An Examination of Telework Policies: Balancing Work-Life Demands during the ‘New Normal’

Abstract

March 2020 Governors and Mayors across America instituted “Stay at Home” and “Shelter in Place” to combat the Covid-19 pandemic. As a result, the Covid-19 pandemic has presented numerous challenges for the field of HRM. It halted traditional in-person business operations, it shut down in-person workplace operations for government jurisdictions for months. It called for the closure of daycares, the K-12 education system, and universities. Response to the pandemic instantly and dramatically shifted the public sector workplace to a stay at home remote working environment. Of interest to this research are the implications of the remote working requirements that resulted from these orders. The focus of this research is to explore the best practices that can be learned from an existing work-life balance program from The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office during the pandemic. Conclusions are drawn emphasizing the importance of HR systems that are responsive to employee needs while remaining committed to effective public service delivery.

Keywords

Covid-19 pandemic telework employee-friendly policies diversity and inclusion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

T.D.

(2001). Family-supportive work environments: the role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behaviors, 58 (3): 414–435.

Allgood

, Jensen

U.T.

and Stritch

J.M.

(2022). Work-family conflict and burnout amid COVID-19: Exploring the mitigating effects of instrumental leadership and social belonging. Review of Public Personnel Administration, Online First.

Bae

K. B.

, & Goodman

(2014). The Influence of Family-Friendly Policies on Turnover and Performance in South Korea. Public Personnel Management, 43(4): 520–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026014536055.

Bae

K.B.

, Lee

, and Sohn

(2019). How to increase participation in telework programs in U.S. federal agencies: Examining the effects of being a female supervisor, supportive leadership, and diversity management. Public Personnel Management. 48(4): 565–583.

Barboza-Wilkes

, Gonzalez

, Resh

, & Wong

(2022). The Emotional Toll of the COVID-19 Crisis on local government workers. Review of Public Personnel Administration, Online First.

Berman

E.M.

, Bowman

J.S.

, West

J.P.

, & Van Wart

M.R.

(2020). Human resource management in public service: Paradoxes, processes, and problems. (6th ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press.

Berman

E.M.

, Bowman

J.S.

, West

J.P.

, & Van Wart

M.R.

(2106). (2020). Human resource management in public service: Paradoxes, processes, and problems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Boulet

& Parent-Lamarche

(2022). Paradoxical effects of teleworking on workers' well-being in the COVID-19 context: a comparison between different public administrations and the private sector. Public Personnel Management. Online First.

Bradbury

M. D.

, & Kellough

J. E.

(2008). Representative bureaucracy: Exploring the potential for active representation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4): 697–714.

10.

CPA HR Consulting. (2020). Leading through a Pandemic - The Impact of Covid-19 on the Public Sector Workforce. https://www.cpshr.us/resources/leading-through-a-pandemic-the-impact-of-covid-19-on-the-public-sector-workforce.

11.

Caillier

J. G.

(2012). The impact of teleworking on work motivation in a U.S. Federal Government Agency. American Review of Public Administration. 42(4): 461–480.

12.

Camarena

& Fusi

(2022). Always Connected: Technology Use Increases Technostress among public managers. American Review of Public Administration, 52(2): 154–168. doi: 10.1177/02750740211050387.

13.

Carless

S. A.

, & Wintle

(2007). Applicant attraction: The role of recruitment function, work-life balance policies and career salience. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15 (4), 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00398.x.

14.

de Vries

, Tummers

, and Bekkers

2019. The benefits of teleworking in the public sector: reality or rhetoric? Review of Public Personnel Administration. 39(4): 570–593.

15.

Doberstein

& Charbonneau

(2022). Alienation in Pandemic-induced telework in the public sector. Public Personnel Management, Online First.

16.

Feeney

M. K.

, & Stritch

J. M.

(2019). Family-friendly policies, gender, and work–life balance in the public sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(3): 422–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17733789.

17.

Fischer

, Siegel

, Proeller

, and Drathschmidt

(2022). Resilience through digitalisation: how individual and organisational resources affect public employees working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Management Review. Online First. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2037014.

18.

Foley

, Linnehan

, Greenhaus

J.H.

, & Weer

C.H.

(2006). The impact of gender similarity, racial similarity and work culture on family-supportive supervision. Group & Organization Management. 31, 420–441.

19.

Guedez

(2021, July 2). Forbes. Five practices that can reduce your employees' stress while teleworking. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2021/07/02/five-practices-that-can-reduce-your-employees-stress-while-teleworking/?sh=cc8428eee388.

20.

Giauque

, Renard

, Cornu

, and Emery

(2022). Engagement, Exhaustion, and Perceived Performance of public employees before and during the COVID-19 crisis. Public Personnel Management. Online First, 1–28.

21.

Guyot

& Sawhill

I.V.

(2020, April 6). Telecommuting will likely continue long after the pandemic. Brookings (2020). https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2020/04/06/telecommuting-will-likely-continue-long-after-the-pandemic/.

22.

Hoyman

, & Duer

(2004). A typology of workplace policies: Worker friendly vs. family friendly? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 24(2): 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X03260845.

23.

Hewitt

(2017). Consumer health mindset. https://www.aon.com/human-capital-consulting/thought-leadership/communication/2017-consumer-health-mindset.jsp.

24.

International Labour Organization. (2020, July 16). Teleworking during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: A practical guide. https://www.ilo.org/travail/info/publications/WCMS_751232/lang–en/index.htm.

25.

Kellough

J. E.

, & Naff

K.C.

(2004). Responding to a wake-up call: An examination of federal agency diversity management programs. Administration & Society, 36 (1): 62–90.

26.

Kim

& Mullins

L.B.

(2016). How does supervsior support and diversity management affect employee participation in work/family policies? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36 (1):80–105.

27.

Klingner

D.E.

, Nalbandian

, & Llorens

J.J.

(2010). Public personnel management: Contexts and strategies. New York: NY: Routledge.

28.

Kwon

& Hee Jeon

(2020). Do leadership commitment and performance-oriented culture matter for federal teleworker satisfaction with telework programs? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(1): 36–55.

29.

Lavigna

R. J.

(07 December 2020). COVID-19 Lessons for the New Government Workplace. Governing. https://www.governing.com/work/Covid-19s-lessons-for-the-new-government-workplace.html.

30.

Lee

, & Hong

(2011). Does family-friendly policy matter? Testing its impact on turnover and performance. Public Administration Review, 71(6): 870–879. https://www-jstor-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/41317386.

31.

Leiter

M.P.

, & Maslach

(1999). Six areas of worklife: a model of the organizational context of burnout. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration. 21(4), 472–489.

32.

Meier

K. J.

, & Funk

K.D.

(2017). Women and public administration in a comparative perspective: the case of representation in Brazalian local governments. Administration & Society. 49 (1):121–142.

33.

Mele

, Belle

, and Cucciniello

(2021). Thanks, but no thanks: prefences towards teleworking colleagues in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(4): 790–805.

34.

Metselaar

S. A.

, den Dulk

, and Vermeeren

(2022). Teleworking at Different Locations outside of the office: Consequences for perceived performance and the mediating role of autonomy and work-life balance satisfaction. Review of Public Personnel Administration, Online First. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X221087421.

35.

Mitev

, Aroles

, Stephenson

K.A.

, and Malaurent

, eds. (2021). New Ways of Working. Organizations and Organizing in the Digital Age. Palgrave Macmillan.

36.

Mor Barak

M. E.

(1999). Beyond affirmative action: Toward a model of diversity and organizational inclusion. Administration in Social Work, 23(3–4): 47–68.

37.

Mor Barak

M. E.

(2011). Managing diversity: Toward a globally inclusive workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

38.

Office of Personnel Management. (2019) Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey: Empowering Employees Inspiring Change. Governmentwide Management Report. Retrieved from: https://www.opm.gov/fevs/reports/governmentwide-reports/.

39.

Office of Personnel Management. (2020). Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey: Empowering Employees Inspiring Change. Governmentwide Management Report. Retrieved from: https://www.opm.gov/fevs/reports/governmentwide-reports/.

40.

Office of Personnel Management. (2021). 2021 Guide to telework and remote work in the federal government: Leveraging telework and remote work in the federal government to better meet our management capital needs and improve mission delivery. Retrieved from: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAMQw7AJahcKEwjYg72Uktb5AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.telework.gov%2Fguidance-legislation%2Ftelework-guidance%2Ftelework-guide%2Fguide-to-telework-in-the-federal-government.pdf&psig=AOvVaw2Xnr55_QEx5wg2xrtAYCQE&ust=1661109084043337.

41.

Office of Personnel Management (2022). Policy, data, oversight: Work-life. Retrieved from: https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/worklife/.

42.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). OECD Better Life Index. Retrieved from: http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org.

43.

Palumbo

(2020). Let me go to the office! An investigation into the side effects of working from home on work-life balance. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 33(6/7): 771–790.

44.

Pink-Harper

and Rauhaus

(2017). Examining the Impact of federal employee wellness programs and employee resilience in the federal workplace. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration. 40(3): 353–387.

45.

Renard

, Cornu

, Emery

, and Giauque

(2021). The Impact of New Ways of Working on Organizations and Employees: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Administrative Sciences. 11(2): 38–56. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020038.

46.

Sabharwal

(2014). Is diversity management sufficient? Organizational inclusion to further performance. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 197–217.

47.

Society for Human Resource Management. (2021). Telecommuting Policy and Procedure. Retrieved from: https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/tools-and-samples/policies/pages/telecommuting_policy.aspx.

48.

Schuster

, Weitzman

, Sass Mikkelsen

, Meyer-Sahling

, Bersch

, Fukuyama

, Paskov

, Rogger

, Mistree

and Kay

(2020), Responding to COVID-19 through Surveys of Public Servants. Public Administration Review, 80 (5): 792–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13246.

49.

Stewart

M.M.

, & Johnson

O.E.

(2009). Leader-member exchange as a moderator of the relationship between work group diversity and team performance. Group & Organization Management, 34 (5): 507–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108331220.

50.

Telework.gov. (2021). Telework Legislation. Retrieved from: https://www.telework.gov/guidance-legislation/telework-legislation/telework-enhancement-act/.

51.

Thompson

C.A.

, Beauvais

, & Lyness

K.S.

(1999). When work-family benefits are not enough: the influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54 (3): 392–415.

52.

United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2018). Telework program office: FY 2018 Telework report. Retrieved from: https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/organizational-offices/office-chief-administrative-officer/telework-program-office.

53.

Unites States Patent and Trademark Office (2021 1). FY 2021 Telework Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/organizational-offices/office-chief-administrative-officer/telework-program-office.

54.

United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2021 2). Telework annual report 2019-2020. Retrieved from: https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Telework_Annual_Report_2019-2020.pdf.

55.

United States Patent and Trademark Office (n.d.). New Employee Telework Agreement. Retrieved from: https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/NewEmployeeTemporaryTeleworkAgreementFinal.pdf.

56.

United States Patent and Trademark Office. (n.d. 2). Telework Enhancement Act Pilot Program (TEAPP). Retrieved from: https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/organizational-offices/office-chief-administrative-officer/telework-program-office.

57.

Wilkins

V.M.

(2007).Exploring the causal story: Gender, active representation, and bureaucratic priorities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 17 (1): 77–94.