating ergonomics into engineering: Empirical evidence and implications for the ergonomists. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 2007;17(4):353–366.

13.

Vink

, Imada

, Zink

. Defining stakeholder involvement in participatory design processes. Appl Ergonomics 2008;39(4):519–526.

14.

Broberg

, Edwards

. User-driven innovation of an outpatient department. Work 2012;41:101–106.

15.

van Eerd

, Cole

, Irvin

, Mahood

, Keown

, Theberge

, et al. Process and implementation of participatory ergonomic interventions: A systematic review. Ergonomics 2010;53(10):1153–1166.

16.

Wilson

. Ergonomics and participation. In: Wilson

, Corlett

, editors. Evaluation of human work: A practical ergonomics methodology. 2nd ed. London: Taylor and Francis; 1995;1071–1096.

17.

Hignett

, Wilson

, Morris

. Finding ergonomic solutions- participatory approaches: In-depth review. Occu Med 2005;55(3):200–207.

18.

Punchihewa

HKG

, Gyi

. Development of a QFD based collaborative design approach to reduce work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). Design Principles and Practices: An Int J 2009;3(6):207–223.

19.

Akao

. Quality function deployment: Integrating customer requirements into product design. Massachusetts: Productivity Press; 1990.

20.

Chan

L-K

, Wu

M-L

. Quality function deployment: A literature review. Euro J Operational Research 2002;143(3):463–497.

21.

Marsot

. QFD: A methodological tool for integration of ergonomics at the design stage. Appl Ergonomics 2005;36(2):185–192.

22.

Karwowski

. Ergonomics and human factors: The paradigms for science, engineering, design, technology and management of human-compatible systems- Invited plenary paper. Ergonomics 2005;48(5):436–463.

23.

McAtamney

, Corlett

. RULA: A survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergonomics 1993;24(2):91–99.

24.

Hignett

, McAtamney

. Rapid entire body assessment (REBA): Technical note. Appl Ergonomics 2000;31(2):201–205.

25.

Corlett

. The evaluation of industrial seating. In: Wilson

, Corlett

, editors. Evaluation of human work: A practical ergonomics methodology. London: Taylor & Francis; 1990;500–515.

26.

, Buckle

. Evaluating change in exposure to risk for musculoskeletal disorders- A practical tool. UK: Health and Safety Executive; 1999.

27.

Karhu

, Kansi

, Kuorinka

. Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis. Appl Ergonomics 1977;8(4):199–201.

28.

Buchholz

, Paquet

, Punnett

, Lee

, Moir

. PATH: A work sampling-based approach to ergonomic job analysis for construction and other non-repetitive work. Appl Ergonomics 1996;27(3):177–187.

29.

Punchihewa

HKG

. The potential of quality function deployment (QFD) in reducing work-related musculoskeletal disorders. UK: Loughborough University; 2010.

30.

Loughborough University. Code of practice on investigations involving human participants: Revised and approved by Council. [Internet]. Leicestershire, Loughborough University. 2003. Available from: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/admin/committees/ethical/cophp/htm

31.

Cross

. Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design. 2nd ed. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons; 1994.

32.

Rantanen

, Domb

. Simplified TRIZ: New problem solving applications for engineers and manufacturing professionals. Florida: CRC Press; 2002.

33.

Suh

. The principles of design. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.; 1990.

34.

Stanton

, Salmon

, Walker

, Barber

, Jenkins

. Human factors methods: A practical guide for engineering and design. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 2005.

35.

Glaser

. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems 1965;12(4):436–445.

36.

Erlandson

, Harris

, Skipper

, Allen

. Doing naturalistic Inquiry: A guide to methods. California: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1993.

37.

Dempsey

, McGorry

, Maynard

WAS

. A survey of tools and methods used by certified professional ergonomists. Appl Ergonomics 2005;36(4):489–503.

38.

, Buckle

. Current techniques for assessing physical exposure to work-related musculoskeletal risks, with emphasis on posture-based methods. Ergonomics 1999;42(5):674–695.

39.

David

. Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: In-depth review. Occu Med 2005;55(3):190–199.

40.

Wilson

, Corlett

. Evaluation of human work: A practical ergonomics methodology. London: Taylor & Francis; 1990.

41.

Maguire MC. RESPECT: User-centred requirements hand-book. Version 3.3. RESPECT Consortium. 1998. Available from: http://www.npl.co.uk/respect

42.

Kuijt-Evers

LFM

, Morel

KPN

, Eikelenberg

NLW

, Vink

. Application of the QFD as a design approach to ensure comfort in using hand tools: Can the design team complete the house of quality appropriately?. Appl Ergonomics 2009;40(3):519–526.

43.

Herzwurm

, Mellis

, Schockert

, Weinberger

. Customer oriented evaluation of QFD software tools. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Quality Function Deployment. October 2-3. Linköping Sweden 1997;1:309–323.

44.

Ramesh

, Tiwana

. Supporting collaborative process knowledge management in new product development teams. Decision Support Systems 1999;27(1-2):213–235.

45.

Sivaloganathan

, Evbuomwan

NFO

, Jebb

, Wynn

. Design function deployment- a design system for the future. Design Studies 1995;16(4):447–470.

46.

Reich

. Improving the rationale capture capability of QFD. Eng with Comp 2000;16(3-4):236–252.

47.

Green

, Bonollo

. The importance of design methods to student industrial designers. Global J Eng Edu 2004;8(2):175–182.

48.

Bruce

, Leverick

, Littler

. Complexities of collaborative product development. Technovation 1995;15(9):535–552.

49.

Franceschini

, Rossetto

. Quality function deployment: How to improve its use. Total Quality Management 1998;9(6):491–500.

50.

Lager

. The industrial usability of quality function deployment: A literature review and synthesis on a meta-level. R&D Management 2005;35(4):409–426.

51.

Pham

, Dimov

. A system for automatic extraction of feature-based assembly information. Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical Engineers 1999;213(B):97–101.

52.

Greenlaw

, Brown-Welty

. A comparison of web-based and paper-based survey methods: Testing assumptions of survey mode and response cost. Evaluation Review 2009;33(5):464–480.

53.

Saunders

, Lewis

, Thornhill

. Research methods for business students. 4th ed. Essex: Prentice Hall: 2007.

54.

Toepoel

, Das

, van Soest

. Design of web questionnaires: The effects of the number of items per screen. Field Methods 2009;21(2):200–213.

55.

Williams

, Haslam

. Core competencies in ergonomics-do we have them? In: Pikaar

R.N.

, Koningsveld

EAP

, Settels

PJM

, editors. Proceedings of IEA Congress. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.: 2006.

56.

Charlton

. Questionnaire techniques for test and evaluation. In: Charlton

, O’Brien

, editors. Handbook of human factors testing and evaluation. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2002; 225–46.

57.

Rosenbaum

. Usability evaluations versus usability testing: When and why? IEEE Trans on Prof Comm 1989;32(4):210–216.

58.

Armstrong

, Brewer

, Steinberg

. Usability testing. In: Charlton

, O’Brien

, editor. Handbook of human factors testing and evaluation. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc 2002;403–32.

59.

Bowen

. Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qual Research 2008;8(1):137–152.

60.

Dowding

, Johnson

. How many users does it really take? Revisiting usability testing. Design Principles and Practices: An Int J 2008;2(2):65–72.

61.

Williams

, Haslam

. Exploring the knowledge, skills, abilities and other factors of ergonomics advisors. Theor Iss in Ergonomics Science 2011;12(2):129–148.