The impact of occupational health and safety regulations on prevention through design in construction projects: Perspectives from Spain and the United Kingdom

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Since the mid-1990 s, Prevention through Design (PtD) has become increasingly prevalent in the built environment. The acceptance of PtD has largely been due to the removal or reduction of risks during the execution phase of construction projects. European States have had the added impetus of national legislation.

OBJECTIVE:

This paper analyzes the influence of European Union Directive 92/57/EEC on occupational safety and health injury prevention in the project design phase.

METHODS:

Qualitative methods comprised individual semi-structured interviews and focus groups with a panel of experts. Sixty individuals from construction and related professions (architects, engineers, constructors, developers, and other construction experts) answered 17 key questions to establish national perceptions of the effectiveness of Directive 92/57/EEC in Spain and the United Kingdom (UK).

RESULTS:

The implementation of PtD in the project design phase in the UK is clearer since the regulations explicitly state the obligations of project designers as well as those of the coordinator. Interviews with Spanish experts show that, in Spain, the prevention culture is less frequently realized.

CONCLUSIONS:

The most significant differences between the European Directive and national regulations which influence PtD are linked to the Health and Safety Coordinator, and Health and Safety documents.

Keywords

Prevention through design (PtD)directive 92/57/EEC occupational safety and health construction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

FIEC. European Construction Industry Federation. Construction in Europe: Key Figures. 2011; Available at: http://www.fiec.eu/Content/Default.asp?PageID=5

OSHA. European Agency for Safety and Health atWork. 2011; Available at: http://osha.europa.eu/en/sector/construction

Council Directive 92/57/EEC of 24 June 1992 on the implementation of minimum safety and health requirements at temporary or mobile construction sites (eighth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 89/391/EEC). 1995.

Martínez Aires

, Rubio Gámez

, Gibb

. Prevention through design: The effect of European Directives on construction workplace accidents. Saf Sci 2010;48(2):248–258.

Gibb

, Haslam

, Gyi

, Hide

, Duff

. What causes accidents? Civil Engineering - Proc Institution of Civil Engineers 2006;159(2):46–50.

Lehtola

, van der Molen

, Lappalainen

, Hoonakker

PLT

, Hsiao

, Haslam

, et al. The Effectiveness of Interventions for Preventing Injuries in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Review. Am J Prev Med 2008;35(1):77–85.

Hecker

, Gibbons

, Barsotti

. Making ergonomic changes in construction: Worksite training and task interventions. In: Alexander

, Rabourn

, editors. Applied Ergonomics. London: Taylor & Francis; 2001. pp. 162–189.

Hecker

, Gambatese

, Weinstein

. Designing for Worker Safety. Prof Saf 2005;50(9):32.

Haslam

, Hide

, Gibb

AGF

, Gyi

, Atkinson

, Pavitt

, et al. Causal factors in construction accidents. Health and Safety Executive September 2003.

10.

Designing for safety and health in construction-a European/UK. Designing for Safety and Health in Construction, Portland, OR, USA: Hecker S, Gambatese J, Weinstein M.(Eds.); 2004.

11.

Behm

. Linking construction fatalities to the design for construction safety concept. Saf Sci 2005;43(8):589–611.

12.

Weinstein

, Gambatese

, Hecker

. Can Design Improve Construction Safety?: Assessing the Impact of a Collaborative Safety-in-Design Process. J Constr Engrg and Mgmt 2005;131(10):1125–1134.

13.

Gambatese

, Behm

, Rajendran

. Design’s role in construction accident causality and prevention: Perspectives from an expert panel. Saf Sci 2008;46(4):675–691.

14.

European Commission. Evaluation methods for the European Union’s external assistance evaluation tool. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. 2006.

15.

Álvarez-Gayou Jurgenson

. Cómo hacer investigación Cualitativa. Fundamentos y Metodología. México: Editorial Paidos; 2003.

16.

Rasmussen

. Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem. Saf Sci 1997;27(2-3):183–213.

17.

Kirwan

. Coping with accelerating socio-technical systems. Saf Sci 2001;37(2-3):77–107.

18.

Accident investigation at Norwegian State Railways: A sociotechnical methodology. Paper presented at the JRC/ESReDA Seminar on Safety Investigation of Accidents; 2003.

19.

Montero

, Araque

, Rey

. Occupational health and safety in the framework of corporate social responsibility. Saf Sci 2009;47(10):1440–1445.

20.

Katsakiori

, Sakellaropoulos

, Manatakis

. Towards an evaluation of accident investigation methods in terms of their alignment with accident causation models. Saf Sci 2009;47(7):1007–1015.

21.

Cisneros-Puebla

, Faux

. nvestigadores cualitativos – historias dichas, historias compartidas: Narración de la investigación cualitativa. Forum: Qualitative Research. Volume 5, No. 3, Art. 37 – September 2004. Introducción al volumen especial: Entrevistas FQS I. 2004.

22.

Naoum

. Dissertation research and writing for construction students. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.; 2007.

23.

Loughborough University. Healthy Design for Construction (D4h). 2002; Available at: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/research/design4health/index.html, 2008.

24.

Cameron

, Duff

, Hare

. Integrated gateways: Planning out health & safety risk. Health and Safety Executive, 2004.

25.

Hare

, Cameron

, Duff

. Exploring the integration of health and safety with pre-construction planning. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management 2006;13(5):438–450.

26.

Böhm

. Theoretical Coding Text Analysis in Grounded Theory. In: Flick

, Kardorff

, Steinke

, editors. A Companion to Qualitative Research London; 2004. pp. 270–275.

27.

Strauss

. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.

28.

Böhm

. The SWOT Analysi. Germany: GRIN Verlag; 2008.

29.

Sepehr

, Mansoureh

, Mandana

. SWOT methodology: A state-of-the-art review for the past, a framework for the future. Journal of Business Economics & Management 2011;12(1):24–48.

30.

Eurostat. European Statistics Official. 2013; Available at: http://eeurostat.ec.europa.eu. Accessed March, 2013.

31.

CDM. The Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007. No. 320. UK: The Stationery Office; 2007.

32.

Löfstedt

. Reclaiming health and safety for all: An independent review of health and safety legislation. London; 2011. p. 1–110-Dept for Work and Pensions, Crown Copyright.

33.

HSE. Update on the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007, Health and Safety Executive Construction Industry Advisory Committee (CONIAC) Minutes. www.hse.gov.uk/aboutus/meetings/iacs/coniac/12/m2-2.pdf. Accessed 6th July, 2012

34.

Cuatrecasas. Responsabilidad en Materia de Seguridad y Salud Laboral. Propuestas de Reforma a la Luz de la Experiencia Comparada. Madrid: Ed La Ley; 2008:183–194.

35.

Esteban Gabriel

. Estudio sobre la integración de la prevención en la fase de redacción de los proyectos. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid; 2011:99–101.

36.

Royal Decree 1627/97. Royal Decree of 24 October 1627/97 laying down minimum safety and health at construction sites. 1997.