Abstract
Background: Laboratory studies have typically been used to establish a relationship between whole body vibration (WBV) magnitude, frequency, exposure duration and reported discomfort. However, the relationship between subjective reports of discomfort, and predicted comfort response according to International Standards Organization (ISO) 2631-1, predicted health risks according to ISO 2631-1 and reported musculoskeletal discomfort has not been examined. The purpose here was to compare discomfort values predicted by ISO 2631-1 with the subjective discomfort reported by nine Load-haul-dump (LHD) operators during typical operating conditions.
Methods: Vibration exposure at the operator/seat interface was measured and processed, for one-hour duration, according to criteria established in ISO 2631-1. Vibration total values were determined for 1-minute exposure periods and the LHD operators provided a discomfort score associated with the same vibration exposure period. A linear regression analysis and correlation was carried out to determine the strength of the relationship between the predicted subjective reports of discomfort, ISO 2631-1 discomfort, objectively measured acceleration levels and reported musculoskeletal discomfort.
Findings: Reported discomfort was poorly correlated to ISO discomfort scores (r=0.1799). Vibration exposure values and Musculo-Skeletal Disorder (MSD) variables were related to both ISO 2631-1 discomfort and to reported discomfort. The MSD scores produced stronger relationships with reported discomfort scores than did the vibration exposure values.