Copy Once or Twice? Isomorphic Pressures and Special District Fiscal Reserves

Abstract

Both general purpose local governments and special districts accumulate and drain fiscal reserves to prepare for and respond to financial uncertainty. Whether or not fiscal reserves behavior are subject to isomorphic pressures is an emerging question in the literature. While multiple papers have provided evidence of a single isomorphic pressure, no paper has separately tested for three distinct isomorphic pressures in the fiscal reserves literature. With a panel dataset of Kentucky school districts from 2004 to 2019, this article uses descriptive and inferential methods to provide evidence of coercive, normative, and mimetic isomorphic pressures. Collectively, these findings not only build the literature on special districts but call into question the role of normative pressures from the Government Finance Officers Association and coercive pressures from state-imposed fiscal reserve rules.

Keywords

Special district financial management isomorphism fiscal reserves

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ammons

D.N.

, & Roenigk

D.J.

(2014). Benchmarking and interorganizational learning in local government, 25(1), 309–335.

Arapis

, & Reitano

(2017). School district fiscal savings and state budget rules. Government Finance Review, 33(3), 31–34.

Arapis

, & Reitano

(2018). A glimmer of optimism in government savings accumulation? An empirical examination of municipal unassigned fund balance in Florida. Public Finance Review, 46(3), 389–420.

Arapis

, Reitano

, & Bruck

(2017). The fiscal savings behavior of Pennsylvania school districts through the great recession. Public Budgeting & Finance, 34(3), 47–70.

Arial

C.M.

(2019). Public administration choice in Idaho school district finance policy observed [Doctoral dissertation, Idaho State University]. Proquest Dissertations & Theses Global.

Barrett

, Fowles

, Jones

, & Reitano

(2019). Forecast bias and fiscal slack accumulation in school districts. American Review of Public Administration, 49(5), 601–613.

Berry

(2008). Piling on: Multilevel governance and the fiscal common-pool. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 802–820.

Bretschneider

, Marc-Aurele

Jr. , & Wu

(2004). “Best Practices” research: A methodological guide for the perplexed. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 307–323.

Buerger

, & Bifulco

(2019). The effect of charter schools on districts' student composition, costs, and efficiency: The case of New York state. Economics of Education Review, 69, 61–72.

10.

Bushouse

B.K.

, Jacobson

W.S.

, Lambright

K.T.

, Llorens

J.L.

, Morse

R.S.

, & Poocharoen

(2011). Crossing the divide: Building bridges between public administration practitioners and scholars. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(S1), i99–i112.

11.

Carslaw

, Richard

, & Mills

J.R.

(2007). Audit timeliness of school district audits. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 19(3), 290–316.

12.

Census of Governments. (2017). Census of Governments. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cog.html.

13.

Coe

(1999). Local government benchmarking: Lessons from two major multigovernment efforts. Public Administration Review, 59(2), 110–123.

14.

Cook

S.J.

, An

, & Favero

(2019). Beyond policy diffusion: Spatial econometric models of public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(4), 591–608.

15.

DiMaggio

P.J.

, & Powell

W.W.

(1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48 (2), 147–160.

16.

Duncombe

& Hou

(2014). The savings behavior of special purpose governments: A panel study of New York school districts. Public Budgeting & Finance, 34(3), 1–23.

17.

Gauthier

S.J.

(2009a). Fund balance: New and improved. Government Finance Review, 25 (2), 10–14.

18.

Gauthier

S.J.

(2009b). GFOA updates Best practices on fund balance. Government Finance Review, 25(6), 68–69.

19.

Gerrish

, & Spreen

T.L.

(2017). Does benchmarking encourage improvement or convergence? Evaluating North Carolina's fiscal benchmarking tool. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(4), 596–614.

20.

Gorina

, Maher

, & Park

(2019). Toward a theory of fiscal slack. Public Budgeting & Finance, 39(4), 48–74.

21.

Governmental Accounting Standards Board. (1999). Statement No. 34 of the governmental accounting standards Board. Norwalk, CT: Governmental Accounting Standards Board.

22.

Governmental Accounting Standards Board. (2009). Statement No. 54 of the governmental accounting standards board. Norwalk, CT: Governmental Accounting Standards Board.

23.

Government Finance Officers Association [GFOA]. (2015). Fund balance guidelines for the general fund. Chicago, IL: Government Finance Officers Association.

24.

Government Finance Officers Association [GFOA]. (2017). Best practices in school budgeting. Chicago, IL: Government Finance Officers Association.

25.

Greer

R.A.

(2014). Overlapping local government debt and the fiscal common. Public Finance Review, 43(6), 1–24.

26.

Guo

, & Wang

(2017). A spatial analysis of Florida county governments' unreserved general fund balances. Public Budgeting & Finance, 37(3), 71–88.

27.

Hall

J.L.

, & Hail

(2006). Special districts. In Federalism in America: An encyclopedia (Eds. Marbach

, Katz

, & Smith

). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, Inc.

28.

Hendrick

(2004). Assessing and measuring the fiscal health of local governments: Focus on Chicago suburban municipalities. Urban Affairs Review, 40(1), 78–114.

29.

Hendrick

(2006). The role of slack in local government finances. Public Budgeting & Finance, 26(1), 14–46.

30.

Heugens

, & Lander

(2009). Structure! Agency! (And other quarrels): A metaanalysis of institutional theories of organization. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 61–85.

31.

Jones

, Reitano

, & Buerger

(2021). Fiscal shocks, budgetary pressures, and public education expenditure stabilization. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(2), 147–156.

32.

Joyce

(2001). What's so magical about five percent? A nationwide look at factors that influence the optimal size of state rainy day funds. Public Budgeting & Finance, 21 (2), 62–87.

33.

Kavanagh

(2013). A risk-based analysis of general fund reserve requirements. Chicago, IL: Government Finance Officers Association.

34.

Kentucky Legislative Research Commission. (2010). School Districts' Fund Balance Study. Lexington, KY: Office of Education Accountability. Research Report No. 376.

35.

Kim

, & Ryu

(2017). Strategic public management for financial condition: Focus on fund balances of school districts. The Social Science Journal, 54(3), 249–260.

36.

LeTendre

G.K.

, Baker

D.P.

, Akiba

, Goesling

, & Wiseman

(2001). Teachers' work: Institutional isomorphism and cultural variations in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. Educational Researcher, 30(6), 3–15.

37.

Martell

C.R.

(2007). Debt burdens of overlapping jurisdictions. Municipal Finance Journal, 28, 1–23.

38.

Mitchell

, Davis

, & Hendrick

(2021). Learning from the Joneses: The professional learning effect of regional councils of government on municipal fiscal slack in suburban Chicago. Public Budgeting & Finance, 1–19.

39.

Mizruchi

M.S.

, & Fein

L.C.

(1999). The social construction of organizational knowledge: A study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 653–683.

40.

Rivenbark

W.C.

, & Allison

G.S.

(2003). The GFOA and professionalism in local government. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 15 (2), 228–238.

41.

Sosin

M.R.

(2012). Decentralization, devolution, financial shortfalls, and state priorities in service programs in the early 2000s. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 701–730.

42.

St. Clair

, Cook

T. D.

, & Hallberg

(2014). Examining the internal validity and statistical precision of the comparative interrupted time series design by comparison with a randomized experiment. American Journal of Evaluation, 35(3), 311–327.

43.

(2019). Understanding the accumulation of local government savings: A dynamic analysis. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(11), 893–903.

44.

(2020). Local governments' response to revenue changes: The effects of unreserved general fund balances. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(11), 964–976.

45.

Tang

, Callahan

R.F.

, & Pisano

(2014). Using common-pool resource principles to design local government fiscal sustainability. Public Administration Review, 74(6), 791–803.

46.

Teodoro

M.P.

(2014). When professional lead: Executive management, normative isomorphism, and policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(4), 983–1004.

47.

Tharwat

(2020). Classification assessment methods. Applied Computing and Informatics, 17(1), 168–192.

48.

Vanyolos

(2011). The impact of state-imposed fund balance limits on school districts: Evidence from New York state. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 23(2), 166–187.

49.

Wang

, & Scorsone

(2019). Economic resilience after the Great Recession: An examination of unreserved fund balance in Michigan counties. Local Government Studies, 46(5), 716–733.