KoyamaY, UchiyamaA, YoshidaJ, YoshidaT, YamashitaT, FujinoY. A comparison of the adjustable ranges of inspiratory pressurization during assisted pressure-controlled ventilation mode of 5 ICU ventilators. Respir Care, 2018; 63(7):849–858.
2.
BlakemanTC, BransonRD. Evaluation of 4 new generation portable ventilators. Respir Care, 2013; 58(2):264–272.
3.
WallonG, BonnetA, GuerinC. Delivery of tidal volume from four anaesthesia ventilators during volume-controlled ventilation: a bench study. Br J Anaesth, 2013; 110(6):1045–1051.
4.
BlakemanTC, RodriquezDJr, HansemanD, BransonRD. Bench evaluation of 7 home-care ventilators. Respir Care, 2011; 56(11):1791–1798.
5.
VasconcelosRS, SalesRP, de P MeloLH, MarinhoLS, BastosVP, NogueiraAdN, et al. Influences of duration of inspiratory effort, respiratory mechanics, and ventilator type on asynchrony with pressure support and proportional assist ventilation. Respir Care, 2017; 62(5):550–557.
6.
ItagakiT, ChenelleCT, BennettDJ, FisherDF, KacmarekRM. Effects of leak compensation on patient-ventilator synchrony during premature/neonatal invasive and noninvasive ventilation: a lung model study. Respir Care, 2017; 62(1):22–33.
7.
ItagakiT, BennettDJ, ChenelleCT, FisherDF, KacmarekRM. Performance of leak compensation in all-age ICU ventilators during volume-targeted neonatal ventilation: a lung model study. Respir Care, 2016; 62(1):10–21.
8.
VolskoTA, HoffmanJ, CongerA, ChatburnRL. The effect of targeting scheme on tidal volume delivery during volume control mechanical ventilation. Respir Care, 2012; 57(8):1297–1304.
9.
Mireles-CabodevilaE, ChatburnRL. Work of breathing in adaptive pressure control continuous mandatory ventilation. Respir Care, 2009; 54(11):1467–1472.
10.
ChatburnRL, Mireles-CabodevilaE, SasidharM. Tidal volume measurement error in pressure control modes of mechanical ventilation: a model study. Comput Biol Med, 2016; 75:235–242.
11.
ChenY, ChengK, ZhouX. Performance characteristics of seven bilevel mechanical ventilators in pressure-support mode with different cycling criteria: a comparative bench study. Med Sci Monit, 2015; 21:310–317.
12.
SakladM, WeyerhaeuserR. The construction of linear resistances for the testing of ventilators. Anesthesiology, 1980; 52(1):71–73.
13.
HillDW, MooreV. The action of adiabatic effects on the compliance of an artificial thorax. Br J Anaesth, 1965; 37:19–22.
14.
OtisAB, FennWO, RahnH. Mechanics of breathing in man. J Appl Physiol, 1950; 2(11):592–607.
15.
HarrisRS, HessDR, VenegasJG. An objective analysis of the pressure-volume curve in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2000; 161(2 Pt 1):432–439.
16.
PereiraC, BoheJ, RosselliS, CombourieuE, PommierC, PerdrixJP, et al. Sigmoidal equation for lung and chest wall volume-pressure curves in acute respiratory failure. J Appl Physiol (1985), 2003; 95(5):2064–2071.
17.
KondiliE, AlexopoulouC, XirouchakiN, VaporidiK, GeorgopoulosD. Estimation of inspiratory muscle pressure in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med, 2010; 36(4):648–655.
18.
ChatburnRL. Simulation studies for device evaluation. Respir Care, 2014; 59(4):e61–e66.
19.
ArnalJM, GarneroA, SaoliM, ChatburnRL. Parameters for simulation of adult patients during mechanical ventilation. Respir Care, 2017; 63(2):158–168.
20.
DexterA, McNinchN, KaznochD, VolskoTA. Validating lung models using the ASL 5000 breathing simulator. Simul Healthc, 2018; 13(2):117–123.
21.
SanbornWG. Microprocessor-based mechanical ventilation. Respir Care, 1993; 38(1):72–109.
22.
DuchateauP, GuerinC. Tidal volume delivery from ICU ventilators at BTPS conditions: a bench study. Respir Care, 2013; 58(4):623–632.
23.
LyazidiA, ThilleAW, CarteauxG, GaliaF, BrochardL, RichardJC. Bench test evaluation of volume delivered by modern ICU ventilators during volume-controlled ventilation. Intensive Care Med, 2010; 36(12):2074–2080.
24.
NathanSD, IshaayaAM, KoernerSK, BelmanMJ. Prediction of minimal pressure support during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Chest, 1993; 103(4):1215–1219.
25.
GattinoniL, TonettiT, QuintelM. Intensive care medicine in 2050: ventilator-induced lung injury. Intensive Care Med, 2017; 44(1):76–78.
26.
WeissCH, BakerDW, TulasK, WeinerS, BechelM, RademakerA, et al. A critical care clinician survey comparing attitudes and perceived barriers to low tidal volume ventilation with actual practice. Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2017; 14(11):1682–1689.
27.
WeissCH, BakerDW, WeinerS, BechelM, RaglandM, RademakerA, et al. Low tidal volume ventilation use in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med, 2016; 44(8):1515–1522.
28.
BellaniG, LaffeyJG, PhamT, FanE, BrochardL, EstebanA, et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA, 2016; 315(8):788–800.
29.
NeedhamDM, YangT, DinglasVD, Mendez-TellezPA, ShanholtzC, SevranskyJE, et al. Timing of low tidal volume ventilation and intensive care unit mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome. A prospective cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2015; 191(2):177–185.
30.
MorrisAH. Human cognitive limitations. Broad, consistent, clinical application of physiological principles will require decision support. Ann Am Thorac Soc, 2018; 15(Suppl 1):S53–S56.
31.
ArnalJM, GarneroA, NovotniD, CornoG, DonatiSY, DemoryD, et al. Closed loop ventilation mode in intensive care unit: a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the numbers of manual ventilator setting changes. Minerva Anestesiol, 2018; 84(1):58–67.
32.
ReesSE, KarbingDS. Determining the appropriate model complexity for patient-specific advice on mechanical ventilation. Biomed Tech (Berl), 2016; 62(2):183–198.
33.
ChatburnRL. Classification of mechanical ventilators and modes of ventilation. In: TobinMJ. editor. Principles and practice of mechanical ventilation. New York: McGraw Hill Medical; 2013:45–64.