Care farming is an increasing part of multifunctional agriculture. Still there are few studies on how the farmers experience their working situation.
OBJECTIVE:
To describe care farmers’ relevant education, motivation, perceived support, involvement with participants, and perceived strain. We also wanted to investigate the possible relationship between different variables and level of perceived strain.
METHODS:
A total of 98 (67%) Norwegian care farmers answered a postal questionnaire in 2011 on demography, motivation, relevant education, involvement in participants, and 11 statements describing perceived strain of care farming. A sum-score of the 11 statements was constructed, and a linear regression model was used to explore the relationships between total perceived strain and the other variables.
RESULTS:
Of the farmers 40% had relevant education. Their main motivation was economical (53%) or “idealistic” (47%). 80% reported that care farming had increased their quality of life. Still the majority experienced it to be socially demanding, and 26% did not receive support from professionals. Higher total perceived strain was found for men, low education, no perceived support, high degree of involvement, and less perceived functionality of participants. The model explained 40% of the variance in total perceived strain.
CONCLUSION:
More systematic cooperation and supervision from the social and health care system might be needed, in order to ensure a health promoting work situation for these care farmers.
HaubenhoferDK, ElingsM, HassinkJ, HineRE. The Development of Green Care in Western European Countries. Explore-the Journal of Science and Healing2010;6(2):106–11.
2.
IancuSC, BundersJF, van BalkomAJ. Bridging the gap: Using farms to enhance social inclusion of people with chronic mental disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand2013;128:318–319.
3.
VikJ, McElweeG. Diversification and the entrepreneurial motivation of farmers in Norway. Journal of small business management2011;49(3):390–410.
4.
BergetB, EkebergO, BraastadBO. Animal-assisted therapy with farm animals for persons with psychiatric disorders: Effects on self-efficacy, coping ability and quality of life, a randomized controlled trial. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health2008;4:9.
5.
HassinkJ, ElingsM, ZweekhorstM, van den NieuwenhuizenN, SmitA. Care farms in the Netherlands: Attractive empowerment-oriented and strengths-based practices in the community. Health & Place2010;16(3):423–430.
6.
GonzalezMT, HartigT, PatilGG, MartinsenEW, KirkevoldM. A prospective study of existential issues in therapeutic horticulture for clinical depression. Issues Ment Health Nurs2011;32(1):73–81.
7.
PedersenI, NordaunetT, MartinsenEW, BergetB, BraastadBO. Farm animal-assisted intervention: Relationship between work and contact with farm animals and change in depression, anxiety, and self-efficacy among persons with clinical depression. Issues Ment Health Nurs2011;32(8):493–500.
8.
IancuSC, ZweekhorstMB, VeltmanDJ, van BalkomAJ, BundersJF. Mental health recovery on care farms and day centres: A qualitative comparative study of users’perspectives. Disabil RehabilEarly online: 1-11. [Epub ahead of print]
9.
De KromMPMM, DessinJ. Multifunctionality and care farming: Contested discourses and practices in Flanders. NJAS –Wagningen Journal of Life Sciences2013;64–65:1724.
10.
BjørkhaugH. Exploring the sociology of agriculture: Famely farmers in Norway – future or past food producers?. In: ErasgaD (Ed.) Sosiological landscape –theories, realities and trends2012, InTech, Kroatia, 283–304.
11.
MittenzweiK, LienG, FjellstadW, OvrenE, DramstadW. Effects of landscape protection on farm management and farmers’ income in Norway. J Environ Manag2010;91(4):861–868.
12.
ZasadaI. Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture –A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy2011;28:639–648.
13.
European Expert Group on the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care. Common European Guidelines on the Transition from Institutional to Community-based Care 2012, Brussels, Belgium.
14.
Ministry of Health and Care Services. Folkehelsemeldingen: God helse - felles ansvar, Mld.St. 34 (2012-2013) (Norwegian White Paper) 2013 Oslo Norway.
15.
BrageS, IhlebaekC, NatvigB, BruusgaardD. Musculoskeletal disorders as causes of sick leave and disability benefits. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen2010;130(23):2369–2370.
16.
KnudsenAK, ØverlandS, HotopfM, MykletunA. Lost working years due to mental disorders: An analysis of the Norwegian disability pension registry. PLoS Onee2012;7(8):42567.
17.
Kaltenbrunner BernitzB, GreesN, Jakobsson RandersM, GernerU, BergendorffS. Young adults on disability benefits in 7 countries. Scand J Public Health2013;41(12 Suppl):3–26.
18.
BockBB, OostingSJ. A classification of green care arrangements in Europe. In: DessinJ, & BockBB (Eds.), The economics of green care in agriculture, COST Action 866, Green care in agriculture2010, Loughborough University, Loughborough, 15–26.
19.
DesseinJ, BockBB, de KromMPMM. Investigating the limits of multifunctional agriculture as the dominant frame for green care in agriculture in Flanders and the Netherlands. Journal of rural studies2013;32:50–59.
20.
Ministry of agriculture and food & Ministry of local government and regional development Inn påa tunet. Nasjonal strategi 2012 Oslo, Norway
21.
BartleEE, CouchonnalG, CandaER, StakerMD. Empowerment as a dynamically developing concept for practice: L essons learned from organizational ethnography. Soc Work2002;47(1):32–43.
22.
HillborgH, DanermarkB, SvenssonT. Professionals’ perceptions of and views about vocational rehabilitation for people with psychiatric disabilities. Work2013;44(4):471–480.
23.
AshbySE, RyanS, GrayM, JamesC. Factors that influence the professional resilience of occupational therapists in mental health practice. Aust Occup Ther J2013;60(2):110–119.
24.
PedersenI, IhlebækC, KirkevoldM. Important elements in farm animal-assisted interventions for persons with clinical depression: A qualitative interview study. Disability and Rehabilitation2012;34(18):1526–1534.
25.
SanneB, MykletunA, MoenBE, DahlAA, TellGS. Farmers are at risk for anxiety and depression: The Hordaland Health Study. Occup Med (Lond)2004;54(2):92–100.
26.
FraserCE, SmithKB, JuddF, HumphreysJS, FragarLJ, HendersonA. Farming and mental health problems and mental illness. Int J Soc Psychiatry2005;51(4):340–349.
27.
Lunner KolstrupC, KallioniemiM, LundqvistP, KymäläinenHR, StallonesL, BrumbyS. International perspectives on psychosocial working conditions, mental health, and stress of dairy farm operators. J Agromedicine2013;18(3):244–255.
28.
CarruthAK, LoganCA. Depressive symptoms in farm women: Effects of health status and farming lifestyle characteristics, behaviors, and belifs. J Community Health2002;27(3):213–227.
29.
VikJ, FarstadM. Green care governance: Between marked, policy and interesting social worlds. J Health Organ Manag2009;23(5):539–53.
30.
BrandthB, HaugenMS. Farm tourism and dilemmas of commercial activity in the home. Hospitality & Society2012;2(2):179–196.
31.
IancuSC. New dynamics in mental health recovery and rehabilitation. The case of care farms. PhD thesis, the Netherlands: Vrije; 2013.
32.
HassinkJ, GrinJ, HulsinkW. Multifunctional agriculture meets health care: Applying the multi-level transition science perspective to care farming in the Netherlands. Sociologia Ruralis2012;53(2):223–45.
33.
TrivediR, BeaverK, BouldinE, EugenioE, ZeliadtSB, NelsonK, RoslandAM, SzarkaJG, PietteJD. Characteristics and well-being of informal caregivers: Results from a nationally-representative US survey. Chronic Illn, 2013; [Epub ahead of print].
