While a voluminous empirical literature has examined both municipal efficiency and financial sustainability in local government, to date no effort has been directed at investigating the relationship between administrative intensity and financial sustainability in local government, notwithstanding its public policy significance. The present paper thus seeks to address this gap in the empirical literature by examining the putative association between administrative intensity and financial sustainability in the New South Wales (NSW) local government system over the period 2015/16 to 2018/19. In addition, we examine whether variations in this relationship exist between regional and urban NSW local authorities. We find that administrative intensity has detrimental effects on financial sustainability in aggregate since it adversely affects the fiscal balance of local councils, while at the same time increasing the financial risk of local authorities. In terms of any variation between regional and urban councils, we find that administrative intensity has a differential impact on the two council categories in various ways.
Points for Practitioners
• No effort has been directed previously at investigating the relationship between administrative intensity and financial sustainability in local government, notwithstanding its public policy significance.
• This study investigates the putative association between administrative intensity and financial sustainability in the New South Wales (NSW) local government system.
• Our empirical findings show that administrative intensity has detrimental effects on financial sustainability.
• Administrative intensity has a differential impact on regional and urban local councils in various ways. ‘One size fits all' approaches should thus be avoided in local government public policy formulation.
AdlerP.S.BorysB.1996Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and CoerciveAdministrative Science Quarterly4189–61
2.
AndersonT. R.WarkovS.1961Organizational size and functional complexity: A study of administration in hospitalsAmerican Sociological Review26(1), 23–28
3.
AndreulaN.ChongA.GuillénJ.2000 Institutional quality and fiscal transparency No. IDB-WP-125. IDB Working Paper Series
4.
AndrewsR.2013Local government amalgamation and financial sustainability: The case of England and WalesPublic Finance and Management13(2), 141–124
5.
AndrewsR.2015Vertical consolidation and financial sustainability: Evidence from English local governmentEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy33(6), 1545–1518
6.
AndrewsR.BoyneG.A.2009Size, structure and administrative overheads: An empirical analysis of English local authoritiesUrban studies46(4), 759–739
7.
AndrewsR.BoyneG.MostafaA.M.S.. 2017When bureaucracy matters for organisational performance: Exploring the benefits of administrative intensity in big complex organisationsPublic Administration95(1), 139–115
8.
AndrewsR.BoyneG.A.2014Task complexity, organization size, and administrative intensity: The case of UK universitiesPublic Administration92(3), 672–656
9.
BellB.DrewJ.DolleryB.E.2016Learning from Experience in NSW?Economic Papers35(2), 99–111
10.
BenitoB.BastidaF.VicenteC.2012Political Budget Cycles in Local GovernmentsLex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government10(4), 341–361
11.
BisognoM., Cuadrado-BallesterosB., García-SánchezI.M.2017. Financial sustainability in local governments: definition, measurement and determinants. In BolívarM. P. R. (Ed.), Financial Sustainability in Public Administration (pp.57–83).Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
12.
BisognoM.Cuadrado-BallesterosB.SantisS.CitroF.2019Budgetary solvency of Italian local governments: an assessmentInternational Journal of Public Sector Management32(2), 122–141
13.
BoonJ.VerhoestK.2014On a Diet: Explaining Differences in Overhead among Public Agencies in the Era of AusterityPublic Performance & Management Review38(2), 234–260
14.
BoyneG.A.MeierK.J.2013Burdened by bureaucracy?Determinants of administrative intensity in public organisations.International Public Management Journal16(2), 327–307
15.
Bruscal.RossiF. M.AversanoN.2015"Drivers for the financial condition of local government: A comparative study between Italy and Spain". Lex Localis13(2), 161–184
16.
CahillA.G.JamesJ. A.1992Responding to municipal fiscal distress: An emerging issue for state governments in the 1990sPublic Administration Review52(1), 88–94
17.
CaldasP.DolleryB.E.MarquesR.(2020) Measuring What Matters in Local Government Sustainability in a Municipal Sustainability Index. Policy Studieshttps://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2020.1726311
18.
CarmeliA.2002A conceptual and practical framework of measuring performance of local authorities in financial terms: analysing the case of IsraelLocal Government Studies28(1), 36–21
19.
CarmeliA.2008The fiscal distress of local governments in Israel: Sources and coping strategiesAdministration & Society39(8), 984–1007
20.
DarnleyM.RutherfordA.RabovskyT.2019Tipping the scales: The causes and consequences of administrative spendingPublic Administration97(2), 467–482
21.
DolleryB.2009Financial sustainability in Australian local government: problems and solutions Centre for Local Government, School of Business, Economics and Public Policy, University of New England
22.
DolleryB.CraseL.GrantB.J.2011The local capacity, local community and local governance dimensions of sustainability in Australian local governmentCommonwealth Journal of Local Governance89183–192
23.
DolleryB.GrantB.2011Financial Sustainability and Financial Viability in Australian Local GovernmentPublic Finance & Management11(1), 28–47
24.
DolleryB.GrantB.2013a Symposium on amalgamation and financial sustainability in local government: part 1.(Report)Public Finance and Management13(2), 53–57
25.
DolleryB.GrantB.2013b Symposium on amalgamation and financial sustainability in local government: part 2Public Finance and Management13(3), 142–147
26.
DolleryB.KorttM.GrantB.2013Funding the Future, Federation Press: Sydney
27.
DolleryB.KitchenH.McMillanM.ShahA.2020Local Public, Fiscal and Financial Governance: An International PerspectivePalgrave McMillan New York.
28.
DolleryB.WallisJ.AllanP.2006The debate that had to happen but never did: The changing role of Australian local governmentAustralian Journal of Political Science41553–567
29.
EasterlyW.RebeloS.1993Fiscal policy and economic growthJournal of monetary economics32(3), 458–417
30.
ElstonT.DixonR.. 2020"The effect of shared service centers on administrative intensity in English local government: A longitudinal evaluation"Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory30(1), 113–129
31.
Farvacque-VitkovicC. D.KopanyiM.2014Municipal finances: A handbook for local governments (Eds)World Bank: Washington, DC
32.
FreemanJ.H.KronenfeldJ.E.1973Problems of definitional dependency: the case of administrative intensitySocial Forces52(1), 108–121
33.
GuillamónM.-D.BastidaF.BenitoB.2011The determinants of local government's financial transparencyLocal Government Studies37(4), 406–391
34.
HendrickR.2004Assessing and Measuring the Fiscal Heath of Local Governments:Focus on Chicago Suburban MunicipalitiesUrban Affairs Review40(1), 78–114
35.
Jacob, B., Hendrick, R. 2013. Assessing the financial condition of local governments. In H. Levine, J. Justice, & E. Scorsone (Eds.), Handbook of local government fiscal health (pp. 11-41). Burlington, MA 01803: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
36.
KalsethJ.Ratts0J.1998Political control of administrative spending: The case of local governments in NorwayEconomics & Politics1063–83
37.
KimberleyJ.1976Organisational Size and the Structuralist Perspective: A Review, Critique and ProposalAdministrative Science Quarterly21(4), 571–597
38.
KlatzkyS.1970Relationship of Organisational Size to Complexity and CoordinationAdministrative Science Quarterly15(4), 428–438
39.
KlohaP.WeissertC.S.KleineR.2005Someone to watch over me: State monitoring of local fiscal conditionsThe American Review of Public Administration35(3), - 236–255
40.
KuhlmannS.BouckaertG.(2016) Local public sector reforms in times of crisis: national trajectories and international comparisons (Eds)Amsterdam: Springer
41.
María Deseada LópezS.Laura AlcaideM., Andrés NavarroG.Manuel Pedro RodríguezB.2019The Influence of Socio-Demographic Factors on Financial Sustainability of Public Services: A Comparative Analysis in Regional Governments and Local GovernmentsSustainability(Basel, Switzerland)11(21), 1–18 doi:10.3390/sull216008
42.
NascholdF.2017. New Frontiers in the Public Sector Management: Trends and Issues in State and Local Government in Europe. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 69.
43.
Narbón-Perpiñál.De WitteK.2018a Local governments' efficiency: a systematic literature review—part lInternational Transactions in Operational Research25(2), 431–468
44.
Narbón-Perpiñál.De WitteK.2018b Local governments' efficiency: a systematic literature review—part IIInternational Transactions in Operational Research25(4), 1107–1136
45.
Navarro-GaleraA.Rodríguez-BolívarM.P.Alcaide-MuñozL.López-SubiresM.D.2016Measuring the financial sustainability and its influential factors in local governmentsApplied Economics48(41), 3961–3975
OsborneS.P.RadnorZ.NasiG.2013A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approachThe American Review of Public Administration43(2), 135–158
48.
OsborneS.P.RadnorZ.Vidall.KinderT.2014A sustainable business model for public service organizations?Public Management Review16(2), 165–172
49.
PenningsJ.1992Structural Contingency Theory: A ReappraisalResearch in Organisational Behavior14(2), 267–309
50.
PetersB.G.2001The Politics of Bureaucracy, 5th ed. London: Routledge
51.
Rodríguez BolívarM.P.Navarro GaleraA.Alcaide MuñozL.López SubirésM. D.2016Risk Factors and Drivers of Financial Sustainability in Local Government: An Empirical StudyLocal Government Studies42(1), 29–51
52.
Rodríguez BolívarM.P.Navarro GaleraA.López SubirésM.D.Alcaide Muñozl.2018Analysing the accounting measurement of financial sustainability in local governments through political factorsAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal31(8), 2135–2164
53.
RoggeN.AgasistiT.DeWitteK.2017Big Data and the Measurement of Public Organizations' Performance and Efficiency: The State-of-the-ArtPublic Policy and Administration32(4), 263–81
54.
RutherfordA.2016Reexamining Causes and Consequences: Does Administrative Intensity Matter for Organizational Performance?International Public Management Journal19(3), 342–369
55.
TingS.K.DolleryB.VillanoR.2014Administrative scale economies in local government: An empirical analysis of Sabah municipalities, 2000 to 2009Urban studies51(13), 2899–2915
56.
TosiH.PattH.1967Administrative Ratios and Organisational SizeAcademy of Management Journal13(2), 161–168
57.
Van HeldenG.HuijbenM.2014Controlling Overhead in Public Sector OrganizationsInternational Journal of Public Sector Management27(6), 475–85
58.
WalkerR.M.2013Internal and External Antecedents of Process Innovation: A Review and ExtensionPublic Management Review16(1), 21–44
59.
YarramR.S.TraC-D.T.T.DolleryB.E.2020Administrative Intensity in Local Government:Do Scale Economies Exist in New South Wales Local Government?, unpublished manuscript, UNE Centre for Local Government, University of New England, Armidale
Zafra-GómezJ.L.López-HernándezA.M.Hernandez-BastidaA.2009Evaluating financial performance in local government: maximizing the benchmarking valueInternational Review of Administrative Sciences75(1), 151–167
