REXIC Project: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study of Documentation of Informed Consent for Research Biobanking in a Public Research and Teaching Hospital

Abstract

Background

The Center for Transfusion Medicine, Cell Therapy and Cryobiology, Milan, Northern Italy, is the headquarter of the POLI-MI biobank. It co-ordinates the biobank activities of the Fondazione Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico of Milan. Such activities require specific safeguarding of donors’ rights and protection of sensitive and genetic data. The Fondazione Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico has set up a project on informed consent with the aim of developing awareness and understanding of this issue. Within this project, it has been decided to evaluate how consent for biobanking material is expressed.

Design and methods

The aim of the study was to evaluate the quality and completeness of consent to biobanking in the POLI-MI biobank. This was a retrospective study carried out in 2012 on samples of consent declarations collected by biobank units in 2011. Some units used a single, standard consent model available from a previous POLI-MI biobank workgroup. Other units used models which had been previouly formulated. Evaluation was made using a form that indicated the essential elements of consent.

Results

A total of 48 consent declarations were collected using the single, standard model and 84 were collected using other models. The consent declarations that used the single, standard model were found to be the most complete and were filled in better than other models.

Conclusions

Progressive adoption of a simple, standard consent model is expected to improve the quality of consent acquisition. Regular audit of the compliance of consent practices with ethical and legal requirements is mandatory to improve the quality of research biobanking.

Keywords

biobanks informed consent ethics research public health

References

Murphy

, Scott

, Kaufman

, . Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking. Am J Public Health 2009;99:2128–34.

Italian National Committee for Biosafety and Biotechnology. Guidelines for the institution and accreditation of biobanks. 19/04/2006.

Riegman

PHJ

, Morente

, Betsou

, . Biobanking for better healthcare. Mol Oncol 2008;2:213–22.

Kaye

Do we need a uniform regulatory system for biobanks across Europe?

Eur J Hum Genet 2006;14:245–8.

Human Tissue Act 2004. United Kingdom Acts of Parliament 2004.

Italian Regulation, 2006. Conversion into law, with modifications, of Legislative Decree of 10th January 2006, n. 3, regarding the bringing into force of the EU directive 98/44/CE concerning the juidicial procedures for the protection of biotechnological inventions. In: Official Journal No.58, 10/03/2006.

Italian Regulation, 2007. Authorization of the treatment of genetic dat. 22nd February 2007. In: Official Journal No.65, 19/03/2007.

Guerin

, Murray

, McGrath

, . Molecular medicine Ireland guidelines for standardized biobanking. Biopreservation & Biobanking 2010;8:3–63.

Italian Regulation, 2011. Authorization of the treatment of genetic data. 24th June 2011. In: Official Journal No.159, 11/07/2011

10.

Goebel

, Pickardt

, Bedau

, . Legal and ethical consequences of international biobanking from a national perspective: the German BMB_EUCoop project. Eur J Hum Genet 2010;18:522–5.

11.

Godard

, Schmidtke

, Cassiman

, Aymée

Data storage and DNA banking for biomedical research: informed consent, confidentiality, quality issues, ownership, return of benefits. A professional perspective. Eur J Hum Genet 2003;11:S88–122.

12.

Legislative Decree n. 196, 30/06/2003. Code for the protection of personal data.

13.

Legislative Decree n. 191, 6/11/2007. Bringing into force of the 2004 EC directive 2004/23/EC on the definition of the regulations concerning donation quality and safety, the supply, control, processing, preservation, storing and distribution of human tissues and cells.

14.

Italian Regulation, 2003. Regulations on personal data protection. In: Official Journal No.174, 29/7/2003, Suppl. No. 123.

15.

European Commission, 2004. Commission Decision of 31 March 2004 concerning setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells, 2004/23/EC.

16.

Italian Regulation, 2007. Application of the European Commission Decision of 6 November 2007 bringing into force the EC Directive 2004/23/EC concerning setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells. In: Official Journal No. 261, 9/11/2007, Suppl. No.228.

17.

Decree

10507, 20/11/2012. Approving the document Guidelines for the regulation of biobanks for research in Lombardy.

18.

Salvaterra

, Lecchi

, Giovanelli

, . Banking together. A unified model of informed consent for biobanking. EMBO Rep 2008;9:307–13.

19.

Widdows

, Cordell

The ethics of biobanking: key issues and controversies. Health Care Anal 2011;19:207–19.

20.

Hawkins

AK.

Biobanks: importance, implications and opportunities for genetic counsellor. J Genet Couns 2010;19:423–9.

21.

Schwartz

, Meslin

EM.

Autonomy and consent in biobanks. Physiologist 2010;53:3–7.

22.

Porteri

, Borry

A proposal for a model of informed consent for the collection, storage and use of biological materials for research purposes. Patient Educ Couns 2008;71:136–42.

23.

Forsberg

, Hansson

, Eriksson

Changing perspectives in biobank research: from individual rights to concerns about public health regarding the return of results. Eur J Hum Genet 2009;17:1544–9.

24.

Petrini

Broad consent, exceptions to consent and the question of using biological samples for research purposes different from the initial collection purpose. Soc Sci Med 2010;70;217–20.

25.

No authors listed. A culture of consent. Nature 2013;498:407.