Drunk Drivers,DWI “Drug Court” Treatment,and Recidivism: Who Fails?

Abstract

We conducted an evaluation of an experimental Driving-While-Intoxicated (DWI) Drug Court treatment program operated by a single municipal court. Specially trained court personnel assessed first-time (and, as we found out, some second-time) DWI offenders for symptoms of alcoholism. Once court personnel reached a clinical determination that an individual was an alcoholic, research team members randomly assigned that person to either the treatment program or to a control group receiving normal municipal court processing. A third group consisted of a like number of randomly selected, nonalcoholic, first-time offenders. The conviction records of all three groups were tracked for up to 24 months following the initial DWI conviction. We found significantly fewer alcohol-related and other serious crime reconvictions for the nonalcoholic group. Among those determined to be alcoholic, the treatment group had significantly fewer reconvictions than the control group. We address the implications and limitations of our findings for similar experimental studies in criminal justice and for DWI Drug Court treatment programs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Belenko

(1998). Research on drug courts: A critical review. The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CASA) at Columbia University. New York: Columbia University.

Blumstein

, & Cohen

(1978). Estimation of individual crime rates from arrest records. Pittsburgh: Urban Systems Institute.

Brennan

T. P.

(1992). The ideal meets the real with the D.U.I. offender. Federal Probation, 56 (1), 40–47.

Brown

J. R.

(1997). Drug diversion courts: Are they needed and will they succeed in breaking the cycle of drug-related crime? New England Journal of Criminal and Civil Confinement, 23 (1), 63–99.

Champion

D. J.

(1998). Corrections in the United States: A contemporary perspective (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Finn

, & Newlyn

A. K.

(1993). Miami's drug court: A different approach. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

Goldkamp

J. S.

(1994). Miami's treatment drug court for felony defendants: Some implications of assessment findings. The Prison Journal, 73 (2), 110–166.

Juhnke

G. A.

Sullivan

T. J.

, & Harman

A. E.

(1995). Attitude changes in DWI offenders: A study of a short-term treatment program. Journal of Addictions and Offender Counseling, 15 (12), 51–58.

Kinkade

Leone

M.C.

, & Wacker

(1992). Probation and the drunk driver: A cost of being “MADD.” Federal Probation, 56 (2), 6–15.

10.

Liu

Siegel

P. Z.

Brewer

R. D.

Makad

A. H.

Sleet

D. A.

, & Serdula

(1997). Prevalence of alcohol impaired driving. JAMA 277, 122–125.

11.

Maltz

M. D.

(1984). Recidivism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

12.

Maruschak

L. M.

(1999). Special Report: DWI offenders under correctional supervision. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

13.

Mays

G. L.

Ryan

S. G.

, & Bejarano

(1997). New Mexico creates a DWI drug court. Judicature, 81 (3), 122–125.

14.

McGuire

(1995). What works: Reducing reoffending. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.

15.

National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University. (1998). Behind bars: Substance abuse and America's prison population. New York: Columbia University.

16.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (1999a). Alcohol traffic safety facts 1996. Http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/ncsa/alc96.html.

17.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (1999b). Alcohol traffic safety facts 1997. Http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/ncsa/alc97.html.

18.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (1999c). State of New Mexico: Toll of motor vehicle crashes, 1996. Http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/ncsa/stateinfo/new2.htm

19.

New Mexico criminal and traffic law manual. (1994). Charlottesville, VA: Michie Company.

20.

New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department. (1994). Driving while impaired: New Mexico 1993. Santa Fe: Transportation Programs Division, Traffic Safety Bureau.

21.

New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department. (1997). New Mexico traffic crash information 1996. Santa Fe, NM: Transportation Programs Division, Traffic Safety Bureau.

22.

New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department. (1998a). Driving while impaired: New Mexico 1997. Santa Fe: Transportation Programs Division, Traffic Safety Bureau.

23.

New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department. (1998b). New Mexico traffic crash information 1997. Santa Fe: Transportation Programs Division, Traffic Safety Bureau.

24.

SAS Institute, Inc. (1996). SAS/STAT Software: Changes and enhancements through Release 6.11. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

25.

SPSS Inc. (1983). SPSS-X user's guide. Chicago: SPSS Inc.

26.

Taxman

F. S.

, & Piquero

(1998). On preventing drunk driving recidivism: An examination of rehabilitation and punishment approaches. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26 (2), 129–143.

27.

United States Census Bureau (1997). State population estimates. Http://www.census.gov/population/estimates/county/co-97-1/97C1_35.txt

28.

Winfree

L. T.

, & Giever

D. M.

(Forthcoming). On classifying driving-while-intoxicated offenders: The experiences of a citywide DWI drug court. Journal of Criminal Justice.

29.

Wooldredge

J.D.

(1988). Differentiating the effects of juvenile court sentences on eliminating recidivism. Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency, 25, 264–300.