The handover of a patient in the pre-hospital setting is different to other handover settings and therefore requires a different definition and description to that of other patient handover environments. Identifying those factors that affect the efficacy of handover could provide useful for formulating improvement strategies.
Aim
This research set out to describe the negative experiences of pre-hospital emergency care personnel handing over in the emergency centre in Johannesburg, South Africa, with a view to identifying potential areas for improvement. This paper reports on responses to an open-ended question that formed part of a purpose-designed, paper-based questionnaire that formed part of a mixed-methods study.
Methods
Data were collected from pre-hospital emergency care personnel within Johannesburg, South Africa. Responses from 140 participants were captured verbatim into Atlas.ti® for coding, analysis and interpretation using a qualitative descriptive methodology. Two themes were generated from a qualitative descriptive analysis of the data: communication barriers, and process barriers to emergency centre handover. These were confirmed by the categories and codes that made up these themes.
Conclusion
This study identifies some of the factors perceived by pre-hospital emergency care personnel to negatively affect emergency centre handover. It provides insights into how communication and process within the emergency centre have the potential to negatively impact emergency centre handover efficacy.
MakkinkA.W., SteinC.O.A., BruijnsS.R.The variables perceived to be important during patient handover by South African prehospital care providers.Afr J Emerg Med2019; 9: 87–90.
2.
SpoonerA.J., AitkenL.M., CorleyA.Nursing team leader handover in the intensive care unit contains diverse and inconsistent content: an observational study.Int J Nurs Stud2016; 61: 165–72.
3.
MachaczekK., WhietfieldM., KilnerK.Doctors’ and nurses’ perceptions of barriers to conducting handover in hospitals in the Czech Republic.Am J Nurs Res2013; 1: 1–9.
4.
KalyaniM.N., FereidouniZ., SarvestaniR.S.Perspectives of patient handover among paramedics and emergency department members: a qualitative study.Emergency2017; 5: e76.
5.
MacFarlaneC., van LoggerenbergC., KloeckW.International EMS systems in South Africa–past, present, and future.Resuscitation2005; 64: 145–8.
6.
ThompsonD.S., O'LearyK., JensenE.The relationship between busyness and research utilization: it is about time.J Clin Nurs2008; 17: 539–48.
7.
ManserT., FosterS.Effective handover communication: an overview of research and improvement efforts.Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol2011; 25: 181–91.
ByrneK.Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare releases targeted solutions tool for hand-off communications.Perspectives (Montclair)2012; 32: 1–7.
10.
RedleyB., BottiM., WoodB.Interprofessional communication supporting clinical handover in emergency departments: an observation study.Australas Emerg Nurs J2017; 20: 122–30.
11.
BostN., CrillyJ., PattersonE.Clinical handover of patients arriving by ambulance to a hospital emergency department: a qualitative study.Int Emerg Nurs2012; 20: 133–41.
Econex.Updated GP and specialist numbers for SA. Health Reform Note 7 2010; 3-8.
14.
RispelL.C.Transforming nursing, policy practice and management in South Africa.Glob Heal Action2015; 1: 1–3.
15.
South African Government.National emergency care education and training policy.Pretoria, South Africa: National Department of Health, 2017.
16.
KaziA.M., KhalidW.Questionnaire designing and validation.J Pak Med Assoc2012; 62: 514–6.
17.
SilverC., LewinsA.F.Computer-assisted analysis of qualitative data. In: LeavyP. (ed). The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research.New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 2014.
18.
SandelowskiM.A matter of taste: evaluating the quality of qualitative research.Nurs Inq2015; 22: 86–94.
19.
SchreierM.Qualitative content analysis. In: FlickU. (ed). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis.London, England: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2014.
20.
OwenC., HemmingsL., BrownT.Lost in translation: maximizing handover effectiveness between paramedics and receiving staff in the emergency department.Emerg Med Australas2009; 21: 102–7.
21.
SuserudB., BruceK.Ambulance nursing: part three.Emerg Nurse2003; 11: 16–21.
22.
Benham-HutchinsM.M., EffkenJ.A.Multi-professional patterns and methods of communication during patient handoffs.Int J Med Inform2010; 79: 252–67.
23.
YatesL., DahmM.R., RogerP.Developing rapport in inter-professional communication: insights for international medical graduates.English for Specific Purposes2016; 42: 104–16.
24.
JenkinA., Abelson-MitchellN., CooperS.Patient handover: time for a change?Accid Emerg Nurs2007; 15: 141–7.
25.
EvansS.M., MurrayA., PatrickI.Assessing clinical handover between paramedics and the trauma team.Injury2010; 41: 460–4.
26.
DawsonS., KingL., GranthamH.Improving the hospital clinical handover between paramedics and emergency department staff in the deteriorating patient.Emerg Med Australas2013; 25: 393–405.
27.
JensenS.M., LippertA., ØstergaardD.Handover of patients: a topical review of ambulance crew to emergency department handover.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand2013; 57: 964–70.
28.
ThakoreS., MorrisonW.A survey of the perceived quality of patient handover by ambulance staff in the resuscitation room.Emerg Med J2001; 18: 293–6.
29.
MarmorG.O., LiM.Y.Improving emergency department medical clinical handover: barriers at the bedside.Emerg Med Australas2017; 29: 297–302.
30.
FitzpatrickD., McKennaM., DuncanE.A.S.Critcomms: a national cross-sectional questionnaire based study to investigate prehospital handover practices between ambulance clinicians and specialist prehospital teams in Scotland.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med2018; 26: 1–11.
31.
VenkateshA.K., CurleyD., ChangY.Communication of vital signs at emergency department handoff: opportunities for improvement.Ann Emerg Med2015; 66: 125–30.
SpencerR., CoieraE., LoganP.Variation in communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department.Ann Emerg Med2004; 4: 268–73.
34.
ParkerJ., CoieraE.Improving clinical communication.Am Med Informatics Assoc2000; 7: 9.
35.
BorowitzS., Waggoner-FountainL., BassE.Adequacy of information transferred at resident sign- out (inhospital handover of care): a prospective survey.Qual Saf Health Care2008; 17: 6–10.
36.
JagsiR., KitchB.T., WeinsteinD.F.Residents report on adverse events and their causes.Arch Intern Med2005; 165: 2607–13.
37.
MohorekM., WebbT.P.Establishing a conceptual framework for handoffs using communication theory.J Surg Educ2015; 72: 402–9.
38.
MeiselZ.F., SheaJ.A., PeacockN.J.Optimizing the patient handoff between emergency medical services and the emergency department.Ann Emerg Med2015; 65: 310–7.e1.
39.
ManserT., FosterS., GisinS.Assessing the quality of patient handoffs at care transitions.Qual Saf Health Care2010; 19: 1–5.
40.
CurrieJ.Improving the efficiency of patient handover.Emerg Nurse2002; 10: 24–7.
41.
YeK., McD TaylorD., KnottJ.C.Handover in the emergency department: deficiencies and adverse effects.Emerg Med Australas2007; 19: 433–41.
42.
BeachC., CroskerryP., ShapiroM.Profiles in patient safety: emergency care transitions.Acad Emerg Med2003; 10: 354–7.
43.
BostN., CrillyJ., WallisM.Clinical handover of patients arriving by ambulance to the emergency department – a literature review.Int Emerg Nurs2010; 18: 210–20.
