An objective and scientific task analysis provides the basis for establishing legally defensible Physical Employment Standards (PES), based on common and essential occupational tasks. Infrequent performance of these tasks creates challenges when developing PES based on criterion, or content validity.
OBJECTIVE:
Develop a systematic approach using Subject Matter Experts (SME) to provide tasks with 1) an occupationally relevant scenario considered common to all personnel; 2) a minimum performance standard defined by time, distance, load or work. Examples provided here relate to the development of a new PES for the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF).
METHODS:
SME of various experience are selected based on their eligibility criteria. SME are required to define a reasonable scenario for each task from personal experience, provide occupational performance requirements of the scenario in sub-groups, and discuss and agree by consensus vote on the final standard based on the definition of essential.
RESULTS:
A common and essential task for the CAF is detailed as a case example of process application. Techniques to avoid common SME rating errors are discussed and advantages to the method described.
CONCLUSION:
The SETS method was developed as a systematic approach to setting occupational performance standards and qualifying information from SME.
PayneWHarveyJ2010A framework for the design and development of physical employment tests and standardsErgonomics537858871
2.
ReillyTBlacklockRNewtonP2012Quantifying performance standards of the common and essential tasks required of the Canadian Forces: Phase IITaylor NAS and Billingn DC, editors. Proceedings of the first Australian conference on physiological and physical employment standardsCanberraAustralian Government, Department of Defence69
Supreme Court of Canada. Britich Columbia Public Service Employee Relations Comission v. BCGSEU0, 3S.C.R. 3 Meirion Decision [Internet]. Ottawa, Ontario; Government of Canada; 1999. [Assessed January, 2013]. Available at http://scc.lexum.org/decisia-scc-csc/scc-csc/scccsc/en/item/1724/index.do
Rayson MP. Job Analysis. In: Constable S and Palmer B, editors. The process of physical fitness standards development. State of the Art Report. Washington DC: Human Systems Information Analysis Center, US Department of Defence; 2000, pp. 67-100
7.
JamnikVKThomasSGBurrJFGledhillN2010aConstruction, validation and derivation of performance standards for a fitness test for correctional officer applicantsApplied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism355971
8.
GledhillNJamnikVShawJ2001Establishing a bona fide occupational requirement for physically demanding occupationsProceedings of the consensus forum on establishing bona fide requirements for physically demanding occupationsGledhillNBonneauJSalmonAToronto, OntarioYork University913
9.
TaylorNASGroellerH2003Work-based physiological assessment of physically-demanding trades: A methodological overviewJournal of Physiological Anthropology2227381
10.
KirwanBAinsworthL1992A guide to task analysisLondonTaylor and Francis
11.
LarsenBAisbettB2012Subjective job task analyses for physically demanding occupations: What is best practice?Ergonomics551012661277
12.
GebhartDL2000Establishing Performance StandardsThe process of physical fitness standards development. State of the Art ReportConstableSPalmerBWashington DCHuman Systems Information Analysis Center, US Department of Defence179200
13.
ZumboBD2001Methodology and measurement matters in establishing a bona fide occupational requirement for physically demanding occupationsProceedings of the consensus forum on establishing bona fide requirements for physically demanding occupationsGledhillNBonneauJSalmonAToronto, OntarioYork University3752
14.
GumieniakRJamnikVKGledhillN2011Physical fitness bona fide occupational requirement for safety-related physically demanding occupations; Test development considerationsHealth and Fitness Journal of Canada424752
15.
PhillipsMPayneWLordCNettoKNicholsDAisbettB2012Identification of physically demanding tasks performed during bushfire suppression by Australian rural firefightersApplied Ergonomics43435441
16.
BilzonJLJScarpelloEGBilzonEAllsoppAJ2002Generic task-related occupational requirements for Royal Naval personnelJournal of Occupational Medicine528503510
17.
ReillyTTiptonM1280Task-based standards for lifeboat crew: Avoiding ageismInternational Congress Series219223
SpivockMReillyTNewtonPBlacklockRJaenenSGagnonP2011Project FORCE: Identification of common, essential, physically demanding tasks in the Canadian ForcesThe 2nd international congress on soldiers’ physical performance.pHäkkinenKKyröläinenHTaipaleRJyväskylä, FinlandUniversity of Jyväskylä and the Finnish Defence Forces105
LavinRPDreyfusMSlepskiLKasperCE2007Subject matter experts: Facts or fictionNursing Forum424189195
23.
BonneauJ2001Evaluating physical competencies fitness related tests task simulation or hybrid. Objectives, process and consensus summary of the national forum on bona fide occupational requirementsProceedings of the consensus forum on establishing bona fide requirements for physically demanding occupationsGledhillNBonneauJSalmonAToronto OntarioYork University2333
GebbhardtDLBakerTASheppardVA1995Development and validation of physical performance tests for the selection and fitness assessment for United States Postal Inspection candidate and incumbent Postal InspectorsHyattsville, MDHuman Performance Systems, Inc
26.
PetersonSDochertyDMcGarveyWRogersT2012Proceedings of the first Australian conference on physiological and physical employment standardsTaylorNASBillingnDCCanberraAustralian Government, Department of Defence36
27.
KingLMHunterJESchmidtFL1980Halo in a multidimensional force-choice performance evaluation scaleJournal of Applied Psychology65507516
28.
Equal Employment Advisory Council [homepage on the Internet]. Lanning v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA). United States Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit. Washington, DA: USA Government; 1999. No. 99-557. [Accessed January 2013]. Available from: http://www.eeac.org/briefs/septavlanning.pdf
