The purpose of this study was to examine the gender differences in the formation of esports gameplay intention. To this end, the determinants and esports gameplay intention were adopted from the Esports Consumption Model (ESC; Jang & Byon, 2020a). A total of 498 respondents (male = 54.2%; female = 45.8%) who were adults and had experienced esports gameplay responded to the online survey. We examined the measurement invariance to examine if the constructs were being measured equivalently across gender. Also, we tested for structural invariance to examine if causal relationships exist the same way across gender. The results indicated that gender differences exist in the paths between hedonic motivation, habit, social influence, and esports gameplay intention. The findings and implications were discussed theoretically and practically, and suggestions were made regarding future studies aimed at overcoming the limitations of the current study.
BányaiF., GriffithsM. D., KirályO., & DemetrovicsZ. (2019). The psychology of esports: A systematic literature review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 35, 351–365.
2.
BonnyJ. W., & CastanedaL. M. (2017). Number processing ability is connected to longitudinal changes in multiplayer online battle arena skill. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 377–387.
3.
BryceJ., & RutterJ. (2003). Gender dynamics and the social and spatial organischzation of computer gaming. Leisure Studies, 22, 1–15.
ChenL. S. L., KuanC. J., LeeY. H., & HuangH. L. (2011). Applicability of the UTAUT model in playing online game through mobile phones: Moderating effects of user experience. First International Technology Management Conference, 625–629.
6.
ChikishY., CarrearsM., & GarciaJ. (2019). eSports: A new era for the sports industry and a new impulse for the research in sports (and) economics. Sports (and) Economics FUNCAS Social and Economic Studies, 7, 477–508.
7.
CsikszentmihalyiM., & LarsonR. (1987). Flow and the foundations of positive psychology.Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg.
8.
CushenP. J., RifeS. C., & WannD. L. (2019). The emergence of a new type of sport fan: Comparing the fandom, motivational profiles, and identification of electronic and traditional sport fans. Journal of Sport Behavior, 42, 127–141.
9.
ByrneB. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming.Routledge.
10.
DeauxK., & LewisL. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991–1004.
11.
DeshbandhuA. (2016). Player perspectives: What it means to be a gamer. Press Start, 3, 48–64.
12.
DwyerB., LupinekJ. M., & AchenR. M. (2018). Challenge accepted: Why women play fantasy football. Journal of Sport Management, 20, 1–13.
13.
FornellC, & LarckerD. R. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
14.
FunkD. C., PizzoA. D., & BakerB. J. (2018). eSport management: Embracing eSport education and research opportunities. Sport Management Review, 21, 7–13.
15.
HairJ. E., BlackW. C., BabinB. J., AndersonR. E., & TathamR. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 7). Prentice Hall.
16.
HamariJ., & SjöblomM. (2017). What is eSports and why do people watch it?Internet Research, 27, 211–232.
17.
HomerB. D., HaywardE. O., FryeJ., & PlassJ. L. (2012). Gender and player characteristics in video game play of preadolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1782–1789.
18.
HuangH. C., HuangL. S., ChouY. J., & TengC. I. (2017). Influence of temperament and character on online gamer loyalty: Perspectives from personality and flow theories. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 398–406.
19.
JangW. W., & ByonK. K. (2020a). Antecedents and consequence associated with esports gameplay. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 21(1), 1–22.
20.
JangW. W, & ByonK. K. (2020b). Antecedents of esports gameplay intention: Genre as a moderator. Computers in Human Behavior, 109, 106336. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106336
21.
KimS. J. (2017). Gender inequality in eSports participation: Examining League of Legends [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Texas at Austin.
ManeroB., TorrenteJ., FreireM., & Fernandez-ManjonB. (2016). An instrument to build a gamer clustering framework according to gaming preferences and habits. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 353–363.
27.
MarupingL. M., BalaH., VenkateshV., & BrownS. A. (2017). Going beyond intention: Integrating behavioral expectation into the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68, 623–637.
PizzoA. D., BakerB. J., NaS., LeeM. A., KimD., & FunkD. C. (2018). eSport vs. sport: A comparison of spectator motives. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 27, 108–123.
33.
PodsakoffP. M., MacKenzieS. B., LeeJ. Y., & PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
34.
QianT. Y., WangJ. J., ZhangJ. J., & LuL. Z. (2019). It is in the game: Dimensions of esports online spectator motivation and development of a scale. European Sport Management Quarterly, 20(4), 458–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2019.1630464
35.
RehbeinF., StaudtA., HanslmaierM., & KliemS. (2016). Video game playing in the general adult population of Germany: Can higher gaming time of males be explained by gender specific genre preferences?Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 729–735.
36.
RuvalcabaO., ShulzeJ., KimA., BerzenskiS. R., & OttenM. P. (2018). Women's experiences in eSports: Gendered differences in peer and spectator feedback during competitive video game play. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 42, 295–311.
37.
ScharkowM., FestlR., VogelgesangJ., & QuandtT. (2015). Beyond the "core-gamer": Genre preferences and gratifications in computer games. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 293–298.
SeoY. (2016). Professionalized consumption and identity transformations in the field of eSports. Journal of Business Research, 69, 264–272.
40.
ShinD. H. (2010). The dynamic user activities in massive mul-tiplayer online role-playing games. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26, 317–344.
41.
ShinD. H., & ShinY. J. (2011). Why do people play social network games?Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 852–861.
42.
VenkateshV., MorrisM. G., DavisG. B., & DavisF. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.
43.
VenkateshV., ThongJ. Y., & XuX. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36, 157–178.
44.
VenkateshV, ThongJ. Y., & XuX (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 17, 328–376.
45.
VermeulenL., Van BauwelS., & Van LooyJ. (2017). Tracing female gamer identity: An empirical study into gender and stereotype threat perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 90–98.
46.
WangE. S. T. (2014). Perceived control and gender difference on the relationship between trialability and intent to play new online games. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 315–320.
