Little is known about the incidence of and risk factors for adverse effects from endotracheal suctioning. We studied the incidence and risk factors, and evaluated the effect of suctioning practice guidelines.
METHODS:
During a 3-month period, in 79 mechanically ventilated subjects, we recorded the adverse effects in 4,506 suctioning procedures. Then practice guidelines were implemented, and 1 year later, during another 3-month period, in 68 subjects, we recorded the adverse effects in 4,994 suctioning procedures.
RESULTS:
In the first period, adverse effects occurred frequently: oxygen desaturation in 46.8% of subjects and 6.5% of suctionings, hemorrhagic secretions in 31.6% of subjects and 4% of suctionings, blood pressure change in 24.1% of subjects and 1.6% of suctionings, and heart rate change in 10.1% of subjects and 1.1% of suctionings. After guidelines implementation, all complications, both separately and all together, were reduced. The incidence of all complications together decreased from 59.5% to 42.6% of subjects, and from 12.4% to 4.9% of procedures (both P < .05). PEEP > 5 cm H2O was an independent risk factor for oxygen desaturation. Receiving > 6 suctionings per day was a risk factor for desaturation and hemorrhagic secretions. The use of guidelines was independently associated with fewer complications.
CONCLUSIONS:
Endotracheal suctioning frequently induces adverse effects. Technique, suctioning frequency, and higher PEEP are risk factors for complications. Their incidence can be reduced by the implementation of suctioning guidelines.
ShimC, FineN, FernandezR, WilliamsMHJr. Cardiac arrhythmias resulting from tracheal suctioning. Ann Intern Med, 1969; 71(6):1149–1153.
2.
McCauleyCS, BollerLR. Bradycardic responses to endotracheal suctioning. Crit Care Med, 1988; 16(11):1165–1166.
3.
BrochardL, MionG, IsabeyD, BertrandC, MessadiAA, ManceboJ, et al. Constant-flow insufflation prevents arterial oxygen desaturation during endotracheal suctioning. Am Rev Respir Dis, 1991; 144(2):395–400.
4.
LuQ, CapderouA, CluzelP, MourgeonE, AbdennourL, Law-KouneJD, et al. A computed tomographic scan assessment of endotracheal suctioning-induced bronchoconstriction in ventilated sheep. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2000; 162(5):1898–1904.
5.
CeredaM, VillaF, ColomboE, GrecoG, NacotiM, PesentiA. Closed system endotracheal suctioning maintains lung volume during volume-controlled mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med, 2001; 27(4):648–654.
6.
MaggioreSM, LelloucheF, PigeotJ, TailléS, DeyeN, DurrmeyerX, et al. Prevention of endotracheal suctioning-induced alveolar derecruitment in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2003; 167(9):1215–1224.
7.
LindgrenS, AlmgrenB, HögmanM, LethvallS, HoultzE, LundinS, et al. Effectiveness and side effects of closed and open suctioning: an experimental evaluation. Intensive Care Med, 2004; 30(8):1630–1637.
8.
SeymourCW, CrossBJ, CookeCR, GallopRL, FuchsBD. Physiologic impact of closed-system endotracheal suctioning in spontaneously breathing patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Respir Care, 2009; 54(3):367–374.
9.
American Association for Respiratory Care. Clinical Practice Guidelines. Endotracheal suctioning of mechanically ventilated patients with artificial airways 2010. Respir Care, 2010; 55(6):758–764.
10.
TingayDG, CopnellB, GrantCA, DargavillePA, DunsterKR, SchiblerA. The effect of endotracheal suction on regional tidal ventilation and end-expiratory lung volume. Intensive Care Med, 2010; 36(5):888–896.
11.
MaggioreSM, VolpeC. Endotracheal suctioning in hypoxemic patients. Réanimation, 2011; 20(1):12–18.
12.
AdlkoferRM, PowaserMM. The effect of endotracheal suctioning on arterial blood gases in patients after cardiac surgery. Heart Lung, 1978; 7(6):1011–1014.
13.
LeurJP, ZwavelingJH, LoefBG, SchansCP. Endotracheal suctioning versus minimally invasive airway suctioning in intubated patients: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Intensive Care Med, 2003; 29(3):426–432.
14.
SoleML, ByersJF, LudyJE, ZhangY, BantaCM, BrummelK. A multisite survey of suctioning techniques and airway management practices. Am J Crit Care, 2003; 12(3):220–230.
15.
SubiranaM, SolaI, BenitoS. Closed tracheal suction systems versus open tracheal suction systems for mechanically ventilated adult patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2007;(4):CD004581.
16.
GrivansC, LindgrenS, AnemanA, StenqvistO, LundinS. A Scandinavian survey of drug administration through inhalation, suctioning and recruitment maneuvers in mechanically ventilated patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2009; 53(6):710–716.
17.
American Association for Respiratory Care. Clinical Practice Guideline. Endotracheal suctioning of mechanically ventilated adults and children with artificial airways. Respir Care, 1993; 38(5):500–504.
18.
JubranA, TobinMJ. Use of flow-volume curves in detecting secretions in ventilator-dependent patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1994; 150(3):766–769.
19.
GuglielminottiJ, AlzieuM, MauryE, GuidetB, OffenstadtG. Bedside detection of retained tracheobronchial secretions in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: is it time for tracheal suctioning?. Chest, 2000; 118(4):1095–1099.
20.
LucchiniA, ZanellaA, BellaniG, GariboldiR, FotiG, PesentiA, et al. Tracheal secretion management in the mechanically ventilated patient: comparison of standard assessment and an acoustic secretion detector. Respir Care, 2011; 56(5):596–603.
21.
AckermanMH. The effect of saline lavage prior to suctioning. Am J Crit Care, 1993; 2(4):326–330.
22.
HaglerDA, TraverGA. Endotracheal saline and suction catheters: sources of lower airway contamination. Am J Crit Care, 1994; 3(6):444–447.
23.
PedersenCM, Rosendahl-NielsenM, HjermindJ, EgerodI. Endotracheal suctioning of the adult intubated patient—what is the evidence?. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 2009; 25(1):21–30.
24.
TiffinNH, KeimMR, FrewenTC. The effects of variations in flow through an insufflating catheter and endotracheal-tube and suction-catheter size on test-lung pressures. Respir Care, 1990; 35(9):889–897.
25.
MorrowBM, FutterMJ, ArgentAC. Endotracheal suctioning: from principles to practice. Intensive Care Med, 2004; 30(6):1167–1174.
26.
RindfleischSH, TylerML. Duration of suctioning: an important variable. Respir Care, 1983; 28(5):457–459.
27.
HessDR, KacmarekRM. Technical aspects of the patient-ventilator interface. In: TobinMJ, editor. Principles and practice of mechanical ventilation, 1st edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994:1039–1065.
28.
LasockiS, LuQ, SartoriusA, FouillatD, RemerandF, RoubyJJ. Open and closed-circuit endotracheal suctioning in acute lung injury: efficiency and effects on gas exchange. Anesthesiology, 2006; 104(1):39–47.
29.
KollefMH, PrenticeD, ShapiroSD, FraserVJ, SilverP, TrovillionE, et al. Mechanical ventilation with or without daily changes of in-line suction catheters. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1997; 156(2 Pt 1):466–472.
30.
MaggioreSM. Endotracheal suctioning, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and costs: open or closed issue?. Intensive Care Med, 2006; 32(4):485–487.
31.
LorenteL, LecuonaM, JiménezA, MoraML, SierraA. Tracheal suction by closed system without daily change versus open system. Intensive Care Med, 2006; 32(4):538–544.
32.
HeinzeH, EichlerW, KarstenJ, Sedemund-AdibB, HeringlakeM, MeierT. Functional residual capacity-guided alveolar recruitment strategy after endotracheal suctioning in cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care Med, 2011; 39(5):1042–1049.
33.
WinstonSJ, GravelynTR, SitrinRG. Prevention of bradycardic responses to endotracheal suctioning by prior administration of nebulized atropine. Crit Care Med, 1987; 15(11):1009–1011.
